FCC approves LTE / EV-DO hybrid gear from LG

We’re not sure what the LG M13 is, exactly, but we can tell you one very important thing about the mysterious device: it’s awesome. We know this because the FCC has revealed some limited documentation about the recent approval, which is where we find out that it’s a “Cellular / PCS CDMA / EvDO and 700MHz LTE Device.” Translated, that means it’ll be able to play both on CDMA networks — take Verizon’s, for example — and also on LTE spectrum deployed in the 700MHz band, which Big Red just so happens to have recently purchased a whole lot of. This wouldn’t be the first time LTE-compatible stuff from LG has garnered FCC love, but it would be the first time we’ve seen a device that supports both LTE and CDMA — and considering that Verizon will have both networks operational for years (if not decades) to come, that’s a pretty important feature. Any creative guesses as to what this might be, then? A modem, perhaps?

Filed under:

FCC approves LTE / EV-DO hybrid gear from LG originally appeared on Engadget on Tue, 23 Jun 2009 17:17:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Read | Permalink | Email this | Comments

Giz Explains: What AT&T’s 7.2Mbps Network Really Means

AT&T’s contribution to the improved overall speed of the iPhone 3GS—their upgraded 7.2Mbps network—is nearly as important as Apple’s. But 7.2 is just a number, and AT&T’s network is just one of many. Here’s where it actually stands.

First, a direct translation: AT&T’s upgraded (or more accurately, upgrading) 3G network claims data download rates of 7.2 megabits per second. Though that’s the lingo used to describe bandwidth, it’s important to remember that those are not megabytes. AT&T’s impressive-sounding 7.2 megabits would yield somewhere closer to .9 megabytes (900 kilobytes) per second, and that’s only if you’re getting peak performance, which you never will because…

That 7.2Mbps is theoretical, and due to technical overhead, network business, device speed and overzealous marketing, real world speeds are significantly lower. UPDATEDEven looking at the old hardware on the current 3G network—the networking guts in your iPhone 3G is technically capable of reaching the 3.6Mbps downstream that AT&T’s network is technically capable of pushing. There are lots of reasons you don’t ever see that. For one, it’s limited to 1.4Mbps to preserve battery life—the faster you download, the faster you burn that battery. Another is congestion—all the a-holes watching YouTubes around you—and backhaul—the amount of pipe running to a tower, or more English-y still, the total bandwidth the tower has available. Another is proximity—the closer to the tower you are, the faster your phone is gonna fly. So for top speeds, you should sit under a deserted tower with plenty of backhaul.

As you can see on our chart above, our tested speeds for everything from EV-DO Rev. A to WiMax ran at anywhere from one half to one sixth their potential speed. Accordingly, Jason found AT&T’s network to run at about 1.6Mbps with the iPhone 3G S—about a third faster than with the 3G, though he was probably still connecting at 3.6Mbps rates—the 7.2 rollout won’t be complete until 2011, according to AT&T.

AT&T-style HSDPA is expected to reach out to an eventual theoretical speed of 14Mbps, which will undoubtedly make the current 3G networks feel slow, but won’t necessarily blow them out of the water. That’s the thing: the iPhone, and indeed just about all high-end handsets on the market today, operate at speeds that are reasonably close to the limits of 3G technology. In a funny sort of way, the iPhone 3GS is already a bit out of date.

So what’s next? And what the hell are those really long green bars up there? Those are the so-called 4G (fourth generation) wireless technologies. Americans can ignore HSPA+ and EV-DO Rev B. for the most part, and given that they’re the slowest of the next-gen bunch, shouldn’t feel too bad. And anyway, as Matt explained, WiMax and LTE are what’s next for us.

Both Verizon and AT&T are within a couple of years of deploying LTE in their networks, and WiMax is already out there in some cities. Our own WiMax tests on Clearwire’s network peaked at an astounding 12Mbps—nearly eight times faster than the iPhone 3GS on AT&T. And even if WiMax is shaping up to be more of a general broadband protocol than a cellular one, this is the kind of thing that’ll be in your phones in a few years, and the promises are mind-boggling: earlier this year, Verizon’s LTE were breaking 60Mbps.

So in short, your brand-new, “S”-for-speed iPhone is pretty speedy—as long as you only look to the past.

ATT Plans 3G Network Upgrades, 4G Rollout

3499689336_fee7abfc58_bAT&T on Wednesday announced plans to significantly boost its 3G network performance and begin testing its new 4G network over the next two years.

The 3G upgrade involves boosting the network to High Speed Packet Access (HSPA) 7.2, which the company claims will double peak speeds of the current network, from 3.6 megabits per second to 7.2Mbps. AT&T said these improvements would begin later this year, and that it would also be releasing phones capable of handling the higher speeds.

AT&T’s release did not mention Apple’s next-generation iPhone or indicate whether the new iPhone, which is expected to be announced June 8, would include a 3G speed upgrade.

Farther down the road, AT&T will begin trials of its 4G Long Term Evolution (LTE) network in 2010 with plans to begin deployment in 2011. LTE is a new wireless technology that is expected to become a global standard. Many domestic and international carriers, including Verizon, have announced plans to adopt LTE for their next-generation networks as well.

This news appears to be a competitive move from AT&T in response to recent statements from Verizon. Verizon’s chief executive Ivan Seidenberg recently said Apple would likely consider sharing the iPhone with Verizon once the telecom company began upgrading to LTE in 2010. Thus, this announcement may be AT&T’s effort to retain its current iPhone customer base as well as its exclusive relationship with Apple.

Press Release [AT&T]

Photo: ktylerconk/Flickr


So long, HSPA+: AT&T “likely” moving straight from 7.2Mbps to LTE

At Mobile World Congress, AT&T Mobility CEO Ralph de la Vega had mentioned to us that AT&T was “better off” than Verizon thanks to 3GPP Release 7’s capabilities to extend existing HSPA infrastructure through to 21Mbps and beyond by using the wonders of HSPA+ before the company would need to bite the bullet and get moving on LTE. We’re not sure whether Big Red’s aggressive LTE plans have AT&T rethinking its strategy or if it just wants to save time, money, and energy by avoiding yet another interim rollout, but we’re now being told by a company spokesman that “it’s likely that timelines for LTE standards will lead us directly from 7.2 to LTE.” He mentions that HSPA+ is “still an option,” but at any rate, this is a markedly different tone than we’ve heard in the past — even as late as last month — and if this means we’re getting LTE even a single day sooner, we’re all for it.

Filed under:

So long, HSPA+: AT&T “likely” moving straight from 7.2Mbps to LTE originally appeared on Engadget on Wed, 27 May 2009 13:46:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink | Email this | Comments

Ericsson and TeliaSonera reveals world’s first commercial LTE site in Stockholm

Mmm, the sweet smell of mobile data burning up the pipes in the morning. Gets us every time. Evidently, the same aroma does something to the brains of Ericsson and TeliaSonera, who have taken their January agreement to the next level by introducing the planet’s first commercial Long-Term Evolution (LTE) site in Stockholm, Sweden. Mind you, we’ve seen lots of trial runs over the past year and change, but this one’s no test. Rather, this site will become part of a commercial network scheduled to go live in 2010, bringing wicked fast mobile transfers to Stockholmers everywhere. Now, let’s hope these American carriers get jealous, and fast.

Filed under: ,

Ericsson and TeliaSonera reveals world’s first commercial LTE site in Stockholm originally appeared on Engadget on Tue, 26 May 2009 08:41:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Read | Permalink | Email this | Comments

Atheros AR6002 makes NEC’s N-06A dual-mode handset a WiFi access point

We’ve seen oodles of dual-mode handsets, but none quite like this. Rather than boasting two radios, two keyboards or two faces, NEC’s N-06A — which is gearing up to debut on NTT DoCoMo over in Japan — actually has two purposes. Aside from making calls on the carrier’s FOMA network, the phone can actually double as a wireless access point when AP Mode is enabled. The handset packs a cutting-edge Atheros AR6002 module, which enables handsets to operate in infrastructure mode, the primary wireless connectivity framework employed in access points, routers, laptops and other WLAN devices. In other words, your netbook (and seven other WiFi-enabled devices) can hop online via your handset, and it’s far easier than the wacky tethering methods we deal with today. Other specs include an 8.1 megapixel camera, HSDPA / WLAN models and a miraculous 3.2-inch touchscreen with an 854 x 480 resolution. There’s no mention of a price or ship date for the handset, but more than that, we’re thirsty for details on when this chipset will be featured in a handset that’s headed to US soil. Check the full release after the break.

Continue reading Atheros AR6002 makes NEC’s N-06A dual-mode handset a WiFi access point

Filed under:

Atheros AR6002 makes NEC’s N-06A dual-mode handset a WiFi access point originally appeared on Engadget on Tue, 19 May 2009 08:00:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink | Email this | Comments

Verizon releases early data-focused LTE specs, CDMA nowhere in sight

Verizon’s got a lot of work to do before it lights up its next-gen LTE network in 2010, and things are beginning to move along: the company just released the first set of specs for device manufacturers as part of its Open Development Initiative. It’s still a rough draft, but there are a few big-picture tidbits buried in the dense jargon — the LTE network will start out as a data-only service, and right now devices aren’t required to support CDMA at all, which is a pretty bold move. That certainly makes sense as Verizon’s test networks go live in the next few months, but the company’s has already said that phones will be available at launch, so we’re guessing things are going to change quickly as time marches on — 60Mbps mobile downloads, here we come.

Read – Verizon PR
Read – Specs site (registration required)

Filed under:

Verizon releases early data-focused LTE specs, CDMA nowhere in sight originally appeared on Engadget on Fri, 17 Apr 2009 12:44:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink | Email this | Comments

Verizon chief talks LTE iPhones, hates on rival: “I don’t know what Sprint thinks it is”

In a refreshingly open, straight-shooting interview with the Wall Street Journal, Verizon boss Ivan Seidenberg — who has a reputation for being candid — talked about virtually every hot-button topic facing its business today, starting with the love-hate relationship it shares with fellow partner Vodafone in its Verizon Wireless joint venture. Seidenberg reiterated that he’d love to take Vodafone’s 45 percent off its hands, but admits that the prospects are unlikely in the short term; he goes on to say, though, that he’s convinced they’ll be willing to dump it once the wireless industry cools off. The next target of his ire is archrival Sprint, which he says will “self-destruct” by failing to meet capacity demand following the launch of the blowout $50 unlimited deal on its iDEN-based Boost subsidiary — fightin’ words from a guy whose ad campaign has revolved around a smug dork in a jumpsuit touting network reliability for half a decade. Finally — and this is kind of juicy — Ivan talks up the iPhone, saying that Apple had never seriously considered a CDMA version, but that he thinks the company will be much more receptive to talks once Big Red moves to LTE and everyone gets on the same page technologically. Of course, if AT&T has anything to say about it, it won’t happen — but it’ll be a fun drama to watch unfold.

[Via Phone Scoop, image via I Can Has Cheezburger?]

Filed under: ,

Verizon chief talks LTE iPhones, hates on rival: “I don’t know what Sprint thinks it is” originally appeared on Engadget on Thu, 16 Apr 2009 17:41:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Read | Permalink | Email this | Comments

Exclusive: WiMax Uncapped Speed Tests

A cable modem in your pocket. Rockin’ down the highway with video on demand. Real wireless broadband. I tested an unthrottled Clearwire WiMax connection all over Portland, and that’s (mostly) what I got.

It’s hard to conceive of harnessing that much bandwidth wirelessly while sitting outside a shopping center, enjoying an unseasonably warm March day. It’s almost a joke, being able to watch Jon Stewart ream Jim Cramer—streamed via Hulu—while sitting in the backseat of a Lincoln Navigator doing 60 on the freeway. Having reviewed gadgets for almost a decade, I sometimes have to fake excitement that I may not truly feel in my loins. But this is different—real, honest-to-God wireless broadband made me freakin’ giddy, even if it didn’t deliver peak speeds at every spot where I parked.

If most of what we review is a chunk of the present, WiMax is from the future. Thankfully, it’s the near future.

The Test
Clearwire is a wireless data service now majority owned by Sprint (but with Comcast and others holding stakes). Currently it’s got the Clear WiMax service in both Portland and Baltimore. In Portland, it sells mobile and home modems that can pull down up to 4Mbps, but you know from reading Giz Explains that WiMax is already capable of a lot more: It’s the first 4G network that’s actually up and running in the US.

Clearwire gave me a chance to see what WiMax was like without any throttling: I got a USB dongle that could pull down whatever was out there. That turned out to be, in some places, nearly 13Mbps downstream—the current speed of your typical cable modem, and about 10 times what wired broadband delivered just a few years back.

I trekked around Portland, OR for a couple of days, testing the boundaries of the WiMax network, and spot testing in different locations around town to see what I got. I used the Motorola USBw25100 WiMax dongle, connected directly to a very sweet, very pimped-out HP Pavilion dv4 notebook that I borrowed for the occasion. (At the moment, there’s no Mac driver for the WiMax modem, but as you can imagine that’s in the works.)

As a helpful comparison, I used a 3G dongle from Verizon Wireless. I want to be clear that this isn’t to be read as a test of Verizon’s Portland network. However, that little USB modem held its own amazingly well, 3G beating 4G on a few occasions—at one point reaching a top speed of 3.3Mbps—so good on you, Verizon!

The tests were fairly simple, and resembled the ones we used for our Coast-to-Coast 3G Test last fall. I ran the Speakeasy Speed Test a minimum of five times in each location with each connection, then averaged those results. I loaded a very heavy page—the Wikimedia Commons Hubble Images page—at least five times, timing the pageload with the YSlow plug-in for Firefox. And I pinged local servers in three sets of 10 to determine latency. I chose locations based on their overall geographic variety, throwing in some locations that just made sense for me to visit, like my in-laws, and the family of my buddy Tom.

Here are the locations, neatly marked on the map, followed by a chart of test results:


View Larger Map


Hot Spots and Cold Spots
As you can see, though I got the kind of awesomeness that blisters during three of my stops, I saw some mediocrity in three more, and in one location, smack in the center of town, I got nothing at all. When I checked with Clearwire, they not surprisingly told me I had accidentally chosen four locations that were slated for improved coverage, the two downtown locations set to get lit up in the coming months.

The up side of the experience was exciting enough that the downside didn’t bash my spirits. You’ll notice in the chart that even when the connection wasn’t that great, latency tended to stay low, and even when the connection was shabby, the download speeds tended to stay at or above 3G levels. I mean, before now, when was 1.2Mbps wireless considered a bad thing? Uploads were consistently just below 2Mbps—a far cry from the 10Mbps I can get with hard-wired cable, but pretty much on par with 3G.

Clearwire has to lease all of its cell towers just like any other wireless carrier, and not having a legacy network in place does keep it from automatically having a tower everywhere it’s needed. Also, the fact that WiMax runs in the 2.5GHz band points to a need for more towers. 3G is in the 1.8 to 2.1GHz, and the proposed LTE operates in the 700MHz spectrum. Though WiMax’s higher frequency may guarantee a more stronger signal closer in, it also has shorter range with the same power. WiMax doesn’t feel like Wi-Fi—it can handle smooth handoffs from tower to tower at high speeds—but the Clearwire coverage map of Portland does look a bit like a tightly packed collection of hotspots.

This can be good news: Clearwire knows every inch of the city, and can look up any customer’s home, workplace or favorite hangout to see if getting the service even makes sense. But it also means that if you’re not covered—depending on how a school board votes about what happens on their rooftops, or what the local port authority has to say about radio antennas—it may be a while before that changes.

Rockin’ Down the Highway
Like most carriers, Clearwire takes advantage the many tall cell towers that line the highway, meaning you get WiMax’s sick bandwidth pretty much unbroken as you fly down the road at 60 or 70 miles per hour. In the following video—in 90 quick seconds—you’ll see the following:
• Speakeasy speedtest showing roughly 13Mbps at 60 miles per hour
• Skype voice call (sorry we didn’t do a video conference)
• Slingbox video that’s being uploaded via WiMax at Clearwire’s office, and downloaded via WiMax in the car
• Hulu, where we load up and begin watching a full-screen episode of The Daily Show, at 70 miles per hour


In Summary:

It’s easy to reach download speeds that are four times the peak of today’s best 3G networks

Power demand does not seem to be any greater than other wireless connections

Most available Clear services now are capped at 4Mbps, though uncapped plans may be available sometime this year

Only a handful of cities will have this service in 2009, with more to come in 2010

Wide fluctuations in bandwidth feel weird: 12Mbps upside makes 3Mbps feel like a disappointing trickle

Within Portland’s city limits, there were plenty of dead zones that will hopefully be filled in soon

[More information on Clearwire service]

Sprint keeping its options open with LTE?

Sprint hasn’t been coy about its love and adoration for all things WiMAX, and while it obviously has a vested interest in seeing the next-gen wireless protocol thrive, even it isn’t completely ignoring the possibility of dabbling in LTE. Or, at least that’s the impression we get from a recent spokesman answer to a question on whether it was “evaluating LTE equipment.” Speaking on behalf of the carrier, John Polivka wouldn’t go so far as to confirm nor deny whether it was actually dipping its toes into LTE testing while its Clearwire buddies weren’t looking, but he did affirm that “as a prudent technology development organization, [Sprint] is always collecting competitive information about various technologies / equipment to monitor and asses the competitive landscape and any potential impacts to Sprint’s plans.” We’ve already seen a few CDMA mainstays admit to siding with LTE for 4G, and honestly, we wouldn’t be shocked to see Sprint eventually cave too. Whatever stops the bleeding, right?

Filed under: ,

Sprint keeping its options open with LTE? originally appeared on Engadget on Tue, 10 Mar 2009 05:01:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Read | Permalink | Email this | Comments