Sonic Blaster is defeated by fashionable noise-canceling ‘head shield’

The Long Range Acoustic Device (or Sonic Blaster, for us simple people) is among the Navy’s proudest feats of warfare engineering and a favored tool of law enforcement agencies. The non-lethal amp pumps out an ultra-powerful beam of sound that deters baddies from coming within 82 feet of its position. Unless, of course, those baddies decide to act fresh and bring one of these sound insulating, double-glazed head shields, which will let the wearer stand right in front of a Sonic Blaster without losing his hearing for all eternity. Created by the BBC’s Bang Goes the Theory show, the head shield is a perfect complement to your favorite hoodie and casual pair of jeans for a stylish riot out on the town.

Filed under:

Sonic Blaster is defeated by fashionable noise-canceling ‘head shield’ originally appeared on Engadget on Fri, 28 Aug 2009 10:56:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Read | Permalink | Email this | Comments

Bose recruits QuietComfort 15 headphones into war on noise

What is it with headphones and extra wordy product names? The Bose QuietComfort 15 Acoustic Noise Cancelling (still with us?) cans are out today, accompanied by an official press release loaded with an impressive array of vague improvements. There’s a new “proprietary acoustic design” for passive noise cancellation, “more sophisticated proprietary electronics” for the active stuff and a “new proprietary ear cushion.” Clearly, Bose wants you to know its stuff is uniquely awesome, but of course the one way to know for sure is to go test them out for yourself. Your nearest purveyor of audiophile equipment should have them already, and he should let you have a pair for $299.

Filed under: ,

Bose recruits QuietComfort 15 headphones into war on noise originally appeared on Engadget on Thu, 20 Aug 2009 09:19:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Read | Permalink | Email this | Comments

Handcrafted Ceramic Speakers are almost too pretty to blast

Joey Roth blew our collective minds way back in 2007 with his conceptual Felt Mouse, but now the designer is taking his creations to the next level by actually shipping a few. The simply named Ceramic Speakers boast only 10 watts of output per channel, though each 4-inch full-range driver is housed in an acoustically dead porcelain and cork chamber that should do quite a lot with quite a little. We can’t say we’re totally fond of the expected $400 to $500 price tag when these go on sale in October, but toss in a similarly designed subwoofer and we just might bite.

[Via Cool Hunting]

Filed under:

Handcrafted Ceramic Speakers are almost too pretty to blast originally appeared on Engadget on Fri, 14 Aug 2009 06:27:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Read | Permalink | Email this | Comments

Logitech dishes two new iPod / iPhone speaker docks, one of them rechargeable

Not quite sure if you’ve noticed, but Logitech has been on a tear for the ages here recently. As the torrent of new gear continues, we’re now faced with another pair of iPod sound systems desperately attempting to knock the “me-too” status and contribute something positive to the world. The Rechargeable Speaker S315i is the larger of the two, boasting a rechargeable battery that’s supposedly good for up to 20 hours of listening. The unit is fully compatible with dock-connecting iPods and iPhones, and there’s even an auxiliary input for those who aren’t down with Cupertino’s wares. The smaller Portable Speaker S125i plays and charges any iPod model and can be powered by an AC adapter, four AA cells or 8.43 tablespoons of Jobs’ favorite fairy dust. Check ’em out this month and next for $129.99 and $69.99, respectively.

Filed under: ,

Logitech dishes two new iPod / iPhone speaker docks, one of them rechargeable originally appeared on Engadget on Wed, 12 Aug 2009 08:17:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Read | Permalink | Email this | Comments

Bongiovi-equipped iHome iP1 iPod / iPhone dock finally ships

Remember that totally snazzy iHome iP1 dock that we toyed with back in May? You know, the one with those boyish good looks and a curious Bongiovi Acoustics Digital Power Station chip built in? Yeah, that very iPod / iPhone dock is finally shipping to those willing to splurge, with a buck under $300 bringing you 100 watts of hair-raising rock through a pair of 4-inch woofers and 1-inch silk dome tweeters. Sure, it’s pretty swank for an iPod dock, but can you imagine the fanfare if this thing was Bon Jovi-approved? Bonus footage is after the break.

[Via HotHardware]

Continue reading Bongiovi-equipped iHome iP1 iPod / iPhone dock finally ships

Filed under: ,

Bongiovi-equipped iHome iP1 iPod / iPhone dock finally ships originally appeared on Engadget on Wed, 12 Aug 2009 07:26:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Read | Permalink | Email this | Comments

Japan considers adding noise pollution to hybrids

Any big city bicyclist knows that being small and silent on the street is a deadly combination. Drivers of 2-ton cages are simply immune to anything but the sights and sounds of combustion engines riding four on the floor. This issue affects silent-running hybrids and compact electrics too, something Japan’s government is taking seriously in a new government review that could result in a mandate for the inclusion of “a sound making function” in their future eco-rides. Safety aside, we presume Japanese manufacturers would choose a sound that’s as tasteful and unassuming as their locally brewed hybrids. Imagine if GM was to make a similar decision… oh, right.

Filed under:

Japan considers adding noise pollution to hybrids originally appeared on Engadget on Fri, 03 Jul 2009 08:01:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Read | Permalink | Email this | Comments

Waterproof Bluetooth Speaker approved by vacationing Billy Corgan

We don’t know a single soul who hasn’t wanted to hear Mellon Collie and the Infinite Sadness from start-to-finish whilst swimming off the coast of Phuket, but seriously, who’s going to tune in on a $40 waterproof Bluetooth speaker ball? Then again, maybe Billy’s secretly more concerned with his choice of swimwear and lack of sunscreen than the clarity of Iha’s riffs.

Filed under:

Waterproof Bluetooth Speaker approved by vacationing Billy Corgan originally appeared on Engadget on Mon, 01 Jun 2009 05:18:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Read | Permalink | Email this | Comments

Klipsch Image S4 impressions

Klipsch has never really been a company to cater to the low-end, but there’s likely never been a time in the outfit’s history to better introduce a lower-end pair of earbuds than right now. The Image headphone line, which started in August of 2007 when the X10s launched at $349, has grown a few members since. Today, we’re talking a look — er, a listen, actually — at the $79 Image S4 in-ear headphones, and while these are far from “cheap,” they’re definitely in the realm of feasibility for anyone considering a set of ‘buds that are marginally more awesome than the stock ones bundled with PMPs these days. Head on past the break for a few impressions.

Continue reading Klipsch Image S4 impressions

Filed under:

Klipsch Image S4 impressions originally appeared on Engadget on Sun, 03 May 2009 21:33:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink | Email this | Comments

Giz Explains: Speakers From the Future

Last week, we explained the difference between $100 and $100,000 speakers. But in the name of clarity, we focused on traditional loudspeakers, around longer than Keith Richards. Here are the newer crazier types.

Alright, so the way speakers generate sound is by moving air. In your standard setup, an alternating current runs through a voice, turning it into an electromagnet that is attracted to and repulsed from the permanent magnet in the driver, which moves the diaphragm (the cone) back and forth. Air is moved, sound is emitted.

But magnets aren’t the only way to generate sound, obviously. Here are a few other ways speakers can get air a-shakin’:

Electrostatic Speakers
Electrostatic speakers are probably the most well-known alternative to traditional loudspeaker design. In some ways, they’re a lot like your standard speaker—a diaphragm moves back and forth. What’s different is the shape of the diaphragm and how the system makes it move.

The diaphragm is a thin film with electrically conductive material that’s stretched out between two conductive plates called “stators”—perforated steel sheets in Martin Logan’s speakers—coated with an insulator. Just as the voice coil in a regular speaker is turned into an electromagnet by a current, the diaphragm and stators here are charged, creating an electrostatic field. As the charge alternates between positive and negative the diaphragm moves back and forth, generating sound. The stronger the charge, the more dynamically the diaphragm moves, and the louder the sound.

The claimed advantage of electrostatic speakers is that the entire diaphragm is driven, not just the apex, like with a standard voice coil/cone setup, so not only do you get improved frequency range, you won’t get distortion from the diaphragm flexing. The flip side is that bass can be kinda weak—though size helps—and high volumes can pose some issues, given that the strong charges required for high volumes increases the chance for “pyrotechnical electrical discharge” (in other words, electrical fire). Oh, and they’re not cheap. But they can sound pretty good!

Plasma Speakers
Plasma speakers aren’t new, but they are badass, and you can build your own. Or you know, just pay a lot of money to get some. The basic principle is, same as always, moving air. Except, instead of magnets or an electric field, a small electrical arc is manipulated, producing different pitches and volume as the intensity is shifted. Maybe not the future, but putting the word “plasma” into any tech just makes it sound future-y.

Distributed Mode Loudspeaker
Distributed mode loudspeaker tech was developed by NXT. It’s different from your standard diaphragm tech because traditional speaker diaphragms have to remain rigid. They vibrate but they don’t bend, because that causes distortion. Distributed-mode diaphragms are supposed to bend. Basically, bending waves are produced in the panel by electricity, and those vibrations create sound.

One big advantage of distributed mode loudspeakers is that they can be really thin. You don’t need a big box. In fact, NXT’s big pitch is that almost anything can be a diaphragm—in 2002, somebody actually tried to market inflatable speakers based on NXT’s tech. But like other loudspeaker alternatives, it can have trouble with bass. A bigger panel helps it out there, however. Warwick Audio’s suspiciously tinfoil-like new flat, flexible loudspeaker technology actually sounds similar in principle to NXT’s DML—a thin membrane is excited and vibrates in time to the electrical signal.

Planar Magnetic
Hey look, it’s another technology using a thin membrane to move air! Planar magnetic speakers use a thin film with a voice coil printed on it (think back to traditional speakers). The coil is suspended between a pair of magnets. As the current alternates, the membrane moves and back forth. As with most of these thin-diaphragm setups, you need to go bigger to get a better bass response, or just go with a separate woofer for low frequencies. Oh, and they also cost lots o’ dollars.

Carbon Nanotubes
Carbon nanotubes, the trendiest near-future material around, can of course be used to make speakers too. Really thin ones. They actually work very differently, too. Nanotube speakers make use of thermoacoustics, just like thunder. The nanotubes are formed into a film with electrodes attached at the end. An electrical current is sent through the film, and as it changes, the air around the tubes heats up or cools down in response, expanding and contracting respectively. Pressure waves are created, and boom, sound. The fidelity supposedly “matches that of conventional loudspeakers.” The nanotubes themselves don’t move at all, meaning that technically, if the technology were harnessed, it could be used to make high-precision, super-low-distortion speakers.

But here’s a really brilliant idea for future speakers that’ll blow you away: Make ’em cheaper without getting crappier. Now there’s innovation!

Still something you still wanna know? Send any questions about speakers, the future or the Numa Numa kid to tips@gizmodo.com, with “Giz Explains” in the subject line.

Giz Explains: The Difference Between $100 and $100,000 Speakers

A speaker system can cost as little as $35. Or as much as $350,000. As a normal person, you probably have just one question about speakers that cost as much a Ferrari: What. The. Hell.

How Speakers Work
Especially when you consider just how simple the overall mechanism behind a standard speaker is: It moves air. Essentially, what happens in a speaker—loudspeaker, to be technical—is that the alternating current from an amplifier runs to the speaker and through the voice coil (which is just, wait for it, a coil of wire) turning the coil into an electromagnet. That, in turns, creates a magnetic field between it and the permanent magnet in the driver. As the current alternates between positive and negative, the magnets are attracted and repulsed, moving the cone back and forth. Voila, it emits the soothing sounds of Bach or Korn. (Driver diagram from Wikipedia’s unusually exceptional loudspeaker article.)

But that’s probably not quite what you think of when you hear “speaker.” You’re probably thinking of a box with a circle thing and maybe a hole in it. That’s actually a loudspeaker system, and it actually has more than one kind of speaker inside of it, called drivers. That’s because the driver tuned to deliver high frequencies—a tweeter—ain’t so good at delivering bass, which is why you need a woofer or subwoofer (low and lower). And then you’ve got mid-range speakers—for mid-range sounds—in higher-end systems. Your average GENERIC SPEAKER COMPANY set skips this middleman. So generally two or more drivers are stuffed in a box or cabinet, called an enclosure.

Lovely, but that doesn’t explain what separates these $107,000 YG Acoustics Anat Reference II speakers from the $50 Logitech Z-2300s on my desk—which are even THX certified. So, we enlisted some help: Cnet’s Audiophiliac Steve Guttenberg, who lives and breathes speakers ranging from the sensible to the ludicrous, and Paul DiComo and Matt Lyons, speaker guys who came from Polk and are now at Definitive Technology.

If you read our profile of Audiophile Maximo Michael Fremer “Why We Need Audiophiles,” it probably won’t surprise that when initially asked simply, “What the difference between ten dollar speakers and ten thousand dollar speakers?” the Definitive guys’ initial answer was, “Well, it ought to be that they sound better.” Even Steve told us, “You can’t apply a Consumer Reports kind of index to something that’s as subjective as audio quality.”

No, but seriously.

The Goal of a Loudspeaker
A speaker’s ultimate goal is “to sound like reality”—the elusive dragon that every audiophile chases—so on a broad, not-very-useful level, how close it comes to matching that reality is the difference between good and bad, expensive and cheap speakers. To be slightly more technical, the “spec” is clarity: The lower the distortion of the original sound it recreates, the better the speaker. In fact, basically every other spec, every confusing number you read on the side of a box is actually totally meaningless, according to both Steve and the Definitive guys. Steve singles out watts as “one of the more useless specifications ever created.” If you have to look for a number when buying speakers, Steve said one that’s “kind of useful” is sensitivity/efficiency, which would be something like 90dB @ 1 watt, which relates how loud a speaker will play at a given power level.

Three Characteristics
But when pressed, there are a few qualities Paul and Matt from Definitive singled out in amazing speakers—what they call the big three:
• More dynamic range, or simply the ability to play louder without sounding like trash as you crank the volume. With good speakers, you want to keep cranking it up, like accelerating a fast car.
• Better bass. That doesn’t mean louder, “but better.” It’s more melodic, and not muddy—you can actually hear individual notes, an upright acoustic bass being plucked.
• “A very natural timbre.” Timbre is the “tone color” or how natural the sound is—if you played the voice of someone you know on a speaker with excellent timbre, it would sound exactly like them. Or if two different instruments play the same note, you’d be able to tell them apart very easily and cleanly.

Beyond that, what audiophiles are looking for—which Mahoney alludes to in the audiophile profile—is a speaker’s ability to create an image, the picture. That is, its ability to create a sense of three-dimensional sound. The defining problem of designing speakers, say the guys from Definitive, is that “physics is dogmatic.” So every speaker is built around a set of compromises.

Size
To put that in some concrete—rather than seemingly religious—terms, you can’t have a small speaker that sounds good. So one defining quality of six-figure speakers is that they are large. They have bigger woofers and tweeters. More surface area means better sound. There are also simply more drivers—every driver you add is like when you add another string to a guitar, to create a better-nuanced sound. So, for instance, a $300 speaker from a “quality manufacturer” you’ll get a 5 1/4-inch woofer and a 1-inch tweeter. A $3000 pair of speakers might have two 5 1/4 mid-range drivers and then a 10-inch woofer.

Build Quality
Build quality is the other thing. A “dead box,” or an enclosure that doesn’t create any sounds of its own—since that’s distortion—is key and something that costs a lot of money. You just want sound from the drivers themselves. The quality of the woofer and tweeter themselves, obviously, comes into play—their ability to handle more power, since that’s what translates into volume.

At the extreme end, Steve says, they can just handle more power without breaking—as the copper wire inside heats up, it can deform or melt, and the driver gets messed up. Pricey speakers don’t do that. In terms of exotic materials or construction, Steve mentioned ribbon tweeters, which are only in the highest-end speaker systems—they’re “literally a piece of aluminum foil that’s suspended between magnets that vibrates back and forth” producing excellent clarity. Better speakers also have intricate dividing networks to make sure the right signals go to the right place—they get more complicated as the price goes up.

Dollar Figures
So how much do you have to spend to get a good system in the eyes (ears?) of an audiophile? Definitive recommends $1000 for a home-theater component setup. (In other words, don’t buy a home theater in a box.) You can also get a pretty decent pair of “neutral, natural sounding” speakers for $300—they “won’t knock your ass” and won’t be great as some things, but they’ll be alright. There’s no magic one-size-fits-all speaker system, however. It depends on the room and the situation. (If your couch is against a wall, skip the 7.1 surround, says Steve.) Heavier speakers tend to sound better than lighter ones, though that’s not an absolute.

But what’s the upper limit? Well, there isn’t any. Paul from Definitive said he heard these $65,000 Krell Modulari Duo last month and “was mezmerized.” It’s like wine to oenophiles, Paul said. As Steve puts it most simply: “To people who are into it, it’s worth it.”

Still something you still wanna know? Send any questions about speakers, KoRn or John Mahoney’s secret Britney shame to tips@gizmodo.com, with “Giz Explains” in the subject line. Big thanks to Steve from Cnet and Paul and Matt from Definitive Technology!


Listening Test: It’s music tech week at Gizmodo.