FlipShare TV Beams Home Videos Onto TVs

flipsharetv

The FlipShare TV is a new set-top box from the Flip video folks, and it looks like nothing as much as a smoke alarm. The little box hooks up to your TV (HDMI or composite) and receives video wirelessly from a nearby computer via a proprietary USB dongle (using a tweaked version of 802.11n). A small remote control lets you, well, control things from the comfort of your sofa. It costs $150.

$150 for plug-and-play wireless video connection sounds pretty good to me (or it would, if my TV screen wasn’t smaller than my laptop screen), but there’s a catch (you saw that coming, right?). First, you’ll need to be running Flip’s own FlipShare software, an you will be limited to the formats that you can play, just like the Apple TV. You can stream standard-def video in AVI and MPEG-4 format, and HS (1280×720) in MPEG-4. Any other formats (including some actually created by the software), will need to be converted.

There are some other features, like the ability to share your clips on a kind of private YouTube for Flip owners, allowing grandparents to watch videos of the grandkids, for example, but it seems like an afterthought.

These various “solutions” (Apple TV, FlipShare TV and the Slingbox) are all temporary fixes. Soon enough, our TVs will be computers, and this stupid differentiation between types of screen will be dead. Until then, I’ll stick to watching my RSS triggered BitTorrent TV shows on my MacBook. In bed.

FlipShareTV [Flip. Thanks! Jamie!]

Pure Digital FlipShare TV Review [Wired.com]


Video: Sports Illustrated Makes a Play for a Tablet App


Wired’s parent company Conde Nast isn’t the only publisher taking touchscreen tablets seriously. Time Warner wants to get in on the game, too. The video above shows off its concept tablet treatment of Sports Illustrated, packed with interactive videos and graphics to create an addictive media experience. We’re impressed.

Meanwhile, while we’re still in iTablet fantasy land, Digg.com’s latest episode of Diggnation makes some allusions to Apple’s rumored touchscreen tablet. Co-host Alex Abrecht claims he has inside knowledge on the pricing: “I was shocked at how cheap the price point is going to be.” But he offers nothing more beyond that. See that video below.

See Also:


Dual-Format Blu-Ray/DVD ‘Flipper’ Discs Landing in Stores

bourne_ultimatum_blu-rayhd_dvd_combo_610x396

Every now and then tech companies will launch a product that’ll make you think, “Wait, why weren’t we doing this all along?” Universal Studio’s new “Flipper” disc is one of those: a two-in-one disc that’s Blu-ray on one side and DVD on the other.

Universal is rolling out the dual-format disc beginning with the Bourne trilogy (Bourne Identity, Bourne Supremacy and Bourne Ultimatum). Each Flipper disc will cost about $30 — about the same as most Blu-ray titles cost brand new.

Why is this a good idea? Well, say you want to bring a movie over to a friend’s house, but it happens to be a Blu-ray disc — and alas, your friend doesn’t own a Blu-ray player. Or, say you have more than one television set, but one of them only has a DVD player plugged into it. Third, say you own a DVD player and are waiting to purchase a Blu-ray player in the not-too-distant future. Buying a Flipper would future proof your movie.

CNET notes
that the now-discontinued HD DVD format tried the two-in-one format back in 2007, so this is hardly a new idea. Still, even if overdue, the Flipper is a welcome option with the rising popularity of Blu-ray players and high-definition TVs.

See Also:

Photo: Amazon


Amazon Promises Kindle Update for Better Content Organization

The Amazon Kindle has many problems: inconsistent international support for both features and availability of titles, a rather too-dark gray screen, no touch and the inability to display any EPUB-format titles bought elsewhere.

Once you start reading, though, the Kindle manages to do what Amazon promises: It disappears in your hand. Apart from the odd bright light reflecting in the screen, you almost forget you’re not reading a paper book. But if you have more than a handful of titles, then good luck browsing them. Although there are separate sections for periodicals, books and the content you have added yourself, Amazon’s attempt at organizing seems to be just to leave everything there in one long list. Imagine trying to navigate a real bricks and mortar bookshop with all the titles arranged either alphabetically or by release date* and you’ll get an idea of the problem.

Now, through the popular social networking site Facebook, the Kindle team has promised to fix things:

We have heard from many of you that you would like to have a better way to organize your growing Kindle libraries. We are currently working on a solution that will allow you to organize your Kindle libraries. We will be releasing this functionality as an over-the-air software update as soon as it is ready, in the first half of next year.

That could, of course, be up to six months away. Amazon has tied its own hands by going for the computer-free model. PC and Mac owners can of course drag and drop content to and from the Kindle, but Amazon doesn’t require you to have a computer to own one (although you need web access to buy one). This means that all the functionality needs to be available on a clunky, slow-refreshing machine with a bad keyboard, instead of going the iTunes route and exploiting the strengths of both computer and mobile device. And this is starting to make the Barnes and Noble Nook, with it’s coverflow-style color LCD screen, look rather more attractive.

