Sprint readies Nexus S 4G update with improved WiMAX performance, we go hands-on (video)

How would you feel about a little Android 2.3.5 (!) action on that Nexus S 4G of yours? What about some WiMAX performance improvements? You should be getting all that plus WiFi connectivity and speakerphone quality tweaks, along with TTY support on Monday July 25th, which is when Sprint is expected to begin rolling out an OTA update for Samsung’s pure Gingerbread handset. We were given an exclusive first look at the new software, and while it’s still being finalized, we tested it side-by-side with the original, and our results show a welcome increase in 4G speeds across the board. As you may remember, we observed repeatable WiMAX performance issues with the old software, so this update is excellent news indeed. The amount of improvement will likely depend on your locale, but even in signal-challenged San Francisco and New York we noticed the difference right away — so kudos to Google, Samsung, and Sprint for addressing this. We also experienced performance in-line with our Epic 4G — the benchmark device used for our initial testing with the previous firmware version. Take a look at our gallery below, and peek at our hands-on video after the break.

Zach Honig contributed to this report.

Continue reading Sprint readies Nexus S 4G update with improved WiMAX performance, we go hands-on (video)

Sprint readies Nexus S 4G update with improved WiMAX performance, we go hands-on (video) originally appeared on Engadget on Fri, 22 Jul 2011 13:00:00 EDT. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink   |  sourceSprint, Google Mobile Help Forum  | Email this | Comments

Engadget Primed: Using benchmarks

Primed goes in-depth on the technobabble you hear on Engadget every day — we dig deep into each topic’s history and how it benefits our lives. Looking to suggest a piece of technology for us to break down? Drop us a line at primed *at* engadget *dawt* com.


Staring at your smartphone, you realize that there’s something missing. It does everything you want it to — very well, we might add — but what hole is left to fill? We’ll help you out with this one: you want bragging rights. There has to be a way to face your friends with confidence, right? All you need is a little nudge in the right direction, and in this edition of Engadget Primed, we’ll give you that much-needed shove by explaining benchmarks.

Perhaps you’ve seen us talk about benchmarks in our product reviews. We’ll typically use them to gauge the relative performance of various devices, but discussing a Linpack score doesn’t mean much without going deeper into what it actually means. What aspects of performance do these benchmarks measure, and what techniques do they use? How much can we rely on them when making purchasing decisions? Read on after the break for the full scoop.

Continue reading Engadget Primed: Using benchmarks

Engadget Primed: Using benchmarks originally appeared on Engadget on Fri, 15 Jul 2011 12:00:00 EDT. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink   |   | Email this | Comments

Qualcomm launches Vellamo browser benchmark for Android devices

Qualcomm’s not exactly a novice when it comes to sizing up phones — it’s already responsible for the graphics benchmark Neocore. Now, it also wants to show you just how much your mobile browser is lagging. The company just introduced Vellamo, a suite of 11 tests designed to gauge browser performance on Android phones and tablets. In case you’re curious, it takes its name from the Finnish goddess of the sea who lures away sailors web surfers (Qualcomm’s joke, not ours). And yes, it’ll work with any device running Android 2.0 or above, even if it doesn’t pack a Qualcomm-made processor. These tests span four broad categories — rendering, JavaScript, user experience, and networking — with only two requiring an internet connection (even then, you can cherry pick specific tests to run). We took it for a spin on our aging, Froyo-packing, Motorola Droid, whose score of 237 landed at the very bottom of the list of results, far behind tablets and newer handsets. (As of this writing, Samsung’s Galaxy Tab 10.1 took the cake.) Curious to see how your device ranks? Hit the source link to download the free APK file.

Gallery: Vellamo

.

Continue reading Qualcomm launches Vellamo browser benchmark for Android devices

Qualcomm launches Vellamo browser benchmark for Android devices originally appeared on Engadget on Thu, 14 Jul 2011 18:59:00 EDT. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink   |  sourceAndroid Market  | Email this | Comments

Make Firefox Start Faster with a Preloader

This article was written on February 06, 2008 by CyberNet.

Firefox Preloader One thing that has always left me puzzled is why Firefox takes so long to startup. Both Opera and Internet Explorer take just seconds to get up and running, but on all four of my computers Firefox takes between 10 and 20 seconds to start (even with no extensions installed).

If you find yourself in a similar situation then what you might need is the open source Firefox Preloader. It can be set to startup when you turn your computer on, and with it Firefox will always be at your beck and call. If there are multiple versions of Firefox installed on your computer you can decide which one you would like it to work with.

