Copying Videos to Other Video Sites Made Easy

This article was written on July 31, 2007 by CyberNet.

If you frequently upload videos to multiple video sharing sites like YouTube or MySpace Videos, you’re going to love Hey!Spread. Hey! Spread is a fairly new video uploading service that “sneezes” your videos, or spreads them to multiple sites with just a few simple steps which means you’ll save yourself a lot of time. The more services your video is uploaded to, the better chance you’ll have that it will become popular which is why Hey! Spread will be useful for some of you. Currently they support several video networks including YouTube, MySpace, Google Videos, Yahoo Videos, Dailymotion, Photobucket, Metacafe, and others.

Heyspread

So not only can you spread your own videos uploaded from your hard drive, but now a new feature just added yesterday will allow you to cross-post videos that are already uploaded to a video sharing site. For example, if there was a video clip on YouTube that you really liked and wanted to spread to MySpace, you’d just need the URL for the video and you’d be able to use Hey! Spread to post the video to MySpace or any other supported service. It’s really a very simple process and makes copying videos from sites like YouTube to other video sites easy.

Source: Digital Inspiration

Copyright © 2010 CyberNet | CyberNet Forum | Learn Firefox

Related Posts:


How will Hulu Affect Joost?

This article was written on October 29, 2007 by CyberNet.

When NBC Universal and News Corp announced that they were teaming up back in March, most people assumed that they were doing so to take on YouTube by launching a video sharing site. As it turns out, they had no intention of competing with YouTube and instead had their eyes set on creating a place where people would be able to view premium video content online. Eventually they named the service Hulu, and just yesterday they took the first step necessary to bring it out to the public by launching a private beta. All it takes is an email address, and you can sign up to get an invite.

Hulu has a lot going for them, especially when you take into consideration the fact that they’ve teamed with AOL, Comcast, MSN, MySpace and Yahoo who will eventually have the premium content available on their sites as well with their own customized video player. They also own the content that will be available which is another huge advantage. When you take a look at the line-up of shows that they’ll be offering, the service is even more impressive with shows like:

  • Prison Break
  • House
  • Bones
  • Heroes
  • Scrubs
  • 24
  • My Name is Earl
  • and more…

hulu

So with a great list of shows in high quality and what appears to be a good interface, is there anything that could prevent Hulu from being a success? NewTeeVee points out a few of their weaknesses – among them are their resistance to anything other than big media shows, and the lack of some way to get viewers to participate in the experience like writing a review for an episode. Another big weakness is that all of the content is ad-supported, they don’t offer an alternative like a monthly subscription to view shows ad-free.

Certainly they’ve got weaknesses, but their strong points are just that, strong. Not only do they have the TV shows, but they also have videos and the option for users to email or even embed the content to share with others. This week they’ll be letting in thousands of beta testers to try it out with even more welcomed in each week after. TV programming on the web is here, and I think it’s here to stay. I’ve submitted my email address to request an invite, and now I can’t wait to try it out. It certainly sounds impressive but leaves me wondering, will Hulu will put a dent in Joost’s user-base?

Copyright © 2010 CyberNet | CyberNet Forum | Learn Firefox

Related Posts:


This Week’s Best YouTube Videos: Black Friday Madness, CraigyFerg and Dr. Who, and More

CraigyFerg Dr Who Tribute

The end of last week was Black Friday, and this past Monday was Cyber Monday – a much more civilized holiday, where instead of lining up outside stores at midnight in the cold, we all head to the office and waste thousands of collective hours of productivity shopping online and eating reheated Thanksgiving leftovers for lunch. Naturally, Black Friday spawned a number of its own videos this week, and we’ll get into that later, but it wasn’t the only hot video on YouTube. 
Craig Ferguson treated us to the “Lost” episode of Dr. Who, Call of Duty: Black Ops met Pokemon and picked up some pretty upbeat electronic music along the way, and the ninja from Ask A Ninja weighed in on the week’s events. Head behind the jump to see.

Does Viacom’s Suit Against YouTube Threaten Online Communication?

This article was written on May 27, 2008 by CyberNet.

youtube viacom battle.pngCan you believe it’s already been a year since Viacom tried to purge Google’s money bank with a $1 billion dollar lawsuit against YouTube? Ever since March of last year (2007) when the lawsuit was filed, we hadn’t really heard much of what was going on, until yesterday. According to the Associated Press, YouTube is claiming that the Viacom suit against them is a threat to online communication. This claim was officially filed in U.S. District Court in Manhattan as YouTube’s response to Viacom.

So what exactly does Google mean by this claim? Google said that if they have to become liable for Internet communication, and thus other carriers and hosting providers would have to become liable, Viacom “threatens the way hundreds of millions of people legitimately exchange information, news, entertainment and political and artistic expression.”

What Google has going for them is that they say they do their very best to follow the Digital Millennium Copyright Act. In fact, they believe they go above and beyond what is even required of them, but it’s still not good enough for Viacom. According to Viacom, they have found over 150,000 clips of copyrighted material on YouTube and they say those videos have been viewed over 1.5 billion times. Despite what Google says, that they remove copyrighted content and help content owners protect their work, Viacom says Google does “little or nothing” to help stop the infringement.

It’s turned into a big game of “he said, she said” and from the sounds of it, it’s only going to get uglier before all is said and done. From our knowledge, we believe Google does what they can to keep copyrighted videos off of YouTube, yet Viacom says making those videos available is part of YouTube’s business plan. Heck, YouTube even implemented a copyright filter (which launched back in October) to help identify copyrighted content as it appears on the site. What more can YouTube do? Should they lose this battle with Viacom, I believe they could be right in that it will threaten online communication.

Image Source

Copyright © 2010 CyberNet | CyberNet Forum | Learn Firefox

Related Posts:


Viacom files appeal in YouTube copyright case, continues to ‘drag it out’

Don’t worry — that “drag it out” bit belongs to Google, not us. If you’ll recall, the suits in Mountain View threw an underground party back in June when the federal court ruled that YouTube fell under the “safe harbor” provision of the DMCA which protects service providers from liability for user content. In essence, this ensured that Google couldn’t be sued or held liable for damages caused by some prankster uploading a ripped episode of 30 Rock to the site, being that Google has promised to yank it post-haste if notified by the copyright owner. That essentially puts the burden of policing on the content creator, but (sensibly) frees Google from the impossible feat of looking at every single clip that gets uploaded before making it live to the world. Just to give you a little perspective, 24 hours of video are uploaded to YouTube every minute, and that’s expected to become even greater as time passes. Despite the logic (and the ruling of the court), Viacom has today filed a 72-page appeal in a likely futile attempt to fight back.

All Things D highlights a killer quote from Viacom in the report — apparently it thinks that if the ruling stands, it’ll “radically transform the functioning of the copyright system and severely impair, if not completely destroy, the value of many copyrighted creations.” As for Google’s response? “We regret that Viacom continues to drag out this case. The court here, like every other court to have considered the issue, correctly ruled that the law protects online services like YouTube, which remove content when notified by the copyright holder that it is unauthorized. We will strongly defend the court’s decision on appeal.” We doubt anything will turn out differently the next go ’round, but obviously we’ll be watching with great interest. Now, back to that clip of 30 Rock we were enjoying quite legally on Hulu…

Viacom files appeal in YouTube copyright case, continues to ‘drag it out’ originally appeared on Engadget on Fri, 03 Dec 2010 17:33:00 EDT. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink   |  sourceAll Things D  | Email this | Comments

The Maccabeats: A Viral Video Chanukah Sensation

maccabeats.jpg

An all-male group (see also: boy band) from Yeshiva University is tearing up the YouTube charts with a new ode to Chanukah titled “Candlelight.” The holiday-themed takeoff on Taio Cruz’s “Dynamite” features such memorable lines as “I flip my latkes in the air sometimes sayin ayy ohh spin the dreidel.”

The video, which has been online since November 3rd, has already racked up more than 800,000 views on the Google-owned video sharing service.

The Maccabeats themselves have been around since 2007. A largely a capella group, they “perform an eclectic array of Jewish, American, and Israeli songs” and are “committed to the philosophy of Torah u-Madda, the integration of traditional and secular wisdom,” according to their site.

“Candlelight” was played on the Today Show this morning, and yes, they will play your Bar Mitzvah.

Video after the jump.

YouTube Letting Users Skip Ads

youtube-logo.jpg

YouTube this week introduced a new feature called TrueView that lets users skip right through ads. Sounds like an advertiser’s worst nightmare, right? Apparently not. According to TechCrunch, advertisers are totally cool with the format.

The thing is, with TrueView, advertisers only have to shell out money when users choose not to hit “Skip,” meaning that those who actually sit through the ads are actually engaged (or in the other room getting a sandwich, but let’s face it, that’s always been a wildcard in the advertising mix).

TrueView features a little timer that counts down from five and then offers up a skip button. The feature also lets users choose between different advertising options–similar to a feature that has existed on Hulu for some time now.

Typo Pulls in $1,000 Per Day for UTube.com

This article was written on May 17, 2007 by CyberNet.

We’ve mentioned UTube before, not to be confused with YouTube, the popular video site.  Last November, the Universal Tube & Rollform Equipment Corporation (UTube.com) decided that they were going to sue YouTube. They went from getting 1,500 visitors per month to over 2 million once the video site gained popularity. Some might view this as the perfect opportunity to make some extra money off of someone’s mistake, but UTube owners filed a lawsuit stating that they wanted YouTube to stop using the domain, or reimburse them for a new corporate identity.

Now if you were UTube and you started receiving all of that traffic, you’d think that they would realize the potential that’s there and work to make money off of the domain for the long haul, instead of making money via a lawsuit.

Utubeimage

Eventually they caught on to that idea because in December, UTube threw up a sponsored search box , some links to monetize the site, and pushed the original content of the site down the page.

Fast forward to now, and UTube is making a decent profit. According to Red Herring, UTube is making an estimated $1,000 per day off of the ring-tone search engine that is certain to attract some of the YouTube seeking users who make the mistake of entering UTube.com into their browser’s address bar.

While their bandwidth costs undoubtedly went up as a result of YouTube’s popularity, an extra $30,000 per month should certainly cover it, and give them some leftover money – yet they’re still suing.

I’d have to imagine that this is the easiest money that corporation has ever made, and I think it’s about time they drop their suit.

Copyright © 2010 CyberNet | CyberNet Forum | Learn Firefox

Related Posts:


Billboard Launches Social 50 Ranking

social50.jpg

In addition to its many artist charts, Billboard just added the weekly Social 50, which ranks artists based on their popularity on social media sites. Yep, social media rules the world.

Social 50 chart ranks artists’ popularity using a formula blending their weekly additions of friends/fans/followers, along with weekly artist page views and weekly song plays on MySpace, YouTube, Facebook, Twitter and iLike. The tally also includes the ratio of page views-to-fans/friends on YouTube and MySpace. The Social 50 emphasizes friends/fans behavior above other activities, followed by artist page views and the ratio of page views to fans and song plays.

So in essence, you, the social media addicted fan, help determine which artists makes the list through your interaction with their social media accounts. In the debut chart, the top five artists that consume the most of our time online are: Rihanna, Justin Bieber, Eminem, Lady Gaga, and Nicki Minaj. Others that made the the list include, Katy Perry, Kesha, Taylor Swift, the Glee Cast, and uh, Michael Jackson (is he still active on social media?).

If your fav didn’t make the list, get back on that social media horse and get following, liking, and listening.

Justin Bieber: Tech’s 2010 Person of the Year?

Thumbnail image for justinbieberbike.jpg

Who is 2010’s tech person of the year? Is it Mark Zuckerberg, the world’s youngest billionaire, who helped transform Facebook into a global juggernaut, donated absurd amounts of money to charity, and was the basis for the year’s most critically acclaimed film?

What about Steve Jobs, who turned the tech world on its head yet again with the introduction of the iPad, which kickstarted the consumer tablet market?

Maybe it’s Meg Whitman, or Carly Fiorina, who both parlayed CEO jobs at prominent tech companies into much-publicized bids for office in California.

I would like to throw my support behind another candidate–that’s right, Justin Bieber (OMG, et al). The 16-year-old Canadian pop singer earned a top spot in tech headlines this year, thanks in no small part a seemingly permanent spot atop Twitter’s trending topics.

Bieber made a name for himself after his young mother began uploading videos of her son performing song covers. He quickly built up a legion of absurdly loyal–and intense–fans who have grown up on social networking. As various social networks reveal their year-end lists of hot topics, the point is made all the more clear: 2010 was the year of the Bieber.

After the jump, check a round up of our Bieber coverage from 2010.