CyberNotes: How To Upgrade Your Portable Firefox

This article was written on August 02, 2006 by CyberNet.

CyberNotes
Web Browser Wednesday
 
How To Upgrade Your Portable FirefoxPortable Firefox (now known to the world as Firefox Portable) makes it easy to always take a great Web browser with you. Besides for the usefulness of portability users can also use it to test experimental builds without fear of losing their existing settings, passwords, and bookmarks.

John Haller recently updated Portable Firefox to the most recent builds but before that I frequently received requests from people to update the build for them. It is actually super easy to do and so I thought I would walk you through the few steps that you need to do in order to upgrade Firefox builds yourself.

The first option that I will recommend is going to your Help menu and selecting “Check For Updates.” The new version of Portable Firefox supports the partial updates for Firefox but previous versions will still be able to update properly. The older versions will normally have to download the entire Firefox file which is around 7MB instead of being able to download a small patch that is just 400KB.

If checking for updates doesn’t work then you can just do it manually. It really isn’t difficult to do and the funny thing is that an extra step is required for versions of Firefox that have been released. It is a little easier for the test builds of Firefox that are released every night.

–Instructions for Released Builds–

  1. Download the released version of Firefox that you want to run unless you have already installed that version on a computer. If you have installed it then skip to step 3.
  2. You have to install Firefox because Mozilla doesn’t offer a ZIP version of builds they release.
  3. Download Portable Firefox (argh, I just can’t get use to the Firefox Portable name so excuse me if I don’t say the proper name throughout the article). Extract the contents wherever you would like.
  4. Find the installation folder of Firefox which is “C:\Program Files\Mozilla Firefox” by default. Just right-click on the Mozilla Firefox folder and select “Copy”.

    Portable Firefox

  5. Browse to where you extracted Portable Firefox and open the App folder. Delete the folder named “firefox”.

    Portable Firefox

  6. Paste the Mozilla Firefox folder into this directory and rename it to “firefox” (without the quotes).
  7. That’s it, go ahead and execute the FirefoxPortable.exe file.

–Instructions for Nightly Builds–

  1. Download the ZIP file of the Firefox nightly build you want to run. The latest nightly build of Firefox 2.0 can be found here.
  2. Download Portable Firefox. Extract the contents wherever you would like.
  3. Extract the contents of the nightly build you downloaded in step 1. Copy the folder named “firefox”.

    Portable Firefox

  4. Browse to where you extracted Portable Firefox and open the App folder. Delete the folder named “firefox”.

    Portable Firefox

  5. Paste the “firefox” folder from step 3 into this directory.
  6. That’s it, go ahead and execute the FirefoxPortable.exe file.

By doing it that way you are able to keep all of your settings, bookmarks, extensions, and anything else that you do to customize your Firefox. If you don’t mind waiting for a release of Portable Firefox to come out then you can always copy your profile over from your old installation to your new installation. You can locate your Portable Firefox profile in the “FirefoxPortable\Data\” and once you are there just copy the “profile” folder over to the same directory in your new Portable Firefox.

Whatever way you choose to use Portable Firefox I am sure it will be a good one. Testing the nightly builds would be a little more cumbersome without using Portable Firefox but it can still be done.

Copyright © 2009 CyberNet | CyberNet Forum | Learn Firefox

Related Posts:

Test Firefox 3.0 Alpha 1 … Yes, That Says 3.0!

This article was written on April 08, 2006 by CyberNet.

Test Firefox 3.0 Alpha 1 ... Yes, That Says 3.0!

While browsing the FTP for Firefox nightlies, I found that they now have Firefox 3.0 Alpha 1 on there. Many people are going to say “wait, Firefox 2.0 hasn’t been released”. Yes, you are correct, but that doesn’t stop them from working on future versions of the browser. Just like Microsoft is working on the next version of Windows (named Vienna) while Windows Vista hasn’t even been released.

The links to download Firefox 3.0 Alpha 1 are below, but I highly recommend that you use the Portable version because you won’t have to install anything and the profile is kept separate from your main Firefox installation. There have been many known instances of crashing as well, but the memory usage seems to be pretty low. I have read in various locations that there are going to be memory leak fixes for version 3.0 that are not going to make the 2.0 release, so that could be the reason.

What is different from Firefox 2.0 Alpha 1? Well, besides the low memory usage, I haven’t noticed much. I have found that some of the Bookmark features are now actually functional, but other than that nothing too special.

All you have to do is download the Portable Firefox 3.0 Alpha 1 file below. Then you unzip the file and browse for the file PortableFirefox.exe. Just execute that file and you will be running Firefox 3.0 Alpha 1! The profile is kept with the PortableFirefox folder so you don’t have to worry about messing up your other profile and the uninstallation process is simple…just delete the folder!

This is by no means designed to be a stable version of Firefox. It is purely for testing which is why I have put together the Portable version so that you can play with it and then delete it, without having to worry about messing up previous installations of Firefox.

NOTE: I am hosting these files off of a private account, so please do not hotlink directly to the files.

Portable Firefox 3.0 Alpha 1 Download
Portable Firefox 2.0 Alpha 1 Download
Portable Firefox 1.5.0.2 Download

———
Windows – firefox-3.0a1.en-US.win32.zip
Windows Installer – firefox-3.0a1.en-US.win32.installer.exe
Linux – firefox-3.0a1.en-US.linux-i686.tar.bz2
Mac – firefox-3.0a1.en-US.mac.dmg

———
Portable Firefox 1.5 Homepage

Copyright © 2009 CyberNet | CyberNet Forum | Learn Firefox

Related Posts:

CyberNotes: Understanding Tweaking the Firefox 3 Address Bar

This article was written on July 23, 2008 by CyberNet.

CyberNotes
Web Browser Wednesday

The new Firefox 3 address bar is one of those things that you either love or hate, and it’s quite amazing how much buzz such a simple aspect of the browser can cause. The new address bar is often referred to as the AwesomeBar because of how useful it can be, but more officially it is considered the Smart Location Bar.

Why does the Smart Location Bar get so much attention? In most browsers the address bar only looks at the sites you’ve previously typed directly into the bar, but in Firefox 3 it also includes results from both your history and bookmarks. This kind of behavior definitely takes some getting used to, and it wasn’t until I had been using it for a few weeks that I really began to love it.

We’ve got a bunch of different things in store for you to today. To get the ball rolling we’re going to briefly explain how Firefox 3 calculates what results should be at the top of the address bar when you’re typing, and what should be at the bottom. Then we’ve got a bunch of tips on how you can tweak and alter various aspects of the location bar until it’s exactly what you want it to be.

–The Algorithm: Frecency–

frecency.pngFirefox 3 assigns a rank to every site that you visit, and it uses multiple criteria to do so. The two main things that factor into how a URL’s value is calculated are how often you visit that site in conjunction with when the site was visited. This value is often called the Frecency: frequency combined with recency.

That sounds simple enough, but as Mozilla’s documentation demonstrates there is a lot more to it. Bonuses are given to sites that you manually type into the address bar, bookmarks that you visit, and more. Plus more weight is given depending on whether you visited the URL in the last 4 days, 14 days, 31 days, or 90 days. All of this plays into what appears in the address bar when you start typing.

The good news is that you can essentially customize each aspect of the algorithm using about:config in the browser. If you pull up about:config and type frecency into the filter list you’ll find all of the different values associated with the algorithm. It’s helpful to know the formula used in the calculation because it will help explain what each of the different entries represent:

Visit Value = Bucket Weight * (Visit Bonus / 100)

The bucket weight values appear in in the about:config as firstBucketWeight, secondBucketWeight, and so on. These “buckets” correspond to the recency of your visit (4 days, 14 days, etc…) which can be adjusted with the firstBucketCutoff, secondBucketCutoff, etc… settings.

Visit bonuses are given to various URL’s depending on a variety of factors, including whether a site is bookmarked, whether it was visited by clicking a link, or whether it was visited by entering the address into the location bar. All of these values can be adjusted as well, and of them have the word “Bonus” on the end of them in the about:config frecency section.

–Deleting Entries & Resetting Stats–

clear private data.jpgAlthough the system seems overly complicated it’s pretty easy to mange what items appear. For example, I’ve read stories by several people saying that they don’t want results from their history showing up in the address bar because of questionable sites that they visit. Well, the results that are available are only those that are in your history, which means clearing out your history will wipe out those “questionable sites.”

You can do this in a variety of ways. If you want to wipe out your entire history (and therefore reset the stats) you can go to Tools -> Clear Private Data, and from there you can erase your browsing history among other things. Alternatively you can go to History -> Show All History where you can manage individual items, and you can also search through your entire history. Just select the items you want to remove and press the Delete key.

If you want a really fast way to remove items from your history you can use the… address bar! That’s right. Select an item from the address bar using the keyboard arrows, and then press the Delete key (Shift+Delete on a Mac) to see it get removed immediately.

–Removing History & Bookmarks–

If you don’t want the address bar searching both your history and bookmarks there is actually a quick fix. Open up the about:config, navigate to browser.urlbar.matchOnlyTyped, and change the value to true. Now the address bar will behave just like it did in Firefox 2 where it only searches those addresses you’ve typed into it.

–Removing Bookmarks–

Believe it or not you can prevent your bookmarks from showing up in the results without giving up the history results. Just open up the about:config and set places.frecency.unvisitedBookmarkBonus and places.frecency.bookmarkVisitBonus both to 0 (that’s the number zero). The next thing you’ll want to do is restart Firefox and clear your history. This is because Firefox has the frecency values stored, and without clearing the history your bookmarks will likely still show up.

Tip: If you want bookmarks appearing that you have visited only set the “unvisited” option to zero. That way your visited bookmarks will continue to show up as normal.

–Hide Unvisited Extension–

The Hide Unvisited add-on is similar to the method I described above for removing your bookmarks from the results, but it eliminates some of the hassle. What it does is set the following values in the about:config to zero:

  • places.frecency.unvisitedTypedBonus
  • places.frecency.unvisitedBookmarkBonus

After those have been set to zero it will erase the frecency values for the bookmarks that you haven’t visited before. This prevents you from having to wipe out your browser’s history in order to see the new values take effect.

This doesn’t, however, prevent your bookmarks from being displayed all together. This only affects those bookmarks that you haven’t visited since the last time you cleared your browser’s cache.

–Alter the Appearance–

The OldBar add-on for Firefox 3 won’t touch the address bar’s algorithm, but it will change the appearance to make the results look like they did in Firefox 2.

oldbar.jpg

–Displaying Google Results–

We’ve supercharged the Firefox 3 address bar with our own homegrown CyberSearch extension. In a nutshell it lets you search Google and see the results right there in the address bar. It’s highly customizable and can make you a lot more productive.

cybersearch web.png

–Distinguishing the Types of Results–

If you want it to be easier to recognize the different types of results in the address bar you may have to look no further than this style designed for the Stylish extension.If you don’t mind diving into the CSS code you can (of course) customize the color scheme, too. With it results from tags will be highlighted in light yellow, bookmarks in light blue, and history items in light green. Similarly our CyberSearch extension has a built-in customization option so that you can pick what background color its results use, and so this works well with it.

address bar style.jpg

Thanks for the tip Mark! [via Ghacks]

–Overview–

Hopefully this article has helped you understand exactly how the Firefox 3 address bar functions, and how you can make it work for you. Be sure to checkout our other Firefox 3 tips, and let us know in the comments how you’ve gone about customizing the address bar.

Copyright © 2009 CyberNet | CyberNet Forum | Learn Firefox

Related Posts:

Ultimate Software Update Monitor?

This article was written on January 23, 2008 by CyberNet.

I’m still on a quest to find a great software update monitor so that I know when new versions of my favorite apps are released, and I just found a new one that looks promising. To recap we’ve showed you how to create your own software update monitor, reviewed UpdateStar, tried out AppSnap, played with File Hippo’s Update Checker, and gave Secunia PSI a whirl. That’s a lot of different ways to check for updated programs, and now we’ll add SUMo to the list.

This program is like any of the others in that it analyzes what applications you have installed, and checks to see if a newer version is available. I wanted to try it out, but using my primary computer wouldn’t put the program through its paces. Instead I decided to use it on my test machine which I knew was running a lot of outdated software, and the results were rather impressive.

To use SUMo you have to download and install it, let it scan for installed apps, and then hit the Check button to compare your versions with a remote database. My results looked something like this:

SUMo Update Monitor

Out of the 81 programs that I had installed there were 36 of them that were out of date. No, I wasn’t surprised since I hardly ever update the software that is on this machine. But compared to the other applications available I would say that SUMo provided the best results. I did notice it telling me that Flock 1.0.5 was the latest version despite 1.0.6 being released today, but I wasn’t expecting the software to catch on to updates that fast.

One thing that makes me a little hesitant about this program is that it recommended an update to Opera 9.25 telling me that Opera 9.5.9745 was the latest version. It’s not wrong, but Opera 9.5 hasn’t officially been released yet. So it is essentially telling me to upgrade my stable software to a Beta copy. Knowledgeable users will be able to catch things like this, but other people may unknowingly upgrade to software that isn’t ready for prime time.

When you decide that it’s time to update a program you can click the Get Update button, but I’ll forewarn you that it’s not all that helpful. It will take you to a site, such as this one, that gives you links to search for the download on various other download sites. A link to the program’s homepage would be more helpful, but as long as your Google skills are good I think SUMo should work out well for you.

Get SUMo Software Update Monitor
Thanks Jeremy for the tip!

Copyright © 2009 CyberNet | CyberNet Forum | Learn Firefox

Related Posts:

CyberNotes: Free RapidShare Premium Accounts

This article was written on July 04, 2006 by CyberNet.

CyberNotes
Time Saving Tuesday
 

Broadband Internet access is becoming standard in homes around the world. With fast Internet access comes file sharing, and that is where RapidShare comes in. RapidShare lets people upload files to their servers and they will host the files at no cost. This is a great solution but some people get annoyed with the limitations RapidShare places on free accounts. If you do not have a Premium RapidShare account then you will have to wait 30 seconds before you can download each file and you are limited to downloading just 30MB/hour.

So how do you get a Premium RapidShare account? You can purchase it for about $12.60 each month or you can watch for free accounts that they giveaway. They periodically give 2-day Premium accounts out on a first-come first-serve basis. You can prevent these accounts from expiring by uploading files and getting people to download the files.

Rapidshare often posts 10’s of thousands free accounts at a time and let people come and get them. There is plenty of software available if you want to get notified of free accounts being posted or you can constantly check their Free Account site. Here is two different pieces of software that will notify you when to get a free account:

Option #1: RapidShare Free Account Notifier

  • Checks availability of free Premium RapidShare Accounts
  • Manual Check
  • Programmable timer
  • Starts with Windows
  • Runs in system tray
  • Popups balloon/plays sound/opens RS page when there are free accounts
  • Proxy support
  • Extreme fast (uses GZIP)



Option #2: RapidCheck

  • Checks availability of free Premium RapidShare Accounts
  • Manual Check
  • Customizable interval
  • Popups balloon and plays a sound when there are free accounts
  • Proxy support
  • Customizable sounds

As you can see both pieces of software are very similar. It doesn’t really matter which one you choose because they will both get you the same result: a free Premium RapidShare account. It is always nice to have a watchful eye doing the checking for us!

Copyright © 2008 CyberNet | CyberNet Forum | Learn Firefox

Related Posts:

CyberNotes: Best Firefox Feed Readers

This article was written on October 31, 2007 by CyberNet.

CyberNotes
Web Browser Wednesday

Firefox Feed Reader One thing that the Firefox developers have stayed clear of thus far is implementing a full RSS feed reader into the browser. Firefox does have a built in system called Live Bookmarks that are supposed to compensate for needing a feed reader in the browser, but as many of you know it falls short.

When it comes to browsers having an integrated feed reader many of them leave users wanting more. Almost all of them lack the power, design, and usability that I love so much, except for one of them. Hands down Flock has the best built-in feed reader, and it far surpasses what any other browser has. You can quickly customize how you’re viewing the feeds, organize them with the intuitive sidebar, and much more.

Today we want to demonstrate the best feed readers for Firefox that don’t require any online services. Some of them are simple, and some of them are rather impressive. What it really boils down to, however, is how usable they are.

The first three listed below are more of the full featured readers, while the last three are toolbar marquees and scrollers. With each extension we provide a screenshot so that you can see what it looks like while being used, and you can click on the thumbnails for a full-size view.

Note: At the end I’ll announce the “winners”

–Beatnik (Homepage)–

Beatnik Firefox Feed Reader Overview: If you’re looking for something that you can configure this is not your feed reader. It is a light weight feed reader that requires absolutely no additional work if you’re already using the built-in Firefox Live Bookmarks.

The Good:

  • The feed reader itself does not utilize the browser’s sidebar, which means you can still have your bookmarks sidebar open while viewing feeds
  • Automatically pulls in feeds from your Live Bookmarks making it an easy upgrade for all Live Bookmark users
  • Sidebar is resizable
  • Expandable/contractible feed items

The Bad:

  • Has absolutely no options to configure
  • Can’t organize feeds into folders
  • The only way to add feeds is by making a Live Bookmark
  • Can’t import feeds form an OPML file

–Wizz RSS Reader (Homepage)–

Wizz RSS Reader Overview: A slightly more extravagant feed reader that has many advanced management features. It doesn’t let you read the entire feed item from the reader though.

The Good:

  • Can import feeds from Live Bookmarks and OPML file
  • The reader can be put in the sidebar or popped out into a new window
  • Save items for quick access later on
  • Setup an email template for sending items to your friends

The Bad:

  • Does not let you preview the entire article, and instead takes you to the article’s website to read it
  • Can’t customize the interval at which the feeds are updated
  • Can be a bit cramped trying to do all your reading in the sidebar

–Sage (Homepage)–

Sage Firefox Feed Reader Overview: Sage is nice because it displays the contents of feeds in a clean and intuitive manner. If you have hundreds of feeds to read this is the Firefox feed reader for you.

The Good:

  • You can manually have it refresh all of the feeds
  • Customizable stylesheets let you change how the contents of feeds are displayed
  • The feed subscriber shows you the last time a feed was updated
  • Two column reading of the news
  • Scales images to fit the width of the content area
  • Import feeds from OPML file
  • Search your feeds
  • Can organize the feeds into folders

The Bad:

  • Would be nice to switch between full feed views and short descriptions
  • Can’t customize the interval at which the feeds are updated

–infoRSS (Homepage)–

infoRSS Overview: This extension puts a scrolling marquee in the Status Bar that shuffles through the news. It is extremely customizable, but there are so many different options that it can be overwhelming.

The Good:

  • Extremely customizable
  • Filter headlines for keywords
  • Create groups of feeds so that you can quickly switch between different types of news
  • Specify the update interval on a per-feed basis or change the default value
  • Report feature shows you how many items haven’t been read in each feed, last time the feed was updated, and more
  • Synchronize with FTP
  • The marquee can be moved from the Status Bar to a toolbar at the top

The Bad:

  • The number of options can be overwhelming for some people, and they aren’t very well organized
  • The marquee animation can be a bit choppy at times, so you might want to change it to a different type of animation

–RSS Ticker (Homepage)–

RSS Ticker Firefox Feed Reader Overview: A superb marquee feed reader that has all the right options.

The Good:

  • Smooth marquee animation
  • Elegant article summary popup
  • Grabs all of your Live Bookmarks right away without any additional configuration
  • Customize the update interval
  • Choose the placement (below the Status Bar or below the Bookmarks Bar)
  • Feed enabling and disabling
  • Makes good use of the room

The Bad:

  • All feeds have to be Live bookmarks, although you can disable them on an individual basis
  • It always has to have its own toolbar to display feeds, which can occupy precious screen space

–Simple RSS Reader (Homepage)–

Simple RSS Reader Overview: This is just a toolbar that cycles through the feeds that you specify. The configuration options are a little limited.

The Good:

  • Nice manager for adding/removing feeds
  • The toolbar is a nice condensed way to keep up with the news
  • Control buttons to move on to the next item, next feed, or restart the cycle

The Bad:

  • Takes awhile to go through a lot of feeds
  • Can’t import feeds
  • Can’t customize the interval at which the feeds are updated
  • Only shows one item at a time

–The Winners–

I’m a little disappointed by the quality of the feed reading options available for Firefox, but some were clearly better than others. For the more full featured feed readers (the first three in this article) I would have to say that Sage is the best. It has the right amount of features, and definitely feels like a feed reader. To my surprise, however, Beatnik comes in a very close second place. There is something about it’s simplicity that I really like.

When it comes to the marquee style feed readers (the latter three in the article) I would put RSS Ticker up on a pedestal above the others. It has smooth animations, an elegant interface, and a sufficient number of options. However, if your heart lies with customizability I would jump on the infoRSS bandwagon, because it is sure to make you drool!

Copyright © 2008 CyberNet | CyberNet Forum | Learn Firefox

Related Posts:

Cookies in Gmail, Hotmail, and Yahoo! Mail Pose Security Threat

This article was written on August 03, 2007 by CyberNet.

HackerCookies are used in your web browser to store information, but have you ever thought about how easy it would be for a hacker to quickly gain access to them? It is actually frighteningly easy as Robert Graham, the CEO of errata security, demonstrated at the Black Hat security convention. All it really takes is a point-and-click of the mouse:

First Graham needs to be able to sniff data packets and in our case the open Wi-Fi network at the convention fulfilled that requirement. He then ran Ferret to copy all the cookies flying through the air. Finally, Graham cloned those cookies into his browser – in easy point-and-click fashion – with a home-grown tool called Hamster.

The attack can hijack sessions in almost any cookie-based web application and Graham has tested it successfully against popular webmail programs like Google’s Gmail, Microsoft’s Hotmail and Yahoo Mail. He stressed that since the program just uses cookies, he only needs an IP address and usernames and passwords aren’t required.

In front of everyone at the convention Graham demonstrated how he could intercept the cookies from a person sending an email. He had someone creat a Gmail account, and in no time at all Graham had intercepted the cookies therefore enabling him to send an email disguised as the victim. As mentioned in the above quote, there were no usernames or passwords needed.

–Secure Yourself–

One of the easiest things that you can do to secure yourself from such an easy attack is to use https:// instead of http:// whenever it is available. Some services like Gmail offer this alternative, and using it encrypts your session using SSL so that these types of attacks don’t happen.

Firefox users (with Greasemonkey), Internet Explorer users (with IE7 Pro or Turnabout), and Opera users can use a script such as this one that is setup to automatically replace the http:// with https:// anytime that you visit Gmail. That way you never have to think about doing it yourself.

You should also try not to visit sites that use sensitive information while connected to a public hotspot, but I think we all know that by now.

Source: TG Daily [via Slashdot]

Copyright © 2008 CyberNet | CyberNet Forum | Learn Firefox

Related Posts:

Ubuntu Installation Now Easier than Ever in Windows

This article was written on January 17, 2007 by CyberNet.

Ubuntu, and nearly all versions of Linux are fairly easy to install aside from some terminology that Windows users may not be familiar with during the installation process. Of course, that is with a fresh install on a new hard drive…if you want to run Ubuntu on the same hard drive as your Windows installation there is always the possibility that you may mess up your existing Windows partition. A member in our forum, Chris, recently wanted to install Ubuntu but didn’t want to completely erase Windows from his hard drive.

He ended up using the Ubuntu Live CD to do the partitioning of his drive which fortunately worked well for him, but there is always the possibility that it could wreak havoc on your hard drive if it is not done correctly. Now it has been two-weeks since Chris successfully setup the dual-booting of Windows and Ubuntu…and I’m sure he wishes that this new solution was released a little sooner. Just last night he pointed out in the forum that it is now possible to complete the Ubuntu/Kubuntu/Xubuntu installation in Windows!

Ubuntu Setup in Windows

I think it is pretty obvious why such a project (which appears to be named “install.exe?”) exists, but here is a quick summary that the homepage for the project provides:

The installation of ubuntu is a major barrier to its spread and use. This project aims to solve this problem by allowing installation from within Windows using an install.exe file, and eliminating the need to partition the hard drive or burn a CD to install. It will allow a faster and more user-friendly installation for Windows users, the ability to install without the risk of data loss through repartitioning, and the ability to install on ultra-portable laptops without CD drives.

Approximately 90% of desktop computers in the world, the target audience of ubuntu, run Microsoft Windows. Most Windows users are familiar with install.exe programs, and know how to use them. Few, however, know how to burn a CD from a .iso file, boot from a CD, shrink partitions, and install ubuntu. By providing Windows users with an installer they are more familiar with, we can ease their learning curve, and open ubuntu to the vast market of casual computer users.

The elimination of the need for partitioning, and thus the chance of data loss, will help ubuntu gain acceptance in the corporate world.

The elimination of the need for an installation CD will allow users without CD burners or spare CDs to try ubuntu, ease burdens on ShipIt, and allow installation on ultra-portable laptops with no CD drives.

There are also a ton of great screenshots available here.

With Ubuntu being this easy to install there is no doubt that it will continue to become more and more popular. According to the forum post on the new installer it currently offers these features:

  • Simple and fast installation 
  • No-risk installation
  • No repartitioning the hard disk
  • No changing the Windows boot loader
  • Easy uninstallation
  • Doesn’t use a virtual machine
  • Doesn’t significantly reduce performance of the resulting installation
  • Resulting installation supports everything a normal install does.

However, it does still have it’s limitations at this point. Right now you can’t customize the various aspects of the installation (it’s pretty much restricted to basic stuff like choosing a username) and it doesn’t allow you to perform the installation on a secondary hard drive. For most people who will be using the installer this isn’t a big concern, but they will hopefully continue to develop it into something that both beginners and advanced users will want to use.

UbuntuLite

On a little bit of a sidenote, if you’re running an old machine that doesn’t meet the requirements of most operating systems you should checkout UbuntuLite. I came across it the other day when looking at OS’s that support legacy computer systems and it was one of the results. It’s nothing very extravagant because it focuses on providing a “lite” operating system that doesn’t include all of the “bloat” that will typically slow down your system and require more resources. Here are very reasonable requirements:

  • CPU – Pentium or equivalent, 150 MHz or higher
  • RAM – 32MB of RAM
  • HDD – 2GB
  • Display – VGA or higher

Now it is time to get ready for Ubuntu 7.04 (Feisty Fawn) which is just a few months away!

Copyright © 2008 CyberNet | CyberNet Forum | Learn Firefox

Related Posts:

3D New York Now Available From Google Earth

pspan class=”mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image” style=”display: inline;”img alt=”GEarthNY3D_1.jpg” src=”http://uk.gizmodo.com/GEarthNY3D_1.jpg” width=”589″ height=”422″ class=”mt-image-none” style=”” //span/p pWhat’s the city featured in the photo above? New York! I hear you cry. /p pWell yes you’d be right, but it’s not actually a photo, rather the new 3D view available from the latest version of Google Earth, which you have to admit looks pretty spectacular./p pThe whole of Manhattan Island has been rendered in glorious 3D with hundreds (perhaps thousands) of buildings for you to fly around in the largest navigatable photo-realistic city to date. /p pbr / /pimg width=’1′ height=’1′ src=’http://feeds.uk.gizmodo.com/c/552/f/9581/s/29cb436/mf.gif’ border=’0’/div class=’mf-viral’table border=’0’trtd valign=’middle’a href=”http://res.feedsportal.com/viral/sendemail2.html?title=3D New York Now Available From Google Earthlink=http://uk.gizmodo.com/2008/12/19/3d_new_york_now_available_from.html” target=”_blank”img src=”http://rss.feedsportal.com/images/emailthis2.gif” border=”0″ //a/tdtd valign=’middle’a href=”http://res.feedsportal.com/viral/bookmark.cfm?title=3D New York Now Available From Google Earthlink=http://uk.gizmodo.com/2008/12/19/3d_new_york_now_available_from.html” target=”_blank”img src=”http://rss.feedsportal.com/images/bookmark.gif” border=”0″ //a/td/tr/table/div

Adobe CS4 Photoshop and Illustrator Review (Verdict: Kick Ass)

I’ve spent more than a month working with Adobe Creative Suite 4 Master Collection. I’m impressed. It pushes the envelope again with new tools and enhancements that will save a lot of time.

Apart from using a text editor, I spend most of my work time in Facebook Illustrator and Photoshop, which I’ve been using since I was in college back in 1748 or 1994—I can’t remember. Until a month ago, I was happy with both programs in their Creative Suite 3 incarnation. Sure, they aren’t perfect, but they are fast in my 24-inch iMac, and they have all the features I wanted. Or so I thought. I didn’t find myself wanting anything more than a few fixes here and there, maybe just enhancements to this or that other tool, like transparent gradients in Illustrator.

I thought that CS3 was pretty much unbeatable for most of the bread-and-butter stuff that I or any other illustrator or photographer can do. As it turns out, CS4 adds enough feature punch to make the upgrade worth it.

The damn tabs

Let’s get this one out of the way now. There’s nothing fundamentally wrong with any of the programs in CS4 except for one thing: The new absolutely horrible tabbed user interface, an idea full of good intentions but poorly executed, to the point of being bad for your workflow.

How Adobe engineers thought this was going to be useful to anyone, I don’t know. Every person I’ve seen working in Photoshop has different windows open, at different sizes, in different places and even spawned across multiple monitors. This is needed to move things around from one document to another, to clone, or just compare images. Sometimes I end up having ten or twenty different documents open because I keep working with several projects at the same time. If you look at my workspace, it may seem anarchic to you, but it’s not for me. Mentally, I organize things how I like them to be, optimized for my workflow. And then, I surf through all of this windows melee at lightning speed using Exposé on the Mac.

The image associated with this post is best viewed using a browser.

The new tabbed interface—which is similar to the tabs in programs like Firefox or Safari—screws all this. Sure, they try to provide tools to emulate the anarchy described above. You can even drag and drop objects using spring-loaded tabs. But when you have a lot of documents open and you run out of tab space, the thing stops working well, giving you a useless chevron pop-up to the left of the tabs (like it does in web browsers). It does a bad job with tiling too—although I don’t use tiling—since it will split the image in whichever way it wants, leaving some images grouped with others if the number of tiles is shorter than the number of documents.

The image associated with this post is best viewed using a browser.

And then, on top of it being a mess in both Windows and Mac OS X, there’s an extra problem for Mac users: Photoshop doesn’t respect Exposé, which allows me to change work documents in a fraction of a second in the clearest and most instinctive way possible. So why try to fix what didn’t need to be fixed? Simply put, you can’t organize images in the same way that you organize linear web pages. The fact is that the tabbed interface doesn’t work well and, in the Macintosh, it doesn’t solve any problem that wasn’t already solved with the Mac OS X interface.

Fortunately, this complaint has an easy solution: You can turn the tab feature off. In Illustrator CS4 too, which suffers from exactly the same problem. I exclaimed “So long, sucker!” after twenty minutes of using it and, quite frankly, I don’t know why the hell it comes turned on by default—specially for people with previous versions of the Creative Suite.

Deep changes

I love Photoshop. I know that newbies get pale at the sheer enormity of this program, but it has grown with me during more than a decade and using it is like breathing—even while there are aspects of it I never touch. The new Photoshop CS4 tries to make things a little bit simpler by reorganizing the menus a bit, cleaning house and making them neater. It also provides new palettes, like the masks and adjustments palette. All the little changes will make sense to the experts and make it a little bit easier to those who are not so experienced.

But the changes in Photoshop CS4 go deeper than this. To start with, the Windows version has full 64-bit support. For many users this won’t provide any big performance advantage (although any second saved counts when it comes to image editing). But for anyone using really big images for print, the 64-bit support will bring a clear performance advantage because of the larger memory space CS4 provides on Windows. If you just work with images out of professional DSLR cameras, however, don’t worry much about this. All the benchmarks I’ve seen only show a performance advantage with extremely large images.

The other deep change, one that will be noticed by everyone, is the OpenGL support in Photoshop. Everyone with any decent video card, that is. I don’t mean a 1GB monster GPU. The humble 256MB ATI Radeon HD2600 included in my 24-inch iMac does an amazing job at keeping things smooth as hot butter. The bigger and more badass your graphic card is, however, the more documents you will be able to keep accelerated in OpenGL. In my iMac, the limit is seven images.

New pixel magic

The GPU acceleration results in some nice tricks. When you zoom deep in an image you now get a pixel overlay—which oddly reminds me of the old school programs like the old PC Paintbrush. The panning is animated, so when you use the hand to move the image, accelerating and lifting your finger from the mouse, the image will sightly hover with the inertia until it stops. But the coolest thing is rotating the image for painting. If you have used Painter, you know that the canvas can be rotated to adjust the image to your drawing angle, much like you do with a piece of paper.

The image associated with this post is best viewed using a browser.

The rotating is not a real rotate command. You just do it as you need it, on screen. When you invoke it, a compass appears on the screen. Since OpenGL treats the image as a texture on a 2D plane, the rotation is non-destructive and the image quality is amazingly good, as nice as a real rotate. I wish this rotate view feature was also available in Illustrator.

Both Photoshop CS4 and Illustrator CS4 offer new ways to access old things in a more streamlined way.

In Photoshop, new tool palettes give access to adjustment layers and masks functionality. The new “save to web” is good too, with a refreshed, more condensed interface. There are also new options for old tools that would be very useful in day-to-day operations, like the localized cluster option when you make a color range selection. This allows you to select areas in an image not only by hue similarity but also taking into account the distance from the place in which you click to sample the color. Or the quick and dirty Vibrance tool, which will allow Dick Tracy-lovers like me to boost the punch of every single image without having to go through a playing with levels, saturation fiddling in selected areas and color curves.

However, perhaps the most spectacular of the new Photoshop tools is the content-aware scale, which will be a great timesaver, especially when you have to modify images to fit a particular layout and you don’t have a lot of room to play at cropping. This tool is simple: Make a selection you want to protect, select the image, scale in any direction you want (vertical, horizontal, or both axis) and watch as the image scales leaving the protected area (almost) intact. Here’s an example:

Original image, 763 x 463 pixels

The image associated with this post is best viewed using a browser.Scaled image, 1026 x 463 pixels.

As you can see, the furniture is left untouched, while the rest of the image scales horizontally. Everything is smoothed out and looks good. At least, good enough to only require a few retouches and, certainly, good enough to fit into your layout. Previously, you had to make a selection, scale the background as good as you can, carefully fill in the blanks with the clone stamp tool, fix the artifact with more cloning, and lose some hair in the process. With the content scaling, you’ll be able to save a lot of time, only requiring a bit of retouching to make things look great.

3D painting

This part is completely new to Photoshop. 3D painting is nice. In fact, it’s fun. While it’s not as sophisticated as other tools I remember (it has been a long time since my Maya and Bodypaint days), it’s easy and straightforward. The 3D rendering engine, on the other side, is bad. Very bad. Horrible. There’s no way anyone can use this to include 3D graphics in your 2D work. So if you are looking to render anything in 3D with Photoshop CS4, look elsewhere.

New vector voodoo

In Illustrator CS4, the changes are also many and worth the upgrade, at least for me. There are small ones—like the clean-up program’s interface has been cleaned up. Things that bothered me before, like the filter menus with duplicated personality, are gone, all merged into one neat Effect menu—to the big ones, like the new Blob tool (a godsend for anyone who likes to draw, rather than pull and push vector lines), the transparent gradients (oh yes!), and the long-awaited (but old Freehand trick) multiple artboards (YES! YES! YES!).

All these are extremely useful and will save a lot of time to any Illustrator user. Actually, the transparent gradients are a fundamental element to create more complex artwork more easily. They basically allow you to treat vector gradients as you treat them in Photoshop, including transparency. In fact, they are better than Photoshop because the interface allows you to change them on the art itself, without having to use a panel.

The Blob tool is great too. It’s basically a brush that unifies all strokes as one single object. Previously, using the normal brush, if you tried to draw freehand you will end with a huge spaghetti monster. This was almost impossible to manage, requiring you to either make groups or outline strokes and then merge them—which obviously is a pain in the ass. With the Blob brush, however, Illustrator CS4 will automagically outline and join all brush strokes into a single, easy to manipulate object.

I would buy this upgrade for the gradients and the blob tool alone. But the final touch that makes this worth it to me is the support for multiple artboards, perhaps the most awaited Illustrator feature of all time. I still remember Freehand fans telling me how they hated Illustrator because it didn’t support multiple pages like Freehand did. I wouldn’t go as far as “hating” but I felt the pain every time I had to do a multiple-page layout, having to jump to Quark (argh) or PageMaker (the horror). This is not needed with the new artboards feature. You can create up to one hundred pages, which is more than enough to manage any brochure or multiple-page art you can imagine.

The icing on the cake is the new smart guides and alignment, which basically allows you to precisely set the position of objects in relation to other objects and any of their elements, without having to set guides manually. Paraphrasing Alice, the new guides are intelligenter and intelligenter than the previous ones.

Verdict

I can’t try the rest of the applications in the Adobe Creative Suite 4 Master Collection with the depth I can use both Photoshop and Illustrator, but if these two—and Bridge CS4—are any sign of what to expect from the other ten apps in the package—and from what I’ve been able to read in reviews of After Effects, Premiere, InDesign, or Flash, it seems they are as good—the collection is completely worth the $2,500 it costs. And definitely worth the $900 of the upgrade. If you are a Photoshop and Illustrator maverick, go for the Design Collection upgrade. If you use these programs professionally, the investment will returned very quickly on saved time alone.