Kindle Facebook promise [Facebook]

*If you visited Foyles bookstore in London before the owner Christina Foyle’s death in 1999, you could have experienced this for real: The 30 miles of shelves were organized not by subject or even author but, inexplicably, by publisher.

See Also:

Kindle photo credit: Charlie Sorrel


Gallery: Sega Genesis Teardown

megadrive-1

Sega’s Mega Drive was first born in 1988, made its way to the US a year later and at last to Europe in 1990. In the United States, it got a change of name: Genesis. At the time, the 16-bit marvel was just amazing, giving us an almost perfect home version of Streetfighter II and the iconic (and dizzying) Sonic the Hedgehog. I had one, and I loved it.

So imagine how I felt when I found one on the street corner this past weekend, sitting alone without controllers, cables or games, but in otherwise perfect condition. That’s how we recycle in Barcelona — we leave things on the street — so I grabbed it, took it home and opened it up. Guess what’s inside? Not much:

megadrive-2

This is the control center. You have headphone volume (also used to hook the machine up to a stereo), a reset button and a cartridge lock which, I have discovered, works by stopping the double flap on the game cart slot from opening.

megadrive-3

The underside. Not much here but patent numbers and and a slide-off hatch to access an expansion port on the side.
megadrive-4

The controller ports, just like VGA sockets. At this time you only ever got two ports, so you’d have to buy a 4-way multitap adapter to add more players.
megadrive-8

The logo. If I remember right, only the early models had that hideous burgundy-colored strip below the cart-slot (in my photo, it has come out pinker than it really is). In later models it changed to white.
megadrive-6

In and out. This is where you would hook up to the TV, providing a stunningly high resolution of 224 lines (US NTSC) and 240 lines (PAL). One great hack was to buy a US model and hook it up to a TV capable of accepting an NTSC signal. Because NTSC runs at 60Hz and PAL at 50Hz, doing this would give your games a 20% speed-boost. I owned a US SNES which I used for this purpose.
megadrive-9

No torx screws here. The Mega Drive is held together with plain ol’ Philips-head screws.
megadrive-10

The innards, most notable by the amount of empty space and lack of fans. The old Motorola 68000 chip must have run a lot cooler than today’s power-guzzlers.

megadrive-15

The chip.
megadrive-13

megadrive-18

Close-up: It’s like a tiny cityscape in there.
megadrive-12

The reverse of the circuit board. And finally, just because I can:
megadrive-26

Yes, it works: I just slid an iPod dock inside, secured it with gaffer tape and ran the USB cable out of a hole. Once the circuitry is out of the way, there is plenty of room in there for modding. I considered putting the guts of active speaker system in there to make a standalone iPod music center, but it’s just more junk taking up space. This Mega Drive will be going back to the street from where it can find a new home.


Photos by Charlie Sorrel under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported License.


BassJump Subwoofer Beefs Up MacBook Speakers

bassjump_main_01

BassJump is a subwoofer that turns your MacBook into a pair of satellite speakers. Instead of silencing the MacBook’s surprisingly good built-in speakers when you hook it up, like a regular external speaker, it augments them with what they lack the most: bass.

After installing a preference pane on the host Mac, you plug in the BassJump to a spare USB port (good luck there). The software controls the crossover frequency (the frequency at which the sound is split and sent to either the sub or the satellites) and lets you choose an EQ preset such as “rock” or “pop”. You can also control the volume of the bass independently to choose how big a kick you get.

At $80, the aluminum-bodied BassJump costs the same as many full 2.1 speaker setups. The advantage, we suppose, is that the BassJump means fewer boxes and cables on your desk.

Bassjump product page [TwelveSouth]

Bassjump press release [TwelveSouth]


Cult Leader Buys Tube Amp, Sees The Light

amp-front-remote

Leander Kahney, ex-Wired.com editor and Cult of Mac boss, just dropped $800 on an amplifier for his computer. He reckons he got a bargain.

Back in the days before the MP3, I was something of an audio geek. My spike-footed, floor-standing speakers sat atop pennies to protect the parquet and were fed by an amplifier with just two knobs: volume and source. Into those went CDs, and that was it. It sounded amazing.

So I’m getting nostalgic (and jealous) twinges when reading about Leander’s new T-2 amp, from Neuhaus Laboratories. The T-2 is a tube amplifier with a digital input (optical or USB). Leander has hooked one end up to a Mac, of course (this model will work with any computer but was designed with the Mac in mind) and the other to a pair of 1980s Polk speakers and a JVC subwoofer. Here’s how it sounds:

I’m definitely no audiophile. I love music, but I’m happy listening to a cheap radio or a pair of iPod headphones. Or so I thought.

Crank it up and woah! What a sound! It’s gorgeous. Fat and meaty. Beautifully detailed, with a solid kick from the sub. There’s no comparison to the old computer speakers. They’re nasty and horrible now, like a cheap tranny radio.

We’re not sure why he’s comparing anything to a transvestite’s radio, but the rest is as clear as the sound he’s getting out of his new setup. With a good stereo, you can really hear things that are buried by an inferior setup.

The specs are, well, the specs are here. What you need to know is that the 2 x 20W amp weighs a chunky 20lbs and comes in stainless steel. It even includes the cables and a pair of white gloves.

Of course, Leander is now entering the world of lossless audio — MP3s just won’t cut it any more. And there’s another problem, summed up by this line from the final section of his review: “Now everything else sounds like sh*t.”

Neuhaus Labs’ T-2 Tube Amp Transports You To Audio Heaven [Cult of Mac]

Product page [Neuhaus]


Video Demonstrates Wired’s Concept iTablet App

Who takes Apple’s rumored touchscreen tablet seriously? Wired’s parent company Condé Nast. Earlier this week, the corporation revealed its plans to work with Adobe to repurpose magazine content for upcoming digital devices, including the Apple tablet (if it is indeed real). The first mag to get the tablet treatment, of course, is Wired.


All Things Digital’s Peter Kafka first reported that news, and he said he was trying to convince Condé to share a video demonstrating the tablet app. Well, here you go. The video above was shot at the Wired Store promotional event currently being held in New York. On display there is a concept video of Wired’s “iTablet” app.

To me, the most interesting part appears around the 30-second mark, where we can see an animated, interactive graphic. Exciting to think about the potential for this hypothetical new format, isn’t it?

Enough said. Here’s a good time to ask — what do you think? Could an Apple tablet save publishing?

See Also:


Steve Jobs to Developer: Name Change ‘Not That Big of a Deal’

ipodboxes

Apple is mighty protective of its iPod trademark, and if you violate it, you’ll get no sympathy from Steve Jobs.

Apple recently sent a letter to software company Little App Factory, requesting that it change the name of its most successful application: “iPodRip,” an app that enables you to copy and transfer songs from your iPod.

In response, John Devor, CEO of Little App Factory, sent a lengthy, emotional e-mail to Jobs. An excerpt:

Dear Mr. Jobs,

….
We are in desperate need of some assistance and we beseech you to help us to protect our product and our shareware company, both of which we have put thousands upon thousands of hours of work into. Our company goal is to create Mac software of the highest quality with the best user experience possible. I myself dropped out of school recently to pursue a path in the Mac software industry, and you yourself have been a consistent inspiration for me.

If there is anything at all you can do with regards to this matter, we would be most grateful.

Best,

John Devor

Jobs’ reply?

Change your apps name. Not that big of a deal.

Steve

Sent from my iPhone

Complying, Little App Factory has since renamed iPodRip to iRip.

That’s unfortunate for Little App Factory, but we have to admit it’s pretty funny Jobs didn’t even take the time to check for correct punctuation. In any case, it’s understandable why Apple is protective of its iPod trademark: It’s the name of one of Apple’s most successful products. From a business perspective, Apple’s legal team has to pursue companies big or small trying to use the mark “iPod.” (On the other hand, it’s more difficult to sympathize for Apple when it’s chasing down companies using the word “Pod.”)

Little App Factory’s full letter is available at CrunchGear, which originally reported this story.

See Also:

Photo: happylandfill/Flickr


‘Smart Info Engine’ Media Player Isn’t So Smart

sungale-cyberus

The Cyberus Smart Info Engine may sound like a steampunk computer which connects to the Victorian Internet (which would actually be awesome) but it is instead the most full-featured digital photo-frame ever.

To be fair, the manufacturer, Sungale, wouldn’t describe it like that. The company (which does make LCD photo-frames) is selling this as a device which can do almost everything in the way of entertainment: Internet radio, e-book reader, movie and music player, photo-frame (natch), RSS, Gmail, and so on. In fact, the only thing it doesn’t seem to do is connect directly to the web through a browser, which is an odd omission in a Wi-Fi-enabled box (although it might just be an omission from the spec sheet).

Add to that a big seven-inch touch screen and a planned price of $280 and this starts to look like a rather compelling little box. And then things start to go wrong.

First, about that “e-book” reader. The screen may be “high-resolution” (actually, at 800×480 it is not), but e-ink it isn’t, and the reader only offers support for PDF (a terrible e-book format) and plain text files. Not even the emerging epub standard or rtf. Then there’s the movie “support”, which is AVI-only, or the almost brain-melting lack of MP3 support (you need to convert music to WMA).

Photo support is (of course) better: you can pop in an SD card to view JPG, TIF, PNG and BMP formats. And you’d better leave that card in there: the device ships with just 1GB of memory.

Worse still is the battery life. The Web site claims two hours, the press release four, but either way that is pretty poor, especially as this isn’t a power-hungry all-purpose laptop.

It is inevitable that this will be compared to the iPod Touch, which has a smaller screen but does all of the above and more, along with a battery that actually lasts long enough to read a book. It also has 8GB of memory and costs $80 less. Oh, and it doesn’t look like a school-teacher’s Filofax, either.

Product page [Sungale]