Mozilla Will Support Firefox 2 Until Mid-December 2008

This article was written on August 21, 2008 by CyberNet.

firefox 2 support-1.pngAfter yesterday’s article about Mozilla rolling out Firefox 3 update notifications it’s clear that there are still some of you who don’t intend on making the leap to Firefox 3 just yet. Maybe you’re still waiting for extensions to get updated, have problems running Firefox 3 on your computer, or just don’t want the new features it offers. Those of you tightly holding on to Firefox 2 will have to let it go by the end of the year if you want any future security and stability updates.

The Firefox 2 download page states that Mozilla is targeting mid-December as the cutoff date:

Firefox 2.0.0.x will be maintained with security and stability updates until mid-December, 2008. All users are strongly encouraged to upgrade to Firefox 3.

That means they’ll be supporting the older version of Firefox for about 6-months after the general release of Firefox 3. That’s about the same amount of time Firefox 1.5 was supported after Firefox 2 was released, and so this doesn’t really come as a surprise.

As we approach the end of the year we’ll be keeping an eye on how many of you decide to make the upgrade. As it stands about 25% of our readers have not jumped on the Firefox 3 bandwagon, but I’d predict that we can get that down to 10-15% by the end of the year.

Copyright © 2010 CyberNet | CyberNet Forum | Learn Firefox

Related Posts:


Mozilla’s Take on Acid3 Test

This article was written on April 02, 2008 by CyberNet.

acid3 pass For about a month now browser developers have been eyeing the new Acid3 test to see how they can push to meet the standards it tests for. Shortly after the test was released we took a look at how the browsers stacked up to each other, but none of them passed the test. Then just last week both Opera and Safari released test builds that demonstrate their compliance.

What about Firefox? Mozilla co-founder Mike Shaver wrote about his thoughts on Ian Hixie’s Acid3 test, and I think it’s safe to say that he’s not overly fond of it:

Ian’s Acid 3, unlike its predecessors, is not about establishing a baseline of useful web capabilities. It’s quite explicitly about making browser developers jump — Ian specifically sought out tests that were broken in WebKit, Opera, and Gecko, perhaps out of a twisted attempt at fairness. But the Acid tests shouldn’t be fair to browsers, they should be fair to the web; they should be based on how good the web will be as a platform if all browsers conform, not about how far any given browser has to stretch to get there.

Mike then went on to say how they won’t be getting support for the Acid3 test into the Firefox 3 browser, which is completely understandable. It’s very unlikely that Opera and Internet Explorer will be adding support Acid3 for their next major milestone releases either. And Safari just released a new version of their browser, and so their next milestone won’t exactly be soon. It’s obvious that the browser developers need time to test the necessary changes, and I don’t think anyone will criticize them for that.

Ian Hixie, one of the developers of the Acid 3 test, responded to Mike in the comments of his post. Here’s a snippet of what he had to say:

I would love to have tested innerHTML and setTimeout and all kinds of stuff like that, but sadly there is no spec for those yet (other than the very much in-progress HTML5 drafts). We can’t write Acid tests for things that we don’t have a spec for. I’ve been working my ass off for the past few years to write a spec for these things. Hopefully by, say, Acid5, we’ll be able to write an Acid test for them.

With Acid2, the original “first cut” failed a lot in IE, Mozilla, and Safari, but actually did pretty well in Opera. We (Håkon and I) then went on a hunt for Opera bugs and made Opera fare much worse on the test. With Acid3, IE and Opera ended up doing really badly on the first cut, and Firefox and Safari did well, so we added some more things that failed in Firefox and Safari. (Then we added even more stuff that failed in Safari, because they kept fixing the damn bugs as I was adding them to the test.)

Of course you wouldn’t want a bunch of the browsers to pass the test immediately after it is released because it wouldn’t really be doing any good. What are your thoughts about this?

[via ZDNet] Thanks to “Change” for the tip!

Copyright © 2010 CyberNet | CyberNet Forum | Learn Firefox

Related Posts:


April Browser Stats were Incorrect

This article was written on May 08, 2008 by CyberNet.

internet explorer sad.pngLast week we took a look at where the various browsers stood up against each other in terms of market share. I was shocked (to say the least) when Internet Explorer triumphantly came out on top with a 1.22% market share increase. That really hit hard for Firefox who’s market share was sent spiraling down to 16.96%, which was nearly a percent lower than the previous month. It’s not too often that you see a single browser gain or drop an entire percent from one month to the next.

