Samsung executive confirms: Galaxy Tab tablet coming by Q3

We had more than a hunch that Samsung was toiling away on a tablet of some sort, and while we’d been loosely referring to its as the S-Pad and Tab, it looks as if the latter moniker is the one that’ll stick. J.K. Shin, president of Samsung’s mobile communications division, recently affirmed as much during a sit-down with the Wall Street Journal, stating the following:

“I can also say that we are planning to launch a tablet computer, named Galaxy Tab, no later than in the third quarter of this year.”

He didn’t elaborate beyond that, so we’re still on pins and needles waiting to find out if it’ll run Windows 7, Bada or BeOS, but we ought to know much, much more in just a few months. An IFA debut, perhaps?

Samsung executive confirms: Galaxy Tab tablet coming by Q3 originally appeared on Engadget on Tue, 15 Jun 2010 17:41:00 EDT. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink   |  sourceWall Street Journal  | Email this | Comments

Wired Explains: Everything You Need to Know About 4G Wireless

If your smartphone seems more like a slowphone, hang in there. The next generation of wireless technologies, known as 4G, promises blazing-fast data transmission speeds.

The first 4G handset, Sprint’s HTC Evo, hits U.S. retail stores Friday, making this a good time to answer your questions about the fast wireless technology behind the Evo.

4G is just getting started, and even Sprint’s network is only available in a handful of cities. But in just about two years, 4G could be almost everywhere.  All major U.S. wireless carriers are working on upgrading their systems to 4G — though we would prefer if some, like AT&T, got their 3G networks working properly in the meantime.

So what goodness will 4G bring to the world and should you hold your breath for it? Read on for our quick guide to all those burning questions about 4G.

Got more questions? Ask them in the comments, and we’ll update this post with answers.

What is 4G?

4G is a loose term for the fourth generation of cellular communications, offering speeds that are about 10 times faster than they are on current third-generation, or 3G, networks.

Its higher data speeds could make smartphones much more comparable to PCs, giving them better multimedia and gaming capabilities.

What are the different 4G technologies?

Just as in the 3G world, 4G technologies fork into two broad camps: LTE and WiMax.

They’re not aligned with the old GSM vs CDMA split, though. This time, AT&T and Verizon are moving towards LTE, while Sprint has thrown its weight behind WiMax.

There’s quite a bit of debate on whether LTE and WiMax meet all the technical requirements to be classified 4G technologies. The International Telecommunications Union suggests that WiMax, the standard that Sprint calls 4G, is actually part of the 3G family, though Sprint markets WiMax as 4G and its speeds are comparable to current LTE speeds.

WiMax has its roots in the wireless broadband access industry and is supported by IEEE, while the LTE standard has been created by a consortium of mobile companies. WiMax requires a new network to be built whereas LTE is an evolution of existing CDMA/HSPA networks.

How fast will 4G be?

The maximum theoretical data transfer with 3G technology is 2 Mbps.  But in practice, you won’t get more than 500 Kbps to 1.5 Mbps, depending on your carrier, the location of the cell tower, congestion, etc.

4G ups the game.

WiMax can offer peak download data speeds of up to 6 Mbps and up to 1 Mbps for uploading data. WiMax rival LTE says it can do much better. It has peak download speeds of 100 Mbps and can support uploads at the rate of up to 50 Mbps.

But remember, these are theoretical speeds conjured by lab rats. Add a million devices on the network, downloading Comedy Central clips on Flash-enabled phones, video chatting, streaming the next chapter in the Saw movie franchise and uploading parodies of the latest Lady Gaga release, and those speeds will drop.

For a better idea of what you can expect with your 4G device, take a look at what tests on the Sprint WiMax and Verizon LTE 4G networks have shown. PC World reports that the HTC EVO 4G phone never broke the 3 Mbps mark in its tests of the phone nationwide. And Verizon’s tests showed in the real world, its download speeds ranged from 5 Mbps to 12 Mbps and with upload speeds of 2 Mbps to 5 Mbps.

I want 4G now. Where can I get it?

About 36 U.S. cities including Seattle, Baltimore, Chicago and Dallas already have 4G coverage from Sprint. There are still some big names like San Francisco and New York missing from the list, but Sprint says 4G will arrive there by the end of the year. You can check out the detailed list of the cities that have 4G coverage on Sprint’s site.

Do I need a new phone to take advantage of 4G?

Yes, you will need a new phone. The first 4G smartphone is the HTC Evo, a device running Google’s Android operating system, which launches today. HTC Evo is a gorgeous device with a 4.3-inch touchscreen, two cameras, GPS navigation, HDMI output and mobile hot-spot capability.  The phone costs $200 with a two-year contract. Sprint is also charging an extra $10 a month, in addition to its standard data plans, as a service fee to access the 4G network.

If you don’t have 4G connectivity where you live, you can still use the phone with existing 3G networks.

Meanwhile, Samsung is creating a 4G phone for MetroPCS. The excitingly named phone SCH-r900 will have a 624-MHz processor, 128 MB of RAM, a 3.2-inch display, and Windows Mobile 6.1 operating system.

There’s been an iPhone 3G, iPhone 3G S.  So is an iPhone 4G next?

Sure, Apple can add the 4G tag to its next iPhone if it wants to, and “iPhone 4G” is how the company has referred to its next-generation smartphone in legal documents. But we doubt that it will have 4G network connectivity — unless Apple’s creating a phone exclusive to Sprint.

What are the 4G plans of the major U.S. carriers?

AT&T: The carrier plans to start trials of its 4G network later this year. AT&T will make the most of its LTE deployments in 2011. But even that may not be enough to free us from the tyranny of capped data consumption and gaping holes in its coverage.

Verizon: In 2009, Verizon tested its 4G wireless service in Boston and Seattle. Verizon said it plans to start offering the service commercially this year in about 30 cities so it can cover about 100 million users. By 2013, Verizon hopes to have the 4G service available nationwide.

Sprint: Sprint is leading the 4G charge with the network already available in at least 36 cities. By the end of the year, most major cities will be covered by Sprint’s 4G network.

T-Mobile: T-Mobile is in no hurry to get to 4G. Maybe because it first needs to get its 3G network in order. The wireless carrier is still talking about upgrading its 3G network to 3.5 G or HSPA+. HSPA+ will come to Los Angeles and other major cities in the United States this year, says T-Mobile. 4G is clearly a long way away.

MetroPCS: The first LTE 4G phone could come from MetroPCS, which is working with Samsung on the device. MetroPCS plans to start its 4G service later this year in cities such as Las Vegas.

Give me some background: What’s the history here and how did we get to 4G?

Cellular systems have evolved in four major phases or generations. The first generation, or 1G, technology was analog and transmitted voice calls only.

The second generation, or 2G, introduced digital transmissions and offered the first support for data, although the focus was still on voice calling. Second-generation phones are based on one of two standards: GSM (used by T-Mobile, AT&T, and most overseas carriers) and CDMA (used by Verizon and Sprint). In either case, average data speed on a 2G network is around 9.6 Kbps, about the same as a ’90s-era modems.

The intermediate “2.5G” level is where things get a little fuzzy. In the GSM camp, a standard called GPRS, which offered better data transmission capabilities, came to be known as 2.5G. GPRS has evolved into the EDGE networks (up to 400-kbps data speeds) still used by many phones today. As for the CDMA universe, 2.5G is referred to as 1XRTT, or just 1X. In the real world, it is known as EVDO and promises download speeds ranging from 600 kbps to 1.4 Mbps.

There’s been some debate on what constitutes 3G. Broadly speaking, 3G is defined not by the underlying technology, but by its speed: up to 2 Mbps. Verizon and Sprint’s 3G systems are referred to as EVDO, while AT&T and T-Mobile use HSDPA. A further level, known as HSDPA+ or Turbo 3G, can support download speeds of up to 14 Mbps.

The next step is 4G.

I want all the details, the nitty-gritty behind the two 4G standards. How do they differ?

LTE or Long Term Evolution, is a standard evolved by a group called the 3rd Generation Partnership Project. It is an all-IP network based upon the same core protocol of the internet, TCP/IP.

Both LTE and WiMax use the principle of Orthogonal Frequency-Division Multiple Access, which conceptually has been around since the 1960s. OFDMA is based on the idea of frequency-division multiplexing, which is a method to transmit multiple data streams over a channel.  In case of OFDMA, a digital data stream that needs to be transmitted is split into multiple pieces, each of which is modulated onto a separate carrier. These sub-carriers are combined together at the end.

The difference between LTE and WiMax lies in how they handle the channel for processing data. WiMax processes all the information in a wide channel. In case of Clearwire’s implementation of WiMax, that means the about two-thirds of the channel is used for downloads, while a third is used to upload data.

LTE splits the channel into two parts using frequency-division multiplexing, so the download and upload speeds are better balanced.

Just say it. Is WiMax better or LTE?

Peanut butter or chocolate? Lost or The Wire? Havaianas or Birkenstocks?  There’s no easy answer. It depends on where you are and what you can get access to.

If you want 4G now, WiMax is pretty much your only choice. It’s also an open standard supported by IEEE. And it is less expensive for service providers to upgrade their equipment to than LTE.

But LTE is coming and almost all the major U.S. carriers, except Sprint, will be supporting it. So ultimately, LTE might win in the long run.

See Also:

Photo: Jeff Kubina/Flickr


Verizon looking to partner up for rural LTE deployments

If you’re wondering why T-Mobile doesn’t have 3G in the middle of the Mojave, the answer’s pretty simple: it’s hard for any of the Big Four to justify spending millions of dollars on infrastructure in sparsely-populated areas. Rather than ignore it and leave the spectrum blank, though, Verizon’s asking other companies to step in and share the responsibilities — sort of — by letting partners do most of the hard work (build towers and operate backhaul) while Big Red chips in its 700MHz spectrum holdings and “core LTE equipment.” Presumably, Verizon will help itself to a share of the proceeds, which from their perspective, makes it look like a win-win scenario: they’re helping to bring 4G technology to underserved areas, doing less work and spending less capital than they’d have to otherwise, and profiting off the spirit of an initiative that FCC chief Julius Genachowski is pushing very, very hard at the moment. And hey, we bet you’ll be getting some insane throughput when you’re rocking the LTE modem in the middle of nowhere.

Verizon looking to partner up for rural LTE deployments originally appeared on Engadget on Wed, 02 Jun 2010 15:36:00 EDT. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink   |  sourceVerizon Wireless  | Email this | Comments

Verizon looking at non-unlimited plans for 4G data, will use LTE for voice by 2012

We’d not-so-secretly hoped that carriers would be looking to dispense with those troublesome 5GB caps on so-called “unlimited” 3G data plans, but there’s a big problem with that: spectrum is still limited, and even though 4G technologies help use it more efficiently, it’s still a constraint that the FCC is going to need many years to solve. We’re not sure how much the spectrum crunch really factors in here, but in addition to his comments on Droid Incredible inventory problems, Verizon Wireless boss Lowell McAdam mentioned at a Barclays Capital conference this week that he hopes to move away from unlimited plans altogether for the company’s LTE network, instead charging for “buckets” of megabytes, just like in the olden days — despite the fact that it’ll cost it a half to a third of what it costs today to transmit the same amount of data.

On a happier note, McAdam said that the company expects to be using its LTE network for voice by 2012, which comes just after its first volley of LTE-capable handsets in early 2011. He also mentioned that at least some of those devices will be shown off at CES 2011, and naturally, we’ll be there — not just to check out the phones, but to raise some hell at the notion that unlimited data is a thing of the past. At this rate, how are we ever going to run the Engadget servers on a wireless connection?

Verizon looking at non-unlimited plans for 4G data, will use LTE for voice by 2012 originally appeared on Engadget on Thu, 27 May 2010 12:28:00 EDT. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink GSMA Mobile Business Briefing  |  sourceFinancial Times  | Email this | Comments

AT&T cries foul over T-Mobile’s ‘HSPA+ is 4G’ talk

No matter how much T-Mobile wants to pretend, HSPA+ is not on the same upload / download pay grade as LTE and WiMAX. Still, that isn’t stopping the company from calling its new technology rollout “4G speeds,” much to the dismay of another major HSPA+ supporter, AT&T. Cue Ma Bell spokesman Seth Bloom, who recently told Fierce Wireless, “I think that companies need to be careful that they’re not misleading customers by labeling HSPA+ as a 4G technology.” Of course, AT&T itself is rolling out that technology as an intermediate step between current 3G and LTE, and we know they want to reserve the 4G nomenclature for the latter’s unveiling. Hey guys, can we just label it 3.95G and call it day?

AT&T cries foul over T-Mobile’s ‘HSPA+ is 4G’ talk originally appeared on Engadget on Tue, 25 May 2010 20:41:00 EDT. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink   |  sourceFierce Wireless  | Email this | Comments

Sprint still not ruling out LTE, says it’s not ‘mutually exclusive’ to WiMAX

The fact that Sprint is welcoming LTE vendors to respond to its RFP for upgrading its legacy CDMA network is no surprise — in fact, it’s no different than the line that the carrier has been taking for well over a year now. What is a bit of a surprise, though, is that it appears to be every bit as ambivalent about the direction of its 4G technology path as ever. The current RFP is strictly for an upgrade of Sprint’s “core” network, meaning its legacy (if you can call 2G / 3G “legacy”) footprint comprised solely of CDMA; its WiMAX assets aren’t affected this time around. In fact, the company’s VP of product and technology development, Kevin Packingham, went on record with Light Reading this week saying that it doesn’t “see WiMAX and LTE as being mutually exclusive” — in other words, these guys could end up doing both in the long term. We appreciate Sprint’s willingness to accept the fact that LTE’s picking up momentum as the global 4G standard, but considering the overwhelming expense involved in building out a new network, is the notion of a two-pronged strategy the right call?

Sprint still not ruling out LTE, says it’s not ‘mutually exclusive’ to WiMAX originally appeared on Engadget on Fri, 21 May 2010 11:37:00 EDT. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink Phone Scoop  |  sourceLight Reading  | Email this | Comments

Verizon to offer ‘up to’ five LTE handsets by next May, Android tablets from HTC and friends

Verizon had already said that it anticipated launching its first LTE handsets in the first half of 2011, but as we’re rounding third base toward the launch of Big Red’s first commercial 4G markets, it’s shedding a little more light on how it thinks this’ll all go down. Basically, wireless chief Lowell McAdam says we can expect “up to” five handsets by May of 2011, exactly a year from now — which could mean anywhere between zero and five, as far as we’re concerned — and that Motorola, LG, HTC, and RIM are all in the running to serve up that first volley of hardware. What’s not clear is whether these will make voice calls over CDMA exclusively (a la EVO 4G) or if they’ll be compliant with the IMS-based (and GSMA-friendly) voice the company expects to eventually roll out on top of its LTE network, but either way, it’s good news.

Turning our attention to Verizon’s recent tablet hullabaloo, McAdam says that although “there’s no reason [the company] couldn’t have an iPad,” the first tablets it offers will be Android-based — yes, “tablets” plural — and that most of them will launch in the fourth from companies “including Motorola, Samsung and LG.” Interestingly, this dovetails rather conveniently with an NVIDIA-powered Motorola tablet with Verizon branding that was briefly (and quietly) shown off at CES this January, so we wouldn’t be surprised if that was the unit we ended up getting. None of these devices might end up with the iPad’s name recognition, obviously, but an LTE-powered Android tablet with HTC’s good design sense certainly can’t hurt.

