ASUS ARES cries havoc, lets slip the GPUs of war: a review roundup of the world’s fastest graphics card

When you name your graphics card after the God of War, you’d better hope it brings some heat, but judging by early reviews, that’s just what ASUS has done. The three slot monstrosity above is the ARES, a $1200 limited edition, fully custom board, sporting twin Radeon HD 5870 GPUs, four gigabytes of GDDR5 memory and practically enough raw copper to smelt a sword. We’re not joking: the thing weighs nearly five pounds and requires a 750 watt power supply with three power connectors (two 8-pin, one 6-pin) to even run. Of course, you’re getting a graphical behemoth for that kind of price, steamrolling every other GPU on the planet — paired with even a 3.8GHz Core i7-930 CPU in 3DMark Vantage (on Extreme settings), Overclock 3D racked up a fairly ludicrous 15,000 score, and the card ripped past 25,000 with a Core i7-980X and a second ARES in CrossFire. The card was less impressive in actual gameplay, merely spanking the (much cheaper) Radeon 5970 and GeForce GTX 480 by a modest amount, and several reviewers complained it was fairly loud… but as the old adage goes, nobody needs a Ferrari to drive the speed limit, but we’ll all drool over them anyhow. Bring on the liquid nitrogen, folks.

Read – Legit Reviews
Read – Overclock3D
Read – Guru3D
Read – PC Perspective
Read – TechPowerUp

ASUS ARES cries havoc, lets slip the GPUs of war: a review roundup of the world’s fastest graphics card originally appeared on Engadget on Thu, 08 Jul 2010 03:09:00 EDT. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink   |   | Email this | Comments

Android 2.2 (Froyo) versus iOS 4: the browser showdown (video)

A little while back Google boldly claimed that Froyo would have the world’s fastest mobile browser, but the lack of final software back then meant we’d had to tie up our itchy hands until now. And boy, it sure looks like it was worth the wait — Ars Technica’s JavaScript benchmarks show that not only is Froyo’s browser almost three times faster than its Éclair counterpart, but it also beats iOS 4’s Safari by at least two-fold. That said, numbers alone don’t always reflect real-life performance — especially with Froyo supporting iPhone’s much-missed Flash — so we went ahead and conducted our own browser speed test. Read on for our videos and results after the jump.

Update: for those who were concerned about the battery affecting the Nexus One’s performance, we did use Android System Info to verify that the CPU was still clocked at 1GHz. We were also able to reproduce the same results with a full battery. Either way, it’s still a win for Android.

Continue reading Android 2.2 (Froyo) versus iOS 4: the browser showdown (video)

Android 2.2 (Froyo) versus iOS 4: the browser showdown (video) originally appeared on Engadget on Wed, 07 Jul 2010 13:56:00 EDT. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink   |   | Email this | Comments

TweakTown slathers four Radeon HD 5870s in liquid nitrogen, crushes some benchmarks (video)

The PC hardware community recently discovered that quad-SLI was a huge waste of cash, so when we heard that TweakTown were stringing together four Radeon HD 5870s in a similar CrossFireX configuration, we figured they were about to throw away their time, too. Boy, were we wrong, because the hardware site never intended to seriously benchmark the rig as a viable gaming PC — their intent was to make our jaws drop, and right now they’re somewhere around our ankles. The contraption brought 3DMark03 to its knees with a soul-shattering score of 200,000 and achieved average framerates approaching a ludicrous four digits in Devil May Cry 4. How? Liquid nitrogen, of course. By attaching LN2-filled copper pots to each of the four already-powerful graphics cards and physically tacking on extra capacitors to direct the voltage, they bumped the Core i7-980X CPU clock to 5.8GHz and each GPU to 1250MHz, in what we think you’ll agree is a healthy jump from 3.06 3.33GHz and 850MHz, respectively. Watch them build the mean machine after the break, and remember kids, don’t try this at home.

Update: The Core i7-980X runs at 3.33GHz, or 3.6GHz in Turbo Mode, not 3.06GHz. Our bad!

Continue reading TweakTown slathers four Radeon HD 5870s in liquid nitrogen, crushes some benchmarks (video)

TweakTown slathers four Radeon HD 5870s in liquid nitrogen, crushes some benchmarks (video) originally appeared on Engadget on Fri, 28 May 2010 13:31:00 EDT. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink   |  sourceTweakTown  | Email this | Comments

OCZ Enyo USB 3.0 SSD gets reviewed: seductively speedy

OCZ’s Enyo USB 3.0 portable SSD is still a fortnight or so away from hitting typical sales channels, but that hasn’t stopped PC Perspective from picking one up via alternative means and putting it through its paces. We already knew that this would easily be the sexiest USB 3.0 SSD to hit the streets this year (okay, so we’re assuming, but we’re willing to bet a handful of Microsoft Points!), but now we know it’ll also be one of the fastest. When tested alongside a USB 3.0 Super Talent thumb drive in a reasonably potent Core i7 desktop, critics found that read / write performance was downright stunning, with sustained read speeds hitting 195MB/sec and write speeds reaching as high as 220MB/sec. ‘Course, the lofty price means that this beaut couldn’t be recommended to all, but it’s certainly nice to have the option if you’re still looking for ways to spend that tax refund check. Video’s after the break, y’all.

Continue reading OCZ Enyo USB 3.0 SSD gets reviewed: seductively speedy

OCZ Enyo USB 3.0 SSD gets reviewed: seductively speedy originally appeared on Engadget on Mon, 24 May 2010 06:22:00 EDT. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink   |  sourcePC Perspective  | Email this | Comments

Google Chrome: faster than a flying potato

Google’s never been shy to make claims that Chrome is the fastest browser on the planet, but it’s truly pulled out all the stops to drive that point home for its latest beta. Rather than rely on some simple benchmarks, Google decided to test Chome against some other things that are fast — namely, a potato cannon, sound waves, and lightning. We won’t spoil all the surprise for you, but you can rest assured that Chrome comes out looking pretty good, and that everything else gets a little messy. Head on past the break to check out the speed tests for yourself, as well as the requisite making-of video.

Continue reading Google Chrome: faster than a flying potato

Google Chrome: faster than a flying potato originally appeared on Engadget on Wed, 05 May 2010 16:36:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink   |  sourceGoogle Chrome Blog  | Email this | Comments

SandForce makes SSDs cheaper, faster, more reliable — just how IBM likes it

SandForce makes SSDs cheaper, faster, more reliable -- just how IBM likes itWe’ve been covering the progression of SandForce for over a year now, creator of smart SSD processors that extend the life of flash storage by better spreading writes across them, boosting performance and reliability along the way. This, according to the company, makes them reliable enough for enterprise use, and IBM has added its vote of support, configuring a 9189 Power 780 server with 56 177GB SSDs (10.5TB in all) sitting behind SandForce’s SF-1500 processor. That combination, when running the TPC-C benchmark, delivered a performance of 150,000 transactions per minute per CPU core. That’s 50 percent higher (per-core) than other entries in the TPC-C benchmark — and considerably cheaper, too. IBM’s configuration is set to be available around October of this year, perhaps ushering in a new era of the platter-free enterprise.

SandForce makes SSDs cheaper, faster, more reliable — just how IBM likes it originally appeared on Engadget on Mon, 03 May 2010 09:56:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink StorageReview.com, The Wall Street Journal  |  sourceTPC-C Result Highlights  | Email this | Comments

OCZ’s Agility 2 SSD reviewed: despite limits, SandForce SF-1200 drive performs well

Contrary to popular belief, one solid state drive isn’t the same as another solid state drive necessarily. OCZ‘s new Agility 2 is proof of that, boasting the final (v3.0.5) version of SandForce’s SF-1200 firmware. The issue here is that Corsair’s recently released Force series of SSDs are shipping (and continue to ship) with v3.0.1 installed, which — according to SandForce — will never be viewed as the final version ready for mass consumption. As the story goes, v3.0.1 may experience a reliability issue with a power management state, but v3.0.5 caps small file random write performance as to better separate the SF-1200 drives from the pricier SF-1500 drives. Our compadres over at AnandTech were able to put the (factory limited) Agility 2 SSD through its paces, and for the most part, it came out looking pretty decent. Critics found 5- to 10-percent performance gains when compared to Intel / Indilinx offerings, but unless you have to have the absolute best, paying extra for that bump may not be the most intelligent move. The other point here is that while the Agility 2 may be capped with the v3.0.5 firmware, at least its upgrade path is a lot clearer than the aforementioned Force; if you ever take v3.0.1 away from that unit, you can kiss that extra performance goodbye. Hit the source link for the full, drama-filled look.

OCZ’s Agility 2 SSD reviewed: despite limits, SandForce SF-1200 drive performs well originally appeared on Engadget on Mon, 26 Apr 2010 18:44:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink   |  sourceAnandTech  | Email this | Comments

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480 set up in 3-way SLI, tested against Radeon HD 5870 and 5970

Not many mortals will ever have to worry about choosing between a three-way GeForce GTX 480 SLI setup, an equally numerous Radeon HD 5870 array, or a dual-card HD 5970 monstrosity, but we know plenty of people would care about who the winner might be. Preliminary notes here include the fun facts that a 1 Kilowatt PSU provided insufficient power for NVIDIA’s hardware, while the mighty Core i7-965 test bench CPU proved to be a bottleneck in some situations. Appropriately upgraded to a six-core Core i7-980X and a 1,200W power supply, the testers proceeded to carry out the sacred act of benchmarking the snot out of these superpowered rigs. We won’t spoil the final results of the bar chart warfare here, but rest assured both camps score clear wins in particular games and circumstances. The source link shall reveal all.

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480 set up in 3-way SLI, tested against Radeon HD 5870 and 5970 originally appeared on Engadget on Tue, 20 Apr 2010 04:16:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink   |  sourceHardware.info  | Email this | Comments

2TB hard drive review roundup: Samsung, Seagate and WD throw down

It’s a 2TB world, folks, and if you’re looking to select a new drive to archive your upcoming vacation footage, you owe it to yourself to do a little research before pulling the trigger. Currently, 2TB options are on the market from Seagate, Western Digital and Samsung, and while all are in the 3.5-inch SATA form factor, they certainly aren’t equal. The benchmarking gurus over at Hot Hardware decided to toss no fewer than ten 2TB drives into the mix, and after running 250 or so tests, they found that WD’s RE4 2TB came out on top. ‘Course, that just so happens to be the most expensive platter in the bunch, checking in at around $0.16 per gigabyte; the admittedly slower Caviar Green 2TB and Seagate Barracuda LP 2TB both came in at less than half of that. Go on and give that source link a look if you’re into bar charts and in-depth analysis of bits and bytes — and remember, friends don’t let friends buy lousy storage.

2TB hard drive review roundup: Samsung, Seagate and WD throw down originally appeared on Engadget on Fri, 16 Apr 2010 13:19:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink   |  sourceHot Hardware  | Email this | Comments

MacBook Pro 15-inch Core i7 Benchmarked: It’s So Fast [Benchmarks]

The new 17 and 15-inch MacBook Pros with Core i5/i7 processors are fast. Fast. Overall I’d say they’re about 50% faster than the last gen Core 2 Duos, which is about the same bump the iMacs got with Core i7. More »