Live from Toshiba’s CES press event

We’re in place to see what Toshiba’s got for us this year. We’re figuring Cell TV is a must (banners around the LVCC make that obvious) and 3D is a given but we’re wondering if an updated Blu-ray player, or another sighting of last year’s Media Center Extender TV that never appeared are in the card. Just a few more minutes until 10 p.m. pst when we find out for sure.

Continue reading Live from Toshiba’s CES press event

Live from Toshiba’s CES press event originally appeared on Engadget on Wed, 06 Jan 2010 13:03:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink   |   | Email this | Comments

Live from LG’s CES press event

We’re getting ready fof the first (of many) press conferences of the day, LG figures to unload all manner of new HDTVs, mobile TV and who knows what else. Watch Phone anyone? Things start in another minute or two, so hang on.

Continue reading Live from LG’s CES press event

Live from LG’s CES press event originally appeared on Engadget on Wed, 06 Jan 2010 11:01:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink   |   | Email this | Comments

Live from ASUS’s CES press event

We’re here at our very first liveblog of this year’s CES, and who better to start it off than the always imaginative ASUS? We’re expecting a number of highly unrealistic concepts, if prior years are any indication, and of course we’re sure ASUS will have something to say on its favorite subject: netbooks. Stay tuned, we’re due to get underway any moment!

Continue reading Live from ASUS’s CES press event

Live from ASUS’s CES press event originally appeared on Engadget on Tue, 05 Jan 2010 16:42:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink   |   | Email this | Comments

Google Nexus One Liveblog

Google’s Nexus One: The Google Phone. It’s being unveiled officially right now. We’re here. Here’s our liveblog page.

Check in bright and early to see what’s coming, and see whether the leaked pricing details are really true, and whether anything’s changed since our first hands on back in December. [Liveblog Page]

Watch it live here:

Live video by Ustream

Live from Google’s Android press conference

We’re live at Mountain View for Google’s super-secret Android press conference. Sure, we’ve got a pretty good idea what’ll be announced here (note: it’s probably not multitouch capabilities on Maps), but you never know, there might be a few surprises in store. The whole shebang is supposed to go down in just a little bit, so stay tuned!

Continue reading Live from Google’s Android press conference

Live from Google’s Android press conference originally appeared on Engadget on Tue, 05 Jan 2010 12:47:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink   |   | Email this | Comments

Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince Blu-ray Liveblog Now

The Harry Potter Half-Blood Prince Blu-ray Liveblog starts now.

11:50: Ten minutes left until the star (Daniel Radcliffe) and the director (David Yates) pop up and start talking about the movie while watching the movie.

11:51: If you’re using the PlayStation 3, you should make sure you’ve got the correct audio output to hear the audio stream. Otherwise, like myself last time, you’ll hear nothing.

11:53: If you miss this, it’ll be on BD-Live in a few weeks, says the British announcer.

11:53: I just figured out that they’re doing this livecast at 12 noon instead of 6PM Pacific because kids in the UK need to watch this too. Otherwise, it’d be 2 in the morning.

11:55: There’s a weird bug right now with two audio streams being overlayed simultaneously. One announcement and one…announcement.

11:56: Oh and if you need to get in, here’s the invite.

12:00: Two voices talking simultaneously is more annoying than you’d imagine.

12:02: It’s about to start in a minute.

12:02: Before we start, I gotta say this was probably in the top half of the Harry Potter movies, for me. The only problems I had with it was the fact that it looked like the whole movie had a power outage. And, that it didn’t follow the book as closely as other movies.

12:03: It’s starting.

12:04: I’m having audio difficulties and had to restart the movie.

12:05: It would be nice to go through one of these screenings without technical problems. You’d think the PS3 would be the most stable platform, but I guess not. And now it’s having trouble loading the BD-Live.

12:06: Millions of kids around the world are logging into BD-Live right now apparently. Hey kids, get off my (virtual) lawn.

12:06: I’m back in! Daniel is talking about Harry Potter and how he differs from the character.

12:07: To answer a person who asked a question about if Dan learned anything from Harry Potter, he says yes.

12:10: His favorite movie is #5. He likes shooting and watching that one.

12:10: The director says he doesn’t have a favorite.

12:12: Oh wait, the director couldn’t make it—this is someone else.

12:12: Harry Potter is there though.

12:13: Daniel is saying the director is great, and can see the whole film while shooting an individual scene.

12:13: Here’s a little hint of how Dumbledore is gay: he was treasuring a knitting magazine (with JK, the author, on the cover).

12:15: Someone asked what other movies he wants to try and get into, and Dan says he wants to concentrate on finishing the last two movies, and then maybe go back to the stage in London or NY.

12:17: Now a question about Alan Rickman. How did Dan feel about hearing Alan Rickman speak, in the first movie? Answer: probably terrified.

12:19: It’s too bad the director isn’t here, because I would very much ask him why the movie is shot during a power outage…in a black hole. Seriously, I couldn’t see anything.

12:20: Q: Is Helena Bonham Carter as cool as she looks?

12:20: A: Yes. Also she is mad. And she pulls off that wig well, and she is hilarious.

12:23: Someone just asked him about what bands he likes. It’d be better if they focused on, you know, what’s going on in the movie, but I guess that’s the kind of question we’re going to get today.

12:24: Q: Is Emma Watson as beautiful in person as she is in the movies?

12:24: A: “Yes!!” That Dan.

12:25: And now they’re singing the praises of Blu-ray, and saying the interactive experience of Blu-ray is “mindblowing.”

12:25: This is the first time they’ve actually seen one of the Harry Potter movies on Blu-ray, apparently.

12:27: What Blu-rays would you want directors’ Q&A of? Post in the comments.

12:27: Q: “What’s your favorite special effects sequence in this film?”

12:27: A: The island near the end of the movie, with the cabin and all the monsters in the water.

12:28: A: Dan’s favorite is the dragon chase in #4.

12:30: Q: “If you had the ability to use an invisibility cloak, what would you do?”

12:30: A: Dan says robbing banks. He did not say sneaking a peek of Emma Watson.

12:32: Q: “Are you or the others going to be Twittering soon?”

12:32: A: Dan says no. He says he likes Twitter, but he feels he’d be inundated.

12:35: Dan’s talking about sports.

12:36: For the most part, the audio stream is a lot more stable than it was during the Terminator live event.

12:38: What’s the next step in these? Video streaming of them in a corner? That might be pretty fun.

12:39: Dan says he was in the right place at the right time to get the part of Harry.

12:43: Unfortunately the two people answering questions, Dan and the other guy, don’t know any technical stuff. It’s too bad the director couldn’t show up.

12:44: Q: Has anyone ever challenged you to a Harry Potter trivia match?

12:44: A: Yes, and I’ve lost every time.

12:48: I’m leaving out the questions about him playing Quidditch and other silly dialogue, btw.

12:54: To answer my own question, I would really love to hear Michael Bay give a commentary on Transformers 2. I’d like to hear his thoughts behind why he wanted to do the CG a certain way, or if he left that all up to the CG folks.

12:57: Q: Besides acting, do you want to get into another part of the film business?

12:57: A: I’d love to direct, but it’s a long way off.

12:59: And now, a peepee break.

1:06: We’re back.

1:06: They’re talking about how an actor on screen now playing Marcus Belby was killed, stabbed, while protecting his brother.

1:10: It would be nicer if you could submit questions directly from your Blu-ray player as well. That would make it more of an all-in-one experience, without having to have a phone or a computer in front of you.

1:15: On another note, BD-Live kind of forms the basis of community watching, in a sense. Right now you can watch with directors and hear them talk, but if you can go in the direction of the Netflix community watch on Xbox Live, you can get communal viewings with your friends as well. That would be pretty interesting, being able to watch the same movie, synced, with a buddy across the country.

1:21: Someone asked if they could get Ricky Gervais into the movies.

1:34: Slight spoiler for #7: They’ll be playing themselves in that one scene.

1:41: They’re talking about the acting process, and the audition process and so forth. Nothing that interesting.

1:43: Q: Do you find it hard working around green screens and CG?

1:44: A: Not really. I don’t have to spend a lot of time in front of a green screen. I only have to do about three days in front of a green screen at a time. In the first film I did a month in front of a screen for Quidditch and that was mind numbing.

1:52: Looks like the audio stream just cut out.

1:53: It’s back.

2:00: I’d also like to hear JJ Abrams talk about Star Trek too. That would be one interesting live commentary.

2:01: I think they’re doing another peepee break now.

2:10: Now the audio is just cutting in and out like mad.

2:29: Oh wow has it been 20 minutes since I typed something. How long is this movie?

2:34: The audio is finicky again, and the movie’s about to end.

2:42: Movie’s over, and they’re saying their thanks for watching.

2:42: Thanks for reading! (Maybe we should stick with Sci Fi movies from now on.)

Fusion Garage CrunchPad video conference liveblog

We’re just getting settled in for Fusion Garage’s CrunchPad webcast — we’ve been promised CEO Chandra Rathakrishnan’s version of the 12-inch tablet’s bizarre saga, and we’ve certainly got quite a few questions of our own to ask. We’ll start updating just as soon as it starts, so make sure you’re up to speed on what went down over the weekend and get ready for some fireworks.

Continue reading Fusion Garage CrunchPad video conference liveblog

Fusion Garage CrunchPad video conference liveblog originally appeared on Engadget on Mon, 07 Dec 2009 12:24:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink   |   | Email this | Comments

Fusion Garage’s Joojoo Unveiling Liveblog

Fusion Garage, the engineering side that booted TechCrunch off of their own Crunchpad project, is about to be unveiled in a live webcast. We’re going to be liveblogging it at 9:30 AM PT (12:30 PM ET). That’s basically now.

9:22: The stream was active for a second—I got a screencap of it above—but it looks like they shut off the video.

9:23: In case you’re not familiar with the story, hit up this link while the webcast is still preparing, and check it out. Basically, Fusion Garage, on behalf of their shareholders, decided that they wanted to cut TechCrunch out of any involvement (besides a crappy advisor role) after the two parties had developed the thing together. Think of it as if your wife one day told you that she’d be raising your kid by herself, and your involvement was no longer needed.

9:28: It’s sad, really, since the CrunchPad was supposed to be one of the first (if not the first) cheap tablets that was designed just for web browsing and “consuming” content. The perfect bed/toilet computer, essentially.

9:29: I mean, even if it does end up being released under a different name by Fusion Garage without TechCrunch’s involvement, would you buy it? Or would you be loyal, in principle, to TechCrunch, since they’re the ones who actually came up with the idea?

9:30: It’s a tough decision. Would most people care about petty stuff like this if the final product was good? Would most people even KNOW about it? Probably not.

9:31: Though, we’ll get to hear FG’s side of the story today. Who knows if TechCrunch’s side was the entire truth. It’ll probably end up being somewhere inbetween.

9:34: It’s starting. Chandra is saying this webcast is a good way to address misconceptions introduced by Arrington’s TC post.

9:36: “I’m a dreamer of big dreams.” And he’s a engineer.

9:36: Chandra is going over his past as an engineer. He’s saying he’s upset by all the posts on him from the last week.

9:37: “Fusion Garage is the only actual do-er in this story.”

9:37: Since 2008, they tried to make a browser-based operating system that supported a “thin, tablet-like touchscreen device.”

9:38: In his first meeting with Arrington, he explained what FG was developing, and how his OS would be the key to making the “vision a reality”. Mike Arrington would introduce them to investors, secure funding and introduce them to hardware vendors. He would want to make a deal so TechCrunch could acquire the company so that Mike would have controlling interest. They had many talks about the acquisition, but nothing solid ever came out of it.

9:40: Mike was “unable to deliver”, in February 2009. Without further development, including a finished prototype, nobody would provide funding to bring a product to market. He then takes a shot at the birthday cake photo.

9:40: “If the project was going to go forward, it would be up to Fusion Garage. It was clear that Michael was not able to deliver.”

9:40: They finished their hardware prototype, and did all the engineering challenges by themselves—as you’d expect.

9:41: Chandra said that he secured funding through “his” network, instead of through Michael Arrington. It seems like this might be the thing that triggered the booting of Mike—the fact that TC couldn’t deliver funding or connections.

9:42: Chandra is saying that there was no agreement for an acquisition by TC. There were talks, but no agreement. He’s saying Fusion Garage owns all IP and proprietary rights for the production. The OS developed entirely by them. “TechCrunch didn’t contribute a single line of code.”

9:43: FG provided Arrington terms for being an advisor role, but was turned down.

9:44: The product will be introduced this week. And they call it Joojoo.

9:45: The reason why they call it Joojoo was because it’s an “African term that stands for magical”

9:45: The device boots in 9 seconds.

9:46: All icons on the site are “web services”, and the screen is really really green.

9:46: You can get online, to the internet, in 9 seconds.

9:46: It has a 12.1-inch capacitive touchscreen. “The largest screen of any device in its class on the market.”

9:47: No physical buttons other than the on-off buttons.

9:47: Joojoo has no preloaded applications, Windows or menus. It will accept sliding and scrolling gestures with your fingers. And it can be used as a digital book. “The internet is the application”, similar to Google’s Chrome OS.

9:48: “Unfortunately Arrington’s dream of $200 or $300 price for something like this was unrealistic. Nothing worthwhile can be delivered to market at that price.” How are they pricing it?

9:48: The Joojoo is more than 3x the iPhone 3GS’s screen. How about netbooks? Those have “noncapacitive touch and a poor web experience”.

9:49: Joojoo “provides the best in class internet experience for everything we do.” And it can “watch full HD videos,” as well as read magazines and books. It weighs 1.1 kg.

9:50: It’s going to be $499.

9:50: Preorders are available this friday on the Joojoo website. It’ll be sold online only, without retail until the near future.

9:50: Q&A Section:

9:50: Q: “Please respond to Arrington’s post.”

9:51: A: “There is no legal case filed today. We are very confident in our position, and we believe we own all the IPs.”

9:51: A: There are no contracts of any kind between us and TechCrunch.

9:51: Q: “What do you say to Michael saying you ambushing him out of the blue.”

9:51: A: Chandra says, basically, Arrington failed on everything he promised he would do (funding, getting connections), so FG had to “move on on their own.”

9:52: Q: “Other companies have tried to introduce tablets to the market and failed. Why is your device different?”

9:52: A: Tablets today run the full Windows operating system. They’re expensive, and heavy, and it wasn’t a form factor that could deliver the way you would like to use. “We believe we can make a big difference.” Then he goes over the features like a 12.1-inch screen and the fact that they “don’t boot to an operating system.”

9:53: There have been verbal discussions about a possible acquisition, but “nothing was delivered on Michael’s part.” There weren’t any verbal assurances, except for Michael saying that he wants to acquire the company.

9:54: Q: “What exactly was the offer you made to Michael that he refused?”

9:54: A: “Michael promised a lot of things, but he did not deliver. We offered the possibility to work with us, and be part of this. Despite us doing everything, software, hardware, funding. But Michael turned down the offer.”

9:55: Q: “Can you comment on Google Chrome OS.”

9:55: A: “They see things in relation to Netbooks, but we believe that Netbooks’ use cases aren’t what they should be for what you want to do.”

9:56: Q: “What kind of offline capabilities does the machine have?”

9:56: A: You can use your Gmail, for example, using a local cache. You’ll synchronize when connectivity is available.

9:56: Q: “Does this product have any real chance to succeed without TechCrunch’s marketing?”

9:57: A: If you define marketing as doing a blog post, then no. Michael has been “talking about this for the longest while.” He really wants to hammer home that Arrington didn’t deliver on any kind of promises.

9:57: Q: “What are the specs?”

9:57: A: “It has a 12.1-inch screen, 4GB SSD, but most of the storage is stored in the cloud.”

9:58: Q: “The screen was extremely green. Is that normal?”

9:58: A: “It’s a trick of the camera. I’ll show this in 1 to 1 demos, and the screen is fine, and the colors are fine.”

9:58: Q: What is the battery life?

9:59: A: 5 hours. Wi-Fi only.

9:59: Q: Do you have any relationships with content providers?

9:59: A: No. We’re in discussions with companies.

9:59: Q: Will there be any Joojoo accessories?

10:00: A: Yes, we’ll announce them in the next couple weeks.

10:00: Q: Will we be showing complete demos in 1:1 meetings?

10:00: A: Yes.

10:00: There will be one color at the moment.

10:00: “We think there will be a lot of demand for this product.”

10:01: Fusion Garage has raised 3 million to date since 2008.

10:01: “Thank you so much for your time today. I look forward to seeing many of you over the coming weeks.”

10:01: That looks like the end. I’ll be getting a hands on with this thing as soon as possible, so check back for that.

Save Us, McG is Making Another Terminator Movie

The Terminator Salvation Blu-ray disc can be watched with live director commentary tonight. It’s starting. Update: McG is making a Terminator 5. No!

6:05: Logging into the Warner Bros. BD-Live account now.

6:08: There’s a Harry Potter one on December 12, apparently.

6:12: Trying to figure out how to log into this commentary.

6:12: Sorry, I may have already had a few beers before this thing started.

6:15: I think it’s the Director’s Cut disc…

6:16: Still loading. It’s a good thing I saw this movie already.

6:17: This IS December 5th right?? Why are there no screenings available?

6:25: OK I’m in. Had to join the session by joining the invite from an email. My fault.

6:26: Strange, it seems to be text only. I thought this thing was going to have audio.

6:29: There’s even an option to have Event Audio “on”, but it’s not working.

6:30: Someone just asked him what’s up with the name “McG”

6:30: Long silence.

6:31: He explains his mom actually came up with the idea to call him McG.

6:36: There we go! Commenter dishab says I had to change to Linear PCM audio to hear it. How in the hell would anyone know how to do that?

6:37: And now either McG is silent, or the audio stream somehow cut out. But he is talking about how he wanted to be a Laker.

6:39: This is seriously annoying. How would a normal person with a PS3 know to flip back and forth between Bitstream and PCM Audio? How would they even know what the hell either of those meant?

6:40: Don’t get me wrong; the idea is pretty great. To have a director give live commentary and answer questions on top of the movie is a good idea. But this BD-Live implementation isn’t any better than it was last year with The Dark Knight. In fact, I think it may actually be worse now.

6:42: Here’s a FAQ posted by dishab in the comments in case any of you are having trouble.

6:44: I’m restarting the movie to see if that will fix the audio problem. What makes it even more frustrating is that I got it to work for about 30 seconds.

6:46: OK, now it works again. McG is talking about how they wanted to vary up the ethnicities of the survivors.

6:46: McG: “Where are all the people that hate this movie? I want these questions soon.”

6:47: They’re going to take a break soon. But before that they’re talking about Moon Bloodgood’s boobies.

6:47: The transcript on screen seems to be way delayed from what he’s actually saying. 30-60 seconds.

6:48: Five minute break. And then afterwards some boobies.

6:49: I think somebody forgot to pause the movie like they did in the Dark Knight screening.

6:50: It’s just silence and no typing now, but the movie is still playing.

6:53: It’s starting up again in 30 seconds.

6:53: They’re back. Oh they missed the boob scene. McG says he didn’t want to make it the “gratuitous titty shot in a genre film.”

6:54: He had to cut out some stuff like a screwdriver attack to make it a PG-13 in the theatrical release.

6:55: McG just compared his movie to The Dark Knight.

6:57: Question: how do you feel about making the horrible Charlie’s Angels films?

6:57: McG: “I really like those movies. If you don’t like them you can fuck off.”

6:59: “I want feedback from the audience if you want another movie or not?”

7:00: From the comments the director’s making, it seems like McG isn’t really a fan of subtlety. I don’t want to get too negative or anything…but yeah.

7:02: In answering a question about if Robert Patrick (T-1000) would be in a future movie. McG said that he might be, if there was a scientist that wanted to model a Terminator after himself. (Yes, he took that base idea from Terminator 3, in case you were wondering.)

7:03: McG just called himself heavyhanded.

7:05: Question: “What do you want for Christmas.”

7:05: McG: “Blah blah let go of materialism blah blah spiritual salvation blah blah douche answer.” It was pretty horrible.

7:06: I don’t know how long I can deal with McG’s commentary.

7:07: And now he just compared himself to Alfred Hitchcock.

7:10: You know when you’re listening to a stupid person try and use big words he doesn’t know the meaning of and end up using similar-sounding words that are totally different? This is like that.

7:10: You know when you’re listening to a shallow person try to come up with some profound things to say, but fails miserably and sounds stupid? Yup. This is that.

7:13: The moderators are picking only the positive comments to give to McG to talk about.

7:13: He just announced that he’s making another Terminator movie. Seriously.

7:15: Here’s a tip that will go down in history from one of the film greats. “There’s two elements that go into filmmaking. There’s sound, and there’s the picture.”

7:16: Oh and for those people who are punching themselves in the face that he’s making another one? He said he’s making one after that.

7:19: McG just confessed to verbal abuse from his father when he was growing up.

7:21: And now McG is being coy about making another one? I don’t get it.

7:22: McG says he only saw one episode of the Sarah Connor chronicles. And he didn’t “pay attention” to the third movie. No wonder none of this shit lined up with the third movie.

7:23: It’s also unfortunate that the main two characters have the names John and Kate.

7:24: And now he’s talking about a second or third movie again.

7:24: I’m doing this for you, by the way, readers. Normally I would have turned this off an hour ago.

7:25: Words, words, words. He’s using a lot of words to say very little.

7:27: And now the audio is cutting in and out. I actually like it more this way.

7:28: Here’s a good comment from djbneozen:

Do you have to be really really full of yourself to be a director for a major Hollywood production nowadays? I’ll just say it right now; T4…not that great. The movie lacked substance. No wonder they aren’t really talking about it directly. I mean, specificly about what was going on in different scenes, why it was shot from this angle or that angle or what they may have cut from the movie. You know, discussing the “directing” choice in the movie with the DIRECTOR.

Batman, on the other hand, spectacular.

Jason…by the attitude of McG, I bet he had a lot more beer than you tonight.

7:30: They paused the movie to figure out the technical difficulties. Namely, the no audio-ness of what’s going on right now.

7:32: You know, I think this movie is the only movie I’ve ever seen that was actually better when watched on the back of 7-inch airplane seat screen.

7:33: Now I have to restart the movie since the audio’s still messed up.

7:34: Apropos of nothing, I just got a spam text talking about debt relief.

7:36: Anyone else like Community with Joel McHale? My favorite new show of the season.

7:37: OK audio is back. I wonder what stupid comments I just missed int he last 5 minutes.

7:37: Aaaaaaand he’s talking about Hitler.

7:38: McG says once the T800 goes out, it’s “curtains” for the resistance.

7:43: Wow, McG just dissed the third movie. Seriously? “We just tried to introduce credibility.” Holy. Fuck. He thinks his movie is better than the third movie.

7:44: McG asked viewers who didn’t like the third act, and it was all positive. Hell, I even liked the third act, because it meant the movie was ending soon.

7:46: He says Sarah Connor is going to be in the next film, but he’s not sure how he’s going to pull that off.

7:47: McG just says he loves what he does. Well, if I were a horrible director (I am) and got handed the reigns of a beloved franchise, I’d love it too.

7:48: McG: “I’m disappointed in myself that I couldn’t make the best movie.” Holy shit. He just said he thought he could make a better movie than #1 or #2.

7:49: Someone asked if McG could use Christian Bale in another one of his movies, what would it be? McG then talks about how it’s good to work with Christian. And then babbles for three minutes before not answering the question.

7:52: McG talks about how he could have made a “dark ending” and ended the franchise by having [spoiler] Connor wake up from the transplant and shoot everyone else. Then it fades to black and the franchise is done.

7:53: THE MOVIE IS OVER! THE MOVIE IS OVER!!!

7:53: Thanks for reading everyone. I hope this was at least somewhat entertaining for you, as painful as it was for me. It’s time to go break this Blu-ray disc so I’ll never have to hear McG’s voice again. Good night.

Google Chrome OS Liveblog Today

We’re liveblogging the Chrome OS reveal today at 10 AM PT, 1PM ET, right here on the Gizmodo Liveblog page. Check back soon to see the OS that Google’s been so coy about the last few months. [Gizmodo Liveblog]