Microsoft Skymarket for Windows Mobile 7 Coming in 2009?

This article was written on September 01, 2008 by CyberNet.

windows mobile 7.jpgIt was just a few days ago that Google unveiled their idea to come out with a central market for Android developers to share their latest creations, and now Microsoft is hot on their tail. The istartedsomething blog noticed a few job postings that Microsoft made regarding something called Skymarket.

The details are sparse, but the launch of Skymarket will be done alongside that of Windows Mobile 7, which is currently slated for early 2009. The job descriptions, however, say that the marketplace will be available for developers as early as this fall. Whomever gets the position at Microsoft will have to draw up a “product offering, pricing, business model and policies that will make the Windows Mobile marketplace ‘the place to be’ for developers wishing to distribute and monetize their Windows Mobile applications.

One thing I can’t wait to see is how much of the cut Microsoft decides to take from developers for the sale of their applications. Steve Ballmer always kind of shrugged off Apple’s App Store because he thought developers wouldn’t want to give up 30% of their revenue to Apple. Well, as it turns out some developers are still able to make a good chunk of money since they are exposed to a lot more users than they would ordinarily be.

By the time 2009 comes to an end we will have three application stores/markets that will be heavily competing for users, and it will be interesting to see which of them comes out on top. Will it be Apple, Microsoft, or Google?

Copyright © 2009 CyberNet | CyberNet Forum | Learn Firefox

Related Posts:

Windows 7 Starter Edition to pave the way for $200 netbooks?

Microsoft still hasn’t nailed down all the specifics about its much talked about Windows 7 Starter Edition, but it looks like the company is all too happy to talk up a few of the potential side effects of the OS variant, including the promise of some actual $200 netbooks by this coming holiday season. Apparently, Microsoft sees netbooks running Windows 7 Starter Edition as all but replacing current entry-level Linux-based netbooks, which it says see a “disproportionate amount of returns,” although the company insists that it will still market Home Premium as the default option for most netbooks. Microsoft also says that’s it’s going out of its way to make Windows 7 as accommodating for netbook manufacturers as possible, adding that it has cleaned up the system tray and “made some other concessions for the OEMs to help with branding.”

[Thanks, fikhl]

Filed under:

Windows 7 Starter Edition to pave the way for $200 netbooks? originally appeared on Engadget on Mon, 30 Mar 2009 13:44:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Read | Permalink | Email this | Comments

Lauren, We Have Someone Who’d Like to Talk to You

By now you’ve probably seen Microsoft’s latest ad featuring Lauren, a woman who claims to be neither cool nor rich enough for a MacBook. Well Lauren, one of our readers has a gift for you.

Mitch Gewirtz of Michigan would like to give you his 17-inch PowerBook. For free. From Mitch:

Subject: I AM UP FOR THE CHALLENGE!

To whom it may concern,

I recently watched the new PC ad on television the other night about “Lauren” purchasing a laptop for under $1000.00. It was a great advertisement targeting everyday PC users. My only concern is that I feel the computer “Lauren” chose will not provide an overall positive experience. I am asking for your assistance to help me locate “Lauren”. I am willing to give her my 17″ Mac laptop “FOR FREE” so she can decide which laptop is superior without putting a price tag on it.

I do believe everyone on this planet is “cool enough to be a Mac person”.

Sincerely,
Mitch Gewirtz

We of course wrote back to Mitch to gauge his level of seriousness in this matter. His response:

Absolutely! I am serious!

I believe my 17″ G4 powerbook is still more advanced than any PC out there today. It is a very healthy laptop that has given me a wonderful experience the last couple of years. I truly believe if “Lauren” had a chance to use this laptop she would change her mind.

Can you help me locate her?

While Apple fanboys are a dime a dozen, we like Mitch’s attitude, a guy willing to put his money where his mouth is (even if that money is invested in an older machine he may be planning to replace). So Mitch, Gizmodo would like to support you on your quest to gift Lauren your PowerBook. We’ve got your back, buddy.

Lauren, where are you? Drop us a line (you can find my email on the side of the page). Let’s make this love connection happen.

Vista SP1 OEM BIOS Cracks Still Work

This article was written on February 08, 2008 by CyberNet.

I would say that Microsoft once again threw down the gauntlet when they announced that Vista SP1 will deactivate machines using OEM BIOS cracks and other methods used to circumvent activation. After over a dozen emails about the topic I decided that I would check out for myself whether Vista SP1 RTM really causes piraters as much trouble as they say it will.

My intention is not to condone piracy with this article, but the OEM BIOS cracks are among the most complex hacks available for any piece of software and they are pretty intriguing. What they do is actually trick Windows into thinking that you’re running a licensed copy of the operating which you purchased from your PC’s manufacturer. It therefore never asks you to activate the machine, and Microsoft even considers it to be “genuine.”

To test out the cracks I installed a fresh copy of Vista Ultimate (without SP1) in a virtual machine. I then used the Paradox OEM BIOS emulation to crack Vista, and it worked without hesitation. After that I installed Vista Service Pack 1 on the computer, and about an hour later I was presented with a deactivated Vista Ultimate SP1:

Vista Deactivation 

My initial though was that Microsoft did it, but like any other pirater I wasn’t about to give up. I tried reapplying the Paradox OEM BIOS crack, but it just wouldn’t work. Within minutes of searching I found another OEM BIOS emulation called Vista Loader. I deactivated the previous crack that I had just tried and fired up Vista Loader. I restarted my computer and you can imagine how surprised I was to see this:

Vista Reactivation

That’s right, my machine was not only fully activated but it was also “genuine” according to Microsoft. That means all of the Windows Updates and the Ultimate Extras were available to me. For those doubting my results here is a screenshot with all the details:

Vista Activation Status

Here are the things that I’ve highlighted in that screenshot:

  • The build number 6.0.6001.18000 indicates that I am indeed running Vista SP1.
  • The “Vista, OEM” shows that the operating system is recognized as a valid OEM version.
  • The partial product key is the last 5 characters from the key that I entered in. When you download the crack it is also accompanied by a list of serial numbers, and I’m sure that you’ll see a key containing “932CC” in that list.
  • The License Status is normally where it would indicate how much time I have left to activate, but it shows that I have a licensed (a.k.a. activated) copy.

I applaud Microsoft for trying to crack down on piracy (pun intended), but it looks like they couldn’t break all of the existing hacks that are out there. It seems like a lot of hassle to try and keep up with all of these cracks so I’ll definitely be sticking with my legal copies.

Note 1: Links to any cracks in the comments will be removed.

Note 2: There’s no sense in me blurring out the Product ID since this isn’t a legal copy of Windows anyway.

Note 3: The virtual machine that we had running this has already been taken down.

Copyright © 2009 CyberNet | CyberNet Forum | Learn Firefox

Related Posts:

Giz Explains: How a Brainy Worm Might Jack the World’s PCs on April 1

It’s lurking in millions of PCs around the world. It’s incredibly sophisticated and resilient, with built-in p2p and digital code-signing technology. It revels in killing security software. On April 1, the Conficker worm will activate.

The scariest thing about the Conficker worm is that literally millions of infected Windows PCs could be linked together to do its bidding. The second scariest thing is that no one really knows what its creator is going to do with this virtual army on April 1, when it’s scheduled to contact a server for instructions. It’s so bad, Microsoft has a running $250,000 bounty for the author, dead or alive. (Well, they probably want him alive, but they hate his guts.)

The New York Times’ John Markoff rounded up some of the more ingeniously evil possibilities in a compelling article, the most sinister being a “Dark Google,” postulated by University of California at San Diego researcher Stefan Savage, that would let bad people scour zombie machines all around the world for data to sell to other bad people.

But let’s back up a bit. Conficker—whose weird name is a combination of “configuration” and a slightly more polite word for f***er, according to Urban Dictionary—actually began life as a lowly, “not very successful” worm in November, says Vincent Weafer, VP at Symantec Security Response. Weafer told us it exploited a Microsoft remote server vulnerability that had already been announced and patched the previous month, so the only systems that were vulnerable were the ones that weren’t up to date.

The B release, pushed in December, on the other hand, was “wildly successful,” says Weafer, infecting millions of unpatched computers because it’s an aggressive little bastard—the first worm in years on a scale like Blaster. It has built-in p2p capabilities, and brute forces its way into open shared folders or printers, so it can crawl an office network quickly. It also piggybacks onto USB flash and hard drives. On top of all that, it’s designed to be incredibly resilient, killing security software, disabling Windows Update, and digging down deep.

The C release came out this past month. It doesn’t go after new machines—it’s actually a payload for computers already infected with B. It transformed Conficker from a sneezing pandemic into a seriously nasty plague. With C, its p2p powers are extended further, with digital code-signing, so it only accepts trusted code updates from itself. That means security experts can’t simply inject code to neutralize it. The patch also made Conficker better at killing security software. And it expanded the scope of the domains it tries to contact for instructions from 250 to 50,000, completely neutralizing security experts’ previous tactic of seizing the domains. There’s effectively no way to the cut the head off of this demon snake. The stage is set: On April 1, Conficker will reach out for the millions-strong zombienet’s next set of instructions.

So what will happen? Well, no one knows for sure. Conficker’s creator can do whatever he wants with his army. Launch massive denial-of-service attacks, setup the “Dark Google” syndicate, target millions of new machines, or generate a tidal wave of spam that’ll crash against servers all over the world.

Most likely though, Weafer told us, Conficker’s creator is motivated by money—they’ll rent it out. And if Conficker’s used as a massive doomsday tool, they’ll “quickly lose the ability to make money” with it. A low key operation harnessing the power of computers that are mainly located in developing nations may not have a big impact, though it would certainly set a terrible precedent: Whatever Conficker’s results, they will lead others to develop this idea in frightening new directions.

Conficker’s innovative approach that utilizes p2p, code-signing and a distributed domain setup will very possibly serve as inspiration to other malware writers, who Weafer said “you can bet” are watching Conficker’s success very closely, just as Conficker’s creators have clearly learned from past malware. It’s like evil open source.

That doesn’t mean April 1 will be a “digital Pearl Harbor.” If your machine is patched and up to date, the Microsoft Report’s Ed Bott tells us, you’ll probably be totally fine. And yes, you can get rid of it if you happen to be infected. There is an outside chance Conficker could turn into a massive parallel computer that borders on self-aware, come April 1, but more than likely, the day will come and go without you noticing anything weird, just some extra spam in your box for some V@ltr3xxx.

Still something you still wanna know? Send any questions about worms, V14GRA, or Jason Chen’s pants to tips@gizmodo.com, with “Giz Explains” in the subject line.

Windows Vista 5536 Pre-RC1 Gets Rave Reviews

This article was written on August 25, 2006 by CyberNet.

I think most of us doubted that Microsoft would be able to get everything running smoothly for Vista RC1 which is due September 7. It looks like Microsoft has released build 5536, which should end up being the RC1, to testers to make sure it will be stable enough for the public to use. So what’s the result? Amazing reviews!

The same thing that I read in almost every review of this build is how quick the install process is. I have seen times ranging from 16 minutes up to 22 minutes which is half the time that it takes to install Windows XP! If you ever used the early versions of Vista (at that time named Longhorn) then you can really appreciate this since those could take more than an hour to install.

Ahhh, but the lack of compatible drivers holds everyone back from using Vista. But wait! Maybe there is hope as Matt explains:

Performance is about 3x better so far on my Dell Inspiron 9300, and driver support is phenominal!  I didn’t have a single device that didn’t come through setup installed except for the sound card which hit Windows Update and immideately downloaded and installed the driver, and did NOT require a reboot before it began to function!  Amazing!

He also posted some screenshots on his Windows Connected Blog.

Longhorn Blogs also put up a quick review of what they thought about build 5536 and said:

In fact, this build has restored my confidence in Windows Vista; it performs well, looks great, and overall we’re headed into RTM with what seems to be a very solid product.

This makes me very anxious to get Vista RC1 but I can wait the two-weeks (hopefully it is not longer). I have heard that the Torrent file is already floating around for Vista 5536 but I will wait for Microsoft to give it the thumbs up and release it as RC1.

Copyright © 2009 CyberNet | CyberNet Forum | Learn Firefox

Related Posts:

Vista And Office 2007 Available For MSDN Next Week

This article was written on November 10, 2006 by CyberNet.

Office 2007 Logo Both Windows Vista and Office 2007 have been sent to the manufacturer but before they get released to businesses at the end of November Microsoft will be making them available to MSDN subscribers next week. Vista is expected to be released on Friday, November 17th while Office 2007 should be Sunday, November 12th

Several sites  have reported that Office 2007 is already available via the Volume Licensing site which means that it will probably be leaked soon. Then after it gets leaked the hackers will be on it and I’m sure it will be cracked in no time. I wonder if I should start a timer from the moment it gets leaked to the time a crack is released?

How long does everyone think it will take Office 2007 and Vista to get cracked, about a week?

News Source: Neowin Forums

Copyright © 2009 CyberNet | CyberNet Forum | Learn Firefox

Related Posts:

Windows Vista and Server 2008 SP2 Release Candidates now available to download

That Windows Vista / Server 2008 Service Pack 2 that hit Release Candidate status last week? You can now download and try for yourself, should you feel inclined and not patient enough to wait for the final version that’s rumored for sometime this quarter. It’s available for Vista x86 and x64 platforms and Server 2008 in x86 / x64 / IA64 varieties. Of course, anyone keeping this in tuned to the going-ons at Redmond probably already installed Windows 7 beta, but if you kept Vista and want Bluetooth 2.1 support and the ability to record data to Blu-ray discs, now’s your chance.

Read – Windows Blog announcement
Read – Download Service Pack 2 RC

Filed under: ,

Windows Vista and Server 2008 SP2 Release Candidates now available to download originally appeared on Engadget on Thu, 05 Mar 2009 08:18:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink | Email this | Comments

Window’s Vienna (Vista’s Successor) Release Date Set for 2009?

This article was written on February 12, 2007 by CyberNet.

Vista’s Successor, Windows Vienna is currently planned for release in 2009.  Originally, Windows Vista was planned for release in 2003, and was to be a “stepping-stone” between XP and Vienna. Instead, Vista was set-back over 3 years, and actually ended up with many of the features that Vienna was to have.

Microsoft has had Vienna in the works for quite some time now, so a release date in 2009 may actually be realistic and attainable. Rumors are already floating around about what will be the next “wow” feature of the next version.  Ben Fathi who is the corporate vice president of development with the Windows Core Operating System Division was talking with PC World and says, “We’re going to look at a fundamental piece of enabling technology. Maybe its hypervisors, I don’t know what it is, maybe it’s a new user interface paradigm for consumers.”

According to Download squad, Vienna will have a new file system, as well as a new user interface which would eliminate the start menu and toolbars. If those features are really part of Vienna, this would make it the most unique, re-defined version of Windows yet.

Just a few thoughts: First, don’t get too excited over 2009, afterall, it could end up being 2012. Secondly, if it really is just a  few years until Vienna, is it worth making the upgrade to Vista?

Sources: PC World, Download Squad

Thanks for the tip CoryC!

Copyright © 2009 CyberNet | CyberNet Forum | Learn Firefox

Related Posts:

What’s New in the Next Release of Windows 7

The Engineering Windows 7 blog has a list of thirty six “visible” changes coming in the next version of Windows 7. Here’s a quickie list of the ones worth knowing and hotly anticipating or whatever:

Aero Peek—where all the windows on the desktop become transparent except the one you’re highlighting—will now work with Alt+Tab. Just pause for a second on the thumbnail you want to scope out. Pretty awesome, since it means less mousing, more peeking.

The Windows key button + [number key] won’t just launch a new instance of the corresponding app in the Taskbar, it’ll switch to the app if it’s already running. And with Internet Explorer, if you keep mashing its number key, it’ll cycle through all of its tabs. To launch a new instance of a running program now, hold down shift. Logical, and nice, though as Adam points out, it could be a little simpler still.

Some smaller things are more refined touch capabilities—the keyboard and right-clicking are now multi-touch, for starters. And something I cared about was that the network icon in the system notification tray didn’t tell you if your connection wasn’t connected to the internet (like it did in Vista), so they’ve brought that back, hurray.

Windows Media Player’s UI is more better! The Now Playing screen has been “cleaned up” (though I’ll believe it when I see it), there’s more playback support for cameras, a better jump list, and easier access to advance settings.

Of course, that’s just a partial list—for all 36 things, which are just a “sampling” themselves, head over there to see if your grievance has been fixed. [Engineering Windows 7 via Lifehacker]