Hasta La Gadget!

Look, we fully understand that someone, somewhere put a lot of time and effort into designing a $250 handheld that does nothing but watch pixelated mobile TV for a lofty per-month price, but seriously, there has to be better uses of one’s time. The 3.5-inch FLO TV Personal Television is on sale today at Amazon, Best Buy and RadioShack, though we suspect that the $249.99 up front price will probably keep most potential buyers at bay. Six months of service are included, but afterwards you’ll be paying at least $8.99 per month (and a rate that low requires a three-year contract) to keep the signals flowing. If we’re being honest, this thing is still more useful than Celio’s REDFLY, but that sure ain’t sayin’ much.

Filed under: Displays, Handhelds

FLO TV Personal Television now on sale for $250, should be in cereal boxes soon originally appeared on Engadget on Fri, 13 Nov 2009 10:19:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Read | Permalink | Email this | Comments

Microsoft’s Xbox 360 may call itself the only console to stream Netflix, but all that could be changing — and soon. As Netflix continues to pull in new subscribers (and cash flow) like it’s no big deal, the company is apparently looking to spread its wings even further by integrating its wildly popular Watch Instantly feature into “a device already owned by a large number of consumers.” Naturally, the most fitting candidates for that would be Sony’s PlayStation 3 or Nintendo’s Wii, though the company has yet to come forward with anything concrete. Just so know you, Netflix credits the Xbox 360’s streaming integration as the main reason some 2.4 million customers have signed up since late 2008, so it’s more than apparent that it loves the game console. Any bets for when this will go down, or are you just plugging your ears in order to avoid potential disappointment?

[Via Joystiq]

Filed under: Home Entertainment

Netflix hints at Watch Instantly integration on ‘already-popular device’ originally appeared on Engadget on Sat, 24 Oct 2009 17:04:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Read | Permalink | Email this | Comments

Think you’re good at turning down the upsell? Try saying no to adding WiMAX to your home internet service for the low, low price of whatever Comcast wants to charge. Thanks to a multi-billion dollar tie-up with Clearwire, Comcast has been offering WiMAX-based internet services in a few markets, but now that On Demand Online is a go, it makes sense to think that the operator would use that as leverage to get people hooked. For those unaware, ODO enables Comcast pay-TV subscribers to watch a vast array of programming from any internet connection, which of course means that any ole 3G / 4G data connection would work just as well as Comcast’s own. Oh, and while mobile TV is pretty good — and we’re going to let Comcast finish — watching HDTV at home with a DVR is definitely the best scenario of all time.

Filed under: Wireless

Comcast could serve TV over WiMAX, inflate your bill even higher originally appeared on Engadget on Wed, 16 Sep 2009 17:03:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Read | Permalink | Email this | Comments

Just as we heard back in February, Time Warner and Comcast have joined hands in order to regain control on some of the content that is slipping right out from under ’em. In the olden days, the only portal for catching content was the ‘tube; today, a vast array of television shows are available gratis on the web, and that’s downright frightening for pay-TV operators. Today, both firms are detailing TV Everywhere in the most general way possible, only telling us that paying Comcast subscribers will soon have access to “premium long-form content” via a web portal. TNT and TBS are the only networks specifically named thus far, but considering that both of those already offer their best programming online to everyone, we’re not terribly impressed.

The agreement also includes a trial with around 5,000 Comcast users, which will be used to heavily test a newfangled authentication technology that will be necessary to allow paying Comcast users to access the material from any internet-connected PC. NewTeeVee has also assembled a clean, easy-to-digest FAQ that explains what exactly all this is. To be frank, it seems like a solution in search of a problem from the consumer viewpoint. After all, with portals like Hulu and individual network websites already providing in-demand content online, why is there even a need for some “special portal” for Comcast users? We’ve heard that paying subs will have access to even more material, possibly movies or other premium shows. But we won’t front: we certainly don’t want TV Everywhere to convert some of the content that’s already free into pay-only content in order to accomplish the aforesaid “even more” goal. At any rate, the public at large probably won’t hear more about this until the trial sessions end at an undisclosed time, but you can bet we’ll be keeping a cautious eye on any developments.

Read – TV Everywhere press release
Read – NewTeeVee FAQ

Filed under: Home Entertainment

Time Warner’s TV Everywhere to pipe internet TV to Comcast subcribers originally appeared on Engadget on Wed, 24 Jun 2009 10:29:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink | Email this | Comments

Here’s something that should help Trent reach a level of moderate contentment. Although we already knew that Apple was expanding its parental controls with iPhone OS 3.0 into the realm of TV shows, movies and App Store apps, a report today about the rejection of Makayama’s Newspaper(s) app provides a good example at the ramifications of such alterations. According to iLounge, it was rejected due to a picture of a topless woman under the section for UK-based tabloid The Sun. The accompanying letter suggested a resubmission once 3.0 (and subsequently the parental controls) go public, which we take to mean that the questionable content will suddenly be okay for the App Store once it’s behind the appropriate age gate. We won’t know for sure until everything falls into place, but sounds like this is one part of the submission approval process that’ll soon end up much less frustrating for developers.

[Via 9 to 5 Mac]

Filed under: Cellphones

iPhone OS 3.0’s parental controls to assuage some app submission woes? originally appeared on Engadget on Mon, 04 May 2009 20:51:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Read | Permalink | Email this | Comments