Apple, Google, Microsoft and Yahoo compared at the macro level

We all love a good debate about how the tech giants of today are competing with each other, but rarely do we get a handy reference sheet like this to point people to. Nick Bilton of the New York Times has put together a segment-by-segment comparison between America’s tech heavyweights, which does a fine job of pinpointing who competes with whom and where. We find the gaps in coverage more intriguing than the overlaps, though, with Microsoft’s only unticked box — mobile hardware — raising habitual rumors of a Pink phone. Apple’s absence from the provision of mapping services might also soon be at an end, given the company acquired map maker Placebase in July of last year (see Computerworld). Anyway, there should be plenty more for you to enjoy, so hit the source for the full chart and get analyzin’.

Apple, Google, Microsoft and Yahoo compared at the macro level originally appeared on Engadget on Mon, 25 Jan 2010 03:49:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink HardOCP  |  sourceNew York Times  | Email this | Comments

Google Nexus One Sales Off to Slow Start

nexus-one-week1-sales-comparison

Google’s Nexus One Android phone could end up being a miss for the search company with the golden touch.

About 20,000 Nexus Ones were sold in the first week, compared to 250,000 for the Motorola Droid and 1.6 million for Apple’s iPhone 3G S, estimates Flurry, an analytics company that tracks the usage of developer applications on iPhone and Android platform.

The shockingly low number, if true, means the Motorola Droid outsold the Nexus One more than 12 times and the iPhone 3G S had 80 times the sales of the Nexus One in its first week.

“As a product, the Nexus One boasts the most advanced Android OS to date as well as unique features,” says Peter Farago, vice-president of marketing in a blog post on Flurry. “However, potentially due to the heightened promise created by early buzz, the handset has ultimately fallen short on sales expectations.”

Google declined to comment. “We are not disclosing sales data for Nexus One phones,” says a company spokesperson.

Google introduced the Nexus One on January 5 as the first Android device that would be sold by the search company itself, rather than a manufacturing or carrier partner. The Nexus One, which runs Android 2.1, has been designed by HTC and works with T-Mobile’s network in the United States.

The device retails for $180 with a 2-year T-Mobile contract, while an unsubsidized version is available for $530. But you can only get the Nexus On through Google’s online store, and only if you’re in the United States, for now. The iPhone 3G S was available in eight countries at launch.

The move has sparked complaints from users unhappy with the poor customer support from Google, which offers no phone or in-store help. Nexus One has also faced device-related issues, such as its inability to effectively connect to T-Mobile’s 3G network and complaints about the touchscreen.

All that may have taken a toll on the Nexus One’s popularity among consumers. Google’s phone also lacks the “‘wow’ factor that is now expected with each new challenger to the iPhone,” says Farago.

The Nexus One has a vivid, crisp OLED display and a 1-GHZ Snapdragon processor that makes it the fastest on the market. It includes voice recognition, turn-by-turn navigation from Google Maps and improvements to the user interface in the form of the latest version of the Android operating system.

Still, most of it is seen by analysts as an “evolutionary” improvement and one that’s not enough to compel customers to overwhelm Google’s online store.

Google’s online launch of the Nexus One could also be blamed for the slow sales.

“It’s a very different go-to-market strategy compared to Verizon’s launch of Droid, on which it spent a record-breaking $100 million on marketing, including aggressive TV advertising spends,” says Farago.

nexusone_firstweeksalescomp

See Also:


CyberWare: Paint.NET 3.0 Released…Breaks the Mold

This article was written on January 28, 2007 by CyberNet.

CyberNet's CyberWare
Tracking Down Great Software For You!

Paint.NET is an photo and image editor that is about as feature intensive as you can get while still keeping it a fast (and light) application. When you start Photoshop you have to wait 10 to 30 seconds before you can start using it, but Paint.net is ready to go almost instantly…which is why this is one of my favorite image editors. Most of the time I am looking to do something quick, and Paint.NET can do 95% of the tasks that I need to do, which primarily consists of cropping or rearranging an image.

The new Paint.NET 3.0 just made things a lot better with my two favorite additions being the “tabbed” interface and a new gradient tool:

  • Simple and intuitive tab-based multi-document user interface.
    Tabbed Interface
  • Now available in 8 languages: English, Chinese (Simplified), French, German, Japanese, Korean, Portuguese (Brazil), and Spanish.
  • Interactive Gradient Tool that makes it very easy to draw and then fine-tune placement and coloring of a gradient.
    Gradient
  • User-definable color palette (as opposed to just the color wheel).
    Color Selector
  • New effects: Clouds, Median, Unfocus, Outline, and an improved Sharpen.
  • More intuitive and more powerful toolbar.
  • Generally improved and cleaner user interface.
  • History files are now compressed to save disk space, reduce disk activity, and improve performance.
  • “Merge Down” layer command.

The only thing that I would like to see now is a right-click menu for a lot of the various options. For example, when managing layers I would like to be able to right-click on one of them and select “Delete” to remove that layer. I find myself right-clicking expecting a menu to popup in Paint.NET since I have become so accustomed to Photoshop’s right-click menus. Maybe they’ll work on that for the next release. ;)

Overall though, I would hate not having this application installed on my PC now. I haven’t looked into being able to put this program on a USB drive and take it with me, but it would be really nice to have it wherever I go so I might try that out to see what happens.

Congrats to the Paint.NET team for making such a great application…I think this should be included with Windows. :D

Download Paint.NET 3.0
News Source: CyberNet Forum [thanks javasharp]

Copyright © 2010 CyberNet | CyberNet Forum | Learn Firefox

Related Posts:


Laptop reliability survey: ASUS and Toshiba win, HP fails

Boy, do we have a nice slab of data for you to sink your teeth into today. The 3-year service history of more than 30,000 laptops has been pored over, analyzed, and reduced to gorgeous comparative charts, which you know you’re dying to know more about. We should note, however, that the service was provided by SquareTrade, whose primary business is selling extended warranties, but that shouldn’t completely prejudice us against reaching conclusions on the basis of the presented facts. Firstly, netbooks have shown themselves to be on average 20 percent less reliable than entry-level laptops, which in turn are 10 percent more likely to break down than premium machines. In other words, you get what you pay for — shocking, right? The big talking point, though, will inevitably be the manufacturer comparison chart above: here ASUS and Toshiba (rather appropriately) share the winners’ spoils, while HP languishes in the ignominious last place, with more than a quarter of all laptops expected to suffer a hardware fault of some kind within three years. So, does your experience corroborate / refute this info? Keep it gentlemanly, okay?

[Via Electronista]

Filed under:

Laptop reliability survey: ASUS and Toshiba win, HP fails originally appeared on Engadget on Tue, 17 Nov 2009 11:09:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Read | Permalink | Email this | Comments

Windows 7 bested by XP in netbook battery life tests

The venerable 2001 classic of an OS, Windows XP, strikes again. The scribes over at Laptop have put together a rather damning battery life comparison between old greybeard and the fresh Windows 7, which finds that on average netbooks get 47 minutes less battery life with the upgraded software. In the case of the ASUS 1008HA, that deficit was a meaty 57 minutes, or 16.7%. Liliputing and jkOnTheRun have run their own tests which invariably reached the same conclusion. Adding these data to an earlier comparison with Snow Leopard, where Windows 7 was again markedly worse than its competitor, leads us to the conclusion that perhaps Microsoft’s 7th heaven hasn’t quite been optimized for the mobile mavens out there… yet.

Read – Stick with XP? Windows 7 Battery Life Worse on Netbooks
Read – Windows 7 + netbooks = lower battery life?
Read – Netbook Battery Tests: Windows XP vs Windows 7

Filed under: ,

Windows 7 bested by XP in netbook battery life tests originally appeared on Engadget on Thu, 12 Nov 2009 03:51:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink | Email this | Comments

Vista SP1 vs. XP SP2 Performance Tests

This article was written on February 18, 2008 by CyberNet.

ancient vista computer Now that Vista SP1 has been released there’s no surprise that performance tests and benchmarks are going to start flooding the Internet, and not surprisingly XP takes the crown in most of the cases. ZDNet has gotten the ball rolling (here and here) with their test results:

Looking at the data there’s only one conclusion that can be drawn – Windows XP SP2 is faster than Windows Vista SP1.  End of story.  Out of the fifteen tests carried out, XP SP2 beat Vista SP1 in eleven, Vista SP1 beat XP SP2 in two of the tests, and two of the tests resulted in a draw.

There’s one inherent problem that I’ve seen with several of the tests so far. Testers are putting the two operating systems up against each other using the exact same systems. No harm, right? Well, there’s a natural progression of technology that would obviously make you think that running XP on the same system as Vista will always result in XP being faster.

Obviously as time goes on the operating systems will take advantage of the system resources that are made available, and if they didn’t there would never be any need to upgrade to a new computer. I remember when I was running Windows 98 thinking that in 10 years we’ll be able to hit the power button and the computer’s bootup sequence would take just seconds because processors would be so fricken’ fast. Here we are about 10 years later, and the bootup times are about the same as they always have been simply because the software grows along with the hardware. Otherwise we might see Windows fit on a few floppy disks.

What I would like to see is someone running XP on a system that was released one year after XP was made available, and then comparing it to Vista running on a similarly priced new system. Or maybe running each of them on a computer that only meets the minimum or recommended requirements for each operating system would be even better. Then these tests would mean a little more to me.

To me these comparisons are like looking at the performance of a video game that was released back in 2001 and putting it up against a game that was released in 2007… using the same hardware. You would obviously expect to see the game from 2001 to do a lot better, but the one from 2007 will likely be better in the graphics compartment.

Copyright © 2009 CyberNet | CyberNet Forum | Learn Firefox

Related Posts:


Windows PC Scout patronizes, offers surprisingly good comparison tool

Want a “high-quality” machine that represents the “best of the best in laptops?” Microsoft’s got your back with its all-new PC Scout, a Flash-based laptop recommendation engine whose delivery is unfortunately more than a little reminiscent of those misguided Windows 7 launch party promos. Ah well, should you successfully navigate your way past bad jokes about space-cats and online dating, and on to the Selection section, you’ll find a thoroughly decent laptop comparison tool — with sliders for price and features narrowing or expanding your available choice in real time. With future plans to expand it to cover desktop hardware as well, Microsoft is making a commendable and seemingly rather useful effort to aid its users in picking out a new machine. Kudos for that, now how about hiring some real actors for a change?

[Via Ars Technica]

Filed under: ,

Windows PC Scout patronizes, offers surprisingly good comparison tool originally appeared on Engadget on Tue, 20 Oct 2009 23:31:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Read | Permalink | Email this | Comments

HTC’s HD2 gets sized up to the competition

We’ve already seen (and written) plenty on the HD2, and we’ve enjoyed our initial experiences with the device — but now someone has finally sized up the massive, Windows Mobile 6.5 smartphone with its touchscreen contemporaries… and the differences are downright shocking. Just take a look at this beast next to Apple’s iPod touch (above) or the company’s own Hero — the displays on the older devices seem dwarfed by the HD2’s 4.3-inch, 800 x 480 WVGA screen. There are lots of other revealing pictures in the writeup, but it’s the side-by-side shots that seem most telling to us — this is certainly the direction we’re headed in for mobile devices. Hit the read link and take a full look for yourself.

[Via SlashGear]

Filed under:

HTC’s HD2 gets sized up to the competition originally appeared on Engadget on Sun, 11 Oct 2009 04:43:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Read | Permalink | Email this | Comments

Google Presentations Misses the Mark

This article was written on September 18, 2007 by CyberNet.

Google Presentations New I’ve been excited for quite some time to see what Google would be able to pull out of their Online Presentation service, but I have to say that I’m a bit disappointed with the final result. For starters, one of the great things that they did is shorten the name of their “Office Suite” to just Google Docs (prior to this it was Google Docs & Spreadsheets), but the service is still in Beta.

Before you get too excited, everything that Google Presentations has to offer isn’t all that great. Take for instance the export feature which has a lot of shortcomings. It only lets you save a presentation as a ZIP file that contains a web-based version of your presentation. It can then be viewed in any browser without an Internet connection being needed, but they don’t let you save it as a standard PowerPoint file.

Initially you may not think that is too bad since you can just email people the link to view it online instead of attaching the file itself to an email, but there was one thing that really irked me. The file size limitation on a Google Presentation is 10MB, and once you hit that you’ll be scrambling to find some way to get the presentation into a desktop app. Sorry, but the only way around that right now is to create a second presentation as a sort of continuation to the first.

Here’s a roundup that I put together of the good, the bad, and the ugly:

The Good (things I like):

  • Add and position text and images
  • Copy/duplicate slides
  • Choose from 15 somewhat stylish themes
  • Revision management makes it easy to revert prior changes
  • Makes it easy to share a presentation with multiple people
  • Remotely present slides with minimal work needed
  • Imports PowerPoint (PPT) presentations

The Bad (things that would be nice to have):

  • No animation or slide transitions
  • Can’t embed videos or audio (they could have at least incorporated it with YouTube for goodness sakes)
  • No editing of photos (integration with Picasa seems like a no-brainer)
  • Charts and diagrams…where are they? Google Spreadsheets already supports this feature, and for most businesses this is a must when creating presentations!

The Ugly (things that will prevent me from using it):

  • Can’t export presentations as a PowerPoint (PPT) presentation
  • 10MB file size limitation — be careful of how many photos you insert! You can also have no more than 5,000 images across all of your presentations, documents, and spreadsheets combined.
  • It’s a bit sluggish…not nearly as responsive as a desktop app
  • Just 5 pre-formatted slide layouts
  • Positioning of images and text is terrible if you’re trying to get them to line up nicely. They need a grid feature or the ability to line up multiple objects along, for instance, their top edge.
  • Doesn’t work in Opera

Google Presentations
Click to Enlarge

Note: I made the above presentation available for public viewing.

Google Presentations will hopefully shape up fast, and turn into a compeitor of Microsoft PowerPoint or OpenOffice.org. Impress isn’t even in order. Heck, Google Presentations can hardly stand up to the likes of ThinkFree and Zoho, so putting it in a side-by-side comparison to a desktop Office app would not shine well on Google.

Google Docs Homepage

Copyright © 2009 CyberNet | CyberNet Forum | Learn Firefox

Related Posts:


Android Battle: CLIQ edition

CLIQ
Galaxy
Tattoo
Hero
Magic / MT3G
Dream / G1
CarrierT-Mobile— (GSM / HSDPA)— (GSM / EDGE)SprintT-MobileT-Mobile
Manuf.MotorolaSamsungHTCHTCHTCHTC
Price$179.99$99.99$149.99
ReleasedJuly 2009Oct 11, 2009Aug 5, 2009Oct 22, 2008
KeyboardSlide-outVirtualVirtualVirtualVirtualSlide-out
AndroidMOTOBLURStandardSense UISense UIStandardStandard
Processor528MHz MSM7201A528MHz ARM11528MHz MSM7225528MHz MSM7201A528MHz MSM7201A528MHz MSM7201A
Screen3.1-inch (est.), 320 x 4803.2-inch, 320 x 4802.8-inch, 240 x 3203.2-inch, 320 x 4803.2-inch, 320 x 4803.2-inch, 480 x 320
Headphone3.5mm3.5mm3.5mm3.5mmExtUSBExtUSB
TouchscreenCapacitiveCapacitiveResistiveCapacitiveCapacitiveCapacitive
Still Camera5MP with AF5MP with Flash3.2MP5MP with AF3.2MP with AF3.2MP with AF
Bluetooth2.02.12.02.02.02.0
ExchangeActiveSyncActiveSyncActiveSyncDepends on versionDepends on version
Storage256MB, microSD8GB, microSD512MB, microSD512MB, microSD512MB, microSD256MB, microSD
Battery1400mAh1500mAh1100mAh1500 mAh1340 mAh1150 mAh
Weight163g114g113g135g116g158g

It’s been over 11 months since the Android first hit the scene with HTC’s T-Mobile G1, and in that time we’ve come to the conclusion that, despite having more or less a clean slate on industrial design choices and specs, little progress has been made in the way of variation. Stacked up side-to-side, Motorola CLIQ manages to stand out with a slide-out keyboard and MOTOBLUR skin, but under the hood, it’s pretty much as uniform as a netbook. Peruse for yourself in the chart above.

Update: We had a typo on the Hero screen size — it’s 3.2-inches, not the other way around! Stupid keyboards.

Filed under: ,

Android Battle: CLIQ edition originally appeared on Engadget on Thu, 10 Sep 2009 20:00:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink | Email this | Comments