Nissan says its new electric car, the Leaf, gets 367 miles per gallon

Nissan’s gotten into a bit of a bragging contest on Twitter — possibly fueled by Chevrolet’s recent, shaky claim that the Volt will get 230 miles per gallon. The company is now saying that its new electric car, the Leaf, will get an astonishing 367 miles per gallon… even though it’s a 100 percent electric car, and runs on absolutely no fuel. So, isn’t that zero miles per gallon? Well, yes and no: all these massive numbers are based on both the Department of Energy and the EPA’s calculations for estimating equivalencies in electric cars. Why? Well, it seems that car companies are still giving us — the prospective buying public — MPG figures because they think that’s what we understand best. Tony Posawatz, vehicle line director for Chevy’s Volt recently admitted to the New York Times that the miles per gallon matrix is “probably not the best measure of goodness” for a car that uses no gallons at all, but that it’s “what people are accustomed to.” We agree — he’s got a point — but people were also accustomed to the hi-fi, the corded landline, and the steam engine. We assure you: people understand that a car that runs on zero gas (and therefore gets an astonishingly low amount of miles per gallon) is really, really awesome. So the MPG matrix is useless when talking about electric cars — we’ll adjust!

Read – Nissan claims 367 miles per gallon for electric Leaf
Read – The Chevy Volt: mileage numerology

Filed under:

Nissan says its new electric car, the Leaf, gets 367 miles per gallon originally appeared on Engadget on Sat, 15 Aug 2009 08:02:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink | Email this | Comments

Tata Motors moves first $2,500 Nano in Mumbai

We’ve been following the development of Tata Motors’ Nano — a teeny little car whose main claim to fame is its tiny price tag of about $2,500 — since way back when it was only an announcement. Well, today the cycle is complete: the first Nano has officially been sold to Mumbai resident Ashok Vichare, who says he bought the car (his first) because it’s the smallest and cheapest sold in India. The company held a lottery to decide who could purchase the first 100,000 Nanos, and says its got a waiting list of about a year for further cars.

Filed under:

Tata Motors moves first $2,500 Nano in Mumbai originally appeared on Engadget on Fri, 17 Jul 2009 19:01:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Read | Permalink | Email this | Comments

Tesla, Ford, Nissan all receive electric car development loans from US government

High five, Tesla fans — everyone’s favorite incredibly controversial electric car company has just been granted $465m in loans from the Department of Energy’s Advanced Technology Vehicle Manufacturing program. The bulk of the money will go towards that postponed Model S factory, while the remaining $100m will be used to fund an electric powertrain manufacturing facility that will sell parts like motors and battery packs to other carmakers. Tesla wasn’t the DOE’s only big winner: Nissan received $1.6b (billion!) to build batteries and EVs in Tennessee and Ford received an undisclosed amount to build two upcoming electric cars, but since those companies have largely drama-free upper management that isn’t constantly involved in lawsuits, it feels a little more routine. Still, it’s an exciting time — let’s hope all these tax dollars turn into affordable, convenient electric transportation sooner rather than later.

Update: A “congressional source” has told the AP that Ford’s getting $5.9 billion, so yeah, the Oval’s still the big dog.

Read – Tesla
Read – Ford
Read – Nissan

Filed under:

Tesla, Ford, Nissan all receive electric car development loans from US government originally appeared on Engadget on Tue, 23 Jun 2009 14:13:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink | Email this | Comments

Coffee-Cup Power Inverter for In-Car Charging

coffee_cup_inverter

I may be wrong, but in-car cup holders seem to be a mostly US-only phenomenon. It might be that Europeans simply don’t live in their cars like Statesiders, or that our coffee tends to be smaller — espresso sized rather than delivered in buckets, the weak, watery brew sucked through a plastic teat while sitting safely inside the protective steel and rubber womb.

Which is a shame, as this little cup-holder mounted gizmo looks genuinely useful. The $30 Coffee Cup Power Inverter plugs into the 12v cigarette lighter socket and up-converts the power to 120v AC. There’s even a USB socket on there for charging iPods and the like. The unit can supply a continuous 200 watts, so unless you’re hooking up hair dryers and soldering irons, you should be good for anything. Actually, I’ve just thought of another reason this wouldn’t work here in Europe (aside from us needing 220v to power our gear): We tend to use our car cigarette lighters for lighting our cigarettes.

Product page [ThinkGeek via BoingBoingBeschizza]


Nike+ Hacked to Open Cars From Afar

ifob

Some years ago, Top Gear’s Jeremy Clarkson was dealt a healthy dose of paranoia when he tested out a Mercedes with keyless entry. The car would lock and unlock automatically if you had the fob in your pocket. The trouble was, Clarkson never knew if the car was actually locked. If he went back to check it, the door just opened again.

Nathan Seidle of Sparkfun electronics decided he needed the same level of niggling worry in his life and rolled his own car-opener with a Nike+ dongle and receiver, an Arduino board, a Nike+iPod Serial to USB Adapter and some creative sabotage.

With a little plugging, soldering and very simple programming, Nate has himself a widget in the cart which constantly beeps out a signal, fishing for an in-range Nike+. When it hears one reply, it decodes its unique ID and if the “key” fits, the car opens. But Nate, like Clarkson, had a problem:

While testing I found the range of the transmitter (the footpod) was really pretty impressive at 50+ feet. This was cool, but I didn’t want my car to be unlocking/lock while walking around my house or office.

The answer? A Tin-Foil hat. A few wrappings of aluminum foil and the range was halved. The car itself ignores the iFob while the engine is running, so it can’t switch off on the road, and Nate has finally rid himself of his final mechanical key. We just wonder what he’s going to use to scratch up any cars that steal his parking space.

iFOBing A Mazda [Sparkfun via Lifehacker]


Gadget Lab Podcast #75: Palm Pre VS. Apple iPhone

Gadget Lab Podcast logo

In this week’s episode of the Gadget Lab podcast, the gang gossips about the upcoming battle between Palm and Apple. Palm’s iPhone rival, the Palm Pre, is hitting stores June 6 — just two days before Apple’s Worldwide Developer Conference, where many are expecting the next iPhone to be announced. We give our impressions of the Palm Pre and a rundown of some of the latest next-gen iPhone rumors.

We conclude the podcast with a rundown of a car most of us will never be able to drive: the Aston Martin DB9 Volante, a $209,000 convertible. James Bond would probably love this thing.

This week’s podcast features Danny Dumas, Priya Ganapati and Brian Chen, with audio engineering by Fernando Cardoso.

If the embedded player above doesn’t work, you can download the Gadget Lab podcast #75 MP3 file.

Use iTunes? Subscribe to the Gadget Lab Audio Podcast in iTunes. Do it now!

Like video? Aim your browser at the Gadget Lab Video Podcast — available on iTunes and right here on the Gadget Lab blog.


Study: 26 Percent in U.S. Still Text While Driving

Do you text while driving? According to a recent study, if you live in the US, there’s a pretty good chance you do. Twenty-six percent of the 4,800 people surveyed admitted that they do in fact text while behind the wheel.

Admittedly, the study might be a touch biased: It was conducted by Vlingo, mobile app manufacturer, but the company claims a sampling error of 1.41 percent. The appropriate question here, I suppose, I whether they did the polling while driving.

Currently only seven states in the U.S. have banned the practice.

Texting While Driving Is Becoming Ridiculous

It’s pretty redundant to make laws outlawing texting while driving because it already falls under laws covering distracted driving, but holy crap, something needs to be done about it.

You have ridiculous cases like the Trolley driver rear ending another train because he was texting his girlfriend, and train conductors causing a 25-fatality crash because he was texting teenage boys telling them that they’re “gonna run the locomotive.”

There’s two commonalities to these accidents. First is that texting while you’re supposed to be paying attention and in charge of other people’s lives is a bad idea. Second, guys seem to be intent on texting people, no matter how inappropriate the time, if it’s going to get them laid.

But there’s nothing better than an anecdotal account of how bad texting while driving is, courtesy of reader Trevor, who has been rear ended three times this year by people texting on their phones.

Anyways, I live in Idaho. And everyone who lives in this state FUCKING SUCKS at driving. The last thing we need is people using their cell phones simultaneously, but of course I see everyone from the 15 year old girls to 50 year old guys typing out emails on their Blackberries. It sucks ass to have to deal with these fucking morons on a daily basis.

Anyways, on to the first incidence of getting hit:
I was driving through stop and go traffic outside of a high school moment after they got out of school, and I am completely stopped when I see a brand new Hummer H2 coming up on my ass at ferocious speed. I knew I was going to get hit, and right before he made contact, I was able to discern a fucking cell phone in his hands through my rear view mirror. The officer on the scene estimated he hit me going roughly 30mph, and had not even applied the brakes before hitting me. Completely totaled my beloved Toyota Tacoma, and gave me a wicked case of whiplash. By the way it was a roughly 17 year old guy driving his parents Hummer to school. Spoiled prick…

Second time was just 6 months later in the winter. It was a touch icy on the roads and I was stopped to make a left turn onto a side street and I look in my rear view mirror (after the Hummer incident I have been made paranoid about being hit), and see a little Dodge Neon moving way too fast towards me and start sliding sideways right into the back of my new truck. I jumped out and asked if she was ok, and the first thing she says to me is “Oh my god, I’m so sorry. I was texting and didn’t even see you there until it was too late.” This time the damage wasn’t too bad, but I ended up being without my vehicle for 2 weeks, during which I had a shitty little rental car, so it still was quite the inconvenience.

Third time was about 3 weeks ago and I’m still feeling sore from it. I was sitting at a stop light and a big Ford F-350 with a huge trailer full of lawn mowing equipment plowed into me at about 25mph, once again totalling my vehicle, and absolutely wrecking my back. I felt like I got hit my a freight train this time. I had my foot on the brake, and he made my car skid forward so hard that I pushed the car in front of me into the car in front of him. An eyewitness to the accident said that the man in the truck was using a phone when he hit me, and it was just verified to me the other day that his phone record shows that he sent a text message seconds before the accident occured. At least this guy was able to apply a little bit of brakes before making contact, but still, I got hit really hard. I’m going to have to see a chiropractor, and I now am searching for another vehicle.

So yeah. That’s my record for getting hit. It really sucks. I can’t quite say I would mind the banning of texting while driving after all of this as I’m 100% sure at least somebody has lost their life in an accident caused by texting while driving. Hell, I used to do it before I got the iPhone which is fucking impossible to do without looking, but after seeing how poorly most others handle it, I can definitely understand why people are wanting this kind of a ban.

I don’t know what we need to do about this, and encoding restrictions on devices themselves to not allow texting while moving is not the solution. I don’t know what is.

Thanks Trevor!

Pedestrian Safety Act of 2009 to investigate the dangers of silent automobile engines

As automobiles become more eco-friendly, they’re also becoming increasingly quieter… which is a good thing, if, like us, you want to live in a completely silent world (the blaring of Mastodon notwithstanding). The obvious problem with quieter vehicles is, of course that they can pose a real danger to unsuspecting pedestrians. To combat this terrifying prospect, Senators John Kerry (D, MA) and Arlen Spector (R, er… D, PA) have introduced The Pedestrian Safety Enhancement Act of 2009. This bill requires the Secretary of Transportation to conduct a study on what effects of hybrid, electric and other silent engine vehicles are having on pedestrian injuries and deaths in the US. The bill specifically focuses on the perils of quiet engines to blind pedestrians, but notes that the dangers are likely wider spread than that. While there are no possible solutions mentioned, may we suggest writing into law that you have to have a bullhorn strapped to your car and yell “vroom vroom” the entire time you drive?

Filed under:

Pedestrian Safety Act of 2009 to investigate the dangers of silent automobile engines originally appeared on Engadget on Wed, 29 Apr 2009 16:51:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Read | Permalink | Email this | Comments

Listening Test: Gizmodo’s Week Long Tribute To Music Tech

I once read that music has more impact the louder you play it. On that note, I’ll tell you the story of the summer I got addicted to very loud car audio equipment.

I worked 30 hours a week during college and more during the summer. I worked at some computer help desk in Boston, but I spent a great deal of spare time hanging out in a local car-stereo installer’s garage, talking to them about what exact set up I should install. They weren’t the cleanest or best installers, looking back, but they did recommend some kick-ass gear.

Two giant Phoenix Gold amps, I forget the designation, painted white with clear windows for viewing the ICs. One was attached to a three-way system for everything above bass; 5-inch drivers in the door, and the tweeters and mids in the side foot panels, aimed through the dash to bounce off the windshield of my shitty little Acura Integra, lowered and ricey before that shit was played out. (It was also white.)

The car-stereo guys let me cut the wooden mounts which would give the deep speaker in the narrow door frame. I actually remember the amp names now. That was a ZX450 and it was pushing 450 watts through four channels, two to the midbass drivers, and two to the high/mids. I ran the 8-gauge wires myself, too. The other amp was the more interesting story, a ZX500, run in mono for I think close to 1000 watts, driving an 18-inch across, 9-inch deep JL Audio 18W6 (which was discontinued, presumably, because it was insane). The sub was mounted where the spare tire should have been, in a custom-built fiberglass tub, which raised the floor of my trunk so that it would barely hold a suitcase, on top of the sub’s grill and half an inch of MDF fiberboard.

The system was played through an Eclipse CD head unit without MP3 capability (this was 1997 or something) which was made by Fujitsu and was very clean. It had an anti-theft system which consisted of a 1-800 number that tricked thieves into calling it to reactivate once they’d tried to get in a few times, which would instead summon the police to your door if you were calling about a reportedly stolen unit.

The first time I powered it up, the car shook so violently the clip on wide angle rear view mirror fell off, and I had to close my eyes because my eyeballs were itching from the vibration. I could also feel the sub pulling the moving the air in and out of my lungs.

I played lots of Biggie Smalls through it, and some Tupac and Mary J Blige when no one was around, and it was pretty gross. I mean, I didn’t have to ring the doorbell when I visited friends, they could hear it a block away.

It forever changed the way I listen to music, because I am definitely unable to hear music with the same nuance that I did before the car stereo. The car was so loud, so notorious on campus, I am surprised it took so long for the setup to get stolen. But it did.

I fell asleep on my couch with my car outside my parking lot, on the street, and when I woke up to go drive home for Thanksgiving, it was gone. I called my mom to say I would miss dinner, and two days later, the insurance company wrote me a check when the car showed up, stripped, in Newton, Massachusetts. I used that money to move to California and to buy a motorcycle, which would eventually snap my leg in three places.

Somehow, this post turned into a note about how stupid of a 20-something I was.

It occurred to me, yesterday, on a long drive, beating on my steering while like a snare drum and my dead pedal as a bass, how much faster I drive as I listen to music. (Even if now I drive a boring station wagon with a stock stereo.) I’m not a music nut, but who can deny how much better our lives when there is song in it?

Music is arguably the most powerful medium, despite its often subtle delivery. Perhaps its power comes from how it can be enjoyed passively, while enhancing the things you’re focusing on. Things from work, to running, to sex, to sleep, to skiing, driving, or just spending time with friends. Video, words, pictures require your focus, but you stand attention to these things. Audio and music go with along with anything well. A soundtrack.

Over the last few decades, since the birth of recording, technology’s changed how we relate to music. In ways that go beyond the white earbuds. Everything in the last twenty years has changed, from how we discover new songs, to how we buy (or steal) it, to how we carry or trade it, to the very fidelity of the recording (which seems not to matter too much to anyone except audiophiles—a dying breed).

The only thing that hasn’t changed is how the music makes us feel, no matter what the volume.

So, this week’s Gizmodo is dedicated to music and the technology that helps us enjoy it. Let us know what you think of the stories, and let us know if there’s anything we should post.


Listening Test: It’s music tech week at Gizmodo.


Listening Test: It’s music tech week at Gizmodo.