Hasta La Gadget!

Opera 10.5 for Windows announced with speed boost, private browsing, and more originally appeared on Engadget on Tue, 02 Mar 2010 13:14:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink   |  Opera  | Email this | Comments

We came, we saw, and we’re still scratching our heads over what Opera is up to with its Mobile World Congress demonstration of its Opera Mini browser running on the iPhone 3GS. But before we get into that, let’s talk performance: it’s fast. Opera Mini is very, very fast on the iPhone. Loading the New York Times, for example, was about 5x faster than loading the same page in the iPhone 3GS’ stock browser. Pages loaded smoothly and were interactive just as quickly as the content began to load — not unlike the Safari browsing experience. From a functionality standpoint, Opera Mini operates exactly as it does on other, less-contentious platforms. So while double-tap to zoom is supported, pinch-to-zoom is not. The iPhone version does, however, remember the state of the browser when you exit Opera Mini. As such, you’ll find your tabs and recent pages right where they were when you last used the app.

The impressive performance gain has to do with how Opera Mini works. First, it’s not doing any rendering of the pages or code processing locally. Web pages are processed by Opera’s servers before sending just the results to the iPhone. Not only does this speed up the local processing but it also limits the amount of data sent — a potential big money saver for people browsing while data roaming (like us in Barcelona) or for those without unlimited data plans.

Unfortunately, Opera refused to let us or anyone photograph the app or take any video of it in action. We couldn’t even photograph the Opera icon in the launch bar or the wallpaper adorned with the Opera logo. Why? It looks just like Opera Mini beta on any other device so it’s not like we’re exposing any competitive intelligence. And it’s not like Opera would be violating any Apple NDA related to the SDK or the app approval process. Unfortunately, Opera was unable to give us a valid reason other than, “you just can’t.”

So why is Opera making such a fuss about this before it has even submitted to Apple for approval? We have three theories that we discussed with Igor Netto, Senior Product Manager within Opera’s Mobile group. Click through if you like conspiracies.

Continue reading Opera Mini on iPhone is fast, but why?

Opera Mini on iPhone is fast, but why? originally appeared on Engadget on Wed, 17 Feb 2010 08:01:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink   |   | Email this | Comments

Windows/Mac: Opera’s developers have released a very unstable but promising version of their web browser into the open. What does Opera 10.5 have to offer? If a quick test is any indication, faster JavaScript speed than any browser out there.

Based on Opera’s reports of their new JavaScript engine, Caraken, being “7x faster” than the standard Futhark engine built into Opera 10.10, we ran it through Mozilla’s Dromaeo JavaScript tests, which combine Apple’s SunSpider and Google’s V8 JavaScript benchmarks. Pure runs-per-second speed isn’t everything, of course, and engines can be built specifically to max out in these kinds of tests. That said, the results of Opera 10.5, rolled into our last round of browser speed tests, were more than a little impressive, using Dromaeo as a measuring stick:

The chart up top is pulled from our most recent speed tests, with Opera 10.5 pre-alpha results rolled in. It shows some, shall we say, notable improvement. The gHacks blog put 10.5 against Firefox 3.6 beta and Chrome’s development build in the SunSpider and V8 tests and found that Opera either beat, or came very close to, Chrome, in those separate runs, and usually left Firefox in the dust. We’ll have to put Opera 10.5 through its full paces when it’s out of its very unstable build.

If you’re the adventurous type and do want to give the pre-alpha a try, you’ll also find improvements to the page rendering engine, new Private Browsing tabs and windows that don’t track any history, and some interface and visual design tweaks, detailed in the post below. The big JavaScript improvements aren’t as pronounced on the Mac build as on Windows, according to the development team, but are still there.

Opera 10.5 pre-alpha is a free download for Windows and Mac systems. Tell us if you think there’s some real speed-ups in this build, and what else you like, in the comments.

Some might say that Microsoft just can’t catch a break. Others might argue that it’s getting exactly what it deserves. Whatever your take on the situation, it seems as if Microsoft may finally have the EU off of its monstrous back (at least momentarily), as a report has surfaced noting that said software giant is nearing approval for a new browser ballot screen demanded by the European Commission. As you well know by know, rivals Mozilla, Opera and Google all submitted change requests to EU regulators in hopes of having browser selection boxes randomized and not displayed within Internet Explorer. Purportedly, the all-clear will come down on December 15th (or earlier), and the antitrust case will be settled as Windows customers have a clearer choice when it comes to selecting a go-to browser from day one. ‘Course, said ballot screen wouldn’t be pushed out to existing users until early next year, but when it goes live users will be able to decide between Chrome, Firefox, IE, Opera and Safari for their browsing needs. Huzzah!

Microsoft reportedly randomizing browser ballots to appease EU, asks ‘are you happy now?’ originally appeared on Engadget on Sun, 06 Dec 2009 17:39:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink Slashdot  |  Computer World  | Email this | Comments

And you thought T-Mobile and Sprint were sniffing the good stuff when they demanded $350 for the HTC Touch Pro2. Shortly after Instinct HD boxes began showing up at select Sprint stores, the flagging carrier has finally come forward with an official ship date (9/27) and price. Try as we may, we still can’t figure out why exactly “HD” is tacked on the end of this thing; the 480 x 320 display is decidedly average, it can’t play back high-def content on the device itself, and the “HD” video output is a feature that approximately 3.8 Earthlings will ever use (on a phone like this, anyway). Compounding the problem is the remarkable lack of detail in the specifications — Sprint simply swears that its 5 megapixel camera and video record mode are HD, but it fails to provide any elaboration whatsoever. Other specs include WiFi, EV-DO Rev A support, Opera Mobile 9.7, an ambient light sensor, haptic feedback and an accelerometer, but even those can’t help justify the $249.99 (after a $100 mail-in rebate and a two-year agreement) asking price. Hey Sprint — we thought you guys were actually looking to gain subscribers. Right?

Filed under: Cellphones

Sprint temporarily loses its mind, wants $250 for Samsung Instinct HD originally appeared on Engadget on Thu, 24 Sep 2009 10:32:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Read | Permalink | Email this | Comments