Verizon to offer ‘up to’ five LTE handsets by next May, Android tablets from HTC and friends originally appeared on Engadget on Mon, 17 May 2010 17:43:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink AllThingsD  |  sourceReuters  | Email this | Comments

Cellphones purportedly used more now for data, Gossip Girl blasts than calls

Ever notice how easy it is to find mobile plans with unlimited minutes these days? Yeah, it’s because they’re about as valuable as pea coats in the dead of summer. With more and more consumers disconnecting their landlines in favor of using their cellie for everything, the art of communicating via voice is also becoming lost. According to “government and industry data” cited in a New York Times report, the growth in voice minutes used by consumers has “stagnated,” with 2009 being the first year ever in which the “amount of data in text, email messages, streaming video, music and other services on mobile devices [in the US] surpassed the amount of voice data in cellphone calls.” Dan Hesse, Sprint’s head honcho, even chimed in with this nugget: “Originally, talking was the only cellphone application; now it’s less than half of the traffic on mobile networks.” We also learned that the average length of a mobile call was just 1.81 minutes in 2009, a drop from the 2.27 minutes per call seen in 2008, with many individuals feeling that other communication methods (email, SMS, Facebook, Twitter, etc.) were far less invasive of someone’s time, being that they could respond to those messages at their convenience. Of course, on the Upper East Side (where all the richies use Verizon dumbphones, apparently), we get the impression that yakking away about a cornucopia of drama is still the hotness.

Cellphones purportedly used more now for data, Gossip Girl blasts than calls originally appeared on Engadget on Fri, 14 May 2010 18:01:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink Twitter (mksteele)  |  sourceNew York Times  | Email this | Comments

4G shocker! The good people of Boston enjoy Verizon’s trial LTE network

You know what makes us happy? Pizza. But a close second has to be 4G technology, which makes us truly envy the Bostonians who were treated to a sample of Verizon’s trial LTE deployment in the friendly confines of a downtown pizza joint last month. Big Red filmed the event — and while the whole thing comes off a little bit like a carefully-orchestrated PR stunt, it’s hard to argue with nearly 10Mbps down and over 2Mbps on the upstream. That’s good stuff that should have Sprint, Clearwire, and the rest of the players on notice — assuming Verizon’s network holds up under the crushing pressure of commercial availability once thousands of rowdy Harvard students start hammering it, of course. Follow the break for the full video.

Continue reading 4G shocker! The good people of Boston enjoy Verizon’s trial LTE network

4G shocker! The good people of Boston enjoy Verizon’s trial LTE network originally appeared on Engadget on Wed, 12 May 2010 22:31:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink LAPTOP Magazine, BGR  |  sourceYouTube  | Email this | Comments

Clearwire sticking with WiMAX until at least 2012

Clearwire always seems to have commitment issue. Despite going steady with WiMAX, the company keeps saying that they might eventually part ways for different pastures — namely LTE, should WiMAX turn out to be a dead end (talk about relationship pressure). That’s still ongoing, as CEO Bill Morrow recently explained to CNET that its contract with Intel has been amended so that “either party can terminate the technology agreement within 30 days” but later adding that it definitely wouldn’t hop on the LTE bandwagon before 2012. He strikes down some false hope a question later: “we won’t be upgrading to LTE, if we do that, for a long time.” Granted, time is a relative construct, and two years may be a “long time” to Bill. Oh, why do you keep stringing ’em both along?

Clearwire sticking with WiMAX until at least 2012 originally appeared on Engadget on Mon, 10 May 2010 21:36:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink Fiercewireless  |  sourceCNET  | Email this | Comments