Apple patent application reveals an LCD with switchable, privacy-protecting viewing angles

Don’t you hate it when the guy next to you on the subway is looking over your shoulder, watching you screw up in Fruit Ninja? Well, Apple could have predicted your discomfort — back in November 2009, before the iPad was anything more than a unicorn, the company applied for a patent on an LCD display with adjustable viewing angles, explicitly designed to “shield the display away from unintended viewers.” According to the filing, the display would include steering modules made of liquid crystal material, which aim the so-called scattering modules that sit on top of them. The top layer then redirects the light, making it possible to narrow down and alter the viewing angle. The patent specifically calls out cellphones and laptops, paving the way for discreet displays on MacBooks and iPhones, though the broad phrase “other portable electronic devices” leaves plenty of room for iPads and iPod Touches. No word, of course, on when or if Apple will secure this patent and if so, what devices might incorporate such screens. We may just be seeing this concept go public now, but it seems consumers could use this even more today than they did back in the fall of ’09, when all they had to worry about was a stranger squinting at their 3GS’ 3.5-inch screen.

Continue reading Apple patent application reveals an LCD with switchable, privacy-protecting viewing angles

Apple patent application reveals an LCD with switchable, privacy-protecting viewing angles originally appeared on Engadget on Sun, 22 May 2011 05:48:00 EDT. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink Electronista  |  sourceUSPTO  | Email this | Comments

Why Apple is trademarking Thunderbolt and why Sony might be left out

Apple Thunderbolt


Thunderbolt
(formerly known as Light Peak) may have been developed by Intel, but it’s Apple that’s been snatching up all the trademark glory. The company first filed in November of 2010 in Jamaica, then followed up in February of this year by securing the rights to the name in Canada, before registering similar claims in Europe, China, and now the US. This raised some interesting questions about Intel’s claim to be the exclusive trademark holder (see the more coverage link) and whether or not other companies would be able to use the Thunderbolt brand. Intrigued, we did a little digging and you’ll find what we uncovered after the break.

Continue reading Why Apple is trademarking Thunderbolt and why Sony might be left out

Why Apple is trademarking Thunderbolt and why Sony might be left out originally appeared on Engadget on Sat, 21 May 2011 12:00:00 EDT. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink MacRumors, Patently Apple (1), (2), (3)  |   | Email this | Comments

Screen Grabs: The Mentalist takes the iPad to new heights

Screen Grabs chronicles the uses (and misuses) of real-world gadgets in today’s movies and TV. Send in your sightings (with screen grab!) to screengrabs at engadget dot com.

Well, it sure looks like The Mentalist went all out for its season finale, stacking not one, not two, but five iPads on top of each other in some sort of makeshift surveillance system (with an extra one the desk for good measure). Apparently, the show had a shocking twist ending when it was revealed that the surveillance cameras being monitored were actually in the Big Brother house.

[Thanks, Tim]

Screen Grabs: The Mentalist takes the iPad to new heights originally appeared on Engadget on Fri, 20 May 2011 17:28:00 EDT. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink   |   | Email this | Comments

Gadget Lab Podcast: PlayStation Phone, Android Hacks, Mac Malware

          

In this week’s Gadget Lab podcast, the crew talks shop about the new PlayStation phone, a popular Android mod, a lame patent troll exploiting app programmers and the state of Macintosh viruses.

Mike Isaac kicks off the show with his take on Sony-Ericsson’s Xperia Play, an Android phone with a built-in game controller and software for playing PlayStation games. It’s a pretty rad device.

Also in the Android world, Cyanogen has been a popular modification for 32 different Android devices. It’s an easy-to-install mod that unlocks new capabilities for Android, such as changing wallpapers or enabling free tethering.

Moving into the Apple universe, I talk about a patent firm that’s threatening to sue several independent iPhone app programmers if they don’t pay him a licensing fee for a patent he owns. The technology? Using an Upgrade button in software. Sounds pretty slimy.

We wrap up the podcast with a look at Mac security. A new Trojan horse called Mac Defender has recently fooled hundreds of customers, and we discuss whether this means Mac customers need to start installing antivirus software by default, like Windows users do.

Like the show? You can also get the Gadget Lab video podcast on iTunes, or if you don’t want to be distracted by our unholy on-camera talent, check out the Gadget Lab audio podcast. Prefer RSS? You can subscribe to the Gadget Lab video or audio podcast feeds.
Or listen to the audio right here:
http://downloads.wired.com/podcasts/assets/gadgetlabaudio/GadgetLabAudio0115.mp3
Gadget Lab audio podcast #115


iPhone Customer Sues AT&T Over ‘Rigged’ Data Charges

AT&T last year discontinued unlimited data plans for iPhones and transitioned to a tiered pricing structure. Photo: Jon Snyder/Wired.com

An iPhone customer has filed a lawsuit against AT&T, claiming that the telecom company is overcharging him for data services.

Filed by Patrick Hendricks in the Northern District of California, the lawsuit seeks class-action status, alleging that AT&T is committing unlawful and fraudulent business practices by regularly overbilling customers for data transactions.

“AT&T’s billing system for iPhone and iPad data transactions is like a rigged gas pump that charges for a full gallon when it pumps only nine-tenths of a gallon into your car’s tank,” the complaint says (pdf).

This lawsuit emerges as the broadband industry gradually shifts toward limited data plans, putting a price on a fixed amount of internet usage. In recent years, AT&T, Comcast and multiple small internet service providers abandoned unlimited data plans in favor of tiered pricing structures.

Wired.com’s Ryan Singel, who has extensively reported on the broadband industry, says the reasoning behind the shift to capped data is not to reduce costs — bandwidth costs are extremely low and keep decreasing — but rather to mitigate network congestion due to limited infrastructure.

AT&T in June 2010 transitioned to tiered data pricing for the iPhone, and Hendricks’ lawsuit suggests that AT&T exploits limited data plans by charging for invisible data transmissions that aren’t visible to the customer.

Hendricks’ lawyers claim that they consulted an independent firm that conducted a two-month study with iPads and iPhones and found that AT&T was overstating web server traffic by 7 to 14 percent, and in some instances by more than 300 percent, to inflate charges.

The lawyers also claim that the firm conducted another test, in which it purchased a brand-new AT&T iPhone and immediately shut down all apps and disabled push notifications and location services. The firm left the phone untouched for 10 days and found that AT&T billed the test account for 35 data transactions, totaling 2.3 megabytes of usage.

An AT&T representative told Wired.com that Hendricks’ complaint made incorrect claims. The company provided the following statement to Wired.com:

Accurate billing is clearly important and, unfortunately, there have been some incorrect claims about our data usage billing practices. We properly charge for all data that our customers send and receive, including data activity that runs in the background on smartphones and other powerful data devices. Data usage for emailing, downloading applications, browsing the web, downloading a video or streaming music is all applied to a customers’ data plan. So are real-time updates to applications, such as weather updates, sports scores, or stock tickers. Particularly for smartphones, tablets and other advanced mobile devices, applications are often constantly running in the background and engaged with our network. And, AT&T captures your data activity nightly to create a bill record in our systems. This will appear on your bill to be a late night “charge,” but in fact, the time stamp reflects the time that your device established a connection to the network, not the time that you sent or received data.

Wired.com checked an iPhone billing statement and did not discover any erratic charges that would support Hendricks’ claims. However, this account was tied to an unlimited data plan.

It’s worth noting, however, that in the tests cited in Hendricks’ complaint, the phone’s cellular signal was not shut off, which would still allow for some data transmissions to occur in the background, such as network diagnostics, as well as transmitting information about data activity for billing to AT&T. Therefore, that part of the test seems questionable.

iPad and iPhone customers: Do you think AT&T has overbilled you for data? Respond in the poll below, or post your observations in the comments section.


Explosion at Foxconn’s Chengdu plant kills two

An explosion occurred at Foxconn’s Chengdu plant earlier today, with reports claiming several workers have been injured. The Taiwanese company has yet to release a statement regarding figures and the cause of this tragedy, but according to 21st Century Business Herald, witnesses saw lightning hit the A05 building before the explosion took place — it is believed that this is a case of dust explosion, and security guards were allegedly warning evacuees that the smoke was toxic. At the time, hundreds of workers were present in the affected workshop which houses an iPad 2 assembly line. Our thoughts are with the victims and their families.

Update: Sina Tech is reporting two deaths and sixteen injured people, with three in critical condition. We’ve also added a video from the scene after the break, courtesy of Sohu.

Update 2: Apple has provided a statement to All Things D, saying:

We are deeply saddened by the tragedy at Foxconn’s plant in Chengdu, and our hearts go out to the victims and their families… We are working closely with Foxconn to understand what caused this terrible event.

Continue reading Explosion at Foxconn’s Chengdu plant kills two

Explosion at Foxconn’s Chengdu plant kills two originally appeared on Engadget on Fri, 20 May 2011 11:29:00 EDT. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink M.I.C. Gadget  |  source21st Century Business Hearld  | Email this | Comments

Apple patent application suggests partial storage of music to speed up streaming

Could Apple’s forthcoming cloud-based music service have a leg up in speed compared to its competitors? It might if a recently published patent application from the company actually pans out. It suggests that just a snippet of the beginning of a song (or movie, for that matter) could be stored locally on a device, and then be synced to the complete version in the cloud, which would let you begin playback “immediately” rather than having to wait for the usual buffering to take place. The patent application also explains that the streaming playback could be adjusted based on the type of communications network, and that there would naturally be various means to authenticate your device and ensure that you actually own the music you’re streaming. Of course, there’s no guarantee that such a system will indeed be a part of Apple’s seemingly imminent streaming service, but the patent application was filed way back in November of 2009, which certainly means it’s had plenty of time to implement it if it chose to.

Apple patent application suggests partial storage of music to speed up streaming originally appeared on Engadget on Thu, 19 May 2011 18:32:00 EDT. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink Apple Insider  |  sourceUSPTO  | Email this | Comments

New Mac Malware Fools Customers, But Threat Still Relatively Small

The 11-inch MacBook Air costs $1,000. Photo: Jim Merithew/Wired.com

A new piece of malware has caused an uptick in Apple customers reporting infected machines, renewing a timeless debate on the state of Macintosh security versus Windows.

The trojan horse is called Mac Defender. It’s a web pop-up containing a spoof message that tells customers their machines are infected by a virus and they must install anti-virus software. If customers agree to install the software, the program sporadically loads porn websites on their computer.

ZDNet writer Ed Bott was first to spot a long thread of complaints in Apple’s support forums related to Mac Defender, with at least 200 posts of customers reporting they’ve been infected by the malware.

“I’ve done similar searches in the past … [and] I have never found more than one or two in-the-wild reports,” Bott wrote. “This time, the volume is truly exceptional.”

Furthering his case, Bott in a follow-up article quoted an AppleCare technician who claims that phone calls to AppleCare support have grown four to five times recently, and the majority of the calls are related to Mac Defender.

Customers and technology observers have debated for years whether the Mac is truly more secure than a Windows PC.

The general consensus among security researchers is that there’s nothing about the Mac that makes it inherently more secure than Windows — indeed, the Mac platform has been easily penetrated in the Pwn2Own hacking contest in years past. But Windows has always been a juicier target for malicious hackers because it has much larger market share than the Mac.

As a result, when customers switch from a Windows to a Mac, they’re often under the impression that they’re switching to a more secure, sterile environment where they won’t need to install expensive, resource-hogging anti-virus software. While it’s not true that the Mac is more secure, the platform is generally “safer” because fewer people target it, security researchers have told Wired.com in the past.

Bott’s discovery renews this debate: A new piece of malware seems to be fooling more Mac customers than past examples. So does this change the scenario? Should Mac customers install anti-virus software by default like most Windows customers do?

Charlie Miller, a security researcher who has repeatedly won the annual Pwn2Own hacking contest by hacking Macs and iPhones, told Wired.com he doesn’t think so.

Miller noted that Microsoft recently pointed out that 1 in 14 downloads on Windows are malicious. And the fact that there is just one piece of Mac malware being widely discussed illustrates how rare malware still is on the Mac platform, he said.

And while 200 posts complaining about Mac Defender in Apple’s support forums may seem like a lot, that’s still a small fraction of the millions of Mac customers in the world.

While Mac Defender does show that the problem is getting worse and people should be more wary about malware, it doesn’t necessarily mean that every Mac user today should rush to buy anti-virus software, Miller said.

Ultimately, it’s up to the customer because there’s a trade-off involved. Anti-virus software will help protect your system from being infected, but it’s expensive, uses system memory and reduces battery life.

“Mac malware is still relatively rare, but is getting worse,” Miller said. “At some point soon, the scales will tip to installing antivirus, but at this point, I don’t think it’s worth it yet for most people.”

In looking into the effects of Mac Defender, Wired.com’s sister publication Ars Technica did a thorough investigation on the state of Mac malware, speaking with 14 Mac support specialists.

“The truth is hard to tease out,” ArsTechnica’s Jacqui Cheng wrote. “Partly because Mac OS X still makes up a comparatively small percentage of the global OS market share, and partly because Apple itself is a secretive company, it’s not easy to find out whether malware on the Mac is indeed becoming more common, or it’s simply being reported on more often.”

The results were all over the map, with most certified Mac support specialists logging a low number of malware reports. But some Apple Genius Bar technicians noticed an uptick in malware instances, thanks to Mac Defender.

Though the conclusion is unclear, the moral of this story is to be wary that Mac malware is in the wild, and be cautious about installing sketchy software from unfamiliar sources. Mac Defender may be the first wake-up call for people who believed that Macs don’t get viruses.

See Also:


XtremeMac InCharge Auto & Home BT chargers stream music, phone calls over bluetooth


There are many ways to get your phone’s tunes to your system’s speakers, and now thanks to XtremeMac, you have two more. At $80, the InCharge Home BT is just $20 cheaper than an Apple TV, and it only lets you stream audio over bluetooth (vs. video, and WiFi for the Apple TV). Its on-the-go counterpart, however — the InCharge Auto BT (also $80) — is a much easier sell, beaming music and phone calls to a car stereo without a need to tether your handset to your receiver. Despite the company name and ubiquitous “Made for iPhone” branding, XtremeMac has confirmed that both devices offer identical functionality with non-Apple handsets as well, along with iPods, iPads, and other bluetooth-enabled gadgets. Available now, both devices support A2DP, connect to your speakers using a bundled 3.5mm cable, and include a 10-watt USB port for charging your devices — assuming you don’t mind cording up, on occasion.

Continue reading XtremeMac InCharge Auto & Home BT chargers stream music, phone calls over bluetooth

XtremeMac InCharge Auto & Home BT chargers stream music, phone calls over bluetooth originally appeared on Engadget on Thu, 19 May 2011 14:53:00 EDT. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink   |  sourceXtremeMac  | Email this | Comments

Verizon finally killing unlimited data plans this summer, says it’ll get iPhone 5 at same time as AT&T

Verizon’s been telegraphing its intent to drop unlimited data plans for nearly a year, and despite the fact that LTE smartphones launched with all-you-can-eat options, those plans haven’t changed one bit. Reuters reports that Verizon will finally nix the megabyte buffet this summer, replacing it with a fully tiered data pricing scheme, though CFO Fran Shammo also floated the idea that tiered data could open up an avenue for family data plans. We’ve never really enjoyed sharing minutes, so we doubt counting our kilobytes will be much fun, but we suppose there’s always room for Verizon to pleasantly surprise us with a really low price for mobile web browsing. Right? By the by, Fran also reiterated claims that the next iPhone will be a global device, and said that when it launches on AT&T, it’ll hit Verizon stores at the very same time.

Verizon finally killing unlimited data plans this summer, says it’ll get iPhone 5 at same time as AT&T originally appeared on Engadget on Thu, 19 May 2011 14:07:00 EDT. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink   |  sourceReuters  | Email this | Comments