AT&T CEO Whines About App Store, Wants to Sell Carrier Bloatware

Now that AT&T is no longer the exclusive provider of the iPhone, the telecom company’s CEO has taken the opportunity to speak out against Apple and the App Store.

In a keynote speech, AT&T CEO Randall Stephenson at Mobile World Congress criticized the closed nature of the App Store, whose offerings are exclusive to Apple devices.

“You purchase an app for one operating system, and if you want it on another device or platform, you have to buy it again,” Stephenson said in a keynote speech at Mobile World Congress. “That’s not how our customers expect to experience this environment.”

Stephenson’s suggestion? He wants carriers to have the ability to sell apps to customers directly through a channel called the Wholesale Applications Community, which serves software from AT&T, Verizon, Sprint and T-Mobile.

In other words, Stephenson wants carriers to have some control of the mobile software experience. He probably misses the good old days when telecoms told manufacturers what they wanted on their phone software — before Steve Jobs negotiated for Apple to have complete control of the iPhone experience and blew up the wireless industry.

Cry me a river, AT&T.

Stephenson’s idea seems pretty self-serving for the telecoms. I don’t know anyone who misses expensive crapware made by carriers. I remember when I had a Motorola RAZR on Verizon, and there was a navigation app to get written directions from one location to another. The price? $10 per month. Absurd, and the demo was barely functional; Google later made the same service free with an SMS service. If telecoms did gain their own app channel on the iPhone and other smartphones, I’m betting nobody would be happy but the carriers.

From Loop Insight


How Apple Is Winning the Post-PC War

A bit of semantic juggling makes Apple the biggest player in both the personal computer and mobile platform markets.

A research report published today by DisplaySearch found that sales of the iPad propelled Apple past HP for the No. 1 spot in the “mobile PC” market.

To make that work, you have to count the iPad as a PC. DisplaySearch combined sales of Mac notebooks with the iPad and found that Apple sold 10.2 million, or 17.2 percent, of mobile computers shipped during the fourth quarter of 2010. HP shipped 9.3 million.

But you could also count the iPad as a mobile device, as some have done. If you lump together the iPod Touch, iPhone and iPad, Apple’s iOS is the mobile operating system most often used to browse the web, according to NetMarketShare.

“While we anticipate increased competition in the tablet PC market later this year with the introduction of Android Honeycomb-based tablets, Apple’s iPad business is complementing a notebook line whose shipments widely exceed the industry average growth rate,” said Richard Shim, Senior Analyst at DisplaySearch. “Apple is currently benefiting from significant and comprehensive growth from both sectors of the mobile PC spectrum, notebooks and tablet PCs. Cannibalization seems limited at this point.”

The reports seem slanted in Apple’s favor: traditionally the iPad wouldn’t be considered a PC, and most research firms have concluded Android is beating the iPhone in the smartphone market, which doesn’t count the iPod Touch or iPad.

But it’s rational to count the iPad as a personal computer because, well, it’s a computer, even if it has more limited capabilities than a PC. And it seems fair to combine iPod Touch, iPad and iPhone sales when determining which mobile platform has the most dominance: They’re all running Apple’s iOS.

When you look at the big picture, the labels don’t matter to the manufacturers: They just want customers buying their products, and they don’t care if you call it a PC, smartphone or tablet.

The two reports also demonstrate that the lines between “PC” and “mobile” are blurring. Technically all these products — the iPhone, MacBook, iPad, iPod Touch, HP notebooks, Android smartphones and so on — are mobile computers.

So if you look at the iPad as a personal computer, and the iPod Touch, iPad and iPhone as one mobile platform (which it is), one thing is clear: Apple may have lost the PC war, but it’s winning in the post-PC era.

Photo: Bryan Derballa/Wired.com


Desk Pets TankBot hands-on (video)

Although we’ve only gotten a glimpse of a TankBot as a render, we were more than interested to see this robot toy doing its thing in the real world. We spotted these tiny desk pals at the International Toy Fair and got to take a look at some working prototypes. As we reported earlier, the TankBots have three functioning modes — autonomous, maze solving and iOS controlled. The bots feature LED eyes and two infrared transmitters — that’s how it solves the mazes. Charging is done by plugging in the USB dongle found on the rear of the tank and you’ll get 15 minutes of battery life after a 30 minute charge. And if you’re wondering how your iOS device will play with the TankBots, a free app will be available to download and each toy will come bundled with an infrared dongle. You can grab TankBots from stores for 20 bucks come June. Head past the break to see some cute, yet impressive maze-solving in action.

Continue reading Desk Pets TankBot hands-on (video)

Desk Pets TankBot hands-on (video) originally appeared on Engadget on Wed, 16 Feb 2011 14:55:00 EDT. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink   |   | Email this | Comments

iPad Overheating Suit Tossed

apple ipad.jpg

A judge this week dismissed a lawsuit regarding iPad overheating concerns. Jacob Balthazar, Claudia Keller, and John Browning filed the suit last year, claiming that the iPad’s tendency to overheat and shut down in direct sunlight undermined the company’s claims that “reading on iPad is just like reading a book.”

The suit was tossed due to a lack of evidence on the part of the plaintiffs. U.S. District Court Judge Jeremy Fogel wrote in his ruling, 
The Court concludes that these allegations are insufficient. At the least, Plaintiffs must identify the particular commercial or advertisement upon which they relied and must describe with the requisite specificity the content of that particular commercial or advertisement.
The plaintiffs now have three days to file an amendment to their original claims.

Verizon iPhone Sales Lacking – Report

Thumbnail image for iphone 4 flat.jpg

After years of waiting and countless studies outlining just how doomed AT&T would be if the news of a Verizon iPhone ever arrived, it turns out that maybe people weren’t all that excited, after all. According to some apparently leaked numbers, customers are buying Verizon iPhones by the boatload, as so many expected. 

Boy Genius Report offered up some less than impressive numbers from the Verizon iPhone’s first five days of availability. The numbers, which were culled from five “very prominent” Apple stores, showed that the Verizon version outsold its AT&T counterpart, but not really by all that much. The biggest disparity came, naturally, on the first day, when 909 Verizon iPhones were sold to AT&T’s 539. The gap shrinks pretty quickly from there. 
On day two, it’s Verizon 916, AT&T 680. Day three is 660 to 471, day four is 796 to 701, and day five is 711 to 618. Pre-orders, meanwhile, were apparently around 550,000. Those aren’t quite standing in line at the Apple Store for five days numbers.
Could it be that people are already fixated on the iPhone 5?

Windows Phone 7 Connector for Mac OS goes gold, hits the Mac App Store

It’s been available since October in beta form, but Microsoft has just turned its Windows Phone 7 Connector product to a shiny shade of gold, giving Mac owners a solid (if not Zune-free) option for hooking up their Windows Phones without firing up Boot Camp. We’re told there aren’t any new features in the latest build worth noting, so you’ll get the same options as before: media synchronization, iTunes compatibility, and support for Windows Phone firmware updates. A full Zune client would be choice, of course — but we’ll take it. And you can take it, too: it’s now in the Mac App Store.

[Thanks, Hayden]

Windows Phone 7 Connector for Mac OS goes gold, hits the Mac App Store originally appeared on Engadget on Wed, 16 Feb 2011 06:55:00 EDT. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink   |  sourceiTunes  | Email this | Comments

Apple’s New Subscription Model Is Evil [Apple]

Digital subscriptions for the iPad are here. Huzzah! Sounds pretty good! You can subscribe to the New Yorker or PopSci with one click, and it’s automagically delivered. No in-app purchases; no muss, no fuss. I’ve been holding out on renewing my paper mag subscriptions, waiting for this very moment. More »

Rhapsody won’t bow to Apple’s subscription policy, issues statement

In case you weren’t aware, Apple’s newly launched App Store subscriptions aren’t sitting so well with everybody. While the functionality could of course be a boon to services that have struggled getting paying customers, folks who have already been doing just fine, thank you very much, are balking at the new restrictions Apple has imposed. Rhapsody has issued a statement, which says that it’s not going to play ball and even levels a bit of a threat: “We will be collaborating with our market peers in determining an appropriate legal and business response to this latest development.” The big trouble stems from the fact that Apple requires anybody offering a subscription service to offer that service for the same price or less through Apple. That means you can still sign up folks through your own methods and get all the cash, but if anybody signs up through your app, Apple gets a 30 percent cut. In addition, Apple is no longer allowing applications to include a link to an external site for purchasing, which means vendors will have trouble getting new users to pay them directly instead of using Apple’s simple but heavily-taxed option. Rhapsody claims that it can’t offer its services at existing prices with Apple grabbing that much of the revenue, and it sounds like Rhapsody will be leaving the App Store soon if an agreement isn’t struck.

Of course, this is just the shiny surface of the dirt Apple’s new policies have scuffed up, and we might even have an antitrust case on our hands, according to the Wall Street Journal. Check out the more coverage link for more on that, and follow after the break for Rhapsody’s statement in full.

Continue reading Rhapsody won’t bow to Apple’s subscription policy, issues statement

Rhapsody won’t bow to Apple’s subscription policy, issues statement originally appeared on Engadget on Tue, 15 Feb 2011 17:58:00 EDT. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink   |   | Email this | Comments

AT&T’s old $49 iPhone 3GS gets a new ad to sell it (video)

It looks like someone’s realized that simultaneous voice and web will not be enough to keep kids away from the Verizon iPhone. But where technical details fail to entice, perhaps a good deal will. Because, really, what’s better (or at least as good) as retaining your current customers? Well, if you ask AT&T it’s bringing in a slew of new ones by advertising that bargain-basement $49 iPhone 3GS (8GB). Feel free to check out the latest commercial after the break — as is usually the case, this one is a non-stop thrill ride.

Continue reading AT&T’s old $49 iPhone 3GS gets a new ad to sell it (video)

AT&T’s old $49 iPhone 3GS gets a new ad to sell it (video) originally appeared on Engadget on Tue, 15 Feb 2011 16:45:00 EDT. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink Boy Genius Report  |   | Email this | Comments

Man Claims Walmart Sold Him a Fake iPad

LiePad

Ken Lamal walked in to his local Walmart and picked up an iPad he wanted to buy, paid for it, and when he unboxed it, inside he found not an iPad, but a display model – plastic that’s been painted to resemble an iPad for display purposes. When he returned to the Walmart to report the fact that he essentially got a display iPad in a box, Walmart told him they couldn’t refund his money, he should contact Apple, and that all returns are processed through them. 
The store says that all returns are processed by Apple and they’re not allowed to repack electronics, so the iPad must have shipped from Apple the way Lamal got it, and that the whole thing is Apple’s problem – not so indirectly implying that Lamal is the one who put the display iPad in the box and is now trying to get cash from the store for it.  
Lamal, for his part, bought himself a real iPad at his local Apple Store instead, and the rest is history. He plans to file suit, if only to finally get his money back. 
[via KPLC TV]