Hasta La Gadget!

We’d been hearing that Philip K. Dick’s estate wasn’t too pleased about Google’s riff on the Nexus-6 name from Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep and Blade Runner for the Nexus One, and now it looks like they’re doing something about it — Phil’s daughter Isa told the Wall Street Journal that the name is a “clear infringement of our intellectual-property rights” and that their lawyers are “dealing head-to-head” with the situation. We’re not exactly sure what that means: unlike George Lucas and the Droid trademark, Dick’s estate doesn’t have a trademark on the Nexus name — and even if it did, we’re not sure consumers would somehow be confused into thinking there was some association between Dick and Google. That said, we’re pretty sure the smart move for Google is to just cut a check and earn some feel-good PR here, but we’ll see what happens.

Philip K. Dick’s estate lawyers up, says Nexus One name is ‘clear infringement’ originally appeared on Engadget on Wed, 06 Jan 2010 16:15:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink Daring Fireball  |  Wall Street Journal  | Email this | Comments

Here’s a superficially curious, but fundamentally quite important, bit of legal wrangling for you. Reuters is reporting that the District of Columbia has filed suit against AT&T Corp for the recovery of unused balances on calling cards purchased from the telecom giant. Estimated at somewhere between 5 and 20 percent of the overall value of the cards, the so-called breakage — leftover credit that customers neglect to use — has typically remained with the carrier as a sort of predictable bonus. The DC Attorney General, however, is seeking to have breakages treated as unclaimed property, which under district law means that after three years they must be returned to the state. Whichever side of the fence you sit on, the decision on this case will set a significant precedent for the future of such prepaid services.

AT&T sued by Washington DC for unused balances on calling cards originally appeared on Engadget on Sun, 03 Jan 2010 15:10:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink   |  Reuters  | Email this | Comments

Sure, this ain’t the first time that Seagate’s allegedly run afoul of the law, but this tale will definitely have you breathlessly demanding more (you know, if patent infringement is exciting to you — which would actually be pretty weird). Way back in July 2000, Convolve (an M.I.T. spin-off formed to market the school’s hard drive noise reduction research) sued Seagate for using patented tech in its Sound Barrier Technology — with the end result being that Seagate drives no longer support automatic acoustic management. But that isn’t the exciting part. In a dramatic turn reported by The New York Times, a former Seagate employee named Paul A. Galloway has apparently provided “an eyewitness account” of what went down, including the theft of info obtained in a meeting between the two companies held in 1998 and 1999 and the destruction of blueprints relating to Convolve’s technology. As for the whistleblower, he claims that he was kept in the dark about the nature of the research he was working on, with Seagate even going so far as to take his computer with notes pertinent to the trial. All of this (and more) are detailed in an affidavit that is available (in PDF form) by hitting that source link — and, man, is it a page-turner!

Ex-Seagate employee claims the company stole MIT research, tried to cover up its tracks originally appeared on Engadget on Tue, 29 Dec 2009 16:12:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink New York Times  |  U.S. District Court Affidavit  | Email this | Comments

More than two years after information about Comcast’s data delaying techniques came to light, a class action lawsuit over the issue has come to a close with a settlement of $16 million and no statement of wrongdoing from the cable giant. That means Comcast continues to tout its newer bandwidth management protocols and those of you that used Ares, BitTorrent, eDonkey, FastTrack or Gnutella between April ’06 and December ’08 and/or Lotus Notes on the service anytime in the summer of 2007 can head over to the settlement website to either opt out of the class action or receive a $16 check. So is that enough cash to make up for the time wasted waiting for Naruto fansubs, Gutsy Gibbon images and the like to finish downloading?

$16 million settlement over Comcast’s P2P throttling nets the affected $16 originally appeared on Engadget on Fri, 25 Dec 2009 21:20:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink Mutlichannel News, DailyTech  |  P2PCongestionSettlement  | Email this | Comments

Psystar’s attorneys have had some truly bumbling moments in the past year or so, and the hits keep coming: now they’re disagreeing over whether or not the would-be Mac cloner is out of business. Lead law firm Camara & Sibley is now denying yesterday’s Dow Jones report, which quoted Psystar’s California counsel Eugene Action as saying the company would be shutting down “immediately,” and insists that the company is still is business selling Rebel EFI. That would be the end of the story for now… except it’s not true. Although Psystar’s site still offers the software for download, it’s listed as “out of stock,” and you can’t buy a license. What’s more, Psystar was just ordered by the California court to stop helping anyone install OS X and warned that it continued to sell Rebel EFI “at its peril,” so it’d be pretty ballsy to offer it for sale once again. Camara & Sibley also says it’s going to appeal the California decision while it presses forward with the second lawsuit in Florida, but we’ve seriously got to wonder who’s going to pay all these bills — Psystar is already on the hook for $2.67 million in fines to Apple, and appeals and a second round of litigation don’t come cheap. We’ll see what happens next, but we can’t say we’re too surprised that the end of Psystar’s story is as shady as its start.

P.S.- Eugene Action might be the single best thing to come out of this whole mess — his website, located at (seriously) myharvardlawyer.us, is a treasure trove of embarrassing hilarity. Choice unedited quote:

I Graduated from Harvard Law School in Cambridge Massachusetts. If you have not heard of Harvard Law school, welcome to planet earth and enjoy your visit.

Well, we’re certainly impressed — too bad that fancy degree didn’t help Psystar win its case, though.

Psystar still in business, or not in business, or… something originally appeared on Engadget on Sat, 19 Dec 2009 17:44:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink   |  PC World, Eugene Action  | Email this | Comments