When the stats rolled out there were a number of red flags thrown up questioning the integrity of the data. Mozilla, confident that their internal numbers did not show such a significant drop, started to investigate the findings. Net Applications gave them a hand, and here are some of the things they found:

1. Usage of Firefox did not appear to decline in April.

2. Usage of IE saw an ultra unusual spike over the period of a few days in April. While there was steady traffic from IE users – as measured by page views – for a short period surrounding April 18th, there was a huge spike in traffic from IE users – as measure by unique visitors – during the same time period. When I say “huge spike”, I mean something on order of 25% to 50% greater than what could have been expected.

3. Most of IE’s spike was attributable to IE6 users on XP (with some assistance from IE7 users on Vista), and nearly the entire spike came from users outside North America.

Net Applications receives traffic data from nearly 40,000 different business websites, and as it turns out there was an online marketing campaign aimed only at Internet Explorer users. There was no details released as to what sites were running it, but Net Applications said that it was “totally unrelated to anything with Vista, Microsoft or Windows.”

They have now put additional filters in place to watch for abnormal behavior like this. According to them they were already watching for stuff like this to happen on any one particular site, but they weren’t expecting such a widespread campaign to occur.

The stats have been updated, and it looks like things have returned to normal. Firefox and Safari both dropped slightly in market share, but only by miniscule amounts this time. Internet Explorer only saw a 0.03% increase instead of the 1.22% that is was at with the incorrect data. Here are the revised stats:

March 2008April 2008Change
Internet Explorer74.80%74.83%+0.03%
Firefox17.83%17.76%-0.07%
Safari5.82%5.81%-0.01%
Opera0.69%0.69%0.00%
Netscape0.55%0.56%+0.01%
Mozilla0.09%0.16%+0.07%
Opera Mini0.04%0.05%+0.01%
Playstation0.04%0.04%0.00%
Pocket IE0.03%0.03%0.00%
Konqueror0.03%0.03%0.00%

Much better! If you’re curious about what the stats looked like before hop on over to our previous post.

[via ComputerWorld]

Copyright © 2010 CyberNet | CyberNet Forum | Learn Firefox

Related Posts:


Opera 9.23 Released – Mum’s the Word on Opera 9.5

This article was written on August 15, 2007 by CyberNet.

Computer Repair DoctorOpera 9.23 has been released and is ready for consumption by the general public. A majority of the things fixed in this release are credited to Mozilla’s jsfunfuzz tool that was released at Black Hat about two-weeks ago. The tool found four bugs in Opera that caused crashes, and one "highly severe" security vulnerability:

  • Fixed four crash bugs found using Mozilla’s jsfunfuzz tool.
  • Fixed a stability issue with Speed Dial.
  • Fixed a critical JavaScript security issue discovered with Mozilla’s jsfunfuzz tool: "A virtual function call on an invalid pointer that may reference data crafted by the attacker can be used to execute arbitrary code."
  • Windows Vista Only: Scrolling problem with some Microsoft mice fixed.

I’m happy that Mozilla was kind enough to release the tool for everyone to use, and I’m extremely happy that people are actually using it! As I stated last time, jsfunfuzz has caught an astonishing 280 bugs in Firefox’s JavaScript engine, and more than two-thirds of those have already been fixed. Thanks to jsfunfuzz, and the creator Jesse Ruderman, the Web has just gotten a little safer.

Now I’m hoping to see test builds of Opera 9.5 soon, and from the looks of it the Opera Desktop Team isn’t taking kindly to comments regarding future versions of the browser. Almost all comments that mention Opera 9.5 are said to be off-topic, and are consequently being removed. I’m sure it is getting annoying for them when every other comment is along the lines of "can’t wait for 9.5," but that is just their community getting excited for the release. Now commenters are referring to it as "The-Build-Which-Should-Not-Be-Named," or TBWSNBN for short. ;) I understand why it is being done, but I was pretty disappointed when I saw my comment get removed as well.

So now I can’t wait to get my hands on TBWSNBN!

Download Opera 9.23
Download Opera 9.23 using BitTorrent
Source: Opera Watch & Opera Desktop Team

Copyright © 2010 CyberNet | CyberNet Forum | Learn Firefox

Related Posts:


Mozilla Employees Get Interviewed

This article was written on May 26, 2008 by CyberNet.

mozilla firefox-1.pngI always find it interesting to read and watch interviews with leaders of various companies, particularly when they give their take on their own products. Just last week a “Support Firefox Day” session was held over the IRC chat service, and in it they had four of the best known Mozilla employees answer questions that you may find interesting. If you missed the chance to participate you can still catch the full interviews over at Mozilla Links (links are below for each respective person).

I read through the dozens of questions and answers given by each person, and pulled out my favorite responses. Here they are in no particular order:

Mike Connor, Firefox’s development leader, was asked:

What didn’t you have time to implement in Firefox 3 that you’d like to implement in a future Firefox 4?

Some things include a powerful query builder for history and bookmarks, better handling of tabs.

Mike Beltzner, Firefox’s UI leader, was asked:

What frustrates you most about the Firefox 3 UI?

Heh, great question. There are a couple of things that are frustrating to me, both at the UI and underlying infrastructure level.

At the UI level, I’m frustrated that we’re not animating more, and not trying to offer more “emergent” interfaces that help users complete tasks based on what we can infer from the task the user is trying to complete.

So, specifically, I want the location bar to be even smarter, and things like saving pages and downloading files to be even smarter. And I want them to animate fluidly so that users can understand how one part of the UI associates with the next, or how one operation flows into the next.

At the underlying level, I’m excited about new platform enhancements like Compositor as it will let us float chrome over parts of the page more naturally, and of course better threading models will help us give users progress indication.

John Lilly, Mozilla’s CEO, was asked:

With so many people moving toward mobile devices in place of their PC, do you foresee the mobile project taking over as the primary vehicle for Firefox?

That’s a super-interesting question. Myself, I find that I use the mobile internet more and more with my iPhone & the Safari browser. Wwhen I travel, especially in Asia – Japan and China -, it feels like sometimes the predominant way of interacting with the web. Having said that, I think that PCs are very unlikely to go away or even decline. So I think of it as an addition of a major form factor, not a replacement. But there’s no question that it’s extremely important for us.

Asa Dotzler, an evangelist at Mozilla, was asked:

What do you think is the best way to spread Firefox amongst people that always used Internet Explorer and don’t know how Firefox could be better?

I think there are a lot of ways and that no one way is best for everyone. I like to ask people what’s painful about going online and then figure out how Firefox can help that pain point. Most people find the Web really uncomfortable. They’re not like a lot of us who love it and can deal with its problems. The web is a series of flaming hoops they have to jump through to get something done. So I try to show them how Firefox removes those flaming hoops so they can just go online, get done what they want to get done, and get back to the rest of their lives.

Copyright © 2010 CyberNet | CyberNet Forum | Learn Firefox

Related Posts:


Thunderbird Organization Established — MailCo

This article was written on September 18, 2007 by CyberNet.

It’s been nearly two months since Mozilla originally announced that they were going to help Thunderbird "spread its wings," and it looks like we finally have a result of the talks. Mozilla has decided to branch Thunderbird off into its own subsidiary, and it will be started with $3 million in seed money that has been provided by the Mozilla Foundation.

Mitchell Baker, Mozilla’s CEO, says that this move will help them improve the email client:

The result is that Mozilla is launching a new effort to improve email and internet communications. We will increase our investment and focus on our current email client — Thunderbird — and on innovations in the email and communications areas. We are doing so by creating a new organization with this as its sole focus and committing resources to this organization. The new organization doesn’t have a name yet, so I’ll call it MailCo here. MailCo will be part of the Mozilla Foundation and will serve the public benefit mission of the Mozilla Foundation.

What will the new organization do exactly? Here’s a few things it hopes to accomplish:

  • Take care of Thunderbird users
  • Move Thunderbird forward to provide better, deeper email solutions
  • Create a better user experience for a range of Internet communications — how does / should email work with IM, RSS, VoIP, SMS, site-specific email, etc?
  • Spark the types of community involvement and innovation that we’ve seen around web "browsing" and Firefox.

The interesting thing in Mitchell’s article is that she was extremely careful this time around to shed some light on the positive things, and seemed to stray away from the things that could cause some concern. One of the things that came to my mind is what’s going to happen after the initial $3 million in seed money is gone? Where are they going to get their funding from then? Firefox is a goldmine when it comes to the integrated search box, but Thunderbird doesn’t really have the same revenue sources as a browser.

Don’t expect to see anything out of the ordinary for a little while since the three current developers will continue to work on Thunderbird 2 patches as well as the future Thunderbird 3. I’m keeping my fingers crossed that this move truly is to make Thunderbird better, and here’s hoping that MailCo can sustain itself!

Sources: Mozilla Press Release, GigaOM & Mozilla Links

Copyright © 2010 CyberNet | CyberNet Forum | Learn Firefox

Related Posts:


Minimo 0.2 Released – Mobile Web Browser with Tabs

This article was written on March 28, 2007 by CyberNet.

MinimoWe have been following the Minimo project for almost a year, and they have definitely made some progress. The last big release, however, was several months back and this has caused some people to think that the project is no longer active.

Minimo 0.2 brings a new look and feel to the table, and is definitely adding some competition to the mobile browser arena. The most recent release is a pretty drastic change over the old interface which can be seen in these screenshots:

Minimo Minimo Minimo Minimo Minimo Minimo Minimo Minimo Minimo Minimo Minimo Minimo

As you can see the tabs closely resemble what you are already familiar with in the Firefox web browser, including the scroll buttons that appear after you have opened a large number of tabs. Mozilla actually hosts the Minimo project (which I think stands for Mini Mozilla), but as Doug Turner notesThis isn’t a Mozilla Corporation product.”

Anyone that has used a Pocket PC before will definitely be grateful that this browser is being developed. The Pocket Internet Explorer that is included with Windows Mobile is not very usable because the loading time for sites seems are painfully long and there is no tabbed interface. My favorite browser for Pocket PC’s is definitely Opera Mobile, but that costs money so Minimo is the perfect solution!

Get Minimo
Source: Doug Turner

Copyright © 2010 CyberNet | CyberNet Forum | Learn Firefox

Related Posts:


Firefox 3 Improves Password Saving

This article was written on September 03, 2007 by CyberNet.

Firefox 3 Password Saver

One of the nicest features in the upcoming Opera 9.5 is that the “save this password” prompt doesn’t hold back the website from loading. This gives the site an opportunity to log you in before saving would could potentially be an incorrect username or password.

The latest Firefox 3 nightlies also have a similar feature, but I believe it is implemented a little better than Opera’s. Firefox doesn’t use a popup dialog box anymore to ask the user to save a password, instead it shows a slim bar along the top of the site (pictured above). It’s unobtrusive, small, and doesn’t interrupt the browsing experience of the user.

Unfortunately no browser has figured out a way to determine whether the login was successful, and if the login wasn’t correct prevent the password-saving option from even appearing. However, this is a good enough alternative for me and I think most users will truly appreciate it.

One other thing that Mozilla added was a bar that appears when trying to install an extension from an untrusted site. Prior to this you had to whitelist a site before you could install an extension from it, but now you can temporarily allow it:

Firefox 3 Extension Installation

Source: Burning EdgeMozilla Links

Copyright © 2010 CyberNet | CyberNet Forum | Learn Firefox

Related Posts:


A Look Ahead at Thunderbird 3

This article was written on May 27, 2007 by CyberNet.

ThunderbirdI love Thunderbird as a desktop email client because it is light weight and fast. I used Outlook 2007 for a little bit, and the features it offered were amazing but it was all a lot more than what I needed. Then when Thunderbird 2 was released I saw it as a great opportunity to switch back.

I noticed today that the Mozilla Thunderbird wiki page had been updated with some of their plans for version 3. There isn’t much information provided, but there are two things they mention that I’m really excited to see in the next release.

—Easier Account Setup—

The first thing that they want is an easier way for users to setup their email account. This is primarily in regards to people who use the email service provided by their ISP, who often provide limited information on setting up an external email client such as Thunderbird.

To make it easier the Thunderbird team has two options in mind: shipping Thunderbird with popular ISP files, or hosting a service with the ISP files. I would rather not see Thunderbird ship with a bunch of ISP files that people would never use, so my preference would be that a site is setup to host the ISP configuration files. That way the selection would be a lot better because users would be able to submit their own configurations.

Of course I think Thunderbird should still do the hunting when it comes to finding the necessary files. For example, a user should begin setting up their account by entering in their email address. Then Thunderbird can go to an online database containing the ISP files and search for the appropriate configuration. All of this could easily be done transparently meaning that the user just has to sit back and sip their coffee while Thunderbird does all of the work behind the scenes.

—Simple Extension Installation—

I have said for quite awhile that Thunderbird needs a better way to download and use extensions. Here is what the Thunderbird team had to say about the current way of installing an extension:

Currently a user must download the extension file locally and then either install the extension by opening the addons dialog and clicking the install button or dragging the extension into the add ons dialog. We get too many complaints from users who click on the extension from within their browser (Firefox) and the extension ends up trying to load in Firefox.

To get around this problem they either want to implement a small browser in Thunderbird for getting extensions, or create a Thunderbird-specific MIME type. The browser would probably be the easiest to implement, but the MIME type would be a lot more effective.

By creating a custom MIME type for Thunderbird extensions a user would be able to click on an extension to install within any browser, and that file will immediately get associated with Thunderbird. When the user then tries to open the extension Thunderbird will popup to install it. This is all very similar to when you download an MP3 from your browser it will ask you if you want to open it with your default media player, and in this case it will ask if you want to open the extension in Thunderbird.

—Overview—

It looks like Thunderbird 3 is headed in the right direction, but it isn’t expected to be available until the first quarter of 2008. Since it is still about a year before it hits final form there will probably be features that get pulled, and more that get added. We’ll keep you up-to-date on anything we find out, but my fingers are crossed that we’ll see tabs in version 3!

Thunderbird 2 Review with Screenshots
View the extension I use in Thunderbird 2
Download Mozilla Thunderbird 2

Copyright © 2010 CyberNet | CyberNet Forum | Learn Firefox

Related Posts:


Thunderbird 2 Nearing Completion…No Tabs?

This article was written on March 13, 2007 by CyberNet.

I haven’t been able to find an official release date for Mozilla Thunderbird 2, but it is definitely coming up. They are moving into the release candidate (RC) stage and from that I would guess that a release is due within a month or so. Thunderbird 1.5 had two release candidates before its final release in January 2006, which covered nearly two months in time. Thunderbird 2, however, is looking very stable so it wouldn’t surprise me to see just the one RC being made available.

Thunderbird 2

There is also a draft of the release notes available to be sure that everything is ready to go when the big day comes. We were all excited to think that there was a possibility of a tabbed interface making it into Thunderbird 2, but there is no mention of it in the What’s New list:

  • Message Tags: Create your own tags for organizing email. Messages can be assigned any number of tags. Tags can be combined with saved searches and mail views to make it easier to organize email.
  • Visual Theme: Thunderbird 2′s theme and user interface have been updated to improve usability.
  • Session History Navigation: Back and Forward buttons allow navigation through message history.
  • Folder Views: Customize the folder pane to show favorite, unread or recent folders.
  • Easy Access to Popular Web Mail Services: Gmail and .Mac users can access their accounts in Thunderbird by simply providing their user names and passwords.
  • Improved Support For Extensions: Extensions can now add custom columns to the message list pane in addition to storing custom message data in the mail database.
  • Improved New Mail Notification Alerts: New mail alerts include information such as the subject, sender and message preview text.
  • Folder Summary Popups: Mouse over a folder with new messages to see a summary of the new messages in that folder.
  • Saved Search Folder Performance: Search results for saved search folders are now cached, improving folder loading performance.
  • Find As You Type
  • Improved Filing Tools: Recent folder menu items for moving and copying messages to recently used folders. Move / Copy again functionality.
  • Updates to the extension system: The extension system has been updated to provide enhanced security and to allow for easier localization of extensions.
  • New Windows installer: Based on Nullsoft Scriptable Install System, the new Windows installer resolves many long-standing issues.
  • Windows Vista Support
  • MacOS X Universal Binaries

I didn’t think there was any chance of tabs making it into the final release once the last beta was posted, but I was still optimistic. I guess it always gives us something to look forward to for Thunderbird 3 which is slated for release in Quarter 1 of 2008. Of course, that date can change at anytime since Thunderbird 2 was supposed to ship the summer of 2006 and Thunderbird 3 was supposed to be early 2007…that didn’t exactly happen though.

In an email dpotts pointed out that the Thunderbird start page (pictured above behind the About Thunderbird window) also got a few new options on it. It’s not a major change, but they did add the read/write messages. Windows Vista support wasn’t on the list before so they may have focused on that as well, but other than that I don’t think much has been added since the last pre-release version.

Download the latest Thunderbird 2 nightly build (might be unstable)

Copyright © 2010 CyberNet | CyberNet Forum | Learn Firefox

Related Posts: