Motorola Xoom UK pricing official at £580 for 3G and £480 for WiFi-only

Motorola has now confirmed that the latest round of prices the Carphone Warehouse, PC World and other UK retailers are listing for its Xoom tablet are indeed the officially sanctioned price points for the Honeycomb slate. After being listed at £600 for the 3G model and £500 for the WiFi-only version initially, the 32GB-equipped 10-incher is now mercifully £20 cheaper, at £580 and £480 for each variant. A quick glance at Apple’s online store tells us that those levies match up exactly to what a corresponding 32GB version of the iPad 2 will cost you, signaling Motorola’s intent to at least be on par in terms of pricing. Stores are still showing the Xoom under a pre-order status for now, but that should be changing swiftly if Motorola wishes to live up to its promise of availability this very week.

Motorola Xoom UK pricing official at £580 for 3G and £480 for WiFi-only originally appeared on Engadget on Fri, 08 Apr 2011 15:50:00 EDT. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink   |  sourceCarphone Warehouse (3G), PC World (WiFi)  | Email this | Comments

Purported Verizon screenshot points to LTE-upgradable 16GB Motorola Xoom

The Motorola Xoom might be starting to look a bit pricey compared to some of its new competitors, but it seems that the company may have a solution in the offing. According to a leaked, supposedly authentic Verizon screenshot obtained by Droid Life, Motorola is apparently planning to launch an LTE-upgradable Xoom with just 16GB of storage instead of the current 32GB, which would presumably also open the door for a cheaper 16GB WiFi-only model. Of course, that’s still a long way from being official, but cutting the storage in half is certainly one sure way to make a (seemingly necessary) price drop a bit more bearable.

[Thanks, Josh S]

Purported Verizon screenshot points to LTE-upgradable 16GB Motorola Xoom originally appeared on Engadget on Fri, 08 Apr 2011 15:11:00 EDT. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink Android Central  |  sourceDroid Life  | Email this | Comments

Motorola’s SocialTV app will turn your Xoom or Atrix into a communicative couch companion

Whether you look at stats or your own limitless experience, you know very well that humanity spends too much time staring at tubes, screens, and other unnatural visualizers. Motorola isn’t really here to fix that ailment, but at least it’s converging the uses of some of those device classes with its introduction of a SocialTV Companion Service. Designed to turn your smartphone, tablet or laptop into a, you guessed it, TV companion device, this new software serves up social networking, complimentary content, real-time chat, TV show ratings, and interactive (as opposed to what, non-interactive?) games. Basically, since you spend your TV-watching time idly browsing away on your Xoom anyway, why not fuse the two things together and “generate some incremental revenue” for your service provider in the process? We presume the new SocialTV stuff will be rolled out in app form, Moto doesn’t dish up those details or give us a launch date. If only we had an app to tell us when to expect new apps to arrive.

Continue reading Motorola’s SocialTV app will turn your Xoom or Atrix into a communicative couch companion

Motorola’s SocialTV app will turn your Xoom or Atrix into a communicative couch companion originally appeared on Engadget on Fri, 08 Apr 2011 06:26:00 EDT. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink Mobile Burn  |   | Email this | Comments

Android Chief: We’re Still Open, Dammit

Google's Andy Rubin speaks at an Android Honeycomb event in February. Photo: Mike Isaac/Wired.com

Android chief Andy Rubin took to the blogs Wednesday evening to combat recent reports of Google clamping down on Android’s openness.

“We continue to be an open source platform and will continue releasing source code when it is ready,” wrote Rubin on the Android Developer Blog. “As I write this the Android team is still hard at work to bring all the new Honeycomb features to phones. As soon as this work is completed, we’ll publish the code. This temporary delay does not represent a change in strategy.”

Google has championed its platform as the open alternative to Apple’s closed iOS system. That openness has been called into question recently, as Google has yet to release the Honeycomb source code to all developers and manufacturers.

Honeycomb is Android’s first tablet-optimized software release. Rubin cites the difference in form factor between tablets and phones as the reason Google hasn’t released Honeycomb’s source code to device manufacturers and developers.

Motorola is the exception: The company’s Honeycomb-fueled Xoom tablet has been on the market for more than a month, which makes Google’s decision to hold the code from wide release a bit mystifying.

Members of the Android industry showed faith in Google, however.

“They say they’re going to release it, I’m not gonna call them liars,” Linux Foundation executive director Jim Zemlin told Wired.com in an interview. The Android OS is based on a version of the Linux OS, which has been an open source, collaborative platform since its release decades ago.

Rubin’s post also addressed questions raised in a recent Bloomberg story about Android’s level of control over its partners. Bloomberg wrote:

Over the past few months, according to several people familiar with the matter, Google has been demanding that Android licensees abide by “non-fragmentation clauses” that give Google the final say on how they can tweak the Android code — to make new interfaces and add services — and in some cases whom they can partner with.

Rubin combats this claim directly, stating Google’s so-called “anti-fragmentation program has been in place since Android 1.0,” citing a list of compatibility requirements manufacturers must adhere to in order to market a device as “Android-compatible.”

He’s referring to Android’s compatibility test suite, or CTS, an automated litmus test to measure whether or not a piece of hardware can claim to run Android.

“Our approach remains unchanged: There are no lock-downs or restrictions against customizing UIs,” wrote Rubin.

Motorola vouches for Rubin’s statement.

“In the time since we’ve started working with Google, our relationship has matured, but it isn’t any more limiting than it ever has been,” Christy Wyatt, Motorola’s VP of mobile software development, told Wired.com. “I don’t believe that anything has changed in the CTS since the beginning.”

Finally, Rubin emphatically denied other rumors of ARM-chipset standardization in the platform, much of which arose in the wake of an anonymously sourced DigiTimes story.

“There are not, and never have been, any efforts to standardize the platform on any single chipset architecture,” Rubin wrote. With the Nexus One, Google’s first flagship phone, the company worked with Qualcomm to install its 1-GHz Snapdragon ARM processors in the HTC-manufactured handsets. The subsequent Nexus S came equipped with Samsung’s 1-GHz Hummingbird processor, which is also based on ARM architecture.

It’s out of character for Rubin and Android to post such a defensive update. Rumors circulating in the media are usually given a brusque “no comment” by Google’s communications team.

But the title of Rubin’s post — “I think I’m having a Gene Amdahl moment” — explains it all. Amdahl coined the acronym FUD (fear, uncertainty and doubt) in 1975. After leaving IBM to form his own IT company, Amdahl claimed he suffered attacks by IBM sales staff attempting to undermine his new venture.

All of this negative attention isn’t good for Android’s “open” image, and maybe that’s what overcame Rubin’s reluctance to speak: too much FUD about Android’s future.

Whether or not this FUD is warranted, however, remains to be seen.

See Also:


Droid X2 reappears in the wild, still indistinguishable from Droid X

You’ve seen it before and now you’re seeing it again. The Droid X2 that Motorola seems unwilling to announce has made another unsanctioned appearance in the wild. It’s still rocking Android 2.2 and there’s sadly no indication of any LTE goodness for it, but we suspect the changes that justify the 2 in its name will be happening under the hood. The 8 megapixel camera round the back comes with the same dual-LED flash array and HD Video label as the original Droid X, once again giving us no hint of what exactly Motorola’s upgraded. Then again, what’s the fun in knowing everything in advance?

Droid X2 reappears in the wild, still indistinguishable from Droid X originally appeared on Engadget on Thu, 07 Apr 2011 13:52:00 EDT. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink Wireless Goodness  |  sourceAndroid Central  | Email this | Comments

Motorola Has Only Sold 100,000 Xooms – Report

moto tablet point.jpg

The thing about framing your product as an iPad killer is that, well, people are going to compare your product to the iPad–every passing mention of a failure or success will be uttered in the same sentence as the competition. So when research firm releases a report stating that your company has only sold 100,000 since launching more than a month ago, people will naturally point out the fact that the competition sold three times that in its first day.

Motorola selling 100,000 Xooms since the tablet’s February 24th launch is certainly not a spectacular number by any stretch, but that uninspiring figure is compounded drastically when compared to Apple’s official numbers. Of course, it’s worth mentioning here that the Xoom’s sales numbers don’t come directly from Motorola–rather they’re estimates released by Deutsche Bank.
By most accounts, however, numbers  for Motorola’s Honeycomb tablet are less than terrific. The device has gotten a fairly lukewarm reception from a number of reviewers, as well, pegging the Xoom as not quite ready for prime time. 

Motorola Xoom, Atrix Too Pricey for the Public

Motorola's Xoom remains the Android tablet to beat, but the high price may be scaring off the public. Photo: Jon Snyder/Wired.com

Motorola’s 2011 Android lineup looked like it would give Apple a run for its money. But high prices and second-place product reviews may be defeating Motorola while its feet are barely out of the blocks.

Sales trends for Motorola’s Xoom tablet and its Atrix smartphone have been “disappointing,” according to James Faucette, analyst for research firm Pacific Crest. Faucette doesn’t provide any specific numbers, and Motorola hasn’t released sales figures, but analysts from Deutsche Bank are estimating the sales of the Xoom at 100,000 units sold within the tablet’s first month-and-a-half of availability, according to a Dow Jones wire report. Compare that to the 300,000 iPads sold on Day One of the tablet’s release a year ago.

Price is a big problem for Motorola. Consumer Reports ranked Motorola’s $800 3G, 32-GB version of the Xoom as equivalent to the 3G, 32-GB version of Apple’s first generation iPad, which goes for $580. Apple’s recently debuted iPad 2 topped Consumer Reports’ list of the 10 most-promising tablets.

However, the Xoom still remains the most viable competitor to the iPad 2, says Consumer Reports. Both tablets boast 10-inch screens, 3G and Wi-Fi capability, but the magazine concedes that the Xoom offers a few features the iPad 2 doesn’t — e.g., a built-in memory-card reader and Flash support.

The Xoom will also be upgradable for use on Verizon’s 4G network for free in the future, whereas Apple has no immediate plans to utilize any of the current 4G networks with its devices.

Each of the tablets on CR’s list was evaluated on 17 criteria, including ease of use, touchscreen responsiveness, versatility and screen glare. Tablets from Dell, Archos, Samsung and Viewsonic were also among those tested.

“So far Apple is leading the tablet market in both quality and price,” Paul Reynolds, electronics editor at Consumer Reports, said in a statement. “However, it’s likely we’ll see more competitive pricing in tablets as other models begin to hit the market.”

In Wired.com’s reviews, we ranked the iPad 2 at the top, scoring a 9 out of 10, while the Xoom came in at a 6.

As for the Atrix, the recent price drop of two competitive phones to $50 — Apple’s iPhone 3GS and HTC’s Inspire 4G with an Amazon deal — may account for Atrix sales coming in “well below forecast,” according to Faucette.

The Atrix has also taken flak for the high prices of its heavily hyped peripheral products. The laptop dock, which allows the phone to be converted into a portable notebook-like device, costs a cool $500. And the HD multimedia device that lets you attach the phone to an external HD monitor, essentially turning the Atrix into a PC, costs another $190. While the bells and whistles of the two accompanying devices made the Atrix stand out from competing smartphone debuts, the price points brought less-flattering attention.

However, as a phone, the Atrix is superb, Wired.com’s reviewer found.

While Motorola may have priced the Atrix’s accessories out of reach, it may be doing the right thing by thinking outside the mobile-market box.

“As the devices become more and more alike, manufacturers will do anything they can to differentiate themselves,” Gartner analyst Ken Dulaney told Wired.com in an interview.

That may include hardware peripherals like those found with the Atrix, or it could include tweaks in the Android user interface — as evidenced in Motorola’s Motoblur UI, or HTC’s Sense — though not all users prefer the UIs (or skins) created by the manufacturers.

With the release of multiple, relatively lower-cost tablets to come later in 2011, we’ll see if Motorola’s plans will change.

See Also:


Motorola NYXboard surfaces from the dead, XBMC reclaims it (update)

Seven months ago, Motorola unveiled a dual-sided, QWERTY-laden TV remote control: the NYXboard. It was never heard from again. Today, we’ve learned why — the open-source community will be selling a version specially redesigned to control your XBMC rig. The folks at Pulse-Eight — a startup with roots in the XBMC community dedicated to designing hardware — tell us they actually talked Motorola out of bundling the remote with set-top-boxes in favor of a nefarious plan. Simply put, they want you to be able to purchase an IR and RF remote that natively supports XBMC for a penny under $60 this June.

While we don’t have any real pictures of the unit quite yet — just the renders you see above and below — developers say it will work with installations on Mac, Windows, Linux and the original Apple TV on day one, and will actually turn off the side of the remote that’s face down to avoid accidental inputs. You’ll find the NYXboard up for pre-order now at our source link, with the first shipments slated for around June 27th. Then again, you might want to wait, as we’re told there are more surprises in store: a second version that can control the Apple TV 2, and a secret method which would allow the remotes to control your home entertainment center without pesky line-of-sight infrared. The best laid plans and all that… but it sounds like Logitech’s Harmony may finally get some competition.

Update: The situation’s a bit tricky, but the XBMC Foundation (a non-profit entity) wants you to know that hardware vendor Pulse-Eight (a for-profit venture) isn’t actually part of their group — Pulse-Eight was founded by an XBMC team member and produces hardware targeted at the XBMC community, but apparently isn’t funded by (nor directs funding towards) the XBMC foundation itself.

