Carrier IQ issues lengthy report on data collection practices, sticks to its guns

After having already tried to explain itself with metaphor, Carrier IQ is now taking its floundering PR campaign back to basics, with an ostensibly thorough primer on its practices and a slightly less convoluted defense of its privacy standards. This morning, the controversial analytics firm released a lengthy, 19-page document that attempts to explain “what Carrier IQ does and does not do.” In the report, titled “Understanding Carrier IQ Technology,” the company explains the benefit it offers to its clientele of network operators, many of whom rely upon Carrier IQ’s diagnostic data to make sure their infrastructure is up to snuff. It also provides a breakdown of how it collects data, as well as a defense against Trevor Eckhart’s findings, though, as you’ll see, these arguments likely won’t put this saga to bed anytime soon. Read more, after the break.

Continue reading Carrier IQ issues lengthy report on data collection practices, sticks to its guns

Carrier IQ issues lengthy report on data collection practices, sticks to its guns originally appeared on Engadget on Tue, 13 Dec 2011 04:57:00 EDT. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink   |  sourceCarrier IQ (PDF)  | Email this | Comments

Google Buzz settlement approved by FTC, yearly privacy audits incoming

Mountain View’s lawyers can collectively breathe a sigh of relief, as the FTC has accepted an earlier proposal relating to Buzz’s numerous privacy violations. The service — which already settled one suit and is scheduled for rendezvous with the grim reaper — was singled out by the commission for misleading users by partially opting them in, even after they had explicitly declined to do so. As punishment, Google will be required to field yearly audits from an independent party for the next twenty years (!). Don’t mess with the law government, kids.

Google Buzz settlement approved by FTC, yearly privacy audits incoming originally appeared on Engadget on Tue, 25 Oct 2011 07:30:00 EDT. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink Macworld  |  sourceFTC  | Email this | Comments

Verizon wants to know where you go, what you look at, that’s all

Verizon’s got a couple of loose ends to tie up. It’s nothing important, you understand, just a tweak to its privacy policy that will allow the carrier to monitor your physical movements and browsing activities. It actually did much the same thing back in 2007 to monitor phone calls. The aim, of course, is to tailor ads to your interests, while also gathering information about your habits that it can sell on to others in the form of “business and marketing reports.” Oh, one more thing: VZW promises not to share any information about you “personally” and it also gives you the option to opt out. (Opt out.)

Verizon wants to know where you go, what you look at, that’s all originally appeared on Engadget on Fri, 14 Oct 2011 08:14:00 EDT. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink Huffington Post  |  sourceVerizon  | Email this | Comments

Facelock app hits the Ovi Store, Symbian handsets frame your face for security

Unlocking your phone doesn’t get any easier than a simple patterned swipe or pre-set pin. But for the fussy amongst you, there’s an alternative solution to make you feel both confidently futuristic, and downright ridiculous. Facelock, the facial recognition security app announced back at Nokia World 2010, has finally mosied on over to the Ovi Store, beta tag in tow. The screen lock tech functions pretty much as you’d expect: once you’ve set a static image of your face as a code, the front-facing camera will then match it up to your mug and, presto magico, you’ll have access to your device. The free app is apparently compatible only with Symbian 3 handsets, although those rocking Anna and Belle shouldn’t encounter any difficulties. Ready to face / off with your phone? Then hit up the source link below to download the gratis goods.

[Thanks, Jerry]

Facelock app hits the Ovi Store, Symbian handsets frame your face for security originally appeared on Engadget on Sat, 08 Oct 2011 04:43:00 EDT. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink Nokia HD Blog (Translated)  |  sourceOvi Store  | Email this | Comments

Mango kills Microsoft’s always-on location tracking, makes good on letter to House of Representatives

Remember all that iPhone tracking hubbub back in April? Sure you do — you probably also recall Apple’s denial, the subsequent Senate hearing, and the rest of the fiasco’s dramatic fallout. Amid the ballyhoo, Microsoft stepped out to admit that its Windows Phone also collected location data, but quickly promised to knock it off following the next scheduled update. According to ChevronWP7 collaborator Rafael Rivera, Windows Phone 7.5 cinches it: Mango “no longer sends location data prior to being granted permission to do so.” Redmond previously told the US House of Representatives that it only collected location data if a user expressly allowed an application to send it along — a claim which Rivera debunked last week, noting that simply launching the camera application captured and transmitted “pin-point accurate positioning information.” The big M maintains that the collected location data was anonymous, and that it shouldn’t have been sent at all unless the user allowed it. Either way, Microsoft’s chapter in the big location tracking blunder of 2011 seems to be at a close, squaring the firm with Congress, its developers, and hopefully its customers.

Mango kills Microsoft’s always-on location tracking, makes good on letter to House of Representatives originally appeared on Engadget on Mon, 03 Oct 2011 02:06:00 EDT. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink BGR  |   | Email this | Comments

Which Telecoms Store Your Data the Longest? Secret Memo Tells All

The nation’s major mobile-phone providers are keeping a treasure trove of sensitive data on their customers, according to newly-released Justice Department internal memo that for the first time reveals the data retention policies of America’s largest telecoms. More »

OnStar abandons plans to keep tracking vehicles after service cancelation

OnStar

OnStar found itself at the center of a firestorm after it sent out an e-mail notifying customers that it planned to collect data from vehicles even after service had expired or been terminated. That is, unless the (soon to be former) users specifically opted out. Well, in a statement today, President Linda Marshall changed course and announced the post-subscription data collection would be opt-in only. The company still hoped some departing customers would volunteer to maintain a connection so that it can “provide former customers with urgent information about natural disasters and recalls affecting their vehicles.” (They’re just looking out for you buddy.) Even if OnStar loses out on boatloads of valuable data, at least the company won’t have to listen to Chuck Schumer’s public chastising any more — that man lays a better guilt trip than your mother and grandmother combined. Check out the full announcement after the break.

Continue reading OnStar abandons plans to keep tracking vehicles after service cancelation

OnStar abandons plans to keep tracking vehicles after service cancelation originally appeared on Engadget on Wed, 28 Sep 2011 03:21:00 EDT. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink   |   | Email this | Comments

Unlike: Why Facebook Integration Is Actually Antisocial

Facebook really changed things up last week. Oh sure, it’s as disrespectful of my privacy as ever, but now it’s enlisted the entire web to help. So I’m done with anything that requires a Facebook login. More »

Senator Schumer blasts OnStar for ‘brazen’ privacy violation, calls for FTC investigation

Last week, OnStar issued a privacy notice informing customers that it would continue to collect data on vehicles still connected to its servers, even for those who have already canceled their subscriptions. The move elicited a chorus of protests from Democratic privacy advocates in the Senate, including Chris Coons, Al Franken and, most recently, Charles Schumer, who wrote a letter to the FTC yesterday calling for an investigation into what he sees as a bold violation of consumer rights. “By tracking drivers even after they’ve canceled their service, OnStar is attempting one of the most brazen invasions of privacy in recent memory,” the New York Senator said. “I urge OnStar to abandon this policy and for FTC to immediately launch a full investigation to determine whether the company’s actions constitute an unfair trade practice.” Find out more about OnStar’s new policy, after the break.

Continue reading Senator Schumer blasts OnStar for ‘brazen’ privacy violation, calls for FTC investigation

Senator Schumer blasts OnStar for ‘brazen’ privacy violation, calls for FTC investigation originally appeared on Engadget on Mon, 26 Sep 2011 09:43:00 EDT. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink PC Mag  |  sourceAP  | Email this | Comments

How Websites Can Track You With Cookies Even If You’ve Disabled Them

This article was written on December 30, 2009 by CyberNet.

Ever since consumers started gaining access to the internet, cookies have been controversial. They have a lot of legitimate uses, such as helping websites remember that you’re logged in. On the other hand, privacy campaigners have often voiced concerns about ad networks using cookies to gain information about your surfing habits. Although browsers will let you disable regular cookies completely if you want, this doesn’t keep sites from storing a more sophisticated type of cookies on your computer…

How is it possible that sites can still track you even if you’ve disabled cookies? The answer lies within a browser plugin that is installed on approximately 99.0% of Internet-enabled computers worldwide: Flash. In version 6 of the popular plugin, something called Local Shared Objects was introduced. This allows websites to store a small amount of data on your computer. But hey, wait a minute… that sounds an awful lot like the concept of cookies.

There are three major reasons why we should be cautious with Flash cookies:

  • By default, every website is allowed to use up to 100kB of storage on your computer. Regular cookies are limited to 4kB. That may not sound like a lot of space these days, but that’s huge in cookie terms.
  • Flash cookies never expire, unlike regular cookies.
  • Even when you opt out of cookies entirely in your browser’s preferences, Flash cookies can still be set unless you disable Flash entirely.

Calm down
Don’t panic. Flash cookies don’t will not send your social security number to criminals or anything like that, but it is important that you understand what they could be used for to make an informed decision about them.

Let’s have a closer look at a common “evil” use of cookies in general: marketing. Sites A, B and C display ads from ad network X on their site. If you go to site A for example, the ad network can place a cookie on your computer that contains the URL you just visited. As you go from site to site, perhaps including site B and C, the network can collect the URLs that display their advertising to generate an anonymous profile about you, containing such information as your interests, political orientation, beliefs, age and the region where you live.

So basically Flash cookies do what regular cookies do too, except that Flash cookies can contain more data and never expire. If that doesn’t sound bad to you, Flash cookies are nothing to worry about.

Finding your Flash cookies
betterprivacy.jpgTo help us find and delete Flash cookies, we’re gonna need a Firefox add-on called BetterPrivacy. After installing it, you can start it by going to Tools > BetterPrivacy. If you take a look at the screenshot, you can see that I’ve been playing a Flash game called Level Up and that I have been using Gmail’s web interface. All entries that begin with a hash are harmless because they’re related to Flash’s preferences.

There are two entries that caught my eye: cnettv.cnet.com and vizu.com. CNET TV appears to have stored data in a file called OVPMetricsProvider.sol, which leads me to believe this cookie is used solely to do detailed site analytics. I didn’t remember going to Vizu.com, so I looked it up. A quick search revealed that it is an analytics company, therefore people who are concerned about their privacy probably don’t want this cookie around.

Deleting Flash cookies
Unfortunately, BetterPrivacy can’t block Flash cookies as of yet. You can however let it delete your Flash cookies on demand with a hotkey or automatically every couple of hours. I’m not too paranoid about my privacy, so I went with the less radical solution of having BetterPrivacy delete my Flash cookies when quitting Firefox. All these options can be accessed on the second tab of the add-on’s preferences window.

betterprivacy options.jpg

Much like regular cookies, Flash cookies also have legitimate uses you don’t want to block. After all, you don’t want to lose your progress in that Flash game you’ve nearly finished. Luckily you can whitelist certain Flash LSOs so that BetterPrivacy won’t delete them. This can be done by going to the first tab of the settings window, selecting an entry and clicking the ‘Prevent automatic LSO deletion’ button.

The tips in this article only cover Firefox. If you have Opera/Chrome/IE/Safari tips that fit in with the article, please do share them with us in the comments.

Copyright © 2011 CyberNetNews.com

Related Posts: