MacBook Pro All-Day Battery Life: Eight Hours

lithiumpolymer

It’s funny. When Apple announced it’s new sealed-battery MacBook Pros last week, almost nobody complained. Remember the fuss about the iPhone’s non-removable battery? Or the MacBook Air? Or the 17” MacBook Pro? It seems like people have finally realized most users hardly ever have to swap out a battery, and if you need some extra juice then an external powerpack works fine.

It seems that Apple wasn’t just trying to annoy its customers, either. The new MacBook Pros have been tested by AnandTech and the batteries last up to (almost) 50% longer. This is without any appreciable increase in weight. How has Apple managed such a thing? Tessellation. The picture above, from Apple, shows that you can squeeze a lot more battery into a small space if you don’t waste that space with gaps. The new batteries are square: the old ones cylindrical.

The 13” gets a decent 30% boost, too, but the winner is the 15”. Anandtech’s test had the machine running for a full eight hours before it died: 8.13 hours in fact, running a light test involving Flash-less web browsing. More strenuous tests cut this time down but as Apple only claims seven hours of life, this extra “free” hour is pretty impressive. All day computing in a regular, full-sized notebook? You got it.

The Best Battery Life I’ve Ever Seen [Anandtech]


Video: Sony’s Svelte Vaio P Runs OS X

Installing OS X on a commodity PC box is, to paraphrase a simian, sweating Microsoft executive, all about “drivers, drivers, drivers!” The underlying architecture of any current Intel chip is more or less the same as that of a Mac. The trick lies in getting the OS to talk to the non-standard displays, sound hardware, Wi-Fi cards and the like.

Ryuu123 of the InsanelyMac forums has managed to work this driver and kernel extension magic with the Sony Vaio P, which is extra impressive for a couple of reasons. First, this is a rather more expensive piece of hardware than the typical hackintosh-box, the MSI Wind — almost as much as a real Mac, in fact. Second is that the Vaio P has some very odd hardware. The screen resolution is rather long and thing (1600 x 768) and the graphics “card” decidedly underpowered.

That said, quite a lot is working. There is no Quartz-anything hardware acceleration for graphics, so the fancy OS X 3D effects are out, and you’ll not be getting online via either the Ethernet nor the Wi-Fi (ryuu123 is planning on adding in a Dell 1510 wireless card) but USB networking works, as does the internal 3G modem. Ironically enough, the MemoryStick slot also works.

Not a bad first effort. We look forward to seeing it fixed up properly: If there is any netbook that should be running OS X, its the Vaio P.

Leopard on VAIO P(VGN-P90HS) working! [InsanelyMac via BBG]

See Also:


MacBook Price Cuts Highlight Tough Choices for Apple as Growth Slows

seventeen_3

Apple has traditionally held its ground as a premium computer manufacturer, but it might just be getting sucked into a recession-prompted price war.

picture-31The company’s recent MacBook price cuts signify its reluctant conformity to the economic downturn. At its Worldwide Developers Conference on Monday, Apple shaved hundreds of dollars off its MacBook models. The high-end, 15-inch MacBook Pros dropped from $2,000 to $1,700. And the price of the unibody MacBook (now renamed the 13-inch MacBook Pro) fell from $1,300 to $1,200. Apple’s most inexpensive MacBook, the lone white model, remains $1,000. (See chart.)

“For a while they’ve been ignoring what’s been happening in the economy,” said Richard Shim, an IDC analyst. “This is an indication that they’re realizing that the first quarter didn’t go as well as it has for them historically. I think this puts them closer in mind about what’s going on in the PC world.”

Still, Apple has avoided making even deeper price cuts, thanks to the juicy profit margins already baked into its products, the availability of cheap components, and the fact that the company also makes money by selling apps and music to iPhone and iPod owners. All of these factors mean that Apple has room to comfortably trim prices even further, if it deems it necessary.

For instance, the company dropped the price of its now low-end smartphone, the iPhone 3G, to just $100 with a two-year contract. But that cut doesn’t cost Apple as much as it might appear, given that the company still gets a carrier subsidy of several hundred dollars for each iPhone.

Apple’s computers have historically been priced well above the average PC. However, Apple’s first quarter of 2009 market-share numbers suggest the company is struggling to compete as a premium brand name in the face of the economic recession. In the first quarter of 2009, Apple’s U.S. notebook market share shrank 0.4 percent compared to the same quarter a year earlier, according to Shim. And in worldwide notebook market share, the company saw 0.3 percent growth compared to the first quarter of 2008, Shim said.

Additionally, Apple is likely hurting from its competitors’ aggressive pricing, cast into relief by Microsoft’s recent Laptop Hunters ad campaign, a BrandIndex survey indicates. The pseudo reality-TV commercials denounce Apple computers as too expensive and even implies Mac users are simple-minded snobs who buy gadgets as a fashion statement. As a result, Microsoft is detracting from Apple’s “value” score by convincing a substantial number of consumers that they get less for their money by buying a Mac, according to the survey.

By cutting its prices somewhat, Apple may also be seizing the opportunity to strike a blow against the netbook market. In 2008, low-powered, budget netbook PCs saw rapid growth, driven by value-conscious consumers looking for a good deal. Apple has no netbook in its lineup, and has said it has no plans to create a netbook.

Fortunately for Apple, netbook sales are seeing a significant slowdown in 2009. In April, netbook manufacturers Acer, Asus and Micro Star International each reported fewer netbooks were sold than expected. Their netbook shipments for the first quarter of 2009 fell considerably below shipments during the third quarter of 2008. Asus, for example, hoped to ship 1 million Asus Eee PC systems during the first quarter, but only 900,000 units sold.

Thus, Apple’s MacBook price cuts are a strategic move to reclaim growth while the netbook market is shrinking. This move allows Apple to continue to avoid offering a netbook, which is wise, because an Apple netbook would have cannibalized MacBook sales, according to ThinkPanmure analyst Vijay Rakesh. With the reduced MacBook price tags, Rakesh expects Apple to see double-digit growth in notebook marketshare — up to 20 percent — in the third quarter of 2009.

Regardless, Apple’s MacBook price tags are still well above the cost of the average notebook — $860 in the United States, according to Shim. Apple’s cheapest MacBook is anchored at $1,000, and Apple could afford to bring it down even lower if it so chose.

According to Tim Bajarin, principal analyst with Creative Strategies, Apple’s new pricing for its MacBook line and the price drop on its lightweight MacBook Air will not compromise much on its profit margins.

“They are not favoring market share over profitability in a big way,” Bajarin explained. “They have already taken the pricing curve down on the unibody and chipsets, so they are building on those lower costs.”

Will Apple deliver a mobile computer for the average Joe in terms of cost? Perhaps so, in the form of a touchscreen tablet that many Apple enthusiasts are placing their bets on. Piper Jaffray analyst Gene Munster predicts such a device — a blown-up iPod Touch, of sorts — will land as soon as 2010.

See Also:

Photo: Jim Merithew/Wired.com


MacBook Pro Teardown Reveals Battery is User Replaceable

macbook teardown

You’ll need a screwdriver to do it, but the sealed batteries in the new MacBook Pros announced last Monday are as user replaceable as those of the MacBook before it. IFixit has already carried out its customary explorations inside the body of the new notebook, and found that, apart from the rearrangement of ports and the latch-free baseplate, things are much as before.

The new, bigger (and 60 grams heavier) battery is claimed to last seven hours. IFixit found that the new unit is a 60 Watt-hours cell, up from the 45 Watt-hours of the original, itself supposedly able to last five hours. So there will be a boost, but we expect you’ll be lucky to even get five hours from it.

The doorless base brings new problems, too. I swapped a 500GB hard drive into my 13” unibody MacBook last week and it was so quick and easy that it wasn’t even worth writing up for Gadget Lab. The hard drive is still considered user-replaceable by Apple, but “replacement does require removing 10 more screws than on the MacBook Unibody.”

IFixit also notes that the SD card sticks out about half an inch when inserted, a little messy, and that the new combined headphone/jack socket omits a digital in connection. It also means that you can’t use headphones and a mic at the same time.

It’s apparent, though, that this is still one of the easiest Apple machines to take apart. If you don’t believe me, try replacing the hard drive on a 12” PowerBook.

MacBook Pro 13” Unibody Teardown [Fixit via Cult of Mac]


When Pro Doesn’t Mean Pro Anymore

It’s kind of amazing how much Apple got right yesterday—and what they got wrong: Their product lines are completely scrambled. The Pro designation has become meaningless and $99 iPhones look just like $499 iPhones.

It’s possible that when the subsidized iPhone 3G dropped last year for $199, a new Apple was born. We just didn’t see it clearly until today, with the announcement of the iPhone 3GS and new MacBook Pro line.

“Pro” used to be a real designation: A Pro machine was designed and built for working professionals. It had more power, better build quality and “top 10 percent” features for the users who needed it—or at least wanted to pay a lot more for it. Now, it’s just a brand.

It’s true that the unibody MacBooks were more like their brawnier “Pro” siblings than ever before—it was even the rationale behind our dual review. But there were still very real dividing lines between them: Most importantly, Pro machines had dedicated graphics cards. As of yesterday, that’s not true. The $1700 15-inch Pro doesn’t have one, and none of 13-inch newly designated Pro models have them either. Also, what kind of professional machine lacks a removable battery, anyway? (Swapping out batteries is how we got through the back-to-back Nintendo and Sony keynotes at E3 this year, though admittedly, the significantly improved battery life might be part of the answer.)

Don’t get us wrong, we love that Apple brought many of the Pro hallmarks down to their consumer machines, like the aluminum chassis, and that now high-end Apple laptops are more affordable than ever. But now real pros probably won’t even look at most of the Pro line.

The new products also don’t show how special you are for paying the most to buy the best. The cheap models and the pricey ones are identical. Your crazy high-end 32GB iPhone 3GS looks just like that other guy’s $99 iPhone 3G. Every unibody MacBook is now a Pro—whether you spend $1200 or twice as much. The old distinctions have been erased.

A leveling of class distinctions in Apple products is going to sting people who valued the affectation of elitism that came with using Apple’s top-of-the-line products. Even subtle differences—like the premium paid for the matte black MacBook over the otherwise identical shiny white one, were signals, beamed out to the others in the coffee shop, declaring who was “da boss.” You know, the guys who wore the white earbuds with pride five years ago. Admittedly, sometimes those guys need a left hook to the kidneys (and sometimes, we are those guys). Maybe it’s good to make the best technology accessible to everybody, with no indicators of who paid more for what.

Maybe Apple is trying to create good design that works for anyone and everyone. I can respect that. Still, the question remains: Does this make rich people look like poor people, or poor people look like rich people? The privileged must know.

Liveblog: Apple’s Worldwide Developers Conference 2009

3592676579_ba110a49ba_b

Check back here 10 a.m. Monday for Wired.com’s live coverage of Apple’s Worldwide Developers Conference 2009. Yours truly will be liveblogging the keynote, accompanied by staff writer Priya Ganapati and photographer Jon Snyder.

Prefer your news through Twitter? Priya will be tweeting juicy bits of the keynote on the Gadget Lab Twitter account. What are you waiting for? Follow us now!

Meanwhile, keep up with all our WWDC-related news. We’re anticipating an exciting Monday, aren’t you?

Photo: Adam Jackson/Flickr


CrunchPad Nears Production, Looks Awesome

cbd2

This is the latest visualization of the CrunchPad, and it’s hot. The touch-tablet is the attempt of internet hype-master Michael Arrington and his TechCrunch team to make a cheap Linux cloud-computer. The machine boots straight into a Webkit browser and is navigated much like you’d navigate the iPhone.

This latest iteration is apparently final, and Arrington says he’ll have a working prototype in a couple of weeks. The case thickness has been shaved down to just 18mm, and it is now made of aluminum for stiffness. I’ve been skeptical all along that Arrington could pull this off, and the previously in-house-only video now on YouTube shows that the software is still rather ugly and clunky looking. But it looks like they might do it, and if the price stays around the promised $200, this could be a genuine winner for customers and Arrington alike, and also proof that in these days of commodity OEM factories, anyone can design and build high-tech hardware, provided they have a good dose of arrogance.

CrunchPad: The Launch Prototype [TechCrunch]

See Also:


What to Expect From Apple at WWDC 2009

wwdc
Even without Steve Jobs emceeing, this year’s Worldwide Developers Conference sold out in record time. Hopes are running high for products that the secretive corporation will unveil at the conference next week. Rumors about new iPhones, upgraded MacBooks and a highly anticipated touchscreen tablet abound, and there’s even gossip about a possible partnership with Verizon.

But as wonderful as all those items sound, they remain unconfirmed by Apple. And frankly, some of the rumors sound too good to be true.

What should we realistically expect? The following is a list of everything Wired.com has heard about WWDC, accompanied by our analysis on which rumored announcements will or will not become a reality.

New iPhones

_mg_1060
There’s a pile of evidence in the blogosphere suggesting Apple will release a lackluster upgrade for its popular iPhone. Likely features include a digital compass, processor and memory upgrades, an improved digital camera with auto-focus and video-recording capabilities, and other minor improvements.

These hardware enhancements don’t add up to much. Instead, Apple seems to be training most of its focus on the previously-announced iPhone 3.0 — a major upgrade to the operating system that will add in-app commerce, tethering, live streaming, the ability to integrate apps with external accessories and push notification, along with a variety of other features such as cut-and-paste.

We’re confident that Apple will introduce an iPhone upgrade at WWDC — it would be a perfectly logical move because Apple announced the current iPhone 3G at WWDC 2008. Also, it would be ideal for Apple to unveil the iPhone at the event so it can hold WWDC sessions on any new hardware APIs (the rumored digital compass, for example).

The latest iPhone-related rumor involves Apple adding a 4-GB model to the line. We’re skeptical about this, because Apple already killed the 4-GB model introduced with the original iPhone just two months after its release in June 2007. Would many people buy one, even if it only costs $100?

It’s more likely that Apple will add a 32-GB model to the iPhone family, because that’d be the next step up from the current 8-GB and 16-GB models.

(See which specific features we predict will appear in the next iPhone in our earlier story “Rumor Round-Up: Everything We’ve Heard About the Next iPhone.”)

No Verizon Deal

verizon
BusinessWeek in April reported hearing from two sources “familiar with the matter” that Apple was working with Verizon on two new iPhones, which could be available as soon as this summer. This would be great news for Verizon customers unwilling to switch to AT&T, the exclusive U.S. carrier for the iPhone.

Our thoughts? Not happening — not anytime soon, at least. Verizon CEO Ivan Seidenberg told the Wall Street Journal he expects Apple to consider sharing the iPhone with Verizon in 2010 — when Verizon begins deploying its fourth-generation network. If Apple is indeed interested in working with Verizon, there is no incentive to make this announcement in mid-2009 — especially when Apple can stretch out the negotiations to shake more money out of its carrier partners. Also, historically Apple does not enjoy making announcements about products until they are finalized.

Also, Apple said in late April it has no plans to change its exclusive relationship with AT&T. Flip-flopping on that statement about six weeks later would make that a blatant lie, wouldn’t it? If any deal happens between Verizon and Apple, we expect it to happen no sooner than 2010.

No Touchscreen Tablet


As much as you might want one now, we don’t see this launching at WWDC. We agree with analyst Gene Munster’s arguments for why an Apple tablet is likely to appear no sooner than 2010. The strongest point raised is that Apple purchased chip company PA Semi in 2008, and Steve Jobs said the purpose of the acquisition was to develop iPhone and iPod chips. Also, Apple has recently been hiring chip designers.

It’s reasonable to infer Apple would wait to introduce its newly developed mobile processor with the release of a highly anticipated touchscreen tablet. There’s no indication this is happening anytime soon.

Incremental Upgrades for MacBook Family


9 to 5 Mac reported a rumor that Apple will roll out incremental upgrades to its unibody MacBooks. We buy that. Apple typically refreshes its notebooks every seven months, and the last upgrades were released in October. WWDC would be an opportune event to announce new MacBooks.

More Details on iPhone 3.0, Mac OS X Snow Leopard Operating Systems

2569944740_7956dc512f_b
We saved the most obvious for last. Apple said in a press release that it plans to preview new features and APIs for its next-generation operating systems iPhone 3.0 and Mac OS X Snow Leopard. For iPhone, expect Apple to lay out the final roadmap for the iPhone 3.0 software developer kit, speaking more extensively on the features we previously wrote about. For Snow Leopard, Apple will likely nerd out about the OS’ optimization for supporting multi-core processors (i.e., Grand Central).

Agree, disagree or have anything to add? Comment with your WWDC predictions below.

See Also:

Photos: Adam Jackson/Flickr, Jon Snyder/Wired.com, Incendiary Mind/Flickr, blakie/Flickr, vernhart/Flickr, macnerd93/Flickr


MacBooks’ Multitouch, Buttonless Trackpad Coming to Windows Notebooks

trackpad
Owners of Apple’s latest MacBooks won’t feel special for much longer. The multitouch, buttonless trackpad unique to MacBooks will be appearing on Windows notebooks in the near future.

Touchpad manufacturer Synaptics said it plans to make its multitouch trackpad available for various PCs. The company will be providing the trackpad, dubbed the ClickPad, to computer manufacturers in the third quarter of 2009.

“ClickPad is available with an innovative mechanical assembly that will provide optimized performance for notebook PC designs, ranging from sleek netbooks to large desktop replacement portables,” Synaptics said in a press release.

What exactly will you be able to do with the ClickPad? Two-finger scrolling, of course, but moving beyond that the ClickPad will offer two-finger pinching for zoom (similar to the iPhone), two-finger pivoting for rotation (for rotating photos, for example), three-finger flick (to go forward or backward a web page, for example), and three-finger press (with MacBooks, this gesture performs a right-click).

This is great news. I own a unibody MacBook Pro, and my favorite part is the trackpad. I feel extremely productive with it thanks to the multitouch gestures (and Firefox), and I like that the whole pad is one large, clickable button.

The ClickPad sounds especially sweet for netbooks, whose trackpads are generally cramped and tiresome to use over long periods of time. We’re hoping Synaptics makes the ClickPad large enough to perform all these gestures smoothly on netbooks.

See Also:

Press release [via Jkontherun]

Photo: Aaronage/Flickr


Netbooks Set to Get More Video and Audio Oomph

nvidia_tegra_board_large

Ever tried watching Hulu or YouTube on a netbook? If your machine didn’t crash immediately, it probably choked and struggled its way through the clip. Nvidia’s latest system-on-a-chip, Tegra, could make your next netbook a veritable video powerhouse.

“It is basically a full motherboard on a PCB (printed circuit board) the size of a pack of gum,” says Mike Rayfield, general manager of the handheld GPU, or graphics processing unit, business at Nvidia.

At the Computex trade show in Taipei, Taiwan, Nvidia said PC manufacturers such as Foxconn, Wistron, Pegatron and Mobinnova plan to release Tegra-based netbooks by the end of the year.

Tegra is the latest of several attempts by chip companies to carve out a slice of the rapidly growing netbook market, where sales are expected to nearly double to 21 million units this year from the year before.  Most netbooks run Intel’s Atom processor, which isn’t powerful enough to handle the demands of video or audio playback. Nvidia, whose GPUs are optimized for rendering video, animation and graphics, is betting it can fix that. However, to get a foothold in netbooks it will compete not only with Intel but also Qualcomm’s Snapdragon, a chipset that promises better power management, and Via’s Nano. The Nano appears in only a few netbooks but powers the Samsung NC20 to surprisingly good results in Wired.com’s review.

Tegra includes an 800-MHz ARM CPU, a high-definition video processor, an imaging processor, an audio processor and an ultralow-power GeForce GPU in a single package. The different processors can be used together or independently while consuming very little power, says the company. And devices based on Tegra could be available to consumers by the end of the year.

“This is the  most advanced ultralow-power computer on a chip,” says Rayfield. “We think it will bring the high-resolution experience we are used to on notebooks and desktop computers to netbooks and other mobile internet devices.”

Last year Nvidia launched Ion, a family of chips that aim to bring better graphics capability to low-cost computing devices. Tegra is completely different, says Dean McCarron, principal analyst at Mercury Research.

“Ion is a chipset that pairs graphics capabilities with an Intel Atom CPU,” he says. “Tegra takes the graphics core and combines it with a CPU that is not an x-86 class.”

The Tegra family will include the Tegra 650 processor, which can run Windows Embedded CE or Google Android, and the Tegra APX 2500 processor, targeted at Windows Mobile smartphones.

The idea is to make mobile devices more powerful, capable of running high-definition video, even as they improve on power efficiency, says Rayfield. The Tegra 650 can offer about 130 hours of audio processing and 30 hours of high-definition video playback.

“What we are talking about here is that with Tegra you can get 120 times longer battery life while listening to music than with the Atom processor and about 10 times more than Snapdragon,” he says.

Still, netbook makers are not likely to rush into Nvidia’s arms. Nvidia is betting the appetite for music and video will drive demand for its products but it may have underestimated the stranglehold that Intel exerts. “In the netbook market, their chances with Tegra are not great,” says McCarron. “So it is possible that we could see them emphasizing Tegra-based devices in geographies such as China that are more receptive to non x-86 architecture.”

Photo: Tegra chip/Nvidia