3D TV channel coming to UK next year, 3D-ready set and glasses required

We can still remember the days, not too long ago, that HD channels were but a sparse luxury. Now of course they’re a dime a dozen, but you can still look onward to the next big thing, which BSkyB is wagering will be 3D. The satellite broadcast is gearing up to launch a 3D television station next year to showcase movies, and sports — the latter of which we’re thinking will be the biggest draw. Any customer with a Sky+ HD box can receive the transmission, but you’re also gonna need to look past that ragged old flat-panel HDTV and instead use a 3D-ready set and glasses. We can’t imagine a huge demand for this anytime in the near future, but if the technology does take off, they’ll be more than ready to capitalize.

Filed under:

3D TV channel coming to UK next year, 3D-ready set and glasses required originally appeared on Engadget on Thu, 30 Jul 2009 23:01:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Read | Permalink | Email this | Comments

LG’s THX-certified LH90 LCD HDTVs now shipping in US

We’ve been following LG’s 240Hz LH90 series of LED-backlit HDTVs since they were launched alongside oodles of internet-connected rivals at CES, and now — at long last — the 1080p trio is shipping to US soil. The sets, which are the first-ever to boast THX certification, also feature an ambient light sensor, 2,000,000:1 dynamic contrast ratio, 240Hz dejudder technology and a super glossy bezel. If you’re jonesing to get one in your abode, you can cruise over to your nearest electronics dealer and part ways with $3,199.95 (55-inch), $2,399.95 (47-inch), or $1,899.95 (42-inch).

Filed under: , ,

LG’s THX-certified LH90 LCD HDTVs now shipping in US originally appeared on Engadget on Wed, 22 Jul 2009 16:19:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Read | Permalink | Email this | Comments

HANNSpree debuts line of plush TVs for tasteless tots

We all know how much children hate television, so sometimes it’s necessary to be a little sneaky, especially when looking to give them their minimum daily requirement of the “Fair & Balanced” — that’s why we’re lucky that HANNSpree is on the case. The company, known for it’s particularly uglified and just plain bizarre display devices is debuting a line of plush animals (including an elephant, giraffe, panda, and polar bear) with televisions embedded in their sides — just the thing for concerned parents who need to trick their kids into watching. With any luck, Junior will soon be rattling off the nine principles with the ease that you once let the names of the four Monkees roll off the tongue. Pretty sweet, right? It’s time for you to get back to The Common Sense Book of Baby and Child Care — but not before eyeballing that gallery below.

Filed under:

HANNSpree debuts line of plush TVs for tasteless tots originally appeared on Engadget on Fri, 17 Jul 2009 07:33:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Read | Permalink | Email this | Comments

CScout Speaks at the Asia Television Forum

mobile television forum singapore 2008

Make that “spoke”. This is old news, but I’ve just discovered some press about us while searching for my name in its most commonly misspelled form “Keferi”. Don’t worry BBC, it’s not just you.

Last December the Asia Television Forum was very nice and flew us in to Singapore to give the keynote presentation for the Mobile Television panel discussion. Broadband TV News reported on it a bit:

“It is an infrastructure experiment, but nobody is yet sure what content or applications will result in One Seg achieving viability.” He said that in the West broadcasters and telcos were “freaking out” looking for a mobile TV business model, but that may have to evolve from experimentation of the type that was taking place in Japan. Keferi suggested that broadcast mobile services could serve as teasers for paid streamed content.

HBO Arrives on iTunes with Higher Prices


This article was written on May 13, 2008 by CyberNet.

iTunes hbo-2.pngRumor had it that HBO shows would be appearing at the iTunes store soon. This was yesterday and now today, sure enough, HBO has made it’s grand entrance. The official Press Release from Apple explains that programs like The Sopranos, Sex and the City, Deadwood, and Rome, Flight of the Conchords and The Wire. The interesting part about this whole thing is that Apple must have decided to ease up on their price restrictions because different HBO shows cost different prices.

Typically shows are priced at $1.99 per episode, but certain HBO shows are priced at $2.99 per episode.

  • The Sopranos – $2.99
  • Deadwood – $2.99
  • Rome – $2.99
  • The Wire – $1.99
  • Sex and The City – $1.99
  • Flight of the Conchords – $1.99

Now it leaves us wondering what other HBO shows will be added to the list and if other television networks will be interested in putting their shows on iTunes knowing they may have some flexibility in the pricing?

Thanks for the tip Omar!

Copyright © 2009 CyberNet | CyberNet Forum | Learn Firefox

Related Posts:

Guess What? Many Of You Wasted Money on Your 1080p TV (But There’s Hope)

The other day I posed a simple question: How far do you sit from your TV? The results show that many of you are not getting all the definition out of your HDTV.

As mentioned, the Lechner Distance chart illustrates that there are specific distances at which the human eye has the best chance of processing all of the detail that HDTV resolution has to offer. According to the data collected in the poll, many of you are probably sitting too far away, especially those of you who sprung for a 1080p set.

Poll results in the 1080i/1080p group for sets under 40-inches indicated that a whopping of 60% of respondents were sitting over six feet from the screen. This is definitely too far away to see all of the detail.

For sets between 40 and 52 inches, 43% of you are sitting over eight feet from the screen. Again, too far away to see it all.

For sets over 52-inches, 35% are sitting between 8 and 10 feet, while 30% are sitting over 10 feet away. To put it in perspective, a 60-inch 1080p set should be about 8 feet (or closer) from you to get the full experience. Even a huge 70-inch 1080p TV should technically only be nine or so feet from your head!

In case you haven’t yet checked out the full chart at HDGuru, here are the optimal viewing distances—based on screen size—for some common-sized 1080p HDTVs:

1080i/p
• 28-inch set: 3.7 feet
• 32-inch set: 4.2 feet
• 37-inch set: 4.8 feet
• 40-inch set: 5.2 feet
• 42-inch set: 5.5 feet
• 46-inch set: 6 feet
• 50-inch set: 6.5 feet
• 52-inch set: 6.8 feet
• 60-inch set: 7.8 feet
• 63-inch set: 8.2 feet
• 70-inch set: 9.2 feet

Analysis
You will notice that we didn’t go into detail about those of you who responded to the 720p portion of the test, and that’s because, by and large, you are watching at about the right distance. 720p TVs can be set out farther than 1080p, yet because they’re cheaper, they find their way into smaller living rooms. Because of the interplay of these two factors, 720p sets are all the more likely to be set up at an optimal viewing distance.

But 1080p, considered better, winds up in larger living rooms, but not always at larger sizes. The joke is, by keeping it as far off as we noted above, you are not much better off with that fancy 1080p set than you would have been, saving some cash and going with 720p.

A final observation is that 6 to 8 feet is far and away the most common distance across all TV sizes and resolutions for you folks—we don’t know what it means except that there are other factors besides Lechner distance that play a larger part in the decision to place the TV, and that most of us—Giz editors included—are unaware that we are not getting the full bang for our HDTV buck.

The situation can be easily remedied by consulting the Lechner chart and whipping out a good old tape measure. In some situations this may not be possible given the dimensions of a room, so it is up to to decide what your priorities are—like should I move the TV to a smaller room, or go out and buy a bigger TV? [Original Survey]

AT&T CruiseCast in-car TV finally launches nationwide

Look, we know all about desperate — those youngsters are cute and all, but any self-respecting parent starts having some seriously evil thoughts about three hours in to any road trip. In a presumed effort to keep you off of the evening news and in good standing with your relatives, AT&T is launching its CruiseCast in-car TV service today. If you’ll recall, we knew the in-car satellite TV solution was being tested in various spots, but today marks the first day that the proverbial beta badge has been ripped off. Of course, such a unique offering ain’t running anyone cheap, with the initial hardware package totaling $1,299 and the monthly fee ringing up at $28. If those numbers have yet to faze you, hop on past the break for a look at the channel lineup.

Continue reading AT&T CruiseCast in-car TV finally launches nationwide

Filed under: , ,

AT&T CruiseCast in-car TV finally launches nationwide originally appeared on Engadget on Tue, 02 Jun 2009 17:23:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Read | Permalink | Email this | Comments

DuPont crafts ultra longevous OLED materials, which likely won’t be affordable

DuPont’s been dabbling in OLED advancement for years now, and while the world waits for the introduction of market-ready big-screen OLED HDTVs, engineers at the miracle-working company are toiling away to make sure those very sets last quite some time. For anyone following the OLED TV scene, you’ll know that luminance longevity has been a nagging issue, but if new developments pan out, stamina will be the least of our worries. In fact, the firm has crafted a green light-emitting material that can purportedly push onward for over a hundred years… continuously. Furthermore, the same scientists have engineered a new blue light-emitting material with a luminance half-life of 38,000 hours along with a red light-emitting material with a life of 62,000 hours. Unfortunately for the laypeople out there, we can’t imagine this stuff being even marginally affordable — but hey, it’s great news for the sybarites!

Filed under:

DuPont crafts ultra longevous OLED materials, which likely won’t be affordable originally appeared on Engadget on Sun, 31 May 2009 07:19:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Read | Permalink | Email this | Comments

Free PVR TV Guide Service Reaches for your Wallet


This article was written on August 10, 2007 by CyberNet.

MythTVThere is some bad news for those of you taking advantage of free media center software, such as MythTV or Media Portal. As it turns out Zap2it couldn’t continue to provide the television listings that many free media center applications were using.

As a result Zap2it had announced earlier this year that, starting September 1st, they were no longer going to be providing TV guide updates to users. Without the guides much of what makes a media center so great would be rendered useless.

You can sleep a little easier knowing that MythTV was able to work with Zap2it, and they will pickup where they left off…kind of. The new service will be called Schedules Direct, but being able to use the service is going to cost $15 every 3-months. That’s still less than what it costs to use a TiVo, and their goal is to get it down to just $20 per year.

Many people that I talk to hate having reoccurring fees hanging over their head that they are constantly having to pay. They much prefer to have a lifetime subscription to things like this. Unfortunately Schedules Direct doesn’t think that will be possible, which is something that might make people look towards software like SageTV or even Windows Media Center (which is included with Vista Home Premium and Ultimate editions). Both of those solutions off free guides after the initial purchase of the software.

Despite Linux users being accustomed to getting things for free, I think they would be willing to fork over the $15 every 3-months if only to support an open-source project. In the next few weeks we’ll be seeing how it all plays out though.

Source: Slashdot & Download Squad

Copyright © 2009 CyberNet | CyberNet Forum | Learn Firefox

Related Posts:

Thin-Film Speakers Add Big Sound to Big TVs

Flexible Speaker

As high-definition TVs get cheaper and bigger, many people are discovering that the joys of HDTV aren’t always matched by similarly high-quality sound.

In fact, the sound from TV sets’ embedded speakers has arguably gotten worse. The cathode-ray tube sets of old had plenty of room in them for high-quality speakers, whereas today’s flat sets have much less space. Less space means less room for the air displacement needed to make big, beefy, well-rounded sound waves, and that means if you want good sound, you’ll need to add a couple hundred bucks to your TV purchase for a nice pair of external speakers.

Now some companies say they have a better way: Transform the front of the TV screen itself into a vibrating membrane, making it in effect a giant, high-fidelity speaker, giving your HDTV an acoustic range that would make Pavarotti proud.

Emo Labs, a Waltham, Massachusetts startup, has created flat, transparent “speakers” that go in front of the display. And it is not alone in its plans to put good sound right on the face of your TV.  Warwick Audio and NXT Technologies, two British companies, and a Korean firm, Plasma & Ion Beam Corp., have similar plans.

“People are spending a lot of money on these TVs expecting to get great video and audio,” says Allan Evelyn, vice president of business development for Emo Labs. “And when they get their HDTV they are disappointed to discover their old CRT TV had much better sound.”

“It’s a question of physics,” says Aldo Cugnini, a digital technology consultant with AGC Systems, “and physics usually dictates that the bigger speakers have higher fidelity.”

Not anymore, says Emo Labs. Wheeling in at least six boxes that contained cables, a prototype 32-inch TV and a notebook computer, Jason Carlson, CEO of Emo Labs joined Evelyn in showing Wired.com an impressive demo. Every note of Diana Krall’s Live in Paris coming straight from the HDTV sounded like it had been piped through a Bose speaker system. “With our flat embedded speakers the sounds come from the screen, almost like what you get in motion picture theaters,” says  Carlson.

Traditional speakers have three fundamental components: a cone that pushes the air, a voice coil that is an electromagnet and a permanent magnet that can attract or repel the voice coil. When the coil moves, it pushes and pulls on the cone. This, in turn, vibrates the air in front, creating sound waves.

But with thinner or smaller displays there is not enough room to create that displacement resulting in a ‘tinny’ and weak sound.

“Manufacturers are challenged for real estate on a display and they want it to be as thin as possible,” says Cugnini.  “That means they can put the speakers behind the display or at the bottom, both which are not ideal.” The best sound field, say experts, comes from the spaces in front of the speaker and the screen.

For HDTV buyers, this can be a significant annoyance.  HDTVs larger than 50 inches are usually connected to external speakers to create a home theater system. But smaller screens tend to be standalone, forcing users to accept poor audio as part of the package, says Evelyn.

The problem is also a result of how most consumers buy their HDTVs.  Retail stores currently hook up rows of HDTVs in a bid to compare the picture quality.  There’s no place there to determine the sound quality on each. “Quite often the video is running on as many of these screens simultaneously and the sound isn’t,” says Cugnini. “And even if it is, it’s not a good determination of how that audio will translate in your bedroom or living room.”

Emo Labs's Edge Motion Speaker Promises Better Sound for Thin Displays

Emo Labs's Edge Motion Speakers Promise Better Sound for Thin Displays

Emo Labs uses a thin membrane made of polyethylene terephthalate (or PET, a plastic used in bottles) and two piezoelectric actuators. The actuators vibrate the membrane along the side, creating a force that is perpendicular to the motion. Emo Labs says it is negotiating with display manufacturers to embed its technology that users can see in TVs in the next nine months to a year.

Meanwhile, researchers at the University of Warwick hope to commercialize their flexible speaker technology by the end of the year.

Warwick Audio has created ultra-thin (0.2 mm thick) laminate panels that can be used to replace traditional magnet-and-cone speakers. Unlike Emo’s, Warwick’s speaker panels are not transparent. The company hopes to use them largely in public address system and displays.

The better sound quality will, however, come at price. Having a membrane in front of the display will result in about 4 percent loss in brightness, says Carlson. And then there’s the additional cost that stems from making the switch to the new tech. Eventually customers will have to pay more for their enhanced audio TV sets.  “Newer technologies cost more to implement so the street price of the TV will go up,” says Cugnini. Emo Labs estimates its speakers would add a 10-15 percent premium to cost.

But wouldn’t that be a small price to pay if Matt Giraud can sound better on American Idol, or Jack Bauer’s car chases on 24 boom just that much louder?

Top Photo:  University of Warwick creates flat, flexible speaker/ University of Warwick