Motorola NYXboard surfaces from the dead, XBMC reclaims it (update) originally appeared on Engadget on Tue, 05 Apr 2011 19:05:00 EDT. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink Tested  |  sourcePulse Eight  | Email this | Comments

AT&T’s Fake 4G Phones May Actually Get Real 4G Soon [At&t]

It’s been well documented that AT&T’s 4G phones aren’t just slow—their upload speeds are often slower than its 3G network. So what happened to that extra G? Turns out it’s not the network itself that’s borked; it’s the phones. AT&T has intentionally crippled the Motorola Atrix and HTC Inspire—the carrier’s only fourth-gen network phones—by actively disabling the handsets’ HSUPA capability. Gross. But there may be sweet relief coming soon. More »

Crippled Phones Reveal AT&T Isn’t Ready for 4G

The Motorola Atrix is one of two phones with disabled HSUPA.

After Texas resident Keith Geissler noticed his new Motorola Atrix wasn’t offering the fast “4G” download and upload speeds that AT&T promised, he filed a complaint to the Better Business Bureau, asking the wireless company to “uncap” his data connection.

AT&T’s response was surprising. While the company assured Geissler it “has not capped the upload speeds on the Atrix,” it did admit that the phone’s HSUPA capability — a key feature in increasing upload speeds on the Atrix as well as the new HTC Inspire 4G smartphone — will not be enabled until a later date.

That means all upload speeds on the Atrix and the Inspire will max out at around 300 Kbps, far below that of the 5.5+ Mbps speeds that HSUPA is capable of uploading. (Geissler wasn’t happy to hear any of this, and posted the exchange to an online message board focused on smartphones.)

‘The concept of 4G is a joke. It’s nothing but marketing now.’

In other words, it’s not a hardware issue. It’s AT&T itself, which isn’t ready to flip the switch to turn on “4G” networks, even though it’s already selling 4G phones. Is anyone surprised?

“The concept of 4G is a joke now,” Gartner Research VP Phil Redman told Wired.com. “At the highest level, it’s supposed to be a technology standard, but it’s nothing but marketing now. If and when 4G-standardized technology is actually decided upon and released, we’ve been inundated with this jargon for so long we may not even recognize it.”

The term “4G speed” seems open to interpretation. Since the International Telecommunications Union — the global authority on telecommunications- and broadband-industry standardization – revised its ruling on what defines 4G network speeds in December 2010, carriers have jumped on the opportunity to market many new smartphones as 4G-enabled. Their definitions have been liberal, to say the least.

For AT&T, part of “4G” compatibility involves having HSUPA speeds. AT&T has been mostly evasive as to why HSUPA has been disabled in the Atrix and HTC Inspire 4G smartphones. The company claims it is performing “the testing and preparations necessary” for users to enjoy the HSUPA capabilities when the function is turned on by phone update.

To add insult to injury to Android users expecting 4G speeds, many iOS counterpart devices using AT&T’s 3G network are indeed HSUPA-enabled.

“Not to twist the dagger that’s already in our backs on this one,” said one forum user at XDA Developers, “as many know, the iPad 2 came out today and guess what … HSUPA enabled.”

Also HSUPA ready: the iPhone 4, a device using AT&T’s 3G network.

So when can we actually expect 4G upload speeds from these “4G” phones? AT&T gave Wired.com a rough street date of next month.

“We will be turning HSUPA upload speeds on via a software update to the Motorola ATRIX 4G and HTC Inspire 4G planned for April,” a spokesman said. He also added that “the Samsung Infuse 4G will launch with HSUPA.”

AT&T isn’t the first to fudge facts on its data practices. In the weeks before the iPhone’s release on the Verizon network in February, the carrier published a document that said the top 5 percent of data users on the network may have their data speeds reduced “to ensure high-quality network performance for other users at locations and times of peak demand.”

As Wired.com’s Brian X. Chen reported, “One of Verizon’s selling points for its version of the iPhone is that it would come with an unlimited data plan — a marked contrast to AT&T, which eliminated its unlimited data plans last year.” But when a company’s shifty data-throttling practices are “disclosed” in unpublicized PDF files, Chen’s assertion that “you just can’t trust wireless carriers” proves accurate.

AT&T obviously hasn’t claimed the lack of HSUPA-enabling in the two phones to be a data-throttling technique. But until we hear reasons beyond “network testing and preparation,” we won’t be so quick to believe them.

See Also: