Motorola Zeppelin outed as the XT800 for China Telecom — US getting it, too?

Even though Motorola’s only officially announced a small handful of devices that run Android so far, this much is clear — the company was dead serious about going all-in on the platform because we’re seeing new leaked hardware practically every time we look. This time around, it’s a clearer view of the Zeppelin, which turns out to be coming to market on China Telecom as the XT800. It looks like it could be a sharp-looking handset, borrowing design elements of the Instinct HD and featuring both GSM and CDMA radios for compliance with Telecom’s up-and-coming 3G network. What makes this juicier, though, is the fact that QQ.com alternately identifies the Zeppelin as the Titanium, a device we’d just seen in the FCC with EV-DO Rev. A last week. That leads us to believe we could see this bad boy on Sprint or Verizon in the near future — and with an HDMI output in this thing, 2010 is shaping up to be a great year for high-end Android gear.

[Thanks, Vitala]

Motorola Zeppelin outed as the XT800 for China Telecom — US getting it, too? originally appeared on Engadget on Mon, 14 Dec 2009 13:54:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink   |  sourcemobile-review, QQ.com  | Email this | Comments

JVC Announces Two Soundbar Systems

JVCSoundbars.jpg

Want to make your home theater system sound even better? Today, JVC announced two soundbar systems that let you create movie theater sound without taking up a lot of space. Both systems will be available this month.

The TH-BA3 is a 280-watt, 5.1-channel surround sound system that includes a soundbar, wireless subwoofer, and wireless rear speaker kit (with wireless left and right speakers and a wireless receiver). The soundbar itself contains four speakers–one each for the left and right main channels, plus two for the center channel–as well as a power amplifier, system controls, and the transmitter for the wireless speakers. It will list for $549.95.

The second system, the TH-BS7, includes a super-slim soundbar that measures 1.4-inches tall, an even slimmer wall-mountable amplifier and control unit, and a wireless subwoofer. This 180-watt, 4.1-channel system includes two front surround channels that use JVC’s Front Surround technology to create a surround sound effect without the need for rear speakers. It will list for $599.95.

Yet another hybrid supercar

Kepler will unveil the Motion hybrid supercar at the Dubai Motor Show. pOriginally posted at a href=”http://reviews.cnet.com/8301-13746_7-10414915-48.html” class=”origPostedBlog”The Car Tech blog/a/p

For sale: Your robot clone

Japan’s Kokoro is offering absurdly vain people the chance to order their own android clone for just $225,000 apiece. Only two bots available, so act now!

iPhone’s App Store Gets Less Spammy in iTunes

convert
Over the weekend Apple rolled out a visual makeover for its App Store page in iTunes, placing emphasis on photos previewing the apps and allowing less space for textual descriptions.

The redesign increased the size of the photos and trimmed down on the amount of words that appear in the “Description” field that developers used to pitch their apps; the descriptions are now limited to two lines. Before, app descriptions could display several lines, and many developers used the opportunity to fill the space with line after line of buzz words, capitalized letters with asterisks and so on to help the app gain attention.

There’s a “…More” button to view the full description of the app, but we doubt most consumers are going to click on it. We’re willing to bet most people just lightly scan the description and spend more time looking at the images anyway when determining whether they want the app.

Long story short, the iTunes App Store got less spammy, which most consumers will likely enjoy. Will some developers complain? Probably. But that’s nothing new.

Via ZDNet

See Also:


Actroids go on sale in Japan, John Isidore not impressed

Alright, you already have a robot dancer, some robot housecats, and you even acquired a Roomba to protect your child from poisonous snakes — what’s next for your futuristic replicant menagerie? Starting in January 2010, the Japanese department store Sogo & Seibu will accept pre-orders for Actroid life-sized, animatronic female robots. Unlike some available models, these ones can’t walk (or do a two-step, for that matter) but they will sit still and smile politely — which might be all you really want in a robotic companion anyways. That’s OK, we’re not here to judge you. Quantities are extremely limited: only two will be sold, at a price of $225,000 each. Get a closer look after the break.

Update: One of our friends at Engadget Japanese has filled in a few more of the details: Apparently the robots will only be manufactured in the likeness of the purchaser, so if you were hoping that this would be a good way to get started on populating your own Hall of Presidents, it looks like you’re out of luck. Unless, of course, you happen to have a strong resemblance to Chester A. Arthur.

