BlueStacks offering Android virtualization within Windows, harmony for one and all

It’d be too easy to simply describe BlueStack’s suddenly titillating software as Android’s Parallels for Windows, but really — why try to complicate things? Currently available only in test form, the program is designed to run a virtualized copy of Android atop a not-at-all-virtualized copy of Windows, and the implications could be far-reaching. According to a hands-on demonstration given to the folks at Slashgear, BlueStack’s software enables Android and Windows to share utilities and drivers; in other words, you can print something within Android via your Windows print driver, or make a call in Android’s Skype application via Microsoft’s VoIP drivers. We’re told that multitasking was smooth and succinct, and while there’s no access to the Android Market, test builds are including Amazon’s Appstore as an alternative. If all goes well, the company should let the code loose “later this year,” but it’s hard to say what kind of price tag (or stipulations) will be attached. Can’t think of a good reason to have Android and Windows living harmoniously? Here’s one. (Oh, and you’re welcome).

BlueStacks offering Android virtualization within Windows, harmony for one and all originally appeared on Engadget on Tue, 05 Apr 2011 08:21:00 EDT. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink Slashgear  |  sourceBluestacks  | Email this | Comments

Rent an iPad During Your Vacation to Madrid, Spain

A typical bar in Madrid. Photo Charlie Sorrel

Forget about buying travel guides. Why not rent an iPad for the duration of your vacation? If you’re going to Madrid, Spain, you can do exactly that. A company called Pad in the City will rent you a 3G iPad for €39 ($55) per day, with unlimited data and a bunch of handy travel apps preinstalled.

It works like this. You reserve the iPad ahead of time and, when you arrive at your hotel, apartment, airport, railway station, wherever, a courier will hand-deliver the iPad to you. He will check your ID, block a €500 deposit on your credit card and hand over the tablet. At the end of your stay, he’ll come back and collect the iPad and un-block the security deposit.

It’s a fantastic idea. An iPad is a really handy travel companion. I was in Madrid a few weeks back for a long weekend and used mine constantly. I live in Spain, though, so I have my own 3G contract, but for visitors this seems ideal. Apps include offline maps, subscriptions to the WSJ and other U.S rags, weather, Angry Birds (yes!), The Lonely Planet Guide to Madrid, car rental apps (hint — parking and traffic are a nightmare in Madrid), a unit converter, a metro map (use this) and more.

In fact, this service gives me an even better idea. What about a vending machine at the airport that will sell you a pre-pay micro SIM card for your iPad? That way you could take your own iPad on vacation and still have 3G. After all, the actual card costs the cellphone carrier almost nothing, and a vending machine is perfect to avoid pesky language barriers for tourists. Heck, if I was contractually allowed to ever leave my (admittedly comfy) blogging chair, I might even look into doing it myself.

Pad in the City [Pad in the City via Cult of Mac]

See Also:


Browser Comparison: Memory Usage, Speed, Acid 3 Test

This article was written on July 09, 2009 by CyberNet.

browser benchmarks.png

Ever since we did a browser comparison test last year there have been a lot of emails and comments asking if we were going to update the article to reflect new releases. I thought about adding in the new browsers as they came out, but decided against it for one reason or another. Instead I thought it would be better to just do a fresh article, and include even more stats than last time.

The main reason that I thought this was worthy of its own article was because a lot has changed in the last year. Since March 2008 we’ve seen major milestone releases from each of big browser makers, and to top it off Google Chrome has come onto the scene. These browsers have also shifted focus from adding nifty new features to diving deep into the code trying to squeeze out every last ounce of performance.

We’ve got a lot in store for you today ranging from JavaScript speed tests to memory usage comparisons, and we’ll even throw in some Acid 3 coverage. Lets go ahead and dive right in.

Notes about testing:

  • All of these tests were performed on the same Windows XP SP3 machine that is wired into a network to eliminate the effects of wireless disturbances.
  • All browsers started with a clean profile and no add-ons/extensions were installed.
  • All browser data, including caches, were cleared before each test was run.
  • Only one browser was open at a time, and no other applications (other than standard XP services) were running.
  • Internet Explorer 8 was used in the native rendering mode (“standards compliant mode”).
  • No plug-ins (Flash, Java, etc…) were installed on the machine to ensure that slow performance wasn’t due to the loading of a plug-in.

–JavaScript Tests–

The main speed test that everyone seems to use for JavaScript is SunSpider. Last year we compared the browsers with the SunSpider test prior to writing our first comparison, and so we wanted to try something different. That’s when we turned to the MooTools SlickSpeed Test. It tests various operations against a lot of common JavaScript libraries including MooTools and JQuery.

So which one did we go with this year? Well, we did both. We ran each test, SunSpider and SlickSpeed, a total of three times each. Then we averaged the results together to get the pretty little graphs you see below. For both of them the goal was for the browser to complete the tests as fast as possible, and so a lower number is better.

Sunspider Test:

sunspider test.png

  1. Safari 4: 603ms
  2. Google Chrome 3.0 Beta: 636ms
  3. Google Chrome 2.0: 720ms
  4. Firefox 3.5: 1278ms
  5. Opera 10 Beta: 2975ms
  6. Opera 9.64: 3931ms
  7. Internet Explorer 8: 5441ms

MooTools SlickSpeed Test:

mootools test.png

  1. Opera 10 Beta: 330ms
  2. Safari 4: 355ms
  3. Opera 9.64: 375ms
  4. Google Chrome 3.0 Beta: 464ms
  5. Firefox 3.5: 580ms
  6. Google Chrome 2.0: 763ms
  7. Internet Explorer 8: 1901ms

  

–Website Rendering Tests–

I used the same method for testing website load times as I did last year. It’s a website called Numion Stopwatch that uses some fancy JavaScript to monitor when a page has finished loading, and then spits out the amount of time it took to complete.

We used two extremely popular sites for these tests: ESPN and the Wall Street Journal. Each site was loaded up three times in each browser, and then the results were averaged together. Obviously we were targeting which browser could load the websites the fastest, and so a lower number is better:

ESPN Load Time:

espn load test.png

  1. Safari 4: 1.936 seconds
  2. Google Chrome 3.0 Beta: 2.194 seconds
  3. Firefox 3.5: 2.380 seconds
  4. Internet Explorer 8: 2.604 seconds
  5. Opera 10 Beta: 2.605 seconds
  6. Opera 9.64: 2.651 seconds
  7. Google Chrome 2.0: 2.873 seconds

Wall Street Journal Load Time:

wsj load test.png

  1. Google Chrome 3.0 Beta: 1.612 seconds
  2. Opera 10 Beta: 1.989 seconds
  3. Opera 9.64: 2.141 seconds
  4. Safari 4: 2.166 seconds
  5. Google Chrome 2.0: 2.552 seconds
  6. Firefox 3.5: 2.886 seconds
  7. Internet Explorer 8: 3.292 seconds

  

–Memory Usage Tests–

I’m sure this is what many of you were looking for. As geeks we like to have a lean browser that knows how to handle itself without us having to keep a watchful eye over it. That’s why we ran numerous different tests to see just how well a browser controls its memory usage when loading a decent number of sites, and also whether it’s able to release that memory once you’ve closed the tabs.

Here’s a rundown of the order in which we ran the tests to collect the stats:

  1. We started the browser, and took a memory usage reading.
  2. Loaded 10 predetermined sites in tabs, and took a memory usage reading after all the sites finished loading.
  3. Loaded 15 more predetermined sites in tabs (totaling 25 sites), and took a memory usage reading after all the sites finished loading.
  4. Let the browser sit for 10 minutes with the 25 tabs open, and then took a memory usage reading.
  5. Closed all the tabs except for Google.com, which was always the first site opened. Then we took a memory usage reading.

And here are the results. The best browser for each test is highlighted in green, and the worst is highlighted in red.

Startup10 Sites25 Sites25 Sites After 10 MinutesClose Tabs
Firefox 3.529.5MB63.2MB136.0MB135.8MB69.3MB
Google Chrome 2.029.2MB152.8MB279.9MB172.4MB56.9MB
Google Chrome 3.0 Beta39.5MB260.9MB389.4MB197.6MB53.7MB
Internet Explorer 837.0MB184.3MB400.8MB402.4MB67.6MB
Opera 9.6421.3MB62.2MB166.4MB151.6MB135.9MB
Opera 10 Beta25.5MB70.4MB175.0MB179.0MB186.2MB
Safari 428.5MB109.5MB231.2MB241.8MB198.4MB

  

–Acid 3 Tests–

Last year we also took a look at how the various browsers scored on the Acid 3 test. At the time a Safari nightly build was the closest to perfection by reaching a score of 86 out of 100. Today, however, is a different story. A few browsers can handle the test perfectly, some are very very close, and others (yeah, IE) have some work cut out for themselves.

Note: Click on any of the thumbnails for a full-size rendering.

  1. Safari 4 (100/100) – It gets a perfect score and renders everything correctly.
    safari 4 acid 3.jpg
  2. Opera 10 Beta (100/100) – It gets a perfect score and renders everything correctly.
    opera 10 acid 3.jpg
  3. Google Chrome 2.0 (100/100) – It gets a perfect score, but not all tests are executed successfully.
    Google Chrome 20 Acide 3.jpg
  4. Google Chrome 3.0 Beta (100/100) – It gets a perfect score, but not all tests are executed successfully.
    google chrome 30 acid 3.jpg
  5. Firefox 3.5 (93/100) – It gets a near perfect score.
    Firefox 35 Acid 3.jpg
  6. Opera 9.6 (85/100) – This is the oldest release we tested, and it comes as no surprise that it doesn’t pass the test. It should be noted that the next milestone, version 10, does pass the test perfectly as seen above.
    opera 9 acid 3.jpg
  7. Internet Explorer 8 (20/100) – While they still have a ways to go before they get a perfect, I do have to give them credit for at least making the image look halfway normal. You know what I’m talking about if you remember what IE7′s rendering of the Acid 3 test was like.
    ie8 acid 3.jpg

  

–Conclusion–

So which browser is the winner? I wouldn’t really say any of them outshine the others. The problem that we are going to face with performance tests from here on out is that the browsers will all come very close to each other in the standings… often within a fraction of a second from one another. As the browsers continue to get optimized we will see these times get even closer, and performance might become less of a concern which picking which one we want to use. So I’d say to pick the browser you feel the most comfortable with, because it’s getting hard to distinguish one browser from another when it comes to performance.

What’s your take on the stats? Anything stand out to you? Will you be switching browsers based upon anything you learned here?

Copyright © 2011 CyberNetNews.com

Related Posts:


Seagate ships GoFlex Slim portable drive

Seagate announces the availability of the 9mm-thick GoFlex Slim, the newest and thinnest member of its GoFlex portable-hard-drive family.

3D Tunes: My life as a virtual karaoke star

A real-world crooner sees what happens when she takes the virtual stage to perform Creedence Clearwater Revival. Note: even singing avatars get butterflies sometimes.

Seagate starts shipping pencil-thin $99 GoFlex Slim hard drive

Remember that 9mm 2.5-inch GoFlex external HDD that Seagate teased us with back at CES? You’re looking at it. The company has just gone official with the newly christened GoFlex Slim, a performance-oriented, multifaceted drive that’s slimmer than your mother’s last smartphone. The final product will boast USB 3.0 support, a 7200RPM drive (ours was 320GB), a three-year warranty and a price tag that’s still being determined. By the numbers, you’re looking at a pocketable drive weighing 0.356 pounds and measuring 4.91- x 3.07- x 0.354-inches, but due to the GoFlex attachment on the bottom, you’ll need the special SuperSpeed USB cable that Seagate includes in order to make contact. In our testing, it managed to transfer files at upwards of 40MB/sec when attached to a USB 3.0 system, which ain’t half bad for a drive that’s powered via USB and slimmer than a pencil. It’ll hit US retailers on August 5th, and at just $99, you know you’ll be picking up two just for kicks and giggles.

Update: Seagate just pinged us with a clarification; it’ll start shipping today!

Continue reading Seagate starts shipping pencil-thin $99 GoFlex Slim hard drive

Seagate starts shipping pencil-thin $99 GoFlex Slim hard drive originally appeared on Engadget on Tue, 05 Apr 2011 08:00:00 EDT. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink   |   | Email this | Comments

Sony’s Bloggie Duo HD camcorder ships this week for $170

Sony’s been mum on its Bloggie Duo HD for the better part of this year, teasing it once at CES and then crossing its fingers that we’d all come searching for it in Q2. Thankfully for those with chronic memory loss, we’ve got it on good authority that this very camcorder is all set to ship tomorrow. And by “good authority,” we mean a status update on Sony’s own e-shop. For those who’ve fallen behind, $169.99 grabs you a pocket-sized camcorder capable of logging two hours of HD video, a handful of 5 megapixel stills, a 2.7-inch LCD and an HDMI output. So, here’s the real question: violet, pink or green?

Continue reading Sony’s Bloggie Duo HD camcorder ships this week for $170

Sony’s Bloggie Duo HD camcorder ships this week for $170 originally appeared on Engadget on Tue, 05 Apr 2011 07:32:00 EDT. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink   |  sourceSony (1), (2)  | Email this | Comments

Toepener: Open Bathroom Door With Your Feet

The Toepener brings hygiene to any public restroom, no matter how disgusting

I’m about to tell you about what I do in public bathrooms. Don’t worry, though: its not gross or weird. I use my foot to open doors and to pop up toilet seats. And I never wash my hands in public restrooms — I just figure that everything in there is too dirty to touch.

As you can imagine, this makes things tricky, and gets me some weird looks. And sometimes, with heavy doors that need to be pulled, it’s impossible. And so I welcome the Toepener, a foot-friendly door handle which is mounted down near the floor so you never have to touch a wet, slimy, germ-infested handle ever again. You just hook it with your toe, pull, and then walk through the door. Simple.

Simple and amazingly obvious. Everywhere I see the Toepener mentioned, the writer remarks that this should be in every bathroom in the world. I agree — almost. It should be in every public bathroom in the world except those in Britain, where it would be wholly undeserved. The Brits, when they get drunk (which is every day) like nothing more than smashing up public bathrooms (I’m English, so bear with me here).

Come Saturday night, you can enjoy the sight of rolls of toilet paper stuffed into toilet bowls, floors slick with urine and water from faucets left running deliberately, cigarette butts everywhere* and all manner of hardware yanked from the walls. And that’s just in the Ladies’. Installing a Toepener in a pub toilet in Britain would be a great idea — right up until the first hooligan sees it, stamps on it, splits the door and spoils it for everyone else.

The Toepener is $50 (or £31, should you wish to flush your money down the toilet by buying one in the UK).

Toepener product page [Toepener via Oh Gizmo!]

*Perhaps, thanks to the ban on smoking in public places, the cigarettes are no longer a problem, but I doubt it.

See Also:


Dell’s 10-inch Windows 7 tablet staying hidden until fall

Dell’s Rosemount tablet is similar to the HP Slate in that it’s a 10-inch, business-centric Windows 7 tablet whose launch has been bumped back further than originally expected. To be clear, this isn’t an explicit delay, since Dell has never given official indication for when in 2011 it’ll launch the slate device, but a leaked tablet roadmap back in February suggested it would be with us in the warm and breezy days of June. Now, Forbes is reporting insider info that states the Rosemount won’t be hitting shops until fall, September at the earliest, meaning it’ll miss the back-to-school sales period but arrive with plenty of time for the holiday shopping rush. Let’s hope all this time taken leads to a finger-friendly software overlay for Windows 7 — we love the OS’ multivariate functionality but it was never designed for control with the imprecision of fleshy digits.

Dell’s 10-inch Windows 7 tablet staying hidden until fall originally appeared on Engadget on Tue, 05 Apr 2011 07:04:00 EDT. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink   |  sourceForbes  | Email this | Comments

App-Powered Car Service Leaves Cabs in the Dust

Uber CEO Travis Kalanick has a plan to make it easier to get a ride. Photo: Jon Snyder/Wired.com

It’s pouring outside, I have an appointment across town in 30 minutes, and my car’s in the shop. To make matters worse, the rain means all the cabs near me are already taken.

Desperate to hitch a ride, I launch the Uber app on my iPhone and tap a button to track my location. In four minutes, a black sedan pulls up to my house, and a driver opens the rear door, welcoming me in.

Fifteen minutes later, I arrive at my destination and step out of the car. I don’t have to hand over the $25 fare or tip, because I’ve already paid through the app. Yes, it was pricey, but it was worth it.

For me, Uber was simple: Request a ride, get in a car and go. But to get the car to my door, Uber’s system first had to crunch through an array of complex mathematical formulas created by its team of computer scientists, all in an attempt to solve a decades-old economics problem plaguing the cab industry: how to optimize driving routes — and provide enough cars — to pick up the most customers in the least amount of time.

“It’s really fun, sexy math,” says Travis Kalanick, Uber’s fearless CEO. He sounds cocky and self-assured, but without giving the impression that he’s trying to sell something. It’s math with real-world benefits, he explains.

“We are not just moving bits,” Kalanick said. “We’re moving people.”

Uber is not a cab business — the app hires luxury sedans — but it offers a compelling alternative to the traditional cab. The cab business is ruthless for everyone, especially the drivers. In order to legally drive a cab, every driver in most American cities must display a “medallion,” a city-issued badge that permits him or her to pick up people on the street when they wave their hands.

For about 80 years, cities’ transportation agencies have enforced the medallion system to regulate the quantity and quality of cabs zooming up and down the streets. The problem is, in most cities, the number of medallions has remained stagnant even as human population and traffic balloon.

Because of the limited number of medallions, the competition among drivers for obtaining a medallion is fierce. Cab drivers camp on waiting lists for nearly 20 years just to grab a badge. Once you’ve got one, the potential payoff is big: Some medallion owners auction off their badges for as much as $600,000 apiece, while others lease their medallions to cab drivers for $100 to $200 per shift.

And because a city’s cab supply is scarce, the competition for hailing a cab on the street is likewise intense, especially on a night like New Year’s Eve, or the minute the bars shout, “Last call!”

With technology, Uber offers an app-powered car service that helps drivers earn money outside the medallion system, which amounts to more vehicles to fill more people.

A startup based in downtown San Francisco, Uber launched in June 2010. The startup has partnered with dozens of sedan services to hire their drivers and hook them up with iPhones containing the Uber drivers’ app. Uber customers can hire drivers using the Uber app available on both iPhone and Android, or anybody with a cellphone can hail an Uber car by sending a text message containing the pick-up address to Uber’s number. Once riders make a request, they receive an ETA from the driver.

When a driver receives a request, it appears on his iPhone, along with GPS coordinates of the rider. From here on, riders can call the driver if they need to make any special requests. Customers are required to enter their credit card information through the Uber app or website prior to requesting a car, so when they step out, there’s no need to yank out their wallets. Riders can rate their drivers with a rating of 1 to 5, so if someone reports a negative experience, Uber can discipline (or fire) delinquent drivers.

Uber so far is only deployed in San Francisco, but over 10,000 customers have registered for the service already. The service will become available in New York “very soon,” according to Kalanick.

There’s no charge for the app, but customers pay a premium each time they book an Uber car — about 40 percent more than a regular cab fare.

To justify the premium, Uber guarantees that anybody who asks for a ride will get a car in a timely manner no matter what. Morevoer, Kalanick promises, the entire experience will be “über.”

“We want a more über experience,” Kalanick said. “Giving somebody you don’t know your credit card is not uber.”

The trick is, it’s not easy being “über.” It takes some really complicated math.