Apple signs Warner Music to its cloud-based music service

Apple signs Warner Music to its cloud-based music service
Need another sign that iTunes will soon be floating your library up to the cloud? Look no further than confirmation of Apple signing Warner Music, a deal that should see the label’s music available in its upcoming streaming iTunes service. This is in addition to last week’s confirmation that two major labels signed on, though its unclear whether Warner is part of the pair or is, indeed, a third. That might leave only one of the major labels left unsigned — or maybe Apple’s already locked down all four but doesn’t want to kiss and tell. Yet.

Apple signs Warner Music to its cloud-based music service originally appeared on Engadget on Mon, 25 Apr 2011 08:52:00 EDT. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink   |  sourceCNET  | Email this | Comments

Microsoft Posts Mac Office 2008 Videos

This article was written on September 19, 2007 by CyberNet.

Office 2008 for Mac Microsoft has been good about keeping a tight leash on the information that’s been made available for Mac Office 2008, but they’ve finally splurged and posted several video demonstrations of the new version in action. We have already posted some of the Mac Office 2008 screenshots that had been making rounds across dozens of sites, but the videos give a more true representation of how the software actually works. I have to admit that the different apps look pretty slick, but that’s coming from a Windows-only user.

The real question is whether Microsoft is a bit late at delivering a new version of Office for the Mac. Apple recently released their new iWork 2008 Office Suite, and I’ve heard great things about it. Heck, it even supports Microsoft’s new Open XML filetypes, but Mossberg says that iWork is "wimpy" compared to Office.

As of right now the Mac Office 2008 release date is still scheduled for January 2008, which happens to be right around the time of Macworld. So we’ll have to sit tight until then for some of the real hands-on reviews to start pouring in.

Note: If the site seems to be slow playing the movies you can watch them all on YouTube.

Mac Office 2008 Sneak Peek [via TUAW]

Copyright © 2011 CyberNetNews.com

Related Posts:


Visualized: a Foxconn worker walks into an Apple store…

… and thinks, “I should ask for another raise.”

Visualized: a Foxconn worker walks into an Apple store… originally appeared on Engadget on Sat, 23 Apr 2011 21:25:00 EDT. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink   |   | Email this | Comments

Could the iPhone 5 look like a beveled iPod touch?

Could the iPhone 5 look like a beveled iPod touch?

See that up there? That could be your next iPhone — or it could be a tear-shaped dream. It’s a mock-up of what is said to be the iPhone 5, according to anonymous sources quoted by Joshua Topolsky. A continuation of the concepts laid out in our post-CES look at what’s next for Apple, the design here is said to be thin, metal-backed, tapered, and sporting a 3.7-inch display with the same 960 x 640 resolution in the iPhone 4’s retina display — resulting in a slight drop from that phone’s vaunted 326ppi density. The home button is quite obviously enlarged, possibly adding some thumbable gestures into the mix. Internals are said to include a “swipable” area, possibly meaning NFC, along with a Qualcomm Gobi chipset with support for CDMA and GSM, so this could be the one phone to rule all the carriers. Or, it might wind up only ever having domain over a single .PSD file. To us, well, it looks a little too thin to be packing all that and a bag of antennas as suggested and, with all the weight at the top, we can see these things flying out of hands left and right. But, we’re certainly willing to be surprised. Place your bets in comments below.

Update: The source has been updated with a note indicating that the bevel may be “a little exaggerated” in the above mock-up and that the back may not be metal after all.

Could the iPhone 5 look like a beveled iPod touch? originally appeared on Engadget on Fri, 22 Apr 2011 19:53:00 EDT. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink   |  sourceThis is my next  | Email this | Comments

DirecTV’s iPad, iPhone, Android apps will (NOT) have HBO Go streaming May 2nd (Update)

Just like the web versions of HBO Go and Max Go are accessible both through their own sites and various provider portals, DirecTV has announced it will include access to them in its own apps on iPad, iPhone and “select Android devices” at the same time native Go apps launch. There’s no word on what restrictions may be placed on Android, if it’s just Froyo or higher hardware with Flash accessibility, then that’s one thing, but Netflix-style DRM tie ups could prove to be much more frustrating to our Game of Thrones streaming plans. The announcement came from DirecTV’s official Twitter account which indicated the apps would progress beyond mere remote control and DVR scheduling on the same May 2nd date previously teased in HBO’s YouTube trailer — we’ll wait and see how long it takes to be integrated into similar apps from competitors like Comcast and Verizon FiOS.

Update: We’ve just heard from DirecTV that this was a “mistweet”, as it turns out they won’t be adding HBO Go access through their own apps and DirecTV customers will have to use the native HBO Go app just like everyone else. Check the @DirecTV account for the latest tweets, we’ll put this one on the shelf next to the DirecTiVo for now.

DirecTV’s iPad, iPhone, Android apps will (NOT) have HBO Go streaming May 2nd (Update) originally appeared on Engadget on Fri, 22 Apr 2011 18:47:00 EDT. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink   |  source@DirecTV (Twitter), (2), Correction  | Email this | Comments

Do Apple, Google and Microsoft Know Your Every Step? A Handy Chart [Ispy]

A fun side-effect of the iOS secret-tracking fiasco is that a lot of other different types of location data and transmissions to and from your smartphone are being conflated into a huge pile of fevered paranoia. But! Don’t freak out. More »

iPads Outnumber Linux Machines on the Web

Pingdom iPad Stats

According to a study by Royal Pingdom and data from Statcounter that covered over 3 million Web sites, the iPad along makes up more hits on the sites that collected data than all of the Linux machines that visited those same sites combined. The big news from the study initially was that Windows 7 users had finally outnumbered Windows XP users, but when the team looked more closely at the numbers of operating systems near the bottom of the list, they uncovered the surprising stats. 
Overall, Windows systems still make up well over 80% of all of the visitors to the Websites in the Statcounter study, but down at the bottom, all Linux users and distros only accounted for 0.71% of all visits. The iPad however, even with the iPhone and iPod Touch removed from the numbers, accounted for 1.18%. That makes the iPad a more popular “desktop” platform than Linux, which is a turn of events few expected. 
At the same time, it’s just as possible that all of the Linux users out there simply aren’t surfing the Web on their computers, or that the majority of Linux systems in use aren’t built for Web browsing. At the same time though, it’s clear that Linux on the desktop doesn’t have the traction that the iPad does.

Why You Should Care About the iPhone Location-Tracking Issue

An unencrypted file stored in iPhones and iPads records a user's location data. An open source application was used to plot the location data from an iPhone belonging to a Wired.com reporter.

You should care about Apple’s collection of geodata on iPhones, iPads and iPod Touch devices, because the method is flawed.

To be clear, “care” doesn’t mean you should smash your iPhone with a hammer, rip out the GPS chip and gulp it down your throat. This isn’t an issue of “Big Brother is watching.”

It’s just a matter of a security flaw that puts your location data at risk if it gets in the wrong hands — not an immediate concern, but a concern nonetheless.

Two data scientists broke the news Wednesday that an unencrypted file stored on iOS devices contains a detailed log of the device’s geographical data dating back 10 months. The scientists also wrote a program, allowing you to plug in your iOS device and automatically output the geodata into an interactive map (like the one above), just so you could see for yourself.

As this story developed, some tech observers have attempted to defuse the issue. “So what?” David Pogue wrote in his New York Times column. “I have nothing to hide. Who cares if anyone knows where I’ve been?”

Here’s why we care.

Permanent Data Storage Is Unnecessary

As Wired.com pointed out yesterday, Apple already admitted and explained that it deliberately stores geodata on its mobile devices so the company can collect it to improve location services.

The general process, summarized: Whenever you use an app with a location service — the Yelp app, for instance, to find nearby restaurants — the iPhone gets information about nearby cell towers and Wi-Fi access points, and stores the info.

Every 12 hours, an iOS device’s stored geodata gets anonymized with a random string of numbers, and it gets transmitted to Apple in a batch. Apple says it keeps all this data in its own database, so it can provide you quicker and more precise location services.

So when you use a location-based app, such as your Maps app to get your location, you’re first pulling data from Apple’s geo database to get your general location, and then your GPS chip homes in on a more precise latitude and longitude. Apple’s location database speeds up the location process.

Location gathering techniques like this aren’t anything new. For instance, when using an app like Google Maps app on your Android phone, some of your location data is cached — or stored — so that if your network connection is interrupted, following directions on the map won’t be.

Data caching also improves the speed of an app’s performance.

“It makes such a huge difference when you can cache this data,” Andreas Schobel, CTO of Android-app–developing studio Catch.com. “Cellphone connections are incredibly high in latency. Imagine having to wait half-a-second longer when sending a tweet with your location included. From a user experience point of view, these caches make sense.”

But the problem remains that there is no reason for that geo data to remain on your device after it’s transmitted to Apple.

In contrast to Apple, Google’s stance on the position is clear: It has been upfront about location data collection from the start. In a statement provided to Wired.com, Google says as much:

All location sharing on Android is opt-in by the user. We provide users with notice and control over the collection, sharing and use of location in order to provide a better mobile experience on Android devices. Any location data that is sent back to Google location servers is anonymized and is not tied or traceable to a specific user.

This is true for both Android and iPhones, but it’s no longer the point. Having a data file with over a year’s worth of your location information stored on your iPhone is a security risk.

So if a thief got his hands on your iPhone, he can figure out where you live and loot you there. Same goes for a hacker who gains remote access to the consolidated.db file. But if a thief or hacker dug into an Android device, there isn’t going to be much geodata saved on the smartphone to digitally stalk you. (There’s plenty of other data on smartphones such as text messages, address books and so forth, but at least we have control over what data we store in this regard.)

Bottom line, this data shouldn’t stick around on your iOS device, because it does nothing but put you at risk. You should care about that, because this problem can be and should be fixed by Apple, and you should demand that.

The Database Makes a Tempting Target for Law Enforcement

If police wanted to, they could subpoena the iPhone’s location database file when investigating a suspect. That file contains too much information for this to even be justified.

Imagine if you were suspected of a crime and police wanted to know where you were at 5 p.m. Thursday. They could subpoena your iPhone, dig into this file and, looking at the various data points, get a good idea of where you were at that time.

Sure, that sounds like it could be a useful practice for busting bad criminals, but what about all that other data? With that file police can not only find out where you were at 5 p.m. Thursday, but also that you see a therapist every Monday morning, or simply that you were somewhere that you’d want to keep to yourself — private matters.

As tempting as it may be to say, “They’re suspected for a crime, they deserve it,” even suspects deserve privacy. They’re suspects, after all, not criminals (yet). The fact that law enforcement can easily get more information than necessary is not a positive thing.

But It’s Not a Huge Immediate Danger

With that said, the chances are small that your iPhone is going to get hacked or stolen, or that you’re going to be suspected of a crime (we would hope). So there’s no reason to freak out. But we should care about the implications of a rich file of geographic data living on our iOS devices offering no customer benefit, creating digital footprints that we can’t erase.

Fortunately, Apple is a media giant, and customer trust is too valuable for the company to lose. It’s likely we’ll see Apple issue a software update soon tweaking the geodata-storage method, hopefully with a full explanation.


Why You Should Care About the iPhone Location Problem

An unencrypted file stored in iPhones and iPads records a user's location data. An open source application was used to plot the location data from an iPhone belonging to a Wired.com reporter.

You should care about Apple’s collection of geo data on iPhones, iPads and iPod Touch devices, because the method is flawed.

To be clear, “care” doesn’t mean you should smash your iPhone with a hammer, rip out the GPS chip and gulp it down your throat. This isn’t an issue of “Big Brother is watching.”

It’s just a matter of a security flaw that puts your location data at risk if it gets in the wrong hands — not an immediate concern, but still a concern nonetheless.

Two data scientists broke the news on Wednesday that an unencrypted file stored on iOS devices contains a detailed log of the device’s geographical data dating back 10 months. The scientists also wrote a program, allowing you to plug in your iOS device and automatically output the geo data into an interactive map (like the one above), just so you could see for yourself.

As this story developed, some tech observers have attempted to defuse the issue. “So what?” David Pogue wrote in his New York Times column. “I have nothing to hide. Who cares if anyone knows where I’ve been?”

Here’s why we care.

Permanent data storage is unnecessary

As Wired.com pointed out yesterday, Apple already admitted and explained that it deliberately stores geo data on its mobile devices so the company can collect it to improve location services.

The general process, summarized: Whenever you use an app with a location service — the Yelp app, for instance, to find nearby restaurants — the iPhone gets information about nearby cell towers and Wi-Fi access points and stores it.

Every 12 hours, an iOS device’s stored geo data gets anonymized with a random string of numbers, and it gets transmitted to Apple in a batch. Apple keeps all this data in its own database so it can provide you quicker and more precise location services, says Apple.

So when you use a location-based app, such as your Maps app to get your location, you’re first pulling data from Apple’s geo database to get your general location, and then your GPS chip homes in on a more precise latitude and longitude. Apple’s location database speeds up the location process.

Location gathering techniques like this aren’t anything new. For instance, when using an app like Google Maps app on your Android phone, some of your location data is cached — or stored — so that if your network connection is interrupted, following directions on the map won’t be.

Data caching also improves the speed of an app’s performance.

“It makes such a huge difference when you can cache this data,” Andreas Schobel, CTO of Android app developing studio Catch.com, told Wired.com in an interview. “Cell phone connections are incredibly high in latency. Imagine having to wait half a second longer when sending a tweet with your location included. From a user experience point of view, these caches make sense.”

But the problem remains that there is no reason for that geo data to remain on your device after it’s transmitted to Apple.

In contrast to Apple, Google’s stance on the position is clear: It has been upfront about location data collection from the start. In a statement provided to Wired.com, Google says as much: “All location sharing on Android is opt-in by the user. We provide users with notice and control over the collection, sharing and use of location in order to provide a better mobile experience on Android devices. Any location data that is sent back to Google location servers is anonymized and is not tied or traceable to a specific user.”

This is true for both Android and iPhones, but it’s no longer the point. Having a data file with over a year’s worth of your location information stored on your iPhone is a security risk.

So if a thief got his hands on your iPhone, he can figure out where you live and loot you there, too. Same goes for a hacker who gains remote access to the consolidated.db file. But if a thief or hacker dug into an Android device, there isn’t going to be much geo data saved on the smartphone to digitally stalk you. (There’s plenty of other data on smartphones such as text messages, address books and so forth, but at least we have control over what data we store in this regard.)

Bottom line, this data shouldn’t stick around on your iOS device, because it does nothing but put you at risk. And you should care about that, because this problem can be and should be fixed by Apple, and you should demand that.

The database is a tempting target for law enforcement

If police wanted to, they could subpoena the iPhone’s location database file when investigating a suspect. That file contains too much information for this to even be justified.

Imagine if you were suspected for a crime and police wanted to know where you were at 5 p.m. Thursday. They could subpoena your iPhone, dig into this file and, looking at the various data points, get a good idea of where you were at that time.

Sure, that sounds like it could be a useful practice for busting bad criminals, but what about all that other data? With that file police can not only find out where you were at 5 p.m. Thursday, but also that you see a therapist every Monday morning, or simply that you were somewhere that you’d want to keep to yourself — private matters.

As tempting as it may be to say, “They’re suspected for a crime, they deserve it,” even suspects deserve privacy. They’re suspects, after all, not criminals (yet). The fact that law enforcement can easily get more information than necessary is not a positive thing.

However, it’s not a huge immediate danger

With that said, the chances are small that your iPhone is going to get hacked or stolen, or that you’re going to be suspected of a crime (I would hope). So there’s no reason to freak out. But we should care about the implications of a rich file of geographic data living on our iOS devices offering no customer benefit, creating digital footprints that we can’t erase.

Fortunately, Apple is a media giant, and customer trust is too valuable for the company to lose. It’s likely we’ll see Apple issue a software update soon tweaking the geo-data-storage method, hopefully with a full explanation.


Exclusive: White iPhone 4 lands at Vodafone UK

Well, would you have a gander at that? That, friends, is Apple’s long-awaited, hardly-forgotten white iPhone 4, and so far as we can tell, this is actually the real deal. We’ve seen retailers making space for the elusive handset over the past few months, and earlier today, we heard that Vodafone UK’s inventory systems were showing the white iPhone 4 as shipping in. Now, we’ve secured a few images of a 16GB model from a separate source that has seemingly made its way into the hands of one lucky customer (read: bloke) over in Britain.

As the story goes, the salesperson rang it up as a black iPhone to help facilitate the transaction, and shortly after the sale went down, Voda sent out a notice to halt sale of these gems “until next week.” Just so you know, the MC604B/A model number shown here is particularly interesting when compared to our own in-house UK iPhone 4; the latter, which is also a 16GB edition, sports a model number of MC603B/A. We suspect we aren’t going too far out on a limb by suggesting that the “3” and “4” are there to represent hue variations, and if you’d like to stretch the theory one step further, MC605B/A represents the 32GB black iPhone 4. In other words, don’t be shocked when the white 32 gigger rolls in as MC606B/A. So, is this the first legitimate sign that a white iPhone 4 is but days away from going on sale? We’re hardly experts in meteorology, but it sure felt like spring in Londontown today.

P.S. – 9 to 5 Mac suggests that it’ll be landing on April 27th, at least in the Netherlands.

[Thanks, Anonymii]

Exclusive: White iPhone 4 lands at Vodafone UK originally appeared on Engadget on Fri, 22 Apr 2011 15:29:00 EDT. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink   |   | Email this | Comments