MSI’s MT-V660 goes to the Zune HD bank for design ‘inspiration’

Well, at least MSI has good taste. We can’t fault the company for nabbing a multitude of Zune HD stylistic elements in the creation of its new MT-V660 PMP — outside of general moral qualms, of course — because the results are predictably attractive. Such brazen style-lifts aren’t a first for MSI, who took quite a few pages out of the MacBook Air book for its first X-Slim. Like we said, good taste. The MT-V660 itself has a 3.2-inch WQVGA screen and a codec-friendly Rockchip RK2806 chipset instead of the Zune’s Tegra. No word on price or availability.

MSI’s MT-V660 goes to the Zune HD bank for design ‘inspiration’ originally appeared on Engadget on Wed, 16 Dec 2009 12:57:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink SlashGear  |  sourceiMP3  | Email this | Comments

Psystar Banned From Selling Mac Clones

picture-7Apple on Tuesday afternoon won a permanent injunction against Psystar, a Florida-based Mac cloner. The ruling prohibits the startup from selling hardware hacked to run Mac OS X.

US. District Judge William Alsup issued the ruling, banning Psystar from the following:

  • Infringing Apple’s copyrights in Mac OS X .
  • Circumventing any technological measure used by Apple to prevent unauthorized copying of Mac OS X on non-Apple computers.
  • Creating or selling a product intended to circumvent Apple’s methods for preventing Mac OS X to be installed on non-Apple hardware.
  • Aiding or abetting any other person or entity to infringe Apple’s copyrighted Mac OS X software.
  • Doing anything to circumvent the rights held by Apple under the Copyright Act with respect to Mac OS X.

In short, that means Psystar can no longer ship generic hardware that’s running Mac OS X. And the cloner can’t sell goods that assist consumers in creating Hackintoshes. Psystar must comply no later than Dec. 31, 2009.

However, it doesn’t spell a complete end to Psystar’s Rebel EFI software, a $50 downloadable utility that enables consumers to create Hackintoshes of their own — even though the ruling about circumvention applies to DIY solutions. Psystar argued Rebel EFI was not explicitly covered in this case and thus should not be included in the injunction. Alsup said Rebel EFI was not covered in the injunction, but the startup could continue to sell its software “at its own peril.”

“What is certain, however, is that until such a motion is brought, Psystar will be selling Rebel EFI at its peril, and risks finding itself held in contempt if its new venture falls within the scope of the injunction,” the final judgment states.

Long story short, even though Rebel EFI was not explicitly mentioned in the case, its functionality is banned by this injunction. So although technically Rebel EFI can be sold, it would be a very, very bad idea.

Psystar opened its business selling Mac clones in April 2008. Apple filed a lawsuit three months later against Psystar, alleging copyright, trademark and shrink-wrap licensing infringements.

Final Judgment [pdf] via AppleInsider via Macworld

Updated 11 a.m. PDT with clarifications regarding the ruling’s effects on Rebel EFI.

See Also:

Photo: Psystar



Intel announces Core i7 Custom Desktop Challenge winners

Well, you know Intel just wasn’t going to let NVIDIA have all the fun with its casemod design contest, and after a few weeks of voting, the chipmaker has now announced the winners of its own Core i7 Custom Desktop Challenge. Not surprisingly, there are a few familiar cases among the winners — including the lovingly crafted Mission-style PC casemod and the OS Xbox Pro (deserved winner of best video) — but there’s also plenty of designs we haven’t seen. That includes the Best in Show winner from modder “Duck,” whose fire engine red system pictured above uses dry ice cooling to allow for overclocking up to 5GHz, and the boombox mod from jj_sky5000, which won the award for best creativity. Hit up the link below for a closer look at those, and the rest of the winners.

[Thanks, Jeffrey]

Intel announces Core i7 Custom Desktop Challenge winners originally appeared on Engadget on Wed, 16 Dec 2009 12:34:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink   |  sourceIntel  | Email this | Comments

How Carriers and Phone Makers Are Strangling Android (And How Google Could Save It)

The Google Phone could be a ploy to upset the wireless industry, or it could be an expensive niche device. Either way, it’d be a bid to take Android back from the companies that seem hell-bent on destroying it.

Android’s most serious problem right now is fragmentation: with each new phone, it seems, comes a different version of the OS. In theory, these differences are superficial, and come down to handset manufacturers’ and carriers’ custom interfaces, which sit atop a mostly unchanged Android core. In practice, it’s much worse.

Just look at the current top tier of Android devices. The Motorola Droid runs Android 2.0. The HTC MyTouch 3G and G1 on T-Mobile run Android 1.6. The HTC Hero, a newer phone than the MyTouch and the G1, is still stuck on 1.5, along with the even newer Motorola Cliq, which shares one parent—Motorola—with the 2.0-loaded Droid. Why is this something to worry about? Remember Google Maps Navigation, the free turn-by-turn app for Android? It only works on Android 2.0 and 1.6. An app written by Google doesn’t even work on every new Google phone. Imagine how things are with third party apps. (Spoiler: it’s a shitshow.)

Google’s been fairly diligent about updating the free, open-source heart of Android moving forward at a steady pace, and supplying handset manufacturers with the tools they need to keep their handsets running the latest software. That said, Google still deserves some of the blame here. That their software updates include new, exclusive functionality is fine on its own. And yeah, their eagerness to allow for Android to be skinned and deeply customized by handset manufacturers is fine on its own—in fact, it’s implicit in the project’s open source ethos. But mixed together, these ambitions create a gurgling software slurry of incompatibility, user experience inconsistency and general frustration. (See: Samsung Behold II) So what happened?

The problem is in the model. Android updates seed out through carriers, over the air or with special installers. This is because the updates are their responsibility: once handset manufacturers (and carriers, through handset manufacturers) have built their own version of Android, they’ve effectively taken it out of the development stream. Updating it is their responsibility, which they have to choose to uphold. Or not! Who cares? The phones are already sold. And there’s very little to motivate a carrier or handset manufacturer to update their Android phones, because the consequences tend to fall on Google: If Android fragments, the App Market doesn’t work. The public sours. Android starts to suck. This is where the Nexus One comes in.

Sold without a carrier, software updates for the Nexus One will be in Google’s hands. They will be able to keep it up to date as Android develops, without having to depend on some other company—or companies—not to drop the ball. Users won’t have to bother learning Google’s esoteric dessert-themed version codenames, and life will be better. This approach to software updates already has a case study: the iPhone. There’s a good reason Apple didn’t entrust AT&T with keeping the iPhone up to date, and that they didn’t want the company that actually manufacturers the phone—Foxconn—to have any responsibility for its software. Smartphone software is finicky and complicated, and so is the experience of using it. It needs to be tightly controlled to remain consistent, and because apps are the most important part of a smartphone platform nowadays, consistency is life or death.

Without totally changing what the Android project is, Google can’t put an absolute stop to fragmentation. What they can do is provide an example of how an Android phone should be done. With the Nexus One, Google probably isn’t getting into the business of making hardware; they’re just trying, in their passive, Googly way, to regain control of a project that’s spiraling toward chaos.

Update: Some input from someone who works in a major carrier’s device development group:

There is TONS of incentive for carriers to update their
software. Take a look at Verizon hosting the only Android 2.0 device.
Are you going to tell me that Sprint and T-Mobile wouldn’t love to
have their Android devices on 2.0 yesterday?

The truth is, there’s very little incentive for the Handset maker to
provide an update. All those phones are already sold and in the
carrier’s inventory. Any investment in updating those models will
bring them no additional cash flow. However focusing on their next
model will.

He’s partly right: carriers have a motivation to keep their software up to date, in that they are the ones who have to deal most with customers. Handset manufacturers are the one’s with the least motivation, since their sale has already been made. But in branding a handset with their name, effectively selling it as their product, and assuming responsibility for seeding updates, a carrier becomes responsible for making sure their customers have up-to-date software, and exerting pressure on handset manufacturers is they don’t hold up their end. —Thanks, David!

Flexible, organic flash memory on tap at the University of Tokyo

If the University of Tokyo has its way, we could be seeing an onslaught of flexible computing devices sooner than you think! Earlier this year the school made some noise with its stretchable OLED prototype and now a research group led by Takeo Someya and Tsuyoshi Sekitani has developed a non-volatile, flexible organic flash memory that may someday be used for large-area sensors, electronic paper devices, and non-volatile memory. Using a polyethylene naphthalate (PEN) resin sheet arrayed with memory cells, the memory can be bent until its curvature radius reaches 6mm without causing mechanical or electrical degradation. As it stands now, the device has a memory retention time of one day — but the team maintains that this can be “drastically improved by reducing the size of the element and employing an SAM with a long molecular length.” Piece of cake, right?

Flexible, organic flash memory on tap at the University of Tokyo originally appeared on Engadget on Wed, 16 Dec 2009 12:07:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink   |  sourceTech-On  | Email this | Comments

This Year in Google: The 2009 Edition


When technologists of the future look back in time, they’ll remember 2009 as the year Google got serious about an internet operating system, speeding up the web, and indexing EVERYTHING in sight. Take a look at the year 2009 in Google.

Google’s Three Biggest Launches of 2009

Two of the three most significant Google releases of 2009 are not yet available to the public in a final release build, but all three are open source. In no particular order:

Chromium OS: In July, Google got Microsoft and Apple shaking in their boots when they announced they were building an operating system. The source code for Chrome OS (in its development phase it’s called Chromium OS) became available in November; early adopters can run virtual machine images and bootable USB drive versions of the OS.

Google Wave: In May, Google demonstrated their new, real-time collaboration webapp, Google Wave, to a crowd of incredulous developers who couldn’t stop applauding. In September, they invited 100,000 users to try the Wave Preview. By now, over one million users have joined the Wave Preview. We wrote a book about Wave; and you can give and get Wave invitations on our dedicated forum page.

Android 2.0/Droid: While Android-based handsets were already available when the year started, the Motorola Droid debuted in November running Android 2.0 (with turn-by-turn GPS capabilities) and took on the iPhone in its “Droid Does” ad campaign. Google also released a flurry of Android-only applications and updates to existing ones in 2009 to boost their mobile platform, including the Google Voice app (which Apple rejected on the iPhone), the amazing Google Goggles app, Google Maps enhancements, and Google Listen.

Google’s Most Updated Apps of 2009

While a few Google products did get shut down, “sunsetted,” or just didn’t change much, several marquee apps grew up a whole lot this year with serious feature additions and upgrades.

Search Engine Upgrades: Remember when Google was just a search engine? Googlers do, because they’re still busy bees improving search results and rolling out new ways to get to them. This year saw the rollout of Google web search’s Caffeine update, as well as music, social, and real-time search, along with several new Google Image search options, and updates to the Google Suggest drop-down.

Gmail: Thanks to Gmail Labs, our favorite web-based email client got a slew of new features for power users, from automatic translations to offline attachments to time zone notifiers to exportable mail filters. If you haven’t recently, cruise through your Gmail account’s Labs area to pick and choose from over 60 experimental features. Gmail’s mobile web application for the iPhone and on Android also saw an overhaul and vast improvement this year.

Chrome web browser: Google’s own browser, Chrome, saw a whole lot of movement in 2009, especially late in the year with the release of bookmark sync, official beta builds for Mac and Linux (finally!), and Chrome extensions.

Google News also saw a couple of interesting experiments like Fast Flip and the News Timeline.

Google’s Mission to Speed Up the Web

If there’s any one thing Google did this year, it was launch a concerted effort on all fronts to make the web faster. From developer tools (like Speed Tracer and the Google Web Toolkit) to consumer products (like Chrome and Google Public DNS), it’s kind of astounding the sheer amount of stuff Google put out there this year under the speed umbrella. They’re even going so far as attempt to reinvent the two pillar protocols of email and the web with Wave and SPDY (a faster replacement for HTTP).

And the rest….

2009 was also the year of a few legal skirmishes (like the Google Books settlement, the Cyanogen C&D, the Google Voice/FCC dust-up), a few acquisitions (like reCAPTCHA, Gizmo5, and AppJet), and data control initiatives (the Google Dashboard and the Data Liberation Front).

You could say it was a pretty busy year at the Googleplex.

Google’s 2009 Product Release Calendar

Take a chronological ride through the last four seasons at Google in this list of 2009 product releases and updates, listed month by month.

January

February

March

April

May

June

July

August

September

October

November

December

Now you tell us:


What was the best Google launch of the year? The biggest flop? The product that made the biggest difference in your daily life? Let us know in the comments.

Gina Trapani, Lifehacker’s founding editor, looks forward to what the GOOG will come up with in 2010. Find her at Smarterware and on Twitter.

CyberNotes: Placing the Tab-Bar on the Side in Firefox and Opera

This article was written on May 23, 2007 by CyberNet.

CyberNotes
Web Browser Wednesday

I’m one of those people who doesn’t know what they would do if their Web browser didn’t have tabs. The problem is that I am a tabaholic and always seem to have 20+ Tabs open at any one given time. As you can imagine, I am often left with very little room for each tab, andfind myself clicking through them all when I’m looking for something. Well, that’s how it was until I decided to put my tabs on the side of my browser.

All of the monitors that I have on both my desktops and laptops are widescreen, giving me extra screen space in the horizontal direction. Because of this extra space I have started to place things like my Windows Taskbar on the side, and that’s when I thought to put my tabs on the side as well.

It’s actually pretty easy to do…

—Firefox—

There is no option in Firefox to move the tab-bar to the side, so the first place I turned was to the extensions. It took a little bit of work but I was able to find an extension called Vertigo which was recently updated to work with Firefox 2. By default the extension is designed to place the tabs on the left side of the screen while still allowing normal operations, such as the rearranging of tabs:

Firefox Sidebar

I also noticed that the extension had a few options, including one to adjust the width of the bar:

Firefox Sidebar

Then I saw that the developer commented saying that the problems with TabMixPlus were also fixed, so I decided to try that out as well. One of the cool things that I stumbled across when playing with various tab-bar settings was that changing the tab-bar position to “bottom” in TabMixPlus would position the tab-bar on the right-side of the browser if Vertigo was installed:

Firefox Sidebar

I also noticed that TabMixPlus took control of the width, but that could easily be changed in the settings:

Firefox Sidebar

Personally, I prefer to have it on the right-side because I keep by bookmarks open in a sidebar on the left-side. It just feels weird if you have two sidebars immediately next to each other.

I also tried having TabMixPlus put close buttons on each of the tabs, but that didn’t work out so well. If having a close button on each tab is an important feature for you then you probably shouldn’t try this out.

—Opera—

Opera is a slightly different story because it already has this feature built-in. All you have to do is right-click on any of your open tabs and click the Customize option. You should now see a screen where you can select the positioning from the Placement drop-down list:

Opera Tabs in Sidebar

After you click the OK button, the tab-bar should be in its new position:

Opera Tabs in Sidebar

 

—Overview—

If you don’t have a widescreen monitor this might not be as beneficial to you since it can take up some valuable screen space. Feel free to checkout our other post on reducing tab clutter if you’re looking for more space-saving techniques.

Copyright © 2009 CyberNet | CyberNet Forum | Learn Firefox

Related Posts:


Pikavu GPS tracker teaches kids to abandon privacy for safety

You can’t put a price on your child’s well-being — but if you could, we’re guessing that it’d fall a little short of the €990 (roughly $1,440) that’s being charged for the Pikavu Express Locator. A child-friendly (read: gaudy) take on the Keruve GPS tracker being used to keep track of Alzheimer’s patients, the package includes a water- and impact-resistant watch that locks to your kid’s wrist and a 4.2-inch touchscreen base station. Four positioning systems (SBAS-GPS, indoorVision, VisionCellid and T-GSM) are employed to keep track of the little guy, and the watch itself has a battery life of up to 4.5 days. Expensive? Indeed. Worth the investment? Well, we don’t know your kids — but probably not. PR after the break.

Continue reading Pikavu GPS tracker teaches kids to abandon privacy for safety

Pikavu GPS tracker teaches kids to abandon privacy for safety originally appeared on Engadget on Wed, 16 Dec 2009 11:41:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink Engadget Spanish  |  sourcePikavu  | Email this | Comments

NVIDIA promises Tegra 2 chipset and third party hardware at CES

For an upstart mobile chipset, Tegra seemed off to a decent start in 2009, but with a minimum of actual hardware actually on shelves for the holidays, we’re supposed to look to 2010 now for Tegra’s big break — according to NVIDIA, anyway. NVIDIA plans to unveil its next-gen Tegra 2 chipset at CES in January, which is rumored to be around twice as powerful as the original, and we’re supposed to be seeing a bunch of “interesting form factors” along side (like that Tegra tablet pictured above, for instance). We’re told to expect tablet PCs, smartbooks, netbooks and MIDs running Tegra in the first half of next year, but the real traction is supposed to take place with the first smartphone entries in the second half of 2010. It sounds like a long time to wait.

NVIDIA promises Tegra 2 chipset and third party hardware at CES originally appeared on Engadget on Wed, 16 Dec 2009 11:15:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink SlashGear  |  sourceX-bit labs  | Email this | Comments

Kobo International E-Book Store Launches: Why Amazon Should Be Afraid

kobophones

There is little doubt that electronic books have gone mainstream. The question now is, in just which direction will the market go? It’s possible that the Kindle will do what Apple and the iPod did for music, essentially owning the market. Or things could split open, with many sellers competing on an open platform. Kobo is betting on the latter.

Kobo is a rebranded Shortcovers, which sells e-books that can be read on almost any device, from Macs and PCs to the iPhone, Blackberry, Android, Palm Pre and any e-reader that can work with EPUB-format books, such as the Barnes & Noble Nook or the Sony Reader. Notably, the Kindle is absent from the list.

Shortcovers has been selling e-books for a while, but the rebranding to Kobo marks the first serious alternative to the Kindle as a platform. Kobo has teamed up with Borders, REDgroup Retail and Instant Fame, which to you and me means that the books are available almost worldwide, in the United States, Canada, the EU, the U.K., Australia and the Asia Pacific region. In fact, Borders will be incorporating Kobo into its store later next year. Kobo is also adding 1.8 million public-domain books from the Internet Archive.

To accompany the launch, there are a slew of new applications. I tried out the new iPhone app, which is, like the Shortcovers app before it, free. You log in with your existing Shortcovers ID and from there you can browse, sample and buy books.

Apart from a name change, Kobo has some new features. Now you can browse by category, choose from a new Top-50 e-books list, New York Times bestsellers, Oprah’s book-club picks and more. The app also has recommended reading lists (right now there is a “Season’s Readings” section, and a splendid “Canadian, eh” list) and a better search function.

It’s very easy to browse, and the Kobo app puts Amazon’s rushed-out Kindle for iPhone application to shame. It’s all done with full artwork for covers, and usually you can read the first chapter of a book (although a lot of the time, you only get to read the end-matter and not any actual content). Reading books is equally elegant, and greatly cleaned-up since the original Shortcovers app. Page turning is animated and actually looks like paper pages flipping.

But when you come to make a purchase, things go slightly awry. By now, most of us are used to in-app purchases on the iPhone, so getting bounced out of Kobo and tossed into a credit card form in Safari is an annoying shock. Once you have laboriously input your details, you are sent back to the Kobo app where your book is waiting for you. It would be more convenient if Kobo took advantage of the iTunes App Store’s ability to complete purchases within the app, with billing handled by Apple.

Subsequent transactions go smoother, and you only need to input your password to buy (it still requires a round-trip to Safari, though).

This reliance on Safari is, we assume, both a way to get around Apple’s 30 percent cut and also to make the experience the same across platforms. And speaking of platforms, only the iPhone and Blackberry have the updated applications so far, with the rest “coming soon.”

Kobo is so far the best and most comprehensive service we have used to buy and read books, especially for non-U.S. residents. It is still flawed, and it is a royal pain that Kindle won’t support EPUB books. But with its platform-agnostic approach, huge catalog and new heavyweight partners, we expect to see Kobo grow fast.

In fact, I’m pretty certain that my next e-book reader will not be a Kindle.

World, Meet Kobo! [Kobo blog]

Kobo Product page [Kobo]

Kobo for iPhone [iTunes]