Continue reading Actroids go on sale in Japan, John Isidore not impressed

Actroids go on sale in Japan, John Isidore not impressed originally appeared on Engadget on Mon, 14 Dec 2009 13:27:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink Plastic Pals  |  sourceMSN Japan  | Email this | Comments

Three great, cheap gifts for Wii owners

A futuristic charger (someday, all our gadgets will charge this way), a supercheap steering-wheel adapter for racing games, and bargain-priced Rayman games. pOriginally posted at a href=”http://news.cnet.com/8301-13845_3-10414815-58.html” class=”origPostedBlog”The Cheapskate/a/p

Cowboys Stadium 3D scoreboard experiment doesn’t go so well, turned off in less than seven minutes


You know 3D has a long way to go when even Jerry Jones can’t manage to sell it for longer than seven minutes: the vaunted real-time 3D scoreboard display experiment at last night’s Cowboys game was turned off to loud cheers after just six minutes and fifty seconds of being active. The problem, as usual, was glasses: most of the 80,000 people in attendance didn’t bother to put on the headgear required to see the 3D effect, and instead saw a blurry anaglyph image — which they then booed. What’s more, some who wore the glasses complained that the 3D effect caused nausea, although probably not as badly as the Cowboys’ 17-20 loss to the Chargers. HDlogix actually has the tech to do glasses-free 3D, but it simply doesn’t work when scaled up for the world’s largest HD monitor — a problem they’ll have plenty of time to solve when the Cowboys fail to make the playoffs with another couple December losses.

Continue reading Cowboys Stadium 3D scoreboard experiment doesn’t go so well, turned off in less than seven minutes

Cowboys Stadium 3D scoreboard experiment doesn’t go so well, turned off in less than seven minutes originally appeared on Engadget on Mon, 14 Dec 2009 13:01:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink   |  sourceAssociated Press, Fox 43  | Email this | Comments

My 10 favorite iPhone apps of 2009

I’ve made my list and checked it 10 times: These are the apps that really made my year. And half of them are freebies. Don’t forget to nominate your 2009 favorites. pOriginally posted at a href=”http://reviews.cnet.com/8301-19512_7-10414502-233.html” class=”origPostedBlog”iPhone Atlas/a/p

Understanding the Windows Pagefile and Why You Shouldn’t Disable It

As a tech writer, I regularly cringe at all the bad tweaking advice out there, and disabling the system pagefile is often a source of contention among geeks. Let’s examine some of the pagefile myths and debunk them once and for all.

What is a Pagefile and How Do I Adjust It?

Before we get into the details, let’s review what the pagefile actually does. When your system runs low on RAM because an application like Firefox is taking too much memory, Windows moves the least used “pages” of memory out to a hidden file named pagefile.sys in the root of one of your drives to free up more RAM for the applications you are actually using. What this actually means to you is that if you’ve had an application minimized for a while, and you are heavily using other applications, Windows is going to move some of the memory from the minimized application to the pagefile since it’s not being accessed recently. This can often cause restoring that application to take a little longer, and your hard drive may grind for a bit.

If you want to take a look at your own pagefile settings, launch sysdm.cpl from the Start menu search or run box (Win+R) and navigate to Advanced –> Settings –> Advanced –> Change. From this screen you can change the paging file size (see image above), set the system to not use a paging file at all, or just leave it up to Windows to deal with—which is what I’d recommend in most cases.

Why Do People Say We Should Disable It?

Look at any tweaking site anywhere, and you’ll receive many different opinions on how to deal with the pagefile—some sites will tell you to make it huge, others will tell you to completely disable it. The logic goes something like this: Windows is inefficient at using the pagefile, and if you have plenty of memory you should just disable it since RAM is a lot faster than your hard drive. By disabling it, you are forcing Windows to keep everything in much faster RAM all the time.

The problem with this logic is that it only really affects a single scenario: switching to an open application that you haven’t used in a while won’t ever grind the hard drive when the pagefile is disabled. It’s not going to actually make your PC faster, since Windows will never page the application you are currently working with anyway.

Disabling the Pagefile Can Lead to System Problems

The big problem with disabling your pagefile is that once you’ve exhausted the available RAM, your apps are going to start crashing, since there’s no virtual memory for Windows to allocate—and worst case, your actual system will crash or become very unstable. When that application crashes, it’s going down hard—there’s no time to save your work or do anything else.

In addition to applications crashing anytime you run up against the memory limit, you’ll also come across a lot of applications that simply won’t run properly if the pagefile is disabled. For instance, you really won’t want to run a virtual machine on a box with no pagefile, and some defrag utilities will also fail. You’ll also notice some other strange, indefinable behavior when your pagefile is disabled—in my experience, a lot of things just don’t always work right.

Less Space for File Buffers and SuperFetch

If you’ve got plenty of RAM in your PC, and your workload really isn’t that huge, you may never run into application crashing errors with the pagefile disabled, but you’re also taking away from memory that Windows could be using for read and write caching for your actual documents and other files. If your drive is spending a lot of time thrashing, you might want to consider increasing the amount of memory Windows uses for the filesystem cache, rather than disabling the pagefile.

Windows 7 includes a file caching mechanism called SuperFetch that caches the most frequently accessed application files in RAM so your applications will open more quickly. It’s one of the many reasons why Windows 7 feels so much more “snappy” than previous versions—and disabling the pagefile takes away RAM that Windows could be using for caching. Note: SuperFetch was actually introduced in Windows Vista.

Put the Pagefile on a Different Drive, Not Partition

The next piece of bad advice that you’ll see or hear from would-be system tweakers is to create a separate partition for your pagefile-which is generally pointless when the partition is on the same hard drive. What you should actually do is move your pagefile to a completely different physical drive to split up the workload.

What Size should my Pagefile Be?

Seems like every IT guy I’ve ever talked to has stated the “fact” that your pagefile needs to be 1.5 to 2x your physical RAM—so if you have a 4GB system, you should have an 8GB pagefile. The problem with this logic is that if you are opening 12 GB worth of in-use applications, your system is going to be extremely slow, and your hard drive is going to grind to the point where your PC will be fairly unusable. You simply will not increase or decrease performance by having a gigantic pagefile; you’ll just use up more drive space.

Mark Russinovich, the well-known Windows expert and author of the Sysinternals tools, says that if you want to optimize your pagefile size to fit your actual needs, you should follow a much different formula: The Minimum should be Peak Commit – Physical RAM, and the Maximum should be double that.

For example, if your system has 4GB of RAM and your peak memory usage was 5GB (including virtual memory), you should set your pagefile to at least 1GB and the maximum as 2GB to give you a buffer to keep you safe in case a RAM-hungry application needs it. If you have 8GB of RAM and a max 3GB of memory usage, you should still have a pagefile, but you would probably be fine with a 1 GB size. Note: If your system is configured for crash dumps you’ll need to have a larger pagefile or Windows won’t be able to write out the process memory in the event of a crash—though it’s not very useful for most end-users.

The other size-related advice is to set the minimum and maximum size as the same so you won’t have to deal with fragmentation if Windows increases the size of the pagefile. This advice is rather silly, considering that most defrag software will defragment the pagefile even if Windows increases the size, which doesn’t happen very often.

The Bottom Line: Should You Disable It?

As we’ve seen, the only tangible benefit of disabling the pagefile is that restoring minimized applications you haven’t used in a while is going to be faster. This comes at the price of not being able to actually use all your RAM for fear of your applications crashing and burning once you hit the limit, and experiencing a lot of weird system issues in certain applications.

The vast majority of users should never disable the pagefile or mess with the pagefile settings—just let Windows deal with the pagefile and use the available RAM for file caching, processes, and Superfetch. If you really want to speed up your PC, your best options are these:

On my Windows 7 system with 6GB of RAM and a Windows-managed pagefile, every application opens quickly, and even the applications I haven’t used in a while still open almost instantaneously. I’m regularly running it up to 80-90% RAM usage, with dozens of application windows open, and I don’t see a slowdown anywhere.

If you want to read more extremely detailed information about how virtual memory and your pagefile really work, be sure to check out Mark Russinovich’s article on the subject, which is where much of this information was sourced.


Don’t agree with my conclusions? Voice your opinion in the comments, or even better—run some benchmarks to prove your point.


The How-To Geek has tested pagefile settings extensively and thinks everybody should just upgrade to Windows 7 already. His geeky articles can be found daily here on Lifehacker, How-To Geek, and Twitter.