How-to: figure out the best value iPhone 4 contracts in the UK

Choices, choices. Do you get the 16GB or 32GB iPhone 4? The black one now or the white one a little later? We can’t tell you which variant of Apple’s next phone will hold its value best over the coming months, but we can try to clear up a bit of the fogginess surrounding price plans on offer from UK networks. Orange and O2 are the first to drop handset pricing and full contract details, but they haven’t made it easy for the discerning buyer, with each carrier offering more than a dozen options. Vodafone, T-Mobile, Three, and even Tesco Mobile are set to follow suit in the coming days and weeks, but we thought we’d get the ball rolling with the pair we have now.

P.S. — And just as we publish this, Voda has gone official with its tariffs. We’ve now broken them down into a more digestible format as well. Just for you.

Continue reading How-to: figure out the best value iPhone 4 contracts in the UK

How-to: figure out the best value iPhone 4 contracts in the UK originally appeared on Engadget on Fri, 18 Jun 2010 06:49:00 EDT. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink   |   | Email this | Comments

iPad still has a major browser vulnerability, says group behind AT&T security breach

You know that tiny little security snafu that allowed over a hundred thousand iPad users’ email addresses out? The one that the FBI felt compelled to investigate? Well, Goatse Security — the group that discovered that particular hole (stop laughing) — isn’t best pleased to be described as malicious by AT&T’s response to the matter, and has requited with its own missive to the world. Letting us know that the breach in question took “a single hour of labor,” the GS crew argues that AT&T is glossing over the fact it neglected to address the threat promptly and is using the hackers’ (supposedly altruistic) efforts at identifying bugs as a scapegoat.

As illustration, they remind us that the iPad is still wide open to hijacking thanks to a bug in the mobile version of Safari. Identified back in March, this exploit allows hackers to jack in via unprotected ports, and although it was fixed on the desktop that same month, the mobile browser remains delicately poised for a backdoor entry — should malevolent forces decide to utilize it. This casts quite the unfavorable light on Apple as well, with both corporations seemingly failing to communicate problematic news with their users in a timely manner.

iPad still has a major browser vulnerability, says group behind AT&T security breach originally appeared on Engadget on Tue, 15 Jun 2010 05:43:00 EDT. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink   |  sourceCNN  | Email this | Comments

Sprint fires employee who leaked weak EVO 4G sales numbers

You know the backstory by now: Sprint boasted that the EVO 4G was its fastest selling phone ever a couple of days after hitting the American market, before abruptly correcting itself and admitting that the EVO’s sales were in fact in line with those achieved by the Pre last summer. What you, and we, didn’t know till now, however, is that Sprint’s self-correction was sparked off by an employee with a curious mind and posting privileges over on the xda-developers forum. On June 6, according to MobileCrunch, this unnamed hero of truthiness browsed Sprint’s internal inventory system and nailed down a figure of 65,500 sold units from Sprint’s own stores — a stat far south from what Sprint would announce a day later. That number ultimately found its way onto the message board, and though it obviously shouldn’t be taken as authoritative (or exhaustive), it was enough to get Sprint to hit the auto-correct button and part ways with the activist member of staff. Harsh.

[Thanks, Carol]

Sprint fires employee who leaked weak EVO 4G sales numbers originally appeared on Engadget on Mon, 14 Jun 2010 19:14:00 EDT. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink   |  sourceMobileCrunch  | Email this | Comments

‘iPhone vs Android’ report finds Apple has three times Google’s market share

It’s oftentimes easy for us to get swept up in Android mania and forget that Google’s mobile platform is still in its infancy. Then we get cold hard numbers like these — showing iPhone OS owning 28 percent of the US smartphone market and closing in on RIM’s leading 35 percent — and we face up to the realization that Android handsets still account for less than one in every ten smartphones owned by Americans today. In spite of collecting 28 percent of all consumer smartphone purchases in the first quarter of 2010 (according to NPD), Google’s OS was only able to climb up a couple of percentage points in terms of total market share, showing just how long a road lies ahead of its world-conquering plans. Guess that now explains why Apple’s response to the earlier numbers was so nonchalant.

Other intriguing figures include a high rate of loyalty among iPhone OS and Android users, with 80 percent of the former and 70 percent of the latter expressing a preference for the same OS in their next phone — both rather shaming Microsoft and RIM’s numbers, which were a mediocre 34 and 47 percent, respectively. Funnily enough, despite its inflammatory title, this report finds Android and iPhone users are more similar to each other than anyone else — an uncomfortable fact for both parties to deal with, we’re sure. The source link contains some more demographic comparisons, so why not go check them out and drop some sage analysis for us in the comments?

‘iPhone vs Android’ report finds Apple has three times Google’s market share originally appeared on Engadget on Sat, 05 Jun 2010 15:34:00 EDT. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink CNET  |  sourceNielsen  | Email this | Comments

Hey, AT&T! We Want Rollover Bytes [At&t]

AT&T killed all-you-can-eat wireless data. Which sadly was inevitable. But if I’m paying for bytes like I do for minutes, why don’t I get rollover data, too? More »

What ATT’s Limited Data Plans Mean for You


AT&T’s all-you-can-eat data plan died Wednesday, and plenty of wireless customers mourned over their loss. But is it really a big deal? It depends on the type of data consumer you are.

The new tiered pricing structure gives AT&T customers the following options:

  1. 200 MB for $15 per month. If you exceed the limit, AT&T will charge $15 extra in units of 200 MB.
  2. 2 GB for $25 per month. If you surpass this limit, you can pay an extra $10 per extra gigabyte.
  3. Current smartphone users can continue their unlimited data for $30 per month — but if they switch to one of the cheaper plans, they can’t go back to unlimited.
  4. To tether your smartphone to a computer, you must use the 2-GB, $25 plan, and pay an extra $20 for the tethering privilege.

For some, these changes stink. For others, it won’t affect their lives much. Which plan is right for you? Let’s break down the options.

Current AT&T smartphone users

In a poll Wired.com conducted Wednesday, 73 percent of 11,000 survey takers reported data usage under 2 GB. A Consumer Reports study also found that the average iPhone user consumes 273 MB of data per month, while a measly 4 percent consume an average of 1 GB per month. It’s safe to say that the majority of customers can confidently subscribe to the 2-GB plan. Keep in mind you have the option to jump between the two limited plans — so, if you find you’re using less than 200 MB, you can switch to that $15 plan instead.

If you haven’t checked out your average usage to determine where you stand, follow the steps laid out in our poll article Wednesday.

Data “hogs”

As for the remaining 27 percent of our survey takers who reported data usage exceeding 2 GB: If you’re already on AT&T, stick with your current unlimited plan. AT&T designed these plans to deal with data hogs, just as AT&T’s Ralph De La Vega warned last year. If you opt for the 2-GB plan, you’re going to be paying at least $35 per month ($25 plus $10 for each extra GB), or possibly much more if your usage goes into many gigabytes.

If you’re not yet an AT&T customer and you plan to gorge a ton of data, you have the option to adjust your behavior to avoid excessive fees by handling more of your data-heavy tasks over Wi-Fi rather than 3G. Or stick with your current carrier.

3G iPad owners

The changes in data plans are most frustrating for 3G iPad customers. The device launched in April with an option to buy unlimited data with no contract commitment for just $30 a month. If you’ve already activated your account with unlimited data, you can continue using it, but here’s the kicker: If you choose not to use 3G data for a single month, you’re booted out of that unlimited plan forever. So essentially AT&T is bullying you into activating unlimited every month if you want to keep using it.

Still, as with smartphones, your course of action depends on your average data usage. The iPad is a tad too new to gather hard data for average usage, but currently we think the device is being used more in living rooms over Wi-Fi connections. So the 2-GB cap might not be too stifling for most iPad customers.

We recommend against the 200 MB plan for iPad customers. The apps and media you stream to the iPad will be bigger in file size than those of a smartphone, so 200 MB can be exceeded easily, even if you only use 3G lightly. Better to pay the $25 for 2 GB rather than $30 after exceeding the 200-MB cap.

If you’re a rebellious 3G iPad customer who also owns a smartphone, you have the option of paying nothing at all for iPad data. Jailbreaking the iPhone enables you to tether it to the iPad, and there are likely similar utilities for other AT&T smartphones, as well. However, keep in mind that jailbreaking an iPhone can void your warranty, and Apple has claimed hacking the handset results in security and performance issues.

Tethering customers

AT&T’s tethering option is indisputably a raw deal. After paying $25 for 2 GB of data, you have to drop an extra $20 each month just to activate tethering. What’s lame is that that extra $20 doesn’t give you an extra data plan; you’re pulling from the same data as your overall usage even when untethered. As GDGT’s Ryan Block said, it’s as if Comcast charged you an extra $20 a month to use your Wi-Fi router.

If you’re really eager to use your phone as a wireless modem, you’re going to be adding upward of $45 a month to your wireless bill. If you’re cringing at the idea, there are alternatives to tethering: Standalone devices such as Verizon’s Mi-Fi and Sprint’s Overdrive will give you a portable Wi-Fi hotspot you can take anywhere. But then you’re talking about a separate data contract with another carrier.

Going forward

The tech industry is making a big move into “cloud” computing, where data is stored on the internet instead of on your own devices. Apple is rumored to be planning a reboot of iTunes that involves streaming media. Therefore, it’s conceivable that data usage will increase as more of our media is stored online, but it’s unclear just how much. For music, LA Times writer Mark Milian points out that you’d need to stream about four hours of Pandora every day to hit that 2-gig monthly limit. (That’s quite a lot of tunes over a month.) But Wired’s Eliot Van Buskirk on Wednesday noted that many cloud services, such as Rhapsody and Spotify, allow you to also store songs for offline listening.

Streaming video is poised to play a bigger role in the near future, with phones such as the HTC Evo 4G and the next-gen iPhone (if the final product is mostly the same as the prototype) sporting front-facing cameras. And let’s not forget about already-popular services like Netflix streaming or YouTube. People who are especially interested in streaming video are going to be the biggest victims. (If you’re a current video-savvy customer with an unlimited plan, don’t ever leave it.)

Still, even as networks become faster and coverage increases, we think in the next five to 10 years people are going to prefer handling their media in a combination of offline and online environments — not only because networks are consistently imperfect, but also for reasons such as privacy and native performance. Whenever a company takes something away from you, it inevitably amounts to outrage. But in the near term, we think most will enjoy the benefit of paying less for just the right amount of data, while heavier data users pay more.

See Also:

Photo: Jon Snyder/Wired.com


Google to disclose WiFi snooping data to regulators amid allegations it was collected intentionally

And the mess gets messier. A class action lawsuit filed against Google in Oregon has now been enriched with the allegation that Google willfully collected personal data with its Street View cars, rather than doing so accidentally, as it claims. It’s a bold accusation, whose primary basis is a patent application, filed by Google in November 2008, for a “computer-implemented method of estimating the location of a wireless device.” A subsidiary claim references the “obtaining [of] one or more packets of data transmitted” from one wireless device to another to help estimate accuracy of location results. That’s the supposedly damning verbiage that shows Google intentionally created WiFi-snooping software, and it’s also what’s being relied on to show that Mountain View couldn’t have been ignorant of the data collection going on. Yes, it’s quite a stretch, but that’s what lawyers are for: mental gymnastics.

Over in Europe, Google is doing its best to placate local regulators, some of whom are contemplating criminal charges against the multinational company, by agreeing to hand over all data that was collected by its vehicles. France, Germany and Spain will be first to peruse the info, though presumably there’ll be an open door to other nosy governments as well. Doesn’t that strike you as weird — having your private data protected by letting a bunch more people look at it?

Google to disclose WiFi snooping data to regulators amid allegations it was collected intentionally originally appeared on Engadget on Fri, 04 Jun 2010 07:33:00 EDT. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink   |  sourceWall Street Journal, Wired  | Email this | Comments

ATT’s Limited Data: Should You Care? Vote in Our Poll


AT&T this morning announced that its unlimited data plan is being discontinued for new subscribers. (Can’t say we didn’t warn you.) Some people are outraged about the new caps. But we’re betting most people won’t care.

First, the basics: The new un-unlimited data plans offers options of 200 MB for $15 a month and 2 GB for $25 a month. If 2 GB ain’t enough, you can tack an extra $10 to your bill for every extra gig.

Keep in mind that if you’re already a current AT&T smartphone user (that includes whiny iPhone customers), your unlimited data plan is still available. These changes only directly apply to brand new AT&T smartphone users, who no longer get the option of unlimited data. Current AT&T customers can opt for the cheaper limited plans as well, but be careful: Once you switch, you can’t go back to the unlimited plan.

Here’s why we think this isn’t a big deal. Even the biggest nerds we know barely ever surpass 300 megabytes a month. So 2GB is probably more than you’ll ever need — and it costs less than the current $30 unlimited data plan. We’ve criticized AT&T on a number of occasions in the past, but we think these new options are beneficial for the vast majority of wireless customers.

Don’t believe us? Check out your data usage for the past six months, like so:
1.) Visit wireless.att.com and log in to your account;
2.) Under the “My Current Usage” screen, click “View Past Data Usage”
3.) In the “Report” field select “Data Usage Trend” and check out that snazzy bar graph.

After you do that, average your results for the past six months and vote in our poll. Just how much data do you use? My monthly average for the past half year is 267 MB, meaning I’m most likely going to be switching to the $25 a month plan and saving some bucks.

UPDATE: If you use more than 4 GB per month, let us know in the comments how you do it. Because, frankly, we’re not believing the early returns, which show more than 20 percent of respondents fall in this category.


AT&T users can keep $30 unlimited data when upgrading phones… unless they want tethering

There’s naturally been a ton of feedback in the past few hours on AT&T’s new data pricing strategy, and the company has been responding to comments all morning over on its Facebook page; one of the key tidbits that’s come out of the discussion so far is that folks on the current $30 smartphone data plan will be able to keep that plan when upgrading hardware. Translation: yes, you’ll be able to get a new iPhone without switching to the $25 / 2GB DataPro plan if you so choose. What you won’t be able to do, though, is keep the $30 plan and add on the $20 tethering option — tethering specifically requires DataPro, so your hopes and dreams of a soft 5GB cap are quashed (unless you want to pay $30 for 3GB of overage, of course).

On a related note, we’ve been tipped that some folks’ iPad orders from Apple have been pushed back to June 7 — an interesting coincidence, considering that’s when DataPlus and DataPro go live. If true, it’s likely so that Apple can pre-install new orders with updated software for managing the new plans, but it’s also a preemptive strike against a horde of people trying to grandfather into the $30 plan over the next few days.

[Thanks, John and Aaron]

AT&T users can keep $30 unlimited data when upgrading phones… unless they want tethering originally appeared on Engadget on Wed, 02 Jun 2010 12:56:00 EDT. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink MacDaddyNews  |  sourceFacebook (via AT&T)  | Email this | Comments

AT&T Just Killed Unlimited Wireless Data (and Screwed Everybody in the Process) [At&t]

Unlimited, all-you-can-eat wireless data was a beautiful thing for Apple devices on AT&T, delivering streams of Pandora, YouTube videos, a million tweets, and hundreds of webpages without worry. And now it’s dead. More »