This feature does come at a cost though. When the preloader first started up on my computer it used about 4MB of memory itself, and Firefox was using about 10MB. Those aren’t drastic numbers, but for those of you conscious about the memory usage you might want to think twice before using the preloader. Also, when you close Firefox it doesn’t actually close all the way, instead it’s just tucked away so that it will still start quickly the next time you go to use it.

Firefox Preloader (for Windows only)
Thanks to “S” for the tip!

Copyright © 2011 CyberNetNews.com

Related Posts:


Nokia claims N9 is ‘the fastest image-capturing phone’ yet

We’ve already established that the N9 is a delight of a phone, both inside and out, but our hands-on time with Nokia’s new flagship gave us only a brief look at its camera performance. Now the company is graciously filling that gap in our knowledge with some further disclosure about its new 8 megapixel imager, including the lofty claim that the N9 is the fastest phone yet when it comes to capturing an image — ousting the likes of the iPhone 4, the Galaxy S II, and even the Canon S95, perhaps the best pocket camera around at the moment. Measuring the time taken from activating the camera app to the completion of the first shot, the N9 clocks in at 2.6 seconds, whereas Apple’s latest does it in 3 seconds and Samsung’s takes a split second more. Aside from its speed, the N9 has Carl Zeiss optics, a wide F2.2 max aperture, dual-LED flash, continuous autofocus, and a 720/30p video mode to boast about, but the benefits of those items will need to be experienced first hand. So Nokia, when are you shipping this thing?

Nokia claims N9 is ‘the fastest image-capturing phone’ yet originally appeared on Engadget on Wed, 22 Jun 2011 05:51:00 EDT. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink   |  sourceNokia Conversations  | Email this | Comments

HotHardware surveys the Cougar Point motherboard horizon, spots a winner

There’s an ocean of possibilities when it comes to choosing the right Socket LGA 1155 board to mother your Sandy Bridge processor. But a roundup review at HotHardware funnels it down to just five rivals within a $179-$267 price bracket and based on Intel’s P67 chipset: two offerings from Asus, plus one each from ASRock, Gigabyte and MSI. The reviewers found clear favorites depending on what you’re looking for: The ASRock Fatal1ty P67 Professional and MSI P67A-GD80 can both bring serious aesthetics to your super rig, and the former has a particularly good bang-for-buck ratio. The Asus P8P67 WS Revolution stands out with four full-length PCI Express lanes for crazy graphics, while the more conservative Asus P8P67 Professional has the lowest idle power consumption of the lot. Click the source link now if you’d prefer to discover the overall winner for yourself. Otherwise, all we can say is, viva la Revolution.

HotHardware surveys the Cougar Point motherboard horizon, spots a winner originally appeared on Engadget on Mon, 20 Jun 2011 09:31:00 EDT. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink   |  sourceHotHardware  | Email this | Comments

Vista Facts & Stats

This article was written on January 19, 2008 by CyberNet.

Vista Tongue

One user over at the Futuremark forum decided to do an unofficial speed comparison of Vista SP1 vs. XP SP2, and in the end he was pleasantly surprised by Vista’s performance. Here’s a rundown on some of the results:

  • File extraction (extracting 3.9GB RAR with WinRAR)
    • Vista: 2min 16sec
    • XP: 2min 22sec
  • Program load times
    • Vista:
      Photoshop CS3: 2 secs
      OpenOffice: 1.5 secs
      Crysis: 26 secs
    • XP:
      Photoshop CS3: 8.5 secs
      OpenOffice: 6.5 secs
      Crysis: 33 secs
  • Crysis GPU-test (1280×1024)
    • Vista (”High”, DX10, 64-bit): 35fps
    • Vista (”High”, DX9, 64-bit): 37fps
    • Vista (”High”, DX10, 32-bit): 35fps
    • Vista (”High”, DX9, 32-bit): 36fps
    • XP (”High”): 39fps

He did more tests, but I summed up the most important ones. Generally Vista took home the crown, except in the gaming arena. When it came to computer games, such as Crysis, Vista was no match for what XP had to offer.

He concluded his results with a chart of what a difference having SuperFetch enabled in Vista makes. As many of you know Vista uses a new technology called SuperFetch to store your most used programs and data into memory when your computer starts up. I’ve had several people ask how they can disable the feature, but maybe these startup times (in seconds) will make you think otherwise:

Vista Superfetch

–Facts from Microsoft–

Bill Gates announced back in January that there are over 100 million copies of Vista on computers that are being used around the world, and that’s a pretty big milestone for the young operating system. Over the last year Microsoft has been able to collect some significant stats in hopes of persuading more users to make the upgrade to Vista, many of which were collected from participants of the Microsoft Customer Experience Improvement Program. Here’s an overview of their findings:

  • Majority of Windows Vista-based PCs boot in less than a minute.
  • Majority of all Windows Vista-based PCs resume from sleep in less than 6 seconds.
  • Windows ReadyBoost is a terrific new innovation in Windows Vista that lets you speed up your system in seconds, and PCs running Windows Vista that are equipped with 512 MB memory experience a performance boost of up to 40 percent.
  • Windows Vista users generally experience 20 percent fewer application “hangs” than those running Windows XP.
  • Based on their first 180 days of availability, Windows Vista has been shown to have fewer vulnerabilities than Windows XP or Mac OS X 10.4.
  • Windows Vista security has improved so much that PCs running it are 60 percent less likely to be infected with viruses, worms, and rootkits than PCs running Windows XP SP2.
  • And Windows Vista-based PCs are over 90 percent less likely to be infected than systems running Windows XP without a Service Pack.
  • Windows Vista-based PCs are almost three times less likely to be infected with potentially unwanted software than Windows XP-based PCs because of Vista shipping with Windows Defender.
  • Internet Explorer 7 is now blocking nearly 1 million attempts to access these fake sites per week. New phishing attacks are more than 25 times as common as new viruses. That’s right, over 20,000 of these fake websites are created every month.

Out of all those stats I would have to say that the most impressive is the one about phishing protection in Internet Explorer 7. I would have never guessed that it protects a million attempts to access phishing sites every week, and I’m glad that I’ve upgraded all of the “computer illiterate” people I know to that version. Because they are likely the ones who would fall for the scams.

[via WinBeta here and here]

Copyright © 2011 CyberNetNews.com

Related Posts:


JVC Kaboom adds a guitar input, dares you to get the band back together

New audio input capabilities are nothing new for JVC, but soon you’ll be able to show off your guitar chops alongside whatever bands you choose to idolize — so long as you’re kosher with rocking a boombox atop your left shoulder, of course. The company has announced that the 2011 offering from its Kaboom line will showcase a guitar / microphone input (1/4-inch) with mixing capabilities to allow for gigs to be played from anywhere you darn well please. The RV-NB70 will have all the key ingredients of previous models, including an iPod dock (updated to be both iPod and iPhone compatible), a USB host that enables use of a mass storage device, an audio input and CD / radio playback. True to the original’s design, this fellow features much of the same look while promising 40 watts of guitar soloing power. Your next box ‘o fury can be had right now for $299.95, and if you’re eager for an encore, the full presser (as well as a demo vid) is just past the break.

Continue reading JVC Kaboom adds a guitar input, dares you to get the band back together

JVC Kaboom adds a guitar input, dares you to get the band back together originally appeared on Engadget on Thu, 16 Jun 2011 10:37:00 EDT. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink   |  sourceJVC  | Email this | Comments

Portal 2 on the stage and IRL

At many anime conventions and events, there’s usually a masquerade of some type – not necessarily a dance, but an opportunity for people who dress up in costumes of their favorite characters from movies, TV shows, and video games, to get up on stage and strut their stuff. In this particular case, a couple of […]

Defraggler 2.0 Beta Offers Boot-Time Defragmenting

This article was written on October 22, 2010 by CyberNet.

defrag computer.png

arrow Windows Windows only arrow
Earlier this week the first Beta release of Defraggler 2.0 was posted, which is a pretty big milestone for the software. This defragmentation utility is freely available, and this update serves as the first major milestone in nearly three years (Defraggler 1.0 Beta debuted back in November 2007). Interestingly enough the list of new features isn’t all that long, but when you’re talking about a Windows defragmenter program a lot of what you’ll want to see are things that happen behind-the-scenes.

The list of new features include:

  • Offering complete offline defrag during the boot process with full OS support
  • UI has been improved with a new Drive Map and customizations
  • Rearchitected the internal defrag processes to make it faster and more efficient

While that list is short the last bullet encompasses a pretty big overhaul, and I see the boot-time defragmenting as a nice feature since it can be set as a one-time thing or at every boot. If you choose to use that option your machine will defrag before you even login to your system, which may mean that it will be able to reorganize some of the files on your system that would have otherwise been unmovable.

I look forward to them polishing this up a bit more, but in my brief tests this Beta worked well. Keep in mind that they don’t have this packaged as a portable release yet like they offer for their latest stable version, which may mean that some of you will want to hold off a bit if you were wanting to throw this on a USB drive.

Defraggler 2.0 Beta Homepage (Windows only; Freeware)

Copyright © 2011 CyberNetNews.com

Related Posts: