Lovely iPod Nano Cases Carved From Old Tapes

nanocassette

Mother! Bring me my Dremel. Hurry woman, and put down that gin. I have to make me one of these wonderful iPod Nano cases, toot-sweet.

I, dear reader, am of course a Victorian master inventor. You, modern weakling that you are, might prefer to buy a retro case to cosset your fourth generation Nano device, for a mere $50 Canadian in today’s money. The tapes come from thrift stores and are “gutted, routered and rebuilt” in Vancouver until they are the perfect fit for the little Nano. They are named the 45 Nano (45 in this case is half the length of a D90 tape in minutes, not the speed of a vinyl “single” pressing).

What I love the most, from my expert, imperial engineering point-of-view is the stark contrast here. The shiny, bon-bon colored iPod against the old, rattly, dull plastic tapes. Wonderful. Now, mother, bring me that gin. And cover up the table legs: I’m feeling giddy.

Product page [Contexture via BBG]


Hands-On With the Zune HD

zune_hd

The upcoming Zune HD was the talk of the GDGT launch event in San Francisco last night, and we got a look at the device. First impressions: It’s compact, lightweight, good-looking and has a very slick interface.

Microsoft’s newest media player has a bright, crisp OLED display that the dark lighting of the nightclub showed off to very good effect. It’s fast and responsive: Video looked great on it. Its 480 x 272 pixels are a far cry from HD, but they present a 16:9 aspect ration and they’re bright and contrasty, with deep, rich blacks, so you won’t mind much. Also, we could zoom and swipe between photos with great speed; the screen never stuttered or paused no matter how quickly we zipped and zoomed the images around. The source of that visual oomph? The Nvidia Tegra chip inside. (”I know it’s not the Microsoft software,” quipped one bystander.)

The Zune team has given a lot of thought to the multitouch interface. Swiping gestures made it easy and even a bit fun to zip through menus of music or pictures, and there’s the familiar (and possibly patented) pinch gesture for zooming in and out of photos.

There’s also a dock, which includes an HDMI-out port (and a remote) so you can plug it into an HD television and watch HD videos at 720p. It appeared to be working just fine. The dock/remote combo will be sold as a separate accessory.

Why would you want to plug your Zune into a TV? The best the Microsoft rep could offer was this: Suppose you’re in a hotel room and you want to watch your movies or look at your photos on the big screen. Hm: What kind of movies and photos would that be?

Microsoft was not saying anything about what the Zune HD will cost or when it will be available. They also wouldn’t let us photograph the interface, apart from the HD radio screen shown above, stating that it was still a “work in progress.”

Photo: Dylan Tweney / Wired.com


Dear Tablet Naysayers: Stop Looking Back When We’re Thinking Ahead


The response we’re seeing to our feature “Why 2010 Will Be the Year of the Tablet” is disappointing, to say the least. Don’t get me wrong — we love starting dialogue here at Wired.com, and when people disagree, it only gets more fun. But in this particular case, the tablet naysayers don’t even appear to be responding to the points raised in our article.

We’re highlighting three posts: Jeremy Toeman’s “The Tablet That Nobody Really Wants“; John Biggs’ “Is 2010 the Year of the Tablet? Nah“; and Matthew Miller’s “Tablet Devices Suck, so Why Does Apple Want to Make One?

Why, why, why, may I respectfully ask, are you all focusing on the past when we’re discussing the future? Our article rests on the premise that 1.) New technologies are improving touchscreen functionality, as depicted by the iPhone; 2.) New software including touchscreen support (e.g., Windows 7) is in the works, presumably delivering more tablet-friendly user interfaces than in the past; 3.) Several manufacturers, including Dell, Intel, HTC and Nokia are concentrating on efforts to construct new tablets with these new technologies, according to our sources.

Notice how many times the word “new” was used in the above paragraph. We’re focusing on new technologies revitalizing an old, generally unloved gadget. And all three naysayers are, oddly enough, looking backward and dismissing tablets based on their old applications running on old hardware — shortcomings we also touched on in our story.

“Tablet devices suck, so why does Apple want to make one?” asks ZDNet’s Miller. Why else would Apple wish to make one? Steve Jobs felt smartphones sucked as consumer devices, and then Apple delivered the iPhone. And look what happened with the entire smartphone category. Did anyone think a keyboard-less phone was going to appeal to the masses? (I know I didn’t.) Yet 40 million iPhones and iPod Touches have shipped worldwide. Don’t listen to Greg House: People do change.

Why is it inconceivable to theorize the same could potentially happen with tablets? We have more than enough publications citing anonymous sources claiming an Apple tablet is on its way soon. And already, without even possessing full knowledge as to what exactly this fabled Apple tablet is going to do, or even confirming what it looks like or how much it will cost, some people are dismissing the product. I can’t even begin to tell you how absurdly unproductive that is. At Wired our motto is “informed optimism,” and dismissing a not-yet-existing product based on the performance of older renditions is more like uninformed pessimism.

We’re not saying an Apple tablet is going to be successful; we aren’t fortunetellers, either. We’re dreaming up possibilities of what Apple could do with this product category. If Apple again swings a home run, and other companies go at bat, too (it appears they are, according to our sources and several reports), boy is 2010 going to be an interesting year in the technology world. We’re excited to see what happens, aren’t you?

See Also:

A mocked-up illustration of an Apple tablet: Photo Giddy/Flickr


Sony to Introduce $200 E-reader

sony-reader

Amazon watch out as Sony is set to launch an all-out offensive against the Kindle.  Sony plans to introduce two new e-readers priced at $200 and $300, according to a release from Sony.

The two new models—PRS-300 branded as Sony Reader Pocket and PRS-600 called Sony Reader Touch–will be available at the end of the month.

The  aggressive pricing on the new devices puts Sony ahead of its rivals. Amazon’s Kindle 2 retails for $300, while the large screen Kindle DX costs $490.  Even the cheapest of e-book readers today such as the Cool-er cost $250.

Specifications of the two Sony e-reader devices had leaked late last week.  The $200 Pocket will have a 5-inch display and will be available in colors including blue, rose and silver. The device can store about 350 standard eBooks. The $300 Touch will have a 6-inch touch screen display. Users can take handwritten notes with the stylus pen or type with the virtual keyboard. All notes can be exported and printed. But unlike the Kindle, both models do not have wireless connectivity.

Sony is also likely to cut prices of e-books in its store to match that of Amazon and the newly launched Barnes & Noble e-book store. New releases and bestseller titles in the eBook Store will be available for $10, said Sony.

See Also:

Photo: Sony PRS-700 Reader (Eirik Newth/Flickr)


Comixology: iPhone Comics Done Right

comixComixology may have solved the problem of reading comics on the small screen. The iPhone application takes advantage of the new in-app purchasing option of iPhone OS 3, allowing you to browse, search, download and pay for titles without leaving the application. The experience is similar to that of the App Store itself, only easier to actually find what you are looking for.

But although the buying of new comics is important (four of the five icons across the bottom of the screen are store controls, and only one takes you to your library), it is the navigation method that really stands out, making the tiny iPhone screen seem a lot more like a real, full-sized comic-book.

Central is the guided scrolling. You view one frame at a time and, when you tap the right side or swipe a finger, it moves to the next frame, filling the screen with that. But the crucial difference is that, if the next frame is on the next row down, it scans down and left to get you there, so you see the bits in between. This is what makes it feel like you are running an eye across the page.

There are lots more usability options in there, too. You can switch off auto-landscape mode, pinch to zoom in, and choose whether you want to see a shrunken, full-page layout at the start or at the end of reading page.

But the big surprise comes at the end of the video, and at the end of a comic. When done, you can opt to buy the print edition of the comic from within the app, using Amazon. Sounds dangerous for your wallet, right? Comixology will also come up with a list of local stores where you can buy the comics, for an even quicker fix. $1, and it comes with 30 free comics.

Product page [iTunes]


Analyst Claims to Have Seen Apple Tablet

3778361783_7c4b75fbdb_o
To dispel any disbelief in Apple’s rumored tablet, an analyst claims to have seen a prototype of the gadget in person.

The analyst, who remains anonymous in the story, told financial publication Barron’s that Apple’s tablet could be introduced in September for a November release. The source shared no details on the specifications of the device. Other publications’ sources have described Apple’s rumored tablet as a 10-inch version of the iPod Touch with multimedia specialties.

“One veteran analyst who has seen first-hand a prototype slate-style computer from Apple says the device could be announced in September for release in November,” the story reads. “Whatever the exact dates, the computer industry is so anxious to see what Apple introduces that it has held off on competing designs until Apple CEO Steve Jobs gives the device his final blessing.”

We’re skeptical about the validity of this claim. First, we question if remaining anonymous would benefit this source, because we imagine Apple doesn’t show its secret products to many analysts; thus it’d be easy to narrow down the possibilities. Second, if the analyst is going to blabber anonymously anyway, why not share additional details of the product? The only reason such a source would come forward would be with the permission of Apple to perpetuate the hype surrounding the product — which seems unnecessary considering the flood of previous reports on this rumored device (see below).

In any case, with all the rumor reports added together, an Apple tablet seems inevitable in the near future. And Wired.com has also heard that in the next year, a large number of tech companies — including Dell, Intel, HTC and Nokia — plan to compete with their own tablet PCs, too.

See Also:


A mocked-up illustration of an Apple tablet: Photo Giddy/Flickr


Why 2010 Will Be the Year of the Tablet

tablet_3

After years of enticing rumors, ambitious prognostications and flat-out blather, 2010 may finally be the year that the tablet PC evolves from being a niche device to becoming a mainstream portable computer.

The tipping point comes via word to Wired.com from a well-connected industry executive that mainstream heavyweights Dell and Intel are collaborating on a touchscreen tablet due for release next year. Though our source has learned little about specifications of the device, what’s apparent is that the tablet will serve as a subscription-based e-reader for displaying newspapers, magazines and other media, giving Amazon’s Kindle — particularly, the nearly $500 large-format DX model — a run for its money.

As notable as the format is the business model: The tablet will be free for consumers who opt into a contract subscribing to one or more digital media subscriptions, according to our source. That’s similar to how telecom companies currently subsidize cellphones when customers agree to two-year contracts.

Our source, who requested to remain anonymous due to a non-disclosure agreement, said the companies are aiming to launch this product in about six months.

Dell and Intel are just the latest examples of a growing trend. MKM Partners analyst Tero Kuittinen said he, too, has heard rumors about not just Dell, but also handset makers Nokia and HTC delivering tablets by end of first quarter 2010. Nearly everyone has now confidently reported that Apple is launching a tablet by early next year. Singapore start-up Fusion Garage and TechCrunch are rushing to release the CrunchPad touchscreen tablet by this November.

Market research firm Display Search now projects the touchscreen market will triple in the next few years, from $3.6 billion to $9 billion.

“The iPhone was a big catalyst for the whole touchscreen industry, even if it’s just from a 3.5-inch mobile phone,” said Jennifer Halgrove, an analyst and director of display technologies with Display Search. “It encouraged people’s imaginations, and now companies are saying, ‘Oh, I can make a bigger one, and I can also have this user friendly interface.’ That really opened this industry.”

The idea of the tablet computer is nothing new to the tech industry. The development of tablet PCs can be traced as far back as 1888, when the United States Patent office granted a patent to electrical engineer Elisha Gray for an electrical-stylus device for capturing handwriting. In more recent years, plenty of hardware companies, such as Hewlett-Packard and Acer, have presented tablets that have only succeeded to fulfill a niche. Controlled with a stylus on a touch-sensitive “digitizer” screen, tablet PCs have traditionally been tailored toward artists and designers, failing to break into the mainstream.

But in recent years, costs of touchscreen components and software have been declining, and new types of touchscreens are emerging in the display market, Colegrove said. After stylus-controlled digitizer touchscreens came resistive touchscreens, which were very cheap to produce but suffered from low durability and poor transmittance. Then, a newer technology called capacitive touch became available, in which electrodes sense a user’s fingers on the X and Y axes, negating the need for a stylus.

In 2007, Apple featured capacitive touch technology (which it marketed with the more friendly term “multitouch”) in its iPhone and iPod Touch, which have sold 40 million units worldwide to date. Clearly, there is a mainstream audience for these keyboard-less computers, and Apple opened the doors with a superior user interface.

“The touch-based user interface is something we got from the handset market,” Kuittinen said. “And now that you have this innovation, it’s easier to go back to the tablet concept, and say, ‘Wait a minute, let’s add this.’ All of a sudden the device is a lot more appealing and sexier, especially since you have multitouch.”

A $0.00, media-centric tablet from Dell and Intel would certainly be competitive against Amazon’s Kindle in terms of price. Who would buy an Amazon Kindle reader if a free tablet were made available? The Kindle 2 costs $300, and the large-format Kindle DX runs for $490 — and even after purchasing a Kindle, consumers must still pay for content.

At Amazon’s Kindle DX launch event in May, The New York Times teased the idea of subsidizing longer term subscription commitments, but only in areas where “home delivery is not available.” Still, no such subsidy model has yet come into fruition for Amazon’s Kindles.

The idea of opting into a contract might initially sound like a turn-off, but Kuittinen told Wired.com that for cellphones, carrier-subsidy has been an extremely successful method to reel in customers. He said he would expect similar results with a subsidized tablet.

Kuittinen added that he has heard the Dell tablet would measure 5 inches — slightly larger than an iPhone but smaller than a Kindle. However, he said he is skeptical about Intel’s involvement with the product. Given the nature of the company, Intel would provide the guts of the device — perhaps a low-powered processor such as the Atom, which is currently used in netbooks. Kuittinen said this processor is not adequately energy-efficient to power a tablet PC compared to the ARM-based chips used in iPhones and devices running Google Android.

“There’s really no other viable alternative,” he said. “Android has such a strong moment right now. It’s going to be so much easier to develop for it.”

The low cost of Intel’s Atom chips would help keep the a rumored device’s overall price down in order to make subsidy not too hefty for content providers involved. But the software would be the key ingredient to drive the success for this device, and an Intel-based machine would either have to run a Windows or Linux-based operating system.

A tablet produced by Dell and Intel would most likely run a mobile version of Windows 7. In presentations marketing Windows 7, Microsoft has been heavily promoting the upcoming operating system’s support for multitouch. Windows 7 is slated for an October 2009 release.

The challenge for Dell and Intel is unlikely to be the creation of the product, but rather cementing negotiations with content partners. The companies will find it difficult convincing large newspaper companies to convert from being an advertisement-based business to a fee-based business. However, they might be more open to the idea if Dell and Intel keep their tablet at a low cost.

Intel and Dell declined to comment on this story.

See Also:

A MacBook modified into a tablet:  Jim Merithew/Wired.com


Hot, High-End iPod Dock for Audiophiles

onkyo_nd_s1

This hot looking block of metal and circuitry is a high-end home-theater and audio dock for the iPod family. The Onkyo ND-S1 will take the bits stored on the music player and perform its own digital to analog conversion before piping the pristine signal off to the stereo setup of your choice.

Don’t laugh. While processing a crappy MP3 is a waste of time and money, lossless formats or even full-on wav and aiff files can benefit from some 16bit, 48kHz love, and you can fit a decent amount of them onto, say, a 32GB iPod Touch. The dock will also hook up to a computer via USB and allow you to sync your iPod with iTunes, as well as grabbing music from that same iTunes library and performing it’s magic. Hooking this thing up to a Mac Mini as a dedicated music box may be overkill, but hey — we’re talking about audiophiles here, the kind of people who can spend hundreds of dollars on mains cable.

The dock also comes with a remote control, and work’s with any iPod except the iPhone. Price is as yet undecided, but it will be on sale in the fall.

Product page [Onkyo via Akihabara News]


How an Apple Tablet Could Pit iTunes Against Amazon.com

apple_tablet_concept_2

With rumors piling up about a forthcoming Apple tablet, it appears more and more likely that such a device will emerge soon.

But what’s still unclear is how this gadget will set itself apart from Apple’s multimedia-savvy product line, including the iPhone and iPod Touch, as well as the scores of failed tablet PCs that have come and gone. Judging from the company’s past moves, we’re betting that Apple’s tablet will be a media-centric device, focused — at least in part — on shaking up the publishing industry.

Apple is already prepared to blow Amazon and other e-book makers out of the water with one key weapon: iTunes. Having served more than 6 billion songs to date, the iTunes Store has flipped the music industry on its head. It also turned mobile software into a lucrative industry, as proven by the booming success of the iPhone’s App Store, which recently surpassed 1.5 billion downloads. Apple has yet to enter the e-book market, and making books as easy to download as music and iPhone apps is the logical next step.

What can Apple do better with e-books? For textbooks or anthologies, Apple can give iTunes users the ability to download individual chapters, priced between a few cents to a few bucks each. It would be similar to how you can currently download individual song tracks from an album. It might even have the same earthshaking potential to transform an entire industry by refocusing it on the content people actually want instead of the bundles that publishers want them to buy. (Of course, Apple would likely offer the à-la-carte purchase model in addition to the option to purchase the entire book as one download — a more attractive option for shorter works such as novels.)

College students would love this: Teachers rarely assign an entire textbook, so they would save hundreds of dollars by downloading only a few chapters of each textbook. Apple is already popular in the education sector, so here’s even more money to milk from students, with the textbook industry worth an estimated $9.8 billion.

Sci-fi fans might only want one story from an anthology, or a historical researcher might target certain subjects. All Apple has to do to secure the book publishers’ enthusiastic cooperation is to offer them a generous cut of the revenues, like the 70 percent it currently offers app developers.

Other than having the upper hand with digital distribution, an Apple tablet can compensate for other e-book readers’ shortcomings. In a previous story, Wired.com polled students on their interest in Amazon’s large-format Kindle DX reader. Several of them said they couldn’t imagine ditching textbooks for a Kindle DX, foreseeing challenges with tasks such as notetaking, highlighting and switching between books while writing essays.

Assuming its computing powers and interface design are anything like the iPhone’s, a touchscreen tablet would make these student-oriented tasks as easy as a few swipes and taps — far more pleasant than clunking around with the Kindle’s cheap buttons and sluggish interface. Plus, we would imagine students would be able to type their papers on the tablet.

Then there’s the obvious: An Apple tablet would have color, making it better for displaying magazine pages, which could also be purchased through the iTunes Store. It wouldn’t be saddled with a slow e-ink screen, so it could display video and browse the web with aplomb.

Let’s not forget to mention the multitude of other tasks an Apple tablet will likely be able to perform if developers decide to code applications for it. Think along the lines of an interactive remote control to enhance the movie-viewing experience on your TV, or a music video player to accompany the tunes blasting from your stereo. Or, heck, even an album-cover display screen for you to gaze at while listening to music. (For more on an Apple tablet’s advantages versus current e-book readers, see Dylan Tweney’s story “Large-Screen Kindle Won’t Mean Squat if Apple Tablet Arrives.”)

There’s huge potential in a tablet if Apple can pull this off. The challenge lies in establishing the right partnerships. If Apple weaves e-books into the iTunes Store, will book publishers hop on board? Given Apple’s success in numbers, we think so.

As for a data provider, it would be even better if Apple could work with a carrier such as Verizon to subsidize the tablet, bringing it closer to $500 — a more attractive price point for students. Because the device presumably would not feature a phone, the monthly plans could be priced significantly lower than an iPhone — $30 to $40, perhaps, for an unlimited 3-G internet connection.

What do you think an Apple tablet would need in order to be compelling? Add your thoughts in the comment section below.

(An aside: We’re aware, as some of our colleagues have pointed out, that an à-la-carte e-book model is an idealistic prediction. A more conservative guess would be that e-books will be available, in full, in iTunes, which would nonetheless be advantageous against Amazon given the enormous amount of iTunes users. We are, however, hopeful that Apple would be the company to drive radical change with e-book pricing models, given its proven ability to twist partners’ arms.)

See Also:

Illustration of an imaginary iPhone tablet: Factoryjoe / Flickr


Financial Times Confirms Apple Tablet for September

3716352885_3c077e9ed9The Apple tablet rumors are coming so thick and fast now that the big surprise would be for Apple not to announce one. The austere and reliable Financial Times has just thrown into the game with an article that confirms a September release for the new oversized iPod Touch, a timing that ties in nicely to Apple’s yearly September iPod announcements.

The device will probably have a 10-inch screen and come without a cell connection. Somewhat bizarrely, the FT describes it as being pitched at rejuvenating sales of the multisong music album. “It’s all about re-creating the heyday of the album when you would sit around with your friends looking at the artwork, while you listened to the music,” a source told the FT. How will this happen? Liner notes and artwork on the big 10-inch screen.

This attempt to turn back the business clock for the music industry is codenamed “Cocktail,” and will tempt consumers to buy albums rather than just picking the songs they like. Unfortunately, it seems to have escaped the music execs that people bought albums because it was the only way to get the tracks you wanted, unlike today where you can pick and choose, discarding the chaff.

The article also mentions book publishers, who have “been in talks with Apple.” This sounds great, and if Apple can manage the battery life issues then a color, hi-res screen could be a Kindle killer. The FT ends with a statement that is indisputably true, given a high-resolution, 10-inch screen: “It’s going to be fabulous for watching movies.”

Apple joins forces with record labels [Financial Times]

Paywall avoiding link to full article [Google]

Photo: nDevilTV/Flickr

See Also: