Keypad Gives Gmail Addicts Colorful Shortcut Keys

The Gboard, a keypad for Gmail shortcut keysHeavy Gmail users know that keyboard shortcuts are the key to mail productivity: I can power through an inbox full of spam and PR come-ons with nothing more than the J, K, X, Shift-3 and Y keys.

For $20, you can put those shortcut keys onto their own, external keypad, with color-coded buttons to make it easy to press whatever you want. The Gboard would be handy for those who have trouble remembering Google’s many shortcut keys (for instance, I had no idea that there were enough to fill out the Gboard’s 19 separate keys). And for power users like me, it might make it even easier to delete messages, much as an external numeric keypad makes it easier for accountants to add up your deductions.

Gboard product page (thanks, Betsy!)


Our top high-end retail laptop pick for Holiday 2009: the Sony Vaio FW560

In the “Netbook” category, we looked at three off-the-shelf models that all retail for $399. While you can get a similar set of components for around $100 less if you shop around, these models all offered some kind of step-up feature.

CrunchPad reborn as JooJoo

Chandra Rathakrishnan, the chief executive of former TechCrunch partner Fusion Garage, reveals plans to proceed with release of new Web-browsing tablet. pOriginally posted at a href=”http://news.cnet.com/8301-19882_3-10410393-250.html” class=”origPostedBlog”Rafe’s Radar/a/p

It’s Time To Make Phone OSes Work On Any Phone

VMWare is making noise about smartphone virtualization again, claiming their new system will run two operating systems at once, sorta. It’s a compelling idea! But even more, it’s a reminder: Why the hell can’t we choose our smartphone’s OS, again?

When you buy a PC, the most important decision you make is selecting its OS. Do you want Windows 7, for a modern Windows machine-slash-media center? Are you a little more conservative, hanging back with Windows XP? Do you want a lightweight Linux OS on your netbook so you don’t have to worry about viruses, or slowdown? Are you a Gentoo purist, building your OS flag by flag, penguin shirt moist from excitement? Or, god forbid, are you a hackintosher? Whatever choice you make, you’re making a choice. You’re selecting the interface with which you interact with your computer, and by extension, the entire digital world. This makes sense.

But this just isn’t how things work in the mobile world. If you want Windows Mobile, you need to buy a Windows Phone, complete with a dedicated Start button. If you want Google’s Android, you’ve got a narrow selection of handsets from a handful of manufacturers, many of which, at least for now, don’t even support the same version of the OS. If you think webOS looks cool, buy a Pre. If you like Symbian, import a Nokia or settle for a Samsung. And most predictably, if you like the App Store, Apple—and only Apple—is ready to process your credit card. Like the Touch HD2’s obscenely hot hardware, but don’t care for Windows Mobile? Tough luck. Think the Droid is a perfect piece of machinery, but don’t understand what all this Android hubbub is about? Shut up.

In the last half-decade, we’ve become acutely aware of what goes into our smartphones. New phones get a spec rundown that mirrors a PC’s: Qualcomm processor X! RAM speed Y! Screen technology Z! It fosters a climate ripe for PC-style hardware wars, with new processor architectures competing head to head, an ongoing—and fruitful—resolution race, and each new phone edging out its predecessors with even more onboard storage, or support for a new input or output cable. It’s fascinating to watch the competition unfold, but it’s even more fascinating to see how tightly grouped development is. These are ARM-based phones, for the most part. They share memory types, display types, cameras, chipsets, processors and often, original device manufacturers. They’re the same thing.

When you buy a smartphone, you’re stuck with its OS. Your carrier might toss you a few software updates, and if you’re particularly gutsy, you might install some custom-baked software of your own, though you’re generally stuck with slight variations on and customizations of the handet’s default OS. It’s as if everyone in the mobile world is emulating what Apple does in the computer space, except worse: at least Macs have Boot Camp, for fuck’s sake. (And before they did, they had the PowerPC excuse.)

I know something like this is miles over the horizon—you can’t just will new hardware support into existence, and the entire industry is currently built around the bound relationship between software and hardware—and that some hardware (guess which!) is probably doomed to live out its entire life in a hollow monogamous relationship, but it’s time for handset manufacturers, along with Google, Microsoft, the Symbian Foundation, and Palm, maybe, to start setting goals. Or at minimum, it’s time for us to start asking them to.

For the companies, this would mean working on driver support for common componentry, opening up to the enthusiast communities who already do so much amazing software work on their own, and agreeing on some kind of common bootloader, from which users can choose to install their operating system.

For users, this would mean freedom. Going into 2010, our smartphones are more central to our lives than ever, and it’s time to acknowledge that. Consumers treat smartphones like computers. The people who make them, though, treat them like dumbphones; prepackaged products, artificially limited for no good reason—at least, no good reason to the people who buy them.

Geek Out on the High Seas with Holland America

HollandAmerica.jpg

Tech-lovers should thank Holland America for giving us a way to avoid all that sun and water on vacation, and do something we really enjoy. The company has installed Microsoft Surface units on the ms Veendam and is currently installing them on the ms Rotterdam. Three other liners–the ms Ryndam, ms Statendam and ms Maasdam–will follow after that.

The Microsoft Surface units are being installed in the ships’ Mix lounges, which feature martini, champagne, and spirits and ales bars. The touch-screen computers let guests listen to music or play games including checkers, chess, air hockey, Tetris, cards, and skee-ball. Sports games include football and basketball.

“Microsoft Surface is an exciting focal point in the trendy Mix entertainment venue, which is designed as the ultimate place to both socialize and be entertained with the latest innovations,” says Richard D. Meadows, CTC, executive vice president, marketing, sales and guest programs.

Fusion Garage Joojoo tablet rises from the ashes of the CrunchPad

Fusion Garage has finally come clean with its side of the story in regards to the CrunchPad debacle, and just unveiled its new Arrington-free version of the device: the Joojoo. The way Fusion Garage tells it, the device was already in the works at the time of the original TechCrunch post about the idea, and that Michael Arrington and co. made zero contributions to the development of the device — and apparently don’t have any sort of contract to prove otherwise. The device is much along the lines of what we’d been hearing: it runs a UNIX-based OS, boots straight to a web browser (otherwise no apps at all), weighs about 2.4 pounds and features a 12.1-inch capacitive touchscreen. There are no physical buttons on the slate outside of the on-off switch, which taps into a 9 second boot time. Under the hood there’s a 4GB SSD, WiFi (no 3G), an accelerometer and about 5 hours of battery life. Pre-orders start on December 11th, with a dream-shattering $499 pricetag bringing this thing back into the realm of reality. We’re supposed to see demos of the Joojoo in the wild this week, and another shot of the device can be found after the break.

Continue reading Fusion Garage Joojoo tablet rises from the ashes of the CrunchPad

Fusion Garage Joojoo tablet rises from the ashes of the CrunchPad originally appeared on Engadget on Mon, 07 Dec 2009 12:50:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink   |  sourceThe Joo Joo  | Email this | Comments

MIT Wins DARPA Balloon Challenge

DARPA_Balloon_Challenge.jpg

A group of MIT students won DARPA’s $40,000 Network Challenge by being the first to submit the locations of 10 moored, red, 8-foot weather balloons at 10 fixed locations across the continental U.S. The team accomplished the goal in just less than nine hours, sorting through tons of misinformation floating around the Internet on Facebook, Twitter, and other sites.

The Washington Post reports that the winning team, headed by post-doc Riley Crane, set up an information-gathering pyramid that assigned each balloon an award of $4,000, the first person to spot one $2,000, and less money to people who referred the various informants down the chain. The team will donate the rest of the award money to charity.

Fusion Garage CrunchPad video conference liveblog

We’re just getting settled in for Fusion Garage’s CrunchPad webcast — we’ve been promised CEO Chandra Rathakrishnan’s version of the 12-inch tablet’s bizarre saga, and we’ve certainly got quite a few questions of our own to ask. We’ll start updating just as soon as it starts, so make sure you’re up to speed on what went down over the weekend and get ready for some fireworks.

Continue reading Fusion Garage CrunchPad video conference liveblog

Fusion Garage CrunchPad video conference liveblog originally appeared on Engadget on Mon, 07 Dec 2009 12:24:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink   |   | Email this | Comments

Fusion Garage’s Joojoo Unveiling Liveblog

Fusion Garage, the engineering side that booted TechCrunch off of their own Crunchpad project, is about to be unveiled in a live webcast. We’re going to be liveblogging it at 9:30 AM PT (12:30 PM ET). That’s basically now.

9:22: The stream was active for a second—I got a screencap of it above—but it looks like they shut off the video.

9:23: In case you’re not familiar with the story, hit up this link while the webcast is still preparing, and check it out. Basically, Fusion Garage, on behalf of their shareholders, decided that they wanted to cut TechCrunch out of any involvement (besides a crappy advisor role) after the two parties had developed the thing together. Think of it as if your wife one day told you that she’d be raising your kid by herself, and your involvement was no longer needed.

9:28: It’s sad, really, since the CrunchPad was supposed to be one of the first (if not the first) cheap tablets that was designed just for web browsing and “consuming” content. The perfect bed/toilet computer, essentially.

9:29: I mean, even if it does end up being released under a different name by Fusion Garage without TechCrunch’s involvement, would you buy it? Or would you be loyal, in principle, to TechCrunch, since they’re the ones who actually came up with the idea?

9:30: It’s a tough decision. Would most people care about petty stuff like this if the final product was good? Would most people even KNOW about it? Probably not.

9:31: Though, we’ll get to hear FG’s side of the story today. Who knows if TechCrunch’s side was the entire truth. It’ll probably end up being somewhere inbetween.

9:34: It’s starting. Chandra is saying this webcast is a good way to address misconceptions introduced by Arrington’s TC post.

9:36: “I’m a dreamer of big dreams.” And he’s a engineer.

9:36: Chandra is going over his past as an engineer. He’s saying he’s upset by all the posts on him from the last week.

9:37: “Fusion Garage is the only actual do-er in this story.”

9:37: Since 2008, they tried to make a browser-based operating system that supported a “thin, tablet-like touchscreen device.”

9:38: In his first meeting with Arrington, he explained what FG was developing, and how his OS would be the key to making the “vision a reality”. Mike Arrington would introduce them to investors, secure funding and introduce them to hardware vendors. He would want to make a deal so TechCrunch could acquire the company so that Mike would have controlling interest. They had many talks about the acquisition, but nothing solid ever came out of it.

9:40: Mike was “unable to deliver”, in February 2009. Without further development, including a finished prototype, nobody would provide funding to bring a product to market. He then takes a shot at the birthday cake photo.

9:40: “If the project was going to go forward, it would be up to Fusion Garage. It was clear that Michael was not able to deliver.”

9:40: They finished their hardware prototype, and did all the engineering challenges by themselves—as you’d expect.

9:41: Chandra said that he secured funding through “his” network, instead of through Michael Arrington. It seems like this might be the thing that triggered the booting of Mike—the fact that TC couldn’t deliver funding or connections.

9:42: Chandra is saying that there was no agreement for an acquisition by TC. There were talks, but no agreement. He’s saying Fusion Garage owns all IP and proprietary rights for the production. The OS developed entirely by them. “TechCrunch didn’t contribute a single line of code.”

9:43: FG provided Arrington terms for being an advisor role, but was turned down.

9:44: The product will be introduced this week. And they call it Joojoo.

9:45: The reason why they call it Joojoo was because it’s an “African term that stands for magical”

9:45: The device boots in 9 seconds.

9:46: All icons on the site are “web services”, and the screen is really really green.

9:46: You can get online, to the internet, in 9 seconds.

9:46: It has a 12.1-inch capacitive touchscreen. “The largest screen of any device in its class on the market.”

9:47: No physical buttons other than the on-off buttons.

9:47: Joojoo has no preloaded applications, Windows or menus. It will accept sliding and scrolling gestures with your fingers. And it can be used as a digital book. “The internet is the application”, similar to Google’s Chrome OS.

9:48: “Unfortunately Arrington’s dream of $200 or $300 price for something like this was unrealistic. Nothing worthwhile can be delivered to market at that price.” How are they pricing it?

9:48: The Joojoo is more than 3x the iPhone 3GS’s screen. How about netbooks? Those have “noncapacitive touch and a poor web experience”.

9:49: Joojoo “provides the best in class internet experience for everything we do.” And it can “watch full HD videos,” as well as read magazines and books. It weighs 1.1 kg.

9:50: It’s going to be $499.

9:50: Preorders are available this friday on the Joojoo website. It’ll be sold online only, without retail until the near future.

9:50: Q&A Section:

9:50: Q: “Please respond to Arrington’s post.”

9:51: A: “There is no legal case filed today. We are very confident in our position, and we believe we own all the IPs.”

9:51: A: There are no contracts of any kind between us and TechCrunch.

9:51: Q: “What do you say to Michael saying you ambushing him out of the blue.”

9:51: A: Chandra says, basically, Arrington failed on everything he promised he would do (funding, getting connections), so FG had to “move on on their own.”

9:52: Q: “Other companies have tried to introduce tablets to the market and failed. Why is your device different?”

9:52: A: Tablets today run the full Windows operating system. They’re expensive, and heavy, and it wasn’t a form factor that could deliver the way you would like to use. “We believe we can make a big difference.” Then he goes over the features like a 12.1-inch screen and the fact that they “don’t boot to an operating system.”

9:53: There have been verbal discussions about a possible acquisition, but “nothing was delivered on Michael’s part.” There weren’t any verbal assurances, except for Michael saying that he wants to acquire the company.

9:54: Q: “What exactly was the offer you made to Michael that he refused?”

9:54: A: “Michael promised a lot of things, but he did not deliver. We offered the possibility to work with us, and be part of this. Despite us doing everything, software, hardware, funding. But Michael turned down the offer.”

9:55: Q: “Can you comment on Google Chrome OS.”

9:55: A: “They see things in relation to Netbooks, but we believe that Netbooks’ use cases aren’t what they should be for what you want to do.”

9:56: Q: “What kind of offline capabilities does the machine have?”

9:56: A: You can use your Gmail, for example, using a local cache. You’ll synchronize when connectivity is available.

9:56: Q: “Does this product have any real chance to succeed without TechCrunch’s marketing?”

9:57: A: If you define marketing as doing a blog post, then no. Michael has been “talking about this for the longest while.” He really wants to hammer home that Arrington didn’t deliver on any kind of promises.

9:57: Q: “What are the specs?”

9:57: A: “It has a 12.1-inch screen, 4GB SSD, but most of the storage is stored in the cloud.”

9:58: Q: “The screen was extremely green. Is that normal?”

9:58: A: “It’s a trick of the camera. I’ll show this in 1 to 1 demos, and the screen is fine, and the colors are fine.”

9:58: Q: What is the battery life?

9:59: A: 5 hours. Wi-Fi only.

9:59: Q: Do you have any relationships with content providers?

9:59: A: No. We’re in discussions with companies.

9:59: Q: Will there be any Joojoo accessories?

10:00: A: Yes, we’ll announce them in the next couple weeks.

10:00: Q: Will we be showing complete demos in 1:1 meetings?

10:00: A: Yes.

10:00: There will be one color at the moment.

10:00: “We think there will be a lot of demand for this product.”

10:01: Fusion Garage has raised 3 million to date since 2008.

10:01: “Thank you so much for your time today. I look forward to seeing many of you over the coming weeks.”

10:01: That looks like the end. I’ll be getting a hands on with this thing as soon as possible, so check back for that.

Get a Sony Blu-ray player for $99.99 shipped

The good news: it’s rockin’ BD-Live! The less-good news: it’s a refurb, so the warranty’s only 90 days. Bonus news: for five bucks more you can do better. pOriginally posted at a href=”http://news.cnet.com/8301-13845_3-10410339-58.html” class=”origPostedBlog”The Cheapskate/a/p