Hasta La Gadget!

Apple may be a small player in terms of overall PC market share, but in the premium price segment, the Macintosh is king.

In June, nine out of 10 dollars spent on computers costing $1,000 and up went to Apple in the U.S. market, according to research company NPD Group. That spells out to 91 percent of the “premium” price segment gobbled up by Macs — up from 88 percent in May.

Granted, Windows PC systems still own 90 percent of the U.S. PC market share. Still, this is a victory for Apple, a company whose focus is on quality products with premium price tags.

These numbers make it crystal clear why Apple continues to avoid stepping into the netbook market with a $400 to $500 offering: Even in a recession, it doesn’t need to. This also illustrates that the recent price cuts made to the MacBook family were indeed an effective move.

Apple has 91% of market for $1,000+ PCs, says NPD [BetaNews]

See Also:

• Survey: Microsoft’s ‘Laptop Hunter’ Ads Are Hurting Apple …
• Microsoft’s ‘Laptop Hunter’ Ads Made on Macs?
• MacBook Price Cuts Highlight Tough Choices for Apple as Growth …
• Spoof Microsoft Ad: Even Bums Won’t Buy a PC
• Apple Debuts Aggressively Priced iPhone 3GS, MacBooks

Photo: Jim Merithew/Wired.com

It may not be all that shocking from a common sense point of view, but AT&T CEO Randall Stephenson’s statement that “there will be a day when you are not exclusive with the iPhone” is still quite a departure from anything he’s said in the past and, given the stakes involved, pretty darn notable. That word came at Fortune’s now happening Brainstorm: Tech conference, where Stephenson unsurprisingly didn’t elaborate on any negotiations with Apple, and only went so far as to say that he thinks AT&T’s partnership with Apple “works really, really well — maybe as well as any strategic partnership we have.” Of course, none of that means exclusivity is going away anytime soon, and you can pretty safely bet that AT&T will keep on pushing as long as it can.

Filed under: Cellphones

AT&T CEO admits iPhone won’t be exclusive forever originally appeared on Engadget on Thu, 23 Jul 2009 16:48:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Read | Permalink | Email this | Comments

Our Gizmodo ’79 celebration may have ended last week, but there’s room for a final post, written by famed retiree and mosquito wrangler Bill Gates. It’s no joke: Gates read the series then sent this in:

I read those 1979 stories all last week, and it put me in a nostalgic mood, so wanted to offer my own memory to add to the collection.

In 1979, Microsoft had 13 employees, most of whom appear in that famous picture that provides indisputable proof that your average computer geek from the late 1970s was not exactly on the cutting edge of fashion. We started the year by moving from Albuquerque back to Bellevue, just across the lake from Seattle. By the end of the year we’d doubled in size to 28 employees. Even though we were doing pretty well, I was still kind of terrified by the rapid pace of hiring and worried that the bottom could fall out at any time.

What made me feel a little more confident was that 1979 was the year we began to sense that BASIC was right on the verge of becoming the standard language for microcomputers. We knew this could be the catalyst that would unlock the potential of the PC to democratize computing and create the right conditions for an explosion in programs and applications that would lead to really rapid growth of the PC market.

By the middle of 1979, BASIC was running on more than 200,000 Z-80 and 8080 machines and we were just releasing a new version for the 8086 16-bit microprocessor. As the numbers grew, we were starting to think beyond programming languages, too, and about the possibility of creating applications that would have real mass appeal to consumers. That led to the creation of the Consumer Products Division in 1979. One of our first consumer products was called Microsoft Adventure, which was a home version of the first mainframe adventure game. It didn’t have all the bells and whistles of, say, Halo, but it was pretty interesting for its time.

Back in the 1970s, there was a publication called the International Computer Programs Directory that handed out what was known as the ICP Million Dollar Award for applications that had more than $1 million in annual sales. In the late 1970s the list included more than 100 different products, but they were all for mainframes. In April, the 8080 version of BASIC became the first software product built to run on microprocessors to win an ICP Million Dollar Award. That was a pretty good sign that a significant shift was underway.

Today, I would be surprised if the number of million-dollar applications isn’t in the millions itself, and they range from apps and games created by a single developer working at home that you can download to your cell phone to massive solutions built by huge development teams that run the operations of huge corporations.

More important, of course, is the fact that more than a billion people around the world use computers and digital technology as an integral part of their day-to-day lives. That’s something that really started to take shape in 1979.

Thanks for the memories, Bill—please keep us posted on that new beer keg of yours!

Microsoft Adventure shot found on YOIS

Tom and Brian take live calls and answer email questions about cell phone plans, wireless reception and Google Chrome issues.

Listen now:
Download today’s podcast


Subscribe now: iTunes (audio) | iTunes (video) | RSS (audio) | RSS (video)


…

Originally posted at The Real Deal Podcast

Qualcomm is no stranger to legal action, but at the end of the day, you’ve gotta hit ’em in the pocketbook if you want to get a company to change its ways. South Korea’s antitrust authorities have decided that the wireless chipmaker is guilty of some nefarious deeds, imposing a 260 billion won fine — that’s 26 with ten zeroes after it — or about $209 million, which is a new record for the agency. The company has a rather large operation in South Korea dealing with giants Samsung and LG, and that seems to be where the problem starts — South Korea claims that they’re offering better contracts to companies who deal exclusively with Qualcomm and shun its competitors, which the government is taking issue with. For its part, Qualcomm denies any wrongdoing and is vowing to “vigorously” defend itself as it works its way through the country’s court system. Whatever, we just want cheaper phones, you know?

Filed under: Cellphones, Wireless

South Korea slaps Qualcomm with massive fine for anticompetitive behavior originally appeared on Engadget on Thu, 23 Jul 2009 15:48:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Read | Permalink | Email this | Comments