Sony Fights Micro Four-Thirds With Lens-Changing Compact

sony-alpha-compact-aps-hd-camera

Quality cameras are about to get a whole lot smaller. Sony has revealed its plans for 2010, and alongside updates to the DSLR line comes a new interchangeable-lens compact to compete against the Micro Four Thirds format. Sony is using a larger APS-C sensor, the size seen in most DSLRs.

The camera, which will come out under the Alpha brand used for its DSLRs, sits between the Olympus Pen and Panasonic GF1 — with their small bodies — and the Samsung NX10 with its larger sensor.

The mockup has typical Sony style: a flat slab with a rather chunky, comfortable-looking handgrip and a lens-hole. The only actual spec Sony has given is for the sensor, a newly developed Exmor APS HD CMOS that will also shoot video (AVCHD-format). It’ll come with a small, flat “pancake” prime lens, presumably giving a 40-50mm equivalent focal length.

This segment, the high-quality “EVIL” (Electronic Viewfinder Interchangeable Lens) compact, will surely take off this year. So far, Panasonic and Olympus have had it all to themselves with the purpose-made Micro Four Thirds format, and Samsung’s only effort so far is the too-big NX10. With Sony in the game, we hope to see some great lenses (Sony uses Carl Zeiss glass) and some aggressive pricing, like that seen with Sony’s high-end DSLRs.

We wonder what Canon and Nikon will do about this. They’re certainly aware of the demand (I spoke to Nikon at CES and was told that there have been a lot of people asking about an EVIL camera), and both companies can easily squeeze one of their great APS-C sensors into a small body. In fact, Nikon used to make the rather good S-series of rangefinders.

The problem is the lenses. The advantage for Panasonic is that it has no heritage of lenses, and was free to start from scratch with M4/3. Both Nikon and Canon are heavily invested in DSLR lenses, and pretty much any Nikon lens ever made will fit on today’s cameras. My guess is that this is the holdup, and that we’ll see a small range of compact, purpose-made glass along with new bodies, coupled with proper adapters that allow you to use legacy lenses with autofocus and auto-exposure intact.

At least I hope so. Right now I can use most lenses ever made, from any manufacturer, on my Panasonic GF1, with a cheap adapter. If we don’t get at least that, why will anyone bother to buy a different brand?

Press release [Sony]

See Also:


Sony Alpha ultra-compact concept hands-off: leaves much to the imagination

We’d love nothing more than to extol the merits of Sony’s Alpha ultra-compact concept with an interchangeable lens — which bears a striking resemblance at face value to Olympus and Panasonic’s Micro Four Thirds standard — but alas, the little device is hidden behind glass. Furthermore, all the Sony reps we managed to corner wouldn’t answer our questions. Will the lenses be interchangeable with Sony’s current Alpha DSLR line, or any of the MFT lenses? What’s been cut from traditional Four Thirds models to accommodate for the drop in size? Radio silence, save for a repeat of this morning’s information and a finger point to the adjacent ”
Exmor APS HD CMOS” sign — which, as we know from this morning, is larger than a Four Thirds sensor, but we’re not sure how much. Still, enjoy the pics we managed to take from behind the glass — and also be sure to enjoy the shots of this morning’s other Sony announcements, the
Super Telephoto Lens (500mm F4 G) and the prototype Distagon T 24mm F2 ZA SSM.


Sony Alpha ultra-compact concept hands-off: leaves much to the imagination originally appeared on Engadget on Sun, 21 Feb 2010 16:19:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink   |   | Email this | Comments

Sony intros Alpha DSLR concepts, ‘ultra-compact’ interchangeable lens model included

PMA is just kicking off in earnest down in Anaheim, and it looks like Sony has arrived in a big way. Looking to make a splash in a DSLR world dominated by Canon and Nikon, the outfit has brought a few of its best and brightest concepts to SoCal. Up first is an ultra-compact “interchangeable lens” concept, which is no doubt Sony’s attempt to get in on the fledgling Micro Four Thirds game before it blows up big. Few details on the device are available, but we’ll be doing our best to pry whatever specifications we can from the booth representatives in short order. Moving on, there’s a conceptual model of the Alpha A700 replacement, complete with an Exmor APS HD CMOS sensor that promises full AVCHD video capabilities. There’s also a prototype of a Super Telephoto Lens (500mm F4 G) as well as a prototype Distagon T 24mm F2 ZA SSM, which ought to make wide angle junkies drool profusely. The company’s also dishing out a raft of accessories, including underwater housing devices, HD lenses and output cables, tripods / accessory packs and a Compact PictureStation photo printing kiosk. Stay tuned for some hands-on action from the show floor.

Sony intros Alpha DSLR concepts, ‘ultra-compact’ interchangeable lens model included originally appeared on Engadget on Sun, 21 Feb 2010 12:26:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink   |  sourceSony 1, 2, 3  | Email this | Comments

Panasonic adds silver and pink body options to GF1, exhibits poor timing

It’s pretty much common knowledge these days that we’re big fans of Micro Four Thirds cameras, and while Olympus may already be shipping its second generation hardware, Panasonic is holding firm with the still highly desirable GF1. Tweaking up the formula just a tad, the company is throwing its Japanese audience a bone with a pair of frankly stupendous color options, led by the silver (looks more like gunmetal to us) number above. We’re digging the contrast between the black sections and silver body, though the real highlight must be that we don’t find the pink option (pictured after the break) intolerable. Good job by Panasonic on picking out these hues, but why on earth are they coming out on March 12 — shouldn’t the marketing department be aware of certain global consumerist events that exist pretty much exclusively to stimulate indulgent purchases of superficially appealing new gear?

Continue reading Panasonic adds silver and pink body options to GF1, exhibits poor timing

Panasonic adds silver and pink body options to GF1, exhibits poor timing originally appeared on Engadget on Fri, 12 Feb 2010 04:07:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink Engadget Japanese  |  sourcePanasonic  | Email this | Comments

A Month With the Lumix GF1, And Why I No Longer Use The Nikon D700

Last month, we took a first look at Panasonic’s Micro Four Thirds (M4/3) GF1, a small camera with interchangeable lenses and a big sensor. That post, detailing the performance and features, got a lot of comments, so I thought it might be a good idea to relay my thoughts after using the camera rather a lot over the last few weeks. Here you’ll find out about its performance, as well as some of the hidden gems that make using it easier.

The (Missing) Viewfinder

As previously noted, the GF1’s rear screen is pretty good, its high resolution and fast (60fps) refresh making it very nice to use. I had thought I’d buy an add-on viewfinder for it, but now I’m not so sure. Composing pictures on this big screen is not only better than on other finderless compacts I have used, but actually more natural-feeling than a ‘finder. It’s almost like using the ground-glass screen of a view-camera.

The one problem is with long lenses, especially heavy Nikon lenses used with an adapter that require manual focus. The extra wobble and zoomed-in focusing would make a viewfinder very welcome here.

Wrong Lenses

Speaking of lenses, I have shot a fair amount with an M4/3 to Nikon adapter, which lets me use my old lenses on the camera. The results are good, and these lenses, which need to be focused completely manually, are surprisingly easy to use.

Pop one on (and set the camera so it will shoot without a lens — page 128 in the manual) and the camera defaults to manual focus. Press on the control dial so it clicks, and the display zooms in to allow accurate focusing. This is amazingly intuitive. You can also move the focus point around the frame.

Because this is all manual, if you set anything other than the widest aperture on your lens it will stop down and the image on the screen will darken. The camera still works great in aperture priority mode, though, so exposures are accurate. One further (unavoidable) niggle: No aperture value is recorded in the EXIF data.

Exposure

Speaking of exposure, the GF1 has a nice line in auto-ISO modes. You can pick two. While both seem to favor setting a wide aperture (I have been using the 20mm ƒ1.7 most of the time) before they ramp up the ISO, they work OK, and you can choose a maximum ISO in the preferences.

The i-ISO mode is the one you want to set. It detects when the camera (or subject) is moving and ups the ISO so you can use a faster shutter speed. This works by monitoring what is happening onscreen, as the GF1 has no accelerometer.

To test it, take the same shot with both Auto and i-ISO. They will be identical. But if you jiggle the camera as you shoot, the i-ISO will kick in. It’s simple, but it works very well. I leave it set pretty much all the time, along with aperture priority.

Video

Video quality is fine, not outstanding. The lack of an image stabilizer really shows up here, and things can get a little jerky. Lock the GF1 down on a tripod, and use it in good light and video shines, with the short depth-of-field from the large sensor and fast lenses lending a very filmlike quality.

But the best part is the dedicated video button on the top plate. Hit it and you start shooting, whatever mode the camera is in. Press again to stop. It uses auto-settings, but you’ll find yourself shooting little clips much more often. Better yet, you will never be left in video mode when you think you’re shooting a still.

The Flash

The vestigial pop-up unit is weak, in both output and construction. It pops out of the solid body and sits on a plastic scaffold high above the camera, waiting to be snapped off.

That said, having it so far off the lens axis means it doesn’t wash things out too much. And having a built-in flash adds another advantage: It can trigger off-camera flash. I set a Nikon SB900 speedlight to “slave” mode, turned the internal flash down as low as it could go and it triggered the Nikon every time, even without line of sight. Manual-shooting strobists will love it.

Other Niceties

The GF1 will store the faces of several people in memory and, if it spots them in a picture, give priority to focus and exposure to them. A gimmick, but a potentially useful one.

The Q-Menu, too, is handy. Press a dedicated button and you can navigate between the onscreen icons, changing settings as you go. It’s the virtual equivalent of having buttons in fixed places, so you can learn where they are.

Problems

I mentioned the tiny control wheel in the last post, and hoped I’d get used to it. I didn’t. The thumb wheel is used to set almost everything in the camera and it is tiny, slippery and hard to turn. Panasonic needs to fix this in any future GF2. Also in need of a fix is the “My Menu,” which lists the last five settings you have changed. You should be able to specify what you want in there.

The LCD screen has a crappy, thin plastic cover. It comes with a screen protector attached, but the hefty cover of my Canon G9 is way better.

The body, while solid, is hard to grip. When shooting it is fine, but try to carry it in one hand as you walk around and you’ll soon drop it. Buy a wrist strap.

There’s plenty more to the GF1, and nothing can beat a hands-on test before you buy one. But if you are worried about idiosyncrasies or showstopping problems, don’t. I have hardly touched my Nikon D700 since I got this camera (just once, for a flash-lit portrait shoot). That should tell you something.

See Also:


New Olympus Pen Adds Flash, Loses Good Looks

779961922_ihpiq-m

Olympus has taken the lovely, popular and slightly flawed Pen EP-1 camera, tweaked it to to be more like Panasonic’s equally nice GF1, and in the process created a Frankenstein’s camera, a bloated monster that bears the same relationship to the EP-1 as Marlon Brando’s Colonel Kurtz bore to his Stanley Kowalski.

So, what’s new? The Pen E-PL1 is still an interchangeable lens, Micro Four Thirds (M4/3) camera, but it gains a pop-up flash and a direct video-record button (this button, found on the Panasonic GF1, is wonderfully useful for quick clip shooting). As mentioned, the body loses its sleek, muscular good looks and also the two innovative thumb dials, replaced by one top-plate dial and a whole lot of buttons. If you are looking for an easy to control manual camera, this isn’t it — stick with the EP2 or the GF1.

The new Pen has some nice features not found in the Panasonic. First, in-body image stabilization, which works whatever lens you put on the front. Second, you can hook up a microphone to supplement to built-in mono mic (both the EPx cameras have stereo mics, the Panny mono with no aux input).

There is also a range of Live Guides, which let you tweak color and other parameters and see the results live on-screen before you shoot. And one of the coolest features is that you can pair the camera with Olympus flashes and control them remotely. That’s a pretty high-end DSLR feature right there.

All this comes in a $600 package, bundled with a Zuiko 14-42mm f3.5/5.6, available in March. If you’re looking to step up from a high-end compact, but don’t need the price or the great manual handling of the EP-2 or GF1, this is a rather sweet-featured camera. If you squint, and don’t look too hard at its ugly lines.

Introducing the Incredible Olympus Pen E-PL1 Camera [Olympus]


Olympus intros $600 12.3 megapixel PEN E-PL1 Micro Four Thirds camera

It certainly took them long enough, but Olympus has finally (finally!) introduced a Micro Four Thirds camera with a price tag that’s a little closer to earth. If you’ll recall, both of the previous PENs cost upwards of $750, but the E-PL1 touts a much more reasonable MSRP of $599.99. And that doesn’t mean Olympus has been stingy on features. Nope, quite the contrary as the the minuscule body is packed with the same 12.3 megapixel image sensor as the E-30 and E-620 (check the images in the gallery to see a size comparison of the actual sensors), in-body image stabilization, continuous autofocus, a 2.7-inch rear LCD, HD movie mode, in-camera “art filters” and a bundled ED 14-42mm f3.5/5.6 zoom lens (28-84mm equivalent in 35mm cameras). Oh and don’t forget the addition of the pop-up flash which just reminds us of E.T. You won’t be able to nab a E-PL1 until next month, but hit the break for some of our hands-on impressions.

Continue reading Olympus intros $600 12.3 megapixel PEN E-PL1 Micro Four Thirds camera

Olympus intros $600 12.3 megapixel PEN E-PL1 Micro Four Thirds camera originally appeared on Engadget on Wed, 03 Feb 2010 01:01:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink   |   | Email this | Comments

Teased Olympus Micro Four Thirds camera leaked?

One of the more exciting camera technologies to emerge in the last 18 months is undoubtedly the Olympus and Panasonic Micro Four Thirds format. Amazing little cameras that pack DSLR-quality sensors into relatively compact shooters by ditching the mirror box. So bear with us as we ogle the latest Olympus leak said to be that Micro Four Thirds shooter teased only last week. The image shows a 14-42mm lens with rumors saying it’ll be cheaper (hooray!) than the E-P1 in part due to a plastic body (eww).

Teased Olympus Micro Four Thirds camera leaked? originally appeared on Engadget on Fri, 29 Jan 2010 04:20:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink   |  source43rumors  | Email this | Comments

Olympus teases mystery camera, new Micro Four Thirds?

Well, there’s not much to go on with this one, but Olympus has just put the above notice on its website, which teases a camera of.. some sort. Given the apparent form factor, however, some folks are speculating that it could be a new Micro Four Thirds camera to complement Olympus’ PEN offerings, or possibly something along the lines of Sigma’s DP2 compact. Either way, it seems pretty likely that we’ll be hearing more about it at PMA next month.

Olympus teases mystery camera, new Micro Four Thirds? originally appeared on Engadget on Wed, 27 Jan 2010 16:27:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink Slash Gear  |  sourceOlympus  | Email this | Comments

Hands-On With Panasonic’s Leica-Lite GF1

lumix_gf1

The Lumix GF1 is Panasonic’s answer to the Olympus Pen, and is the second “rangefinder” style Micro Four Thirds camera on the market. It blows away both the EP-1 Pen and also the new EP-2 Pen, and is — amazingly — good enough to replace all but the best of entry-level DSLRs.

The camera has been reviewed across the internet, but oddly some of the most important points have not been written about. These questions are particularly pertinent when it comes to compact cameras, whose performance varies so much more than that of DSLRs. Here we answer those questions, and hopefully fill in the gaps. The GF1 is here paired with the Lumix 20mm ƒ1.7 “pancake” lens.

Shutter Lag

Shutter lag is the best reason to buy a DSLR. Compacts are notoriously slow to fire when you squeeze the shutter release. The GF1 is as fast as a sub-$1,000 DSLR, taking a picture as soon as you tell it to. You can capture a fleeting expression on your subject’s face, and generally trust the camera to take the photo you want. There’s even a satisfying clunk as the shutter closes and opens (unusually, the GF1 keeps the shutter open until you fire it). In short, it feels like using a film camera.

Screen vs. Viewfinder

I was planning on buying an external, optical viewfinder to go with this camera (yes, I bought the camera myself). The optional electronic finder is a fuzzy, distorted piece of junk, and I usually hate composing on-screen. But although the GF1’s LCD panel has only 460,000 pixels (many newer DSLRs have almost a million), the 60fps refresh rate makes a huge difference. You actually feel like you’re using the focusing screen on an old medium format TLR. Weirdly, I actually find it easier to frame shots than with my Nikon D700’s fantastic viewfinder.

Focus

Auto-focus on the GF1 is startlingly quick, and it has been noted by other reviewers that it is in the same class as an entry-level DSLR. This is a surprise, as the contrast-detection used by live-view cameras is a fundamentally slower technology than the phase detection of an SLR. It’s not in the class of a pro Nikon or Canon setup, but it is fast enough, and more importantly, it is not annoying.

Manual focus, too, is handled well. Either switch into MF, or just turn the lens’ wide, well-damped focus ring when you have the shutter half-pressed, and the screen displays a zoomed view. This makes focus quick and, for a camera of this kind, surprisingly intuitive.

Video

This has been pretty well-documented, so I’ll just say that with the ƒ1.7 lens, you get some sweet, shallow depth of field, and the manual focus is ideal for video. A dedicated button will start recording immediately whatever mode you are in, making it a snap to shoot a quick clip.

High ISO

One of selling points of a large-sensor camera is low noise, even at high ISOs. The GF1 runs all the way up to ISO 3200. How does it do?

Pretty well. It’s no Nikon D3S, but noise is perfectly acceptable up to ISO 1600, and even at ISO 3200 the noise is handled well. More importantly, the color saturation and tonal range manage not to fade at higher speeds.

There are two tricks that will take a night-time, ISO 3200 shot and make it look amazing. One is to convert to black and white. This nixes the the offensive colored speckles that are color noise and leaves the pleasantly grain-like luminance noise. It looks like B&W film.

The other is to use Adobe’s Lightroom 3 Beta. Here’s a comparison after a conversion to black and white. On the left is the old noise-reduction algorithm, on the right is the new one. Even with this web-sized picture you can see the difference. It works this well in color, too.

iso-noise-comparison

The Bad

These are nitpicks on an otherwise amazing camera. First, it needs more dials. The Canon S90 has a useful dial around the lens collar, as well as a command dial at the back. The GF1 has a single, tiny dial which tends to slide under my normal-sized thumb. Also, there is no in-body image stabilization — it comes in the lens (an the 20mm doesn’t have it). Also found in the lens, inexplicably, is the accelerometer. Again, the 20mm lacks this feature and therefore the camera doesn’t auto-rotate images. And remember, this is a $1,000 device.

panny-cam-1

Last is the battery compartment. The plastic lid feels flimsy on the all-metal body, and the spring inside looks like it came from a $1 flashlight. Poor.

In all, though, this is a camera that feels most like my old Leica M6. If you think of it as a Leica lite, it is cheap. If you compare it to a Canon Rebel, it is expensive. It is also small, and a lot of fun to use. I can’t stop snapping.

And one more thing — I picked up a Micro Four Thirds-to-Nikon adapter. As soon as I get home, I’ll have my entire lens collection to try out, from Lens Baby to a 50mm ƒ1.8 (which will turn into a 100mm ƒ1.8) to an 85mm ƒ1.8, which will become a rather amazing 170mm ƒ1.8 on this camera. I am, it’s safe to say, quite excited.

Product photo: Jon Snyder
Photos: Charlie Sorrel
Top 1/30th sec, ƒ1.7, ISO 125
B&W noise comparison 1/1250th sec ƒ1.7 